‘Unspeakable horror’: the attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki

‘Unspeakable horror’: the attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki
This combination image of two file photos dated 1945 shows a view of the city of Hiroshima before (L) and after (R) the first atomic bomb was dropped by a US Air Force B-29 aircraft on the city on August 6, 1945. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 04 August 2025

‘Unspeakable horror’: the attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki

‘Unspeakable horror’: the attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki
  • In 2016, Barack Obama became the first sitting US president to visit Hiroshima but offered no apology for the attack

TOKYO: Japan this week marks 80 years since the United States dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in World War II.

The first on August 6, 1945 killed around 140,000 people in Hiroshima and three days later another 74,000 perished in Nagasaki.

Here are some facts about the devastating attacks:

- The first atomic bomb was dropped on the western city of Hiroshima by the US bomber Enola Gay, nicknamed “Little Boy.”

- It detonated about 600 meters from the ground, with a force equivalent to 15,000 tons of TNT.

- Tens of thousands died instantly, while others succumbed to injuries or illness in the weeks, months and years that followed.

- Three days later the US dropped a second bomb, dubbed “Fat Man,” on the southern city of Nagasaki.

- The attacks remain the only time atomic bombs have been used in wartime.

In Hiroshima, the first thing people noticed was an “intense ball of fire,” according to the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC).

Temperatures near the blast reached an estimated 7,000 degrees Celsius (12,632 degrees Fahrenheit), which incinerated everything within a radius of about three kilometers (five miles).

“I remember the charred bodies of little children lying around the hypocenter area like black rocks,” Koichi Wada, a witness who was 18 at the time of the Nagasaki attack, has said of the bombing.

ICRC experts say there were cases of temporary or permanent blindness due to the intense flash of light, and subsequent related damage such as cataracts.

A whirlwind of heat generated also ignited thousands of fires that ravaged large parts of the mostly wooden city. A firestorm that consumed all available oxygen caused more deaths by suffocation.

It has been estimated that burn- and fire-related casualties accounted for more than half of the immediate deaths in Hiroshima.

The explosion generated an enormous shock wave that blew people through the air. Others were crushed to death inside collapsed buildings or injured or killed by flying debris.

Radiation sickness was reported in the aftermath by many who survived the initial blasts and firestorms.

Acute symptoms included vomiting, headaches, nausea, diarrhea, haemorrhaging and hair loss, with radiation sickness fatal for many within a few weeks or months.

Survivors, known as “hibakusha,” also experienced longer-term effects including elevated risks of thyroid cancer and leukaemia, and both Hiroshima and Nagasaki have seen elevated cancer rates.

Of 50,000 radiation victims from both cities studied by the Japanese-US Radiation Effects Research Foundation, about 100 died of leukaemia and 850 suffered from radiation-induced cancers.

The group found no evidence however of a “significant increase” in serious birth defects among survivors’ children.

The twin bombings dealt the final blow to imperial Japan, which surrendered on August 15, 1945, bringing an end to World War II.

Historians have debated whether the bombings ultimately saved lives by bringing an end to the conflict and averting a ground invasion.

But those calculations meant little to survivors, many of whom battled decades of physical and psychological trauma, as well as the stigma that sometimes came with being a hibakusha.

Despite their suffering, many survivors were shunned — in particular for marriage — because of prejudice over radiation exposure.

Survivors and their supporters have become some of the loudest and most powerful voices opposing nuclear weapons, including meeting world leaders to press their case.

Last year, the Japanese anti-nuclear group Nihon Hidankyo, a grassroots movement of hibakusha, won the Nobel Peace Prize.

In 2019, Pope Francis met several hibakusha in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, decrying the “unspeakable horror” and calling for the abolition of nuclear weapons.

In 2016, Barack Obama became the first sitting US president to visit Hiroshima. He offered no apology for the attack, but embraced survivors and called for a world free of nuclear weapons.

Russia is one of around 100 countries expected to attend this year’s memorial in Nagasaki, the first time Moscow has been invited to commemorations in the city since the start of the war with Ukraine.


EU seeks ‘face-saving’ deal on UN climate target

Updated 29 sec ago

EU seeks ‘face-saving’ deal on UN climate target

EU seeks ‘face-saving’ deal on UN climate target
BRUSSELS: EU countries will seek Thursday to settle on an emissions-cutting plan to bring to a key UN conference in Brazil, as divisions on the bloc’s green agenda threaten its global leadership on climate.
Environment ministers for the 27-nation bloc are gathering in Brussels with the clock ticking down on a United Nations deadline to produce plans to fight global warming for 2035.
One of the world’s biggest greenhouse-gas emitters behind China, the United States and India, the EU has to date been the most committed to climate action, by some margin.
As such the bloc was hoping to pull ahead and derive its submission to November’s COP30 climate conference from a more ambitious 2040 goal.
But that is yet to be agreed by member states, leaving Brussels scrambling for a last-minute solution.
Denmark, which holds the EU’s rotating presidency, has suggested submitting to the UN a “statement of intent,” rather than a hard target.
That would include a pledge to cut emissions between 66.3 percent and 72.5 percent compared to 1990 levels — with the range expected to be narrowed down at a later stage.
“This approach would ensure that (the) EU does not go to (the) UN Climate Summit empty-handed,” said a spokesperson for the Danish presidency of the European Council.
But even that is hardly a done deal and talks on Thursday could prove lengthy. One European diplomat suggested reporters prepare “a sleeping bag.”

- ‘Better than nothing’ -

The nearly 200 countries party to the 2015 Paris Agreement on climate action were supposed to put forward updated policies in February, providing a tougher 2035 emissions reduction target and a detailed blueprint for achieving it.
But only a handful made the deadline, since extended to September — still allowing plans to be assessed before COP30 starts on November 10, in the Brazilian city of Belem.
While not as good as a formal submission the “statement of intent” was “much better than nothing,” said a senior EU diplomat.
“It sort of saves the EU face at international level,” added Elisa Giannelli, of the E3G climate advocacy group.
The UN has pushed for world leaders, among them EU chief Ursula von der Leyen, to announce their commitments at the General Assembly in New York next week.
The EU has set a goal of becoming carbon neutral by 2050 under its so-called European Green Deal, and says it has already cut emissions by 37 percent compared to 1990.
But climate has increasingly taken a backseat in Brussels, as political winds turned.
With wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, security and defense are now top of mind, said Linda Kalcher, director of the Strategic Perspectives think tank, noting that EU leaders’ talks on climate are much less frequent now.
Right-wing electoral gains in several member states and the European Parliament have curbed ambitions, and the European Commission has pivoted to boosting industry, faced with fierce competition from China and US tariffs.

- ‘Short-sighted’ -

That was where the commission’s proposal to cut emissions by 90 percent by 2040, which was to inform the UN goal, got bogged down.
Denmark and Spain are among those pushing for approval. But others, like Hungary, the Czech Republic and Poland, think it over-ambitious and detrimental to industry.
France, which is suffering from shaky finances and a prolonged political crisis, wants more clarity on the investment framework to support decarbonization before committing.
“We are not living in a European Green Deal era anymore,” said Giannelli.
Rather than seeing climate action as “an opportunity for international trade, economic growth, and competitiveness,” some nations have taken the “short-sighted view” that it is a costly exercise benefiting “only climate,” she said.
Last week, Paris and Berlin called for the 2040 target to be discussed at a leaders’ summit in October — effectively pushing back a decision that the commission had hoped could have been reached Thursday.
The delay sent a “bad signal” and brought into question EU leadership, said Michael Sicaud-Clyet of environmental group WWF, adding that the bloc was “losing its credibility” on climate.
“We continue to work together to find a compromise,” Wopke Hoekstra, the European Commissioner for Climate, told AFP, adding that he thought a deal on 2040 could still be reached before COP30.

Shooting kills 3 officers and wounds 2 more in rural Pennsylvania. Police say the shooter is dead

Shooting kills 3 officers and wounds 2 more in rural Pennsylvania. Police say the shooter is dead
Updated 38 min 45 sec ago

Shooting kills 3 officers and wounds 2 more in rural Pennsylvania. Police say the shooter is dead

Shooting kills 3 officers and wounds 2 more in rural Pennsylvania. Police say the shooter is dead
  • The medical response unfolded on a rural road in south-central Pennsylvania that winds through an agricultural area with a red barn and farm fields

NORTH CODORUS, Pennsylvania: Law enforcement were investigating Thursday after a shooting killed three officers and wounded two more in southern Pennsylvania the day before.

The violence erupted in rural York County as officers followed up on a domestic-related investigation that began on Tuesday. Police killed the shooter.

Hours after the violence, community members held American flags and saluted as police and emergency vehicles formed a procession to the coroner’s office.

Gov. Josh Shapiro condemned the violence at a news conference and said it was a tragic loss of life. Attorney General Pamela Bondi called the violence against police “a scourge on our society.”

It was one of the deadliest days for Pennsylvania police this century. In 2009 three Pittsburgh officers responding to a domestic disturbance were ambushed and shot to death by a man in a bulletproof vest.

Police departments across the region expressed condolences on social media. People were leaving flowers at the headquarters of the Northern York Regional Police Department.

The investigation into the shooting will cover multiple locations in York County, state police said in a statement.

The shooting erupted in the area of North Codorus Township, about 185 kilometers west of Philadelphia, not far from Maryland, authorities said.

Dirk Anderson heard “quite a few” shots from his home across the street from the shooting, he said. He saw a helicopter and police arrive.

The emergency response unfolded on a rural road in south-central Pennsylvania. Some 30 police vehicles blocked off roads bordered by a barn, a goat farm and soybean and corn fields.

The two injured officers were in critical but stable condition at York Hospital, authorities said.

Authorities did not identify the shooter, the officers or which police department they belonged to, or describe how they were shot, citing the investigation.

Family members of those killed were grieving but proud of their loved ones, said Shapiro.

Another officer in the area was killed in February, when a man armed with a pistol and zip ties entered a hospital’s intensive care unit and took staff members hostage before a shootout that left both the man and an officer dead.


Britain will recognize Palestinian state this weekend, Times reports

Britain will recognize Palestinian state this weekend, Times reports
Updated 18 September 2025

Britain will recognize Palestinian state this weekend, Times reports

Britain will recognize Palestinian state this weekend, Times reports
  • Prime Minister Keir Starmer warned in July that it would take the action unless Israel took steps to relieve suffering in Gaza
  • Starmer is under pressure from some in his Labour Party to take a harder line against Israel

LONDON: Britain will formally recognize a Palestinian state this weekend, after US President Donald Trump, who opposes the decision, has left the country at the end of his state visit, the Times newspaper reported.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer warned in July that it would take the action unless Israel took steps to relieve suffering in Gaza and reached a ceasefire in its nearly two-year war with Hamas.
Israel says recognizing a Palestinian state, which France, Canada, and Australia have also said they will do this month, would reward Hamas.
The Times, without citing its sources, said Britain would make an announcement once Trump has completed his trip on Thursday. Britain’s foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
In July, Trump, who is currently enjoying an unprecedented second state visit to Britain, said he did not mind if Britain made such a move, but since then the US has made clear its opposition to any such action by its European allies.
Starmer, who is under pressure from some in his Labour Party to take a harder line against Israel, had said Britain would recognize Palestinian statehood at the United Nations General Assembly next week unless Israel took substantive steps to alleviate the situation in Gaza.
Britain has long supported the policy of a “two-state solution” for ending the conflict in the region but previously said this could only come when the time was right.


France braces for disruption on day of anti-Macron ‘anger’

France braces for disruption on day of anti-Macron ‘anger’
Updated 18 September 2025

France braces for disruption on day of anti-Macron ‘anger’

France braces for disruption on day of anti-Macron ‘anger’
  • Unions vow mass protests, public transport set to be paralyzed in places due to strikes
  • Officials warn of possible disturbances by extremist elements

PARIS: France was bracing on Thursday for a day of nationwide disruption in a show of anger over President Emmanuel Macron’s budget policies, with unions vowing mass protests, public transport set to be paralyzed in places due to strikes and officials warning of possible disturbances by extremist elements.
Prime Minister Sebastien Lecornu, Macron’s seventh head of government, took office last week, vowing a break from the past against the background of an ongoing political crisis.
But the appointment of the former defense minister has failed to assuage the anger of unions and the left.
They remain incensed about the draft €44 billion ($52 billion) cost-saving budget of his predecessor Francois Bayrou, despite Lecornu’s pledges to abolish both the life-long privileges of prime ministers and a widely detested plan to scrap two public holidays.
Strike action on Thursday will see around a third of teachers walk out, nine out of 10 pharmacies shuttered and severe disruption on the Paris Metro, where only the three driverless automated lines will work normally.
It is expected to be the most widely followed day of union-led protests and strikes since the months-long mobilization in early 2023 against Macron’s controversial pension reform, which the government eventually rammed through parliament without a vote.
“We feel that our colleagues were not fooled by the appointment of Sebastien Lecornu,” which “did not calm the anger,” said Sophie Venetitay, general secretary of Snes-FSU, the leading union for middle and high school teachers.
While the day of protest represents an early test of crisis management for Lecornu, anger is crystallizing against Macron, who has just one-and-a-half years left in power and is enduring his worst-ever popularity levels.
The “obstacle” to revoking the pension reform – still vehemently opposed by the unions – lies “in the Elysee Palace,” said the head of the CGT union Sophie Binet.
‘Very, very strong’ mobilization
Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau said he expected a “very, very strong” mobilization on Thursday, describing it as a “hybrid day,” with the risk of sabotage actions from ultra-left groups from early morning and the mass sanctioned protests in the day.
“We will respond with massive resources and clear orders,” he told BFM-TV, saying more than 80,000 police officers and gendarmes would be deployed, backed by drones, armored vehicles and water cannons.
Between 600,000 and 900,000 people are expected to take to the streets nationwide, according to an interior ministry estimate.
Paris Police Chief Laurent Nunez said on Wednesday that he was “very concerned” about the risk that rioters intent on provoking fights and damage would infiltrate the union march in Paris, urging shops in the center to close for the day and protect their storefronts.
A more informal day of action held on September 10, despite isolated disruption, did not succeed however on its self-declared aim to “block everything.”
Most high-speed trains in France are still expected to run on Thursday while disruption to airlines should be minimal after air-traffic controllers postponed a strike but warned of a three-day action in early October.


US judge orders pro-Palestinian protest leader Khalil deported to Algeria or Syria

US judge orders pro-Palestinian protest leader Khalil deported to Algeria or Syria
Updated 18 September 2025

US judge orders pro-Palestinian protest leader Khalil deported to Algeria or Syria

US judge orders pro-Palestinian protest leader Khalil deported to Algeria or Syria
  • Court filing: Mahmoud Khalil failed to disclose information on his green card application

WASHINGTON: A judge in the southern US state of Louisiana has ordered prominent pro-Palestinian protest leader Mahmoud Khalil to be deported to Algeria or Syria after failing to disclose information on his green card application, according to court documents filed Wednesday

“It is hereby further ordered that Respondent be Removed from the United States to Algeria, or in the alternative to Syria,” Judge Jamee Comans wrote in a court filing.

The order dated September 12 by the immigration judge asserted the lack of full disclosure on Khalil’s green card application “was not an oversight by an uninformed, uneducated applicant... rather, this Court finds that Respondent willfully misrepresented material fact(s).”

Khalil, in a statement to the American Civil Liberties Union, said in response to the order: “It is no surprise that the Trump administration continues to retaliate against me for my exercise of free speech.”

“Their latest attempt, through a kangaroo immigration court, exposes their true colors once again.”

Khalil, a legal permanent resident in the United States who is married to a US citizen and has a US-born son, was detained by immigration for three months beginning in March and faced potential deportation.

A former Columbia University student who was one of the most visible leaders of nationwide pro-Palestinian campus protests, he was released from custody in June, but faced continued threats of deportation from federal authorities.