South Sudanese exiles face uncertain future after release from prison in neighboring Sudan

South Sudanese exiles face uncertain future after release from prison in neighboring Sudan
Daud Mahmoud Abdullah, who says he spent six months in prison after being accused of cooperating with the Rapid Support Forces, sits with his wife and brother, whom he was reunited with at the Renk transit center, South Sudan on Aug 9, 2025. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 19 August 2025

South Sudanese exiles face uncertain future after release from prison in neighboring Sudan

South Sudanese exiles face uncertain future after release from prison in neighboring Sudan
  • The border town of Renk has become a hub for South Sudanese nationals trying to get home

RENK, South Sudan: As a young man in the mid-1980s, Daud Mahmoud Abdullah left his home in Aweil in South Sudan and headed north. It was a time of war. South Sudan was still part of Sudan and was fighting for independence, in a conflict that would claim about 2 million lives.

He never went back. But now, aged 60 and after 6 months in a Sudanese prison, he is closer to home than he’s been in 40 years. This July, he finally crossed the border back into his native South Sudan, taking a deep breath and reminding himself, “I am alive.”

After everything that has happened to him, it feels like a miracle.

Sudan – once his place of refuge – has been embroiled in a brutal civil war since April 2023 that has killed 40,000 people and displaced nearly 13 million more, according to UN agencies.

Abdullah lived in the town of Wad Madani, capital of Al-Jazirah State, about 135km south of Khartoum. There had been incursions into the area by the Rapid Support Forces, a paramilitary force once known as the Janjaweed who were notorious for mass killings, rapes and other atrocities in Darfur two decades ago. More recently, the RSF have again been accused of by the International Criminal Court of committing war crimes, including the attacks on famine-hit Zamzam and other camps in North Darfur.

In January, the Sudanese Armed Forces began recapturing parts of Al-Jazirah state from the RSF – and making sweeping arrests. Abdullah got caught up in the incursions on his way home from the market: he was picked up by SAF soldiers and accused of cooperating with the RSF.

Abdullah says that he was “beaten, tortured and burned with cigarettes” to make him confess. Although he never made a confession, he was thrown in prison.

Held without charge and tortured in prison

In a report released in March, the top UN human rights body detailed how both the SAF and the RSF have detained tens of thousands of people “without charge, with limited or no contact with their families, in squalid and overcrowded facilities” in “a widespread pattern of arbitrary detention, torture, and ill-treatment.”

Abdullah can attest to this. He remembers inmates dying from starvation, beatings or illnesses like cholera on a daily basis. One morning, he discovered that 28 of his fellow inmates had died in the night. For the next three days the bodies lay inside his cell, and the soldiers refused to remove them. “Even when you shouted to them,” said Abdullah, “they would tell you, ‘if you want to die also, you can die with them.’”

The Associated Press spoke to eight men in total, some of whom were detained in other prisons in Al-Jazirah State and Khartoum. All recounted nightmarish conditions during their incarceration. They described being crammed into cells alongside hundreds of other prisoners.

Cells were so crowded that they were forced to sleep with their knees tucked under their chin. Beatings occurred regularly; one said he lost the use of his right eye as a result.

One man, Michael Deng Dut, 29, said he had been “tortured with electricity more than 18 times.” Simon Tong, 39, said that he was tortured with a knife during an interrogation, and rolled up his sleeve to expose the scars on his arm.

Many of the men said they were given only a handful of food and a small cup of water once a day. “This is the reason many of us passed away,” said Tong, “because of the lack of food and water.”

A place between north and south

In July, 99 South Sudanese prisoners were separated from the other inmates. As the men awaited their fate, one died, reducing their number to 98. On July 28, they were bundled into a bus and driven away, not knowing where they were going.

“They did not tell us they were going to release us,” says Abdullah.

He didn’t realize where he was until they reached the South Sudanese border and were taken to Renk, the country’s northernmost town, by South Sudanese officials. Though still far from home, Abdullah was back in his own country for the first time in 40 years.

The border town of Renk has become a hub for South Sudanese nationals trying to get home. When the Sudanese civil war broke out in 2023, UN agencies and the South Sudanese government established an onward transportation program which has moved more than 250,000 people, according to the UN’s International Office of Migration.

On June 1, 2025, the program was suspended due to global cuts to humanitarian funding. The number of people living in and around a transit center in Renk has since swelled to 12,000, roughly six times its intended capacity. Thousands are living in makeshift shelters made of sticks and cloth.

Reunited but stranded

But for Abdullah, arriving in Renk was a moment of overwhelming joy after months of torture and uncertainty. He was overcome to see his wife, daughter, and younger brother waiting for him. His wife had decided to take his family south after his younger brother had been arrested and released by SAF for the third time.

“When I saw Abdullah, I thanked God,” she said. “We did not expect to see him alive again.”

Abdullah now hopes to return to Aweil, the town where he was born. He still has family in Sudan, and is trying to contact them so that they might join him in Renk.

“If they come back safely, then we plan to go to Aweil,” he said. “All of us, together.”


US says it has regional support for Gaza peace resolution and proposed UN stabilization force

US says it has regional support for Gaza peace resolution and proposed UN stabilization force
Updated 06 November 2025

US says it has regional support for Gaza peace resolution and proposed UN stabilization force

US says it has regional support for Gaza peace resolution and proposed UN stabilization force
  • Under the draft proposal, governance of Gaza would be transferred away from Hamas and demilitarization imposed on the group
  • A copy of the draft resolution was circulated Wednesday night for formal consideration by Security Council

NEW YORK CITY: The US mission to the UN on Wednesday said that key regional partners, including , Qatar and the UAE, have thrown their weight behind its draft resolution for Gaza.

The development signals a diplomatic push within the UN Security Council to advance a two-year transitional mandate for the war-torn enclave, and the deployment of an international stabilization force.

During a meeting convened by the US ambassador to the UN, Mike Waltz, the 10 elected, non-permanent members of the council (Algeria, Denmark, Greece, Guyana, Pakistan, Panama, South Korea, Sierra Leone, Slovenia and Somalia), joined by regional states including , Egypt, Qatar, Turkiye and the UAE, expressed support for the Washington-led initiative, a spokesperson for the US mission said.

The draft resolution endorses the creation of a transitional governance body, a so-called “Board of Peace.” Control of Gaza would therefore be transferred out of the hands of Hamas, and demilitarization would be imposed on the group.

The draft resolution also authorizes the deployment of an “International Stabilization Force” in Gaza that would operate under a two-year UN mandate. It would have the authority to use “all necessary measures” to protect civilians, oversee flows of humanitarian aid, secure zones along the borders with Israel and Egypt, demilitarize non-state actors, and train a new Palestinian police force.

A copy of the draft resolution was circulated Wednesday night for formal consideration by all 15 members of the Security Council. 

The regional buy-in to the draft reflects the “historic opportunity” to end decades of bloodshed in the Middle East and transform Gaza into a safer, more prosperous territory, the spokesperson continued, and underlines the intent of the US to translate the resolution into results rather than “endless talk.”

The backing of major regional actors is significant because their participation is widely viewed as a prerequisite for authorization of any multinational stabilization force to operate in Gaza, and gain international legitimacy.

The US spokesperson stressed that no US troops would be deployed in Gaza. Instead, Washington has engaged in talks with states including Indonesia, the UAE, Egypt, Qatar, Turkiye and Azerbaijan about contributing troops to an international stabilization force.

The draft text reportedly stipulates that such a force would operate under a unified command, as agreed by the Board of Peace, Egypt and Israel once status-of-mission agreements are reached.

It further outlines a sequence of events through which the force will stabilize the security situation in Gaza, demilitarize non-state armed groups, decommission weapons, and oversee training and support for the newly vetted Palestinian police force.