India vows to protect national interests after Trump threatens Delhi with 50 percent tariff

Special India vows to protect national interests after Trump threatens Delhi with 50 percent tariff
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump hold a joint press conference in the White House in Washington, DC, on Feb. 13, 2025. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 22 min 18 sec ago

India vows to protect national interests after Trump threatens Delhi with 50 percent tariff

India vows to protect national interests after Trump threatens Delhi with 50 percent tariff
  • The US is India’s top export market, making up about 18 percent exports, 2.2 percent GDP
  • India likely to diversify trade partners, strengthen ties with Middle East, expert says

NEW DELHI: India has vowed to take “all actions necessary” to protect its national interests after US President Donald Trump doubled US tariffs on India to 50 percent over Delhi’s purchase of Russian oil.

Trump signed an executive order on Wednesday to place an additional 25 percent tariff on India on top of a 25 percent tariff that is set to come into effect on Thursday, making the South Asian country one of the most heavily taxed US trading partners in Asia.

The order finds India is “currently directly or indirectly importing Russian Federation oil,” and says it is “necessary and appropriate” to apply the new 25 percent tariff on Indian goods.

The US is India’s top export market, making up about 18 percent of exports and 2.2 percent of its GDP.

Foreign ministry spokesman Randhir Jaiswal said the US decision to impose additional tariffs was “extremely unfortunate,” as Delhi’s imports from Russia “are based on market factors” and done to ensure energy security for the 1.4 billion Indian population.

“We reiterate that these actions are unfair, unjustified and unreasonable. India will take all actions necessary to protect its national interests,” he said in a statement.

The 50 percent tariff could cut Indian GDP by 0.6 to 0.8 percent, according to Anupam Manur, an economist at the Takshashila Institution in Bangalore. The cut would risk India’s economic growth slipping below 6 percent this year.

As the combined tariffs will come into effect 21 days after the signing of the order, India still has time to negotiate with the Trump administration.

“There is speculation that the 25 percent additional tariffs might be a negotiating tactic by the Trump administration, which can be used as a leverage point against India in the upcoming round of trade talks,” Manur said.

“So, India will continue negotiating with the US, but the room for making concessions to the US is getting smaller due to the bad-faith nature of dealings.”

India will likely look at diversifying trade partners, as Washington becomes increasingly “unreliable trading partner with multiple ad-hoc tariff impositions.”

“The recently concluded FTAs (free trade agreements) with Australia and the UK have come at a good time. India will hope to sign a trading arrangement with Europe as well. India will also look to strengthen its trading relationship with the Middle East,” Manur said, highlighting how UAE and are India’s third and fifth largest trading partners, respectively.

As India exports about $81 billion goods annually to the US, the impact would be felt in India domestically in labor-intensive industries, such as gems and jewelry, apparel, textiles, auto parts, sea food and chemicals.

Lalit Thukral, president of the Noida Apparel Export Cluster, which employs about one million people, said the 50 percent tariff rate is “too much” for his industry.

“The 50 percent is out of reach now. We cannot do that. It means you have to close your factories, close your business … Buyers who are in the US are running away … They are placing orders to China, Vietnam or a third country. They will not come to India now,” he told Arab News.

“I have been in this field for the last 45 years and for the first time we have seen this kind of situation. This is a very horrible situation. Had we known that this trouble was coming we could have planned it, but we were not ready for this kind of thing to come.”


Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to ‘scale up’ number of sites from 4 to 16

Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to ‘scale up’ number of sites from 4 to 16
Updated 4 sec ago

Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to ‘scale up’ number of sites from 4 to 16

Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to ‘scale up’ number of sites from 4 to 16
  • US ambassador to Israel says organization has achieved ‘pretty phenomenal’ results
  • Hundreds of Palestinians seeking food have been shot dead near GHF sites since May, according to health workers

LONDON: The US and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation will “scale up” its sites in Gaza from four to 16, US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee has said.

In an interview with Fox News, Huckabee said: “The immediate plan is to scale up the number of sites up to 16 and begin to operate them as much as 24 hours a day.”

The GHF was conceived by Israelis, is operated by American contractors on the ground, and receives diplomatic and financial support from the US, The New York Times reported.

It currently operates four aid distribution sites, mostly in southern Gaza.

Huckabee and Steve Witkoff, the US’ special envoy to the Middle East, visited a GHF site in the enclave last week.

Huckabee’s comments are viewed as a response to mounting criticism of Israel’s war and humanitarian strategy for Gaza.

Aid groups have warned that the enclave is in the grip of a rapidly worsening hunger crisis, with Palestinians confronting famine levels of food insecurity.

The World Food Programme, a UN body, has said that the humanitarian crisis in Gaza has reached “new and astonishing levels of desperation, with one-third of the population not eating for multiple days in a row.”

Observers widely viewed the launch of the GHF as an Israeli attempt to supersede Gaza’s existing humanitarian network, which was largely run by the UN.

The foundation has been severely criticized by the UN and has faced a boycott, after UN officials said its methods violated humanitarian law.

Hundreds of Palestinians seeking food have been shot dead near GHF sites since the foundation began operations in May, health workers in the enclave have said.

Israeli forces are stationed close to the sites, and the country’s military said its troops had fired “warning shots” toward crowds of desperate Palestinians.

Huckabee said: “The president has been telling us he wants food into the hands of hungry people, but he wants it in a way that it doesn’t get into the hands of Hamas. That’s exactly what we did when we stood up GHF.”

He added that the foundation coordinated with the Israeli military but was not under its control, and that its results were “pretty phenomenal.” 


Starmer defends Palestine recognition pledge

Starmer defends Palestine recognition pledge
Updated 38 min 6 sec ago

Starmer defends Palestine recognition pledge

Starmer defends Palestine recognition pledge
  • UK’s PM has faced criticism from Israeli officials over move
  • He is set to recognize Palestinian state next month unless set of conditions met

LONDON: UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has defended his pledge to potentially recognize a Palestinian state next month, The Independent has reported.

Starmer’s defence of his move came after Israeli officials criticized his plan, and as British family members of Hamas-held hostages are set to stage a protest in London against the government.

Starmer said that there was a “sense of revulsion” about the level of suffering in Gaza among the British public.

He highlighted his intentions to only recognize a Palestinian state if Israel failed to meet a set of conditions relating to the war in Gaza.

It must address the humanitarian disaster in the enclave, reach a ceasefire with Hamas, and commit to reviving the path toward a two-state solution, he said.

The pledge was not a propaganda boost to Hamas, Starmer said, denying that the “terrorist organization” could play any role in a future government of Gaza.

The pro-Israel protest is set to take place in the English capital this weekend. Demonstrators will march on Downing Street to demand the release of the remaining hostages before any formal recognition of Palestine.

Israeli Ambassador to the UK Tzipi Hotovely accused Starmer and the government of “rewarding” Hamas’ actions through the pledge.

Kemi Badenoch, the opposition Conservative leader, said on Tuesday that Starmer had “made a mistake” and “what we need to focus on now is a ceasefire and getting the hostages home.”

Starmer told Channel 5 that the hostages held by Hamas and other militant groups had been held for a “very, very long time in awful circumstances, unimaginable circumstances, and Hamas is a terrorist organization, and that’s why I’m really clear about Hamas.”

He added: “They should release the hostages straight away and they should play absolutely no part in the governance of Palestine at any point.”

The prime minister highlighted the terms of his pledge, and said: “We do, alongside that, have to do all that we can to alleviate the awful situation on the ground in Gaza. We need aid in volume and at scale.”

The government had to do “everything we can” to get aid in, working with other countries “and it’s in that context that I set out our position on recognition.” 


Kazakh cleric seeks to start new Orthodox church to rival Russia’s

Kazakh cleric seeks to start new Orthodox church to rival Russia’s
Updated 40 min 10 sec ago

Kazakh cleric seeks to start new Orthodox church to rival Russia’s

Kazakh cleric seeks to start new Orthodox church to rival Russia’s
  • Vorontsov, a former priest at the Moscow-governed Orthodox Church of Kazakhstan, was dismissed last year after describing the war in Ukraine as a fratricidal “sin” on social media
  • He also called for Kazakhstan to “fence itself off” from Russia

ALMATY: A popular Kazakh cleric opposed to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine said Thursday he was attempting to start a new church independent of Moscow, after the Russian Orthodox Church defrocked him over his criticism of the Kremlin.

The row has become another headache for Russia, which has already seen other former Soviet states cut ties with the Russian Orthodox church.

Vladimir Vorontsov, a former priest at the Moscow-governed Orthodox Church of Kazakhstan, was dismissed last year after describing the war in Ukraine as a fratricidal “sin” on social media. He also called for Kazakhstan to “fence itself off” from Russia.

Vorontsov said Thursday he was collecting signatures to start a new church outside of Moscow’s orbit which he would send to the Patriarchate of Constantinople, the highest governing authority for the Orthodox Church outside of Moscow.

“I plan to send this letter next week,” he told AFP.

Kazakhstan, a former Soviet republic of around 20 million, is a majority Muslim country but home to a sizeable Orthodox Christian minority — around three million people, most of them ethnic Russians.

The Orthodox Church in Kazakhstan, the country’s largest Christian church, is subordinate to the Russian Orthodox Church and its pro-Kremlin leader Patriarch Kirill.

The Kazakhstan branch of the Russian Orthodox Church said earlier this week that Vorontsov had been dismissed for “serious canonical crimes.”

It accused him of attempting to create an illegal, “schismatic” church to rival the Moscow-governed one.

“Any of his speeches on behalf of the Orthodox Church are illegal. He misleads people, cunningly posing as an Orthodox priest,” it said.

The Russian Orthodox Church has itself been in schism with the Patriarchate of Constantinople since 2018 over the latter’s decision to grant autonomy to the Orthodox Church of Ukraine.

Since Russia launched its Ukraine invasion, several former Soviet countries — including Lithuania and Estonia — have cut ties with the Russian Orthodox Church, officially known as the Moscow Patriarchate.

The Russian Orthodox Church last month reminded its subordinate members in Kazakhstan and Belarus to include “Russian Orthodox Church” or “Moscow Patriarchate” in their official titles.


Germany to extend border controls in migration crackdown

Germany to extend border controls in migration crackdown
Updated 59 min 38 sec ago

Germany to extend border controls in migration crackdown

Germany to extend border controls in migration crackdown
  • Berlin also plans to deport more rejected asylum seekers with criminal records to Taliban-run Afghanistan and to war-scarred Syria, Dobrindt said
  • Merz has vowed a tough crackdown on irregular immigration

BERLIN: Germany will push on with temporary border controls beyond a September deadline as it cracks down on irregular immigration, Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt said Thursday.

Berlin also plans to deport more rejected asylum seekers with criminal records to Taliban-run Afghanistan and to war-scarred Syria, Dobrindt said in a podcast with media outlet Table.Today.

Germany’s conservative Chancellor Friedrich Merz has vowed a tough crackdown on irregular immigration, saying this is the only way to stem rising support for the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party.

A spate of deadly attacks blamed on asylum seekers and other foreign nationals fueled public fears during the campaign for the February election, in which the AfD scored a record 20 percent.

“We will continue to maintain the border controls” beyond the September 15 deadline, Dobrindt said about the measures first launched last year under the previous government of Olaf Scholz and extended by six months in March.

“We are in agreement with our European partners that this is a necessary measure until the (EU) external border protection system is fully operational,” he said.

Members of Europe’s Schengen area are allowed to temporarily reintroduce border controls for up to two years in response to serious threats such as terrorism or large-scale unauthorized migration.

Merz’s government further tightened the border checks when it took power in early May, moving to also reject most asylum seekers — a step that sparked an outcry from human rights groups.

Federal police numbers deployed daily at the borders were stepped up to 14,000 from 11,000.

According to ministry data, 9,254 people were turned back at German land borders between May 8 and July 31 — with most recorded cases from Afghanistan followed by Algeria, Eritrea and Somalia.

Germany’s border with France saw the most rejections, at more than 2,000 in that period, followed by Poland, Switzerland and Austria.

Germany has also twice deported migrants convicted of offenses to Afghanistan, most recently last month when 81 were sent back — a move Dobrindt said “cannot remain a one-off measure.”

Amnesty International criticized the deportations, saying the situation in Afghanistan was “catastrophic” and that “extrajudicial executions, enforced disappearances and torture are commonplace.”

Dobrindt also said Berlin was working to organize deportation flights to Syria, where an Islamist-led offensive toppled longtime Syrian ruler Bashar Assad in December.


3 charged in UK for supporting banned Palestine Action group

3 charged in UK for supporting banned Palestine Action group
Updated 54 min 39 sec ago

3 charged in UK for supporting banned Palestine Action group

3 charged in UK for supporting banned Palestine Action group
  • Jeremy Shippam, Judit Murray, Fiona Maclean charged under Terrorism Act for supporting a proscribed organization
  • Protests in support of the group set to take place this weekend, 500 people could attend

LONDON: Three people in the UK have been charged for supporting the banned group Palestine Action.

The trio, two women and a man, were detained on July 5 at a protest in Westminster in London. Twenty-six other people were also arrested.

Jeremy Shippam, 71, Judit Murray, 71, and Fiona Maclean, 53, were charged under section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000. They will appear at Westminster Magistrates Court on Sept. 16.

Palestine Action was proscribed as a terrorist group in the UK after activists broke into a Royal Air Force base at Brize Norton in England in June this year, causing £7 million ($9.38 million) of damage to two military aircraft.

Support for or membership of a banned group in the UK is a criminal offense punishable by up to 14 years in prison.

Despite the ban, the group is challenging its terrorism designation after the High Court ruled on July 30 it should be reviewed.

Around 500 people, meanwhile, are set to attend a demonstration in support of Palestine Action in London on Saturday.

It follows previous demonstrations after the group’s proscription in London, Manchester and several other major UK cities, at which more than 200 people were arrested.

The group Defend Our Juries, which is helping to organize the protest, said attendees would hold placards reading “I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action.”

A spokesperson for Defend Our Juries said: “Defend Our Juries has confirmed that 500-plus people have committed to holding ‘I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action’ signs on Saturday in central London, as part of the Lift the Ban campaign, to end the proscription of Palestine Action.

“Since the threshold for the conditional commitment requirement has been reached, the action will go ahead as planned.”

Dominic Murphy, head of Counter Terrorism Command at the Metropolitan Police, said: “Anyone who displays public support for Palestine Action, a proscribed organisation, is committing an offence under the Terrorism Act and can expect to be arrested and, as these charges show, will be investigated to the full extent of the law.

“These charges relate to three people arrested in central London on 5 July. We are also planning to send case files to the Crown Prosecution Service for the other 26 people arrested on the same day.

“I would strongly advise anyone planning to come to London this weekend to show support for Palestine Action to think about the potential criminal consequences of their actions.”