Gaza staff face starvation: Joint statement from AFP, AP, BBC, Reuters

Gaza staff face starvation: Joint statement from AFP, AP, BBC, Reuters
Palestinians gather as they carry aid supplies that entered Gaza through Israel, amid a hunger crisis, in Beit Lahia in the northern Gaza Strip on July 20, 2025. (REUTERS/File)
Short Url
Updated 24 July 2025

Gaza staff face starvation: Joint statement from AFP, AP, BBC, Reuters

Gaza staff face starvation: Joint statement from AFP, AP, BBC, Reuters
  • Statement calls on Israel to allow journalists in and out of Gaza, permit adequate food supplies into territory
  • Over 100 charity and human rights groups say Israel’s blockade pushing Palestinians in Gaza toward starvation

Four leading news organizations said Thursday their journalists in Gaza are facing the threat of starvation as the Israeli assault on Gaza grinds on, while top US envoy Steve Witkoff was to meet with key negotiators from the Middle East for talks on the latest ceasefire proposal and the release of hostages.

“We are desperately concerned for our journalists in Gaza, who are increasingly unable to feed themselves and their families,” said a joint statement by The Associated Press, Agence France-Presse, Reuters and the BBC. “For many months, these independent journalists have been the world’s eyes and ears on the ground in Gaza. They are now facing the same dire circumstances as those they are covering.”

The statement called on Israel to allow journalists in and out of Gaza and allow adequate food supplies into the territory.

The statement came a day after more than 100 charity and human rights groups said that Israel’s blockade and ongoing military offensive are pushing Palestinians in the Gaza Strip toward starvation.

Also Thursday, Hamas confirmed it had sent its latest ceasefire proposal to Israel, with an Israeli official calling it “workable,” although no details were provided. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak on record.

Israel’s war in Gaza, launched in response to Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, attack, has killed more than 59,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry. Its count doesn’t distinguish between militants and civilians, but the ministry says that more than half of the dead are women and children.


Rights groups urge Lebanon to protect freedom of expression in new media law

Rights groups urge Lebanon to protect freedom of expression in new media law
Updated 16 September 2025

Rights groups urge Lebanon to protect freedom of expression in new media law

Rights groups urge Lebanon to protect freedom of expression in new media law
  • Proposed amendments risk undermining reform efforts, critics say
  • NGOs urge parliament to abolish criminal defamation, end pretrial detention

BEIRUT: Lebanon’s parliament should ensure that a draft media law it is considering upholds the right to freedom of expression, 14 Lebanese and international rights organizations urged on Tuesday.

This includes decriminalizing defamation, blasphemy, insult and criticism of public officials; prohibiting pretrial detention in speech-related violations; and removing onerous restrictions on the establishment of media outlets.

The calls come as the parliament’s Administration and Justice Committee is set to resume its discussion of the draft law on Tuesday.

On Aug. 31, members of parliament received proposed amendments to the draft law’s text, which, organizations said, included reintroducing pretrial detention and provisions that criminalize insult and defamation.

Rights groups, including Amnesty International, Committee to Protect Journalists, Human Rights Watch, and Reporters Without Borders, warned the suggested amendments would further restrict the work of media organizations that are subject to a legal complaint by prohibiting them from publishing materials about the complainant while judicial proceedings are ongoing.

They warned that Lebanon’s criminal defamation laws have been repeatedly used to target and silence government critics, activists and journalists in Lebanon, with journalists repeatedly summoned before security agencies for their work.

“Parliament should ensure that these practices come to an end by passing a media law that is entirely consistent with international human rights standards, including on the right to freedom of expression and media freedom,” the organizations said in a statement.

“Lebanon’s parliament should adopt a media law that includes rights protections that Lebanese rights and media groups have long fought for,” they added.

Rights groups, who reviewed the proposed amendments, opposed the reintroduction of pretrial detention, including “under aggravated circumstances, such as infringing on individuals’ dignity or private lives.”

Pretrial detention is only permissible in Lebanon for offenses that are punishable by more than one year in prison. It is expressly prohibited for media-related offenses in Lebanon’s existing media laws.

“If adopted, such an amendment would be a significant step backward for the protection of the right to freedom of expression and media freedom in Lebanon,” the organizations said.

They noted that the suggested amendment does not specify what “infringing on individuals’ dignity or private lives” entails.

“A vague law that leaves people uncertain of what expression may violate it has a chilling impact on freedom of expression, as people may self-censor out of fear that they might be subject to summons, pretrial detention or eventual prosecution,” they added.

“Vague provisions also leave the law subject to abuse by authorities, who may use them to silence peaceful dissent.”

Such a general legislative ban, they said, would constitute “a serious infringement on the right to freedom of expression.”

The suggested amendments would require licensed television stations to provide the Information Ministry and the National Council for Audiovisual Media with regular reports, including detailed information on the schedule of broadcast programming, and imply that electronic media be subjected to a prior licensing regime rather than a notification regime.

“Unless carefully crafted, such licensing requirements risk allowing for arbitrary decision-making over who can establish and operate media outlets and could facilitate violations of the right to freedom of expression and media freedom,” the statement said.

Lebanon’s parliament began discussing a new media law in 2010 after a former parliament member, Ghassan Moukheiber, and Maharat Foundation, a Beirut-based nongovernmental organization specializing in media and freedom of expression issues, submitted a proposal to amend Lebanon’s outdated Publications Law.

In January 2023, parliament established a subcommittee to study and amend the draft media law, a final version of which was submitted to the Administration and Justice Committee on May 27.

The draft law submitted to the committee in May included advances in protecting the right to freedom of expression in Lebanon, including abolishing pretrial detention and prison sentences for all speech-related violations. It also repealed criminal defamation and insult provisions from Lebanon’s penal code and military judiciary law.

The Administration and Justice Committee started discussions on the latest draft media law on July 29 and has held three meetings on the issue.

However, proposed amendments, introduced to parliament members on Aug. 31, were largely opposed by international rights groups for provisions viewed as restricting media freedom.

Rights groups urged the committee to make its discussions public to ensure transparent legislative debates and facilitate effective public participation.


Trump files $15 billion defamation lawsuit against The New York Times

Trump files $15 billion defamation lawsuit against The New York Times
Updated 16 September 2025

Trump files $15 billion defamation lawsuit against The New York Times

Trump files $15 billion defamation lawsuit against The New York Times

NEW YORK: President Donald Trump filed a $15 billion defamation lawsuit against The New York Times and four of its journalists on Monday, according to court documents.
The lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Florida names several articles and one book written by two of the publication's journalists and published in the lead up to the 2024 election, saying they are “part of a decades-long pattern by the New York Times of intentional and malicious defamation against President Trump.”
“Defendants published such statements negligently, with knowledge of the falsity of the statements, and/or with reckless disregard of their truth or falsity," the lawsuit says.
The New York Times did not immediately respond to an email requesting comment early Tuesday.
In a Truth Social post announcing the lawsuit, Trump accused The New York Times of lying about him and defaming him, saying it has become “a virtual ‘mouthpiece’ for the Radical Left Democrat Party.”
Trump has gone after other media outlets, including filing a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the The Wall Street Journal and media mogul Rupert Murdoch in July after the newspaper published a story reporting on his ties to wealthy financier Jeffrey Epstein.


Australia wants ‘minimally invasive’ age checks under teen social media ban

Australia wants ‘minimally invasive’ age checks under teen social media ban
Updated 16 September 2025

Australia wants ‘minimally invasive’ age checks under teen social media ban

Australia wants ‘minimally invasive’ age checks under teen social media ban
  • Internet watchdog unveils guidance for tech firms
  • Social media firms should use existing data to estimate age
  • Blanket age verification process “unreasonable,” regulator says

SYDNEY: Australia urged social media platforms on Tuesday to employ “minimally invasive” methods to check the age of users covered by its world-first teen social media ban, which take into account artificial intelligence (AI) and behavioral data.
Governments and tech firms worldwide are closely watching Australia’s effort to become the first country to block use of social media by those younger than 16, starting from December.
“eSafety recommends the most minimally invasive techniques available,” the Internet watchdog said in its guidance for firms to comply with the law passed in November.
Social media platforms are not required to conduct blanket age-verification as firms can use existing data to infer age reliably, eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said.
“We know that they have the targeting technology to do this,” she told a media briefing.
“They can target us with deadly precision when it comes to advertising, certainly they can do this around the age of a child.”
She added, “Adults should not see huge changes ... it would be unreasonable if platforms re-verify everyone’s age.”
In July, Grant widened the ban to Alphabet-owned YouTube, following complaints by Meta’s Facebook and Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok about an earlier decision to exempt the video-sharing site popular with teachers.
Google and Meta did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
In February, eSafety said 95 percent of teenagers aged 13 to 15 reported using at least one social media platform since January 2024, but warned that the actual numbers could be much higher.
Federal Communications Minister Anika Wells urged “reasonable steps” by social media companies to detect and deactivate underage accounts, to prevent re-registration and provide an accessible complaints process for their users.
“We cannot control the ocean, but we can police the sharks and today we are making clear to the rest of the world how we intend to do this,” Wells told reporters.
There was no excuse for non-compliance, she added, as the platforms had the capability to do so, ranking among the world’s biggest and best-resourced companies.
Amid concern about the impact on young people’s mental health, Australia’s ban passed into law in November 2024, with companies given a year to adopt it, while facing a December 10 deadline to deactivate the accounts of underage users. ($1=1.4993 Australian dollars)


UN expert says Gaza deadliest conflict ever for journalists

UN expert says Gaza deadliest conflict ever for journalists
Updated 15 September 2025

UN expert says Gaza deadliest conflict ever for journalists

UN expert says Gaza deadliest conflict ever for journalists
  • Special rapporteur Irene Khan says Israel's killing of journalists is the 'cover-up of genocide'
  • At least 252 Palestinian journalists have been killed in Gaza since October 2023

GENEVA: A UN expert accused Israel Monday of intentionally targeting journalists in a bid to cover up “genocide,” warning that the war raging there was the deadliest ever for media workers.
“The way in which journalists are being killed, silenced ... is the cover-up of genocide,” Irene Khan, the special rapporteur on the right to freedom of opinion and expression, told reporters in Geneva.
She said the latest United Nations figure showed that at least 252 Palestinian journalists have been killed in Gaza since the war was triggered by militant group Hamas’s unprecedented attack on Israel on October 7, 2023.
That makes it “the deadliest conflict ever for journalists,” Khan said, warning that the number “is of course likely to go up, because every week we hear news of more killings.”
Already, “more journalists have been killed in Gaza than in both World Wars, Vietnam War, wars in Yugoslavia and the war in Afghanistan combined,” she said.
By comparison, she said 14 journalists had been killed in Ukraine since Russia began its full-scale invasion in early 2022, while the number of journalists killed over two decades of conflict in Afghanistan was in “the dozens.”
Khan, who is an independent expert mandated by the UN Human Rights Council but who does not speak on behalf of the United Nations, maintained that many of the journalists killed in Gaza had been “targeted.”
They are being “deliberately picked out and killed because of the work that they are doing to expose the atrocities, the crimes, the genocide on the ground,” she said.
The expert slammed Israeli “smear campaigns,” accusing many of the journalists killed in its strikes of being “terrorist supporters or terrorists themselves” in a bid to “delegitimize and discredit” them and their work.
“So it is not just killing journalists, but (an) attempt is being very clearly made here to kill the story,” she charged.
Khan also voiced outrage that Israel has continued to block all access to Gaza for international journalists.
“What is happening in Gaza is extremely unusual,” she said. “I cannot recall another situation where a member state of the United Nations has denied access to independent international media for a conflict.”
She said a “terrible precedent” is being set for media freedom and demanded international action.
“States must stop Israel before all journalists in Gaza are silenced.”


US, China reach framework deal on TikTok; Trump and Xi to speak on Friday

US, China reach framework deal on TikTok; Trump and Xi to speak on Friday
Updated 15 September 2025

US, China reach framework deal on TikTok; Trump and Xi to speak on Friday

US, China reach framework deal on TikTok; Trump and Xi to speak on Friday
  • US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent says deal would address US security concerns but keep “Chinese characteristics” of TikTok
  • While details of a possible deal remain unclear, it could finally end the TikTok ban saga that began during Trump’s first presidency

MADRID/WASHINGTON: US and Chinese officials said on Monday they have reached a framework agreement to switch short-video app TikTok to US-controlled ownership that will be confirmed in a Friday call between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping.
The potential deal on the popular social media app, which counts 170 million US users, was a rare breakthrough in the months-long talks between the world’s No. 1 and No. 2 economies that have sought to defuse a wide-ranging trade war that has unnerved global markets.
After a meeting with Chinese negotiators in Madrid, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said a September 17 deadline that could have disrupted the popular social media app in the US encouraged Chinese negotiators to reach a potential deal.
He said that deadline could be extended by 90 days to allow the deal to be finalized, but declined to discuss specifics of the deal.
Bessent said when commercial terms of the deal are revealed, it will preserve cultural aspects of TikTok that Chinese negotiators care about. “They’re interested in Chinese characteristics of the app, which they think are soft power. We don’t care about Chinese characteristics. We care about national security,” Bessent told reporters at the conclusion of two days of talks in Madrid. It is the second time this year that the two sides have said they were nearing a TikTok deal. The earlier announcement in March ultimately did not pan out.
Any agreement could require approval by the Republican-controlled Congress, which passed a law in 2024 requiring divestiture due to fears that TikTok’s US user data could be accessed by the Chinese government, allowing Beijing to spy on Americans or conduct influence operations through the app.
But the Trump administration has repeatedly declined to force a shutdown, which could anger the app’s millions of users and disrupt political communications. Trump has credited the app with helping him win re-election last year, and his personal account has 15 million followers. The White House launched an official TikTok account last month.
“A deal was also reached on a “certain” company that young people in our Country very much wanted to save. They will be very happy! I will be speaking to President Xi on Friday. The relationship remains a very strong one!!!” Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform.
Bessent did not say whether parent company ByteDance would transfer control of the app’s underlying technology to the unnamed US buyer. Wang Jingtao, an official at the Chinese cyberspace regulator, said the deal could license intellectual property rights, including algorithms.
Aside from TikTok, the US has cited national security concerns to block shipments of semiconductors and other advanced technology to China, and ban Chinese products that Washington has concluded could be used to spy on Americans or gather intelligence.
China’s top trade negotiator, Li Chenggang, told reporters that those concerns amounted to “unilateral bullying.” “The United States cannot on the one hand ask China to take care of its concerns, and on the other hand continue to suppress Chinese companies,” Li said.
Li said the two sides had reached a “basic framework consensus” on resolving TikTok-related issues — a slight variation from the language used by the US side. The US-China meeting at the Spanish foreign ministry’s baroque Palacio de Santa Cruz was the fourth round of talks in four months to address strained trade ties as well as TikTok’s divestiture deadline.
Delegations led by Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng have met in European cities since May to try to resolve a trade war that has seen tit-for-tat tariff hikes and a halt in the flow of rare earths to the United States.

TRUMP, XI TO DISCUSS MEETING
Trump has repeatedly expressed interest in a meeting with Xi, and China is trying to woo Trump to Beijing for a summit. Bessent said it was up to the leaders to discuss whether to meet during Friday’s call. A source familiar with the talks said the US team told the Chinese side that any potential meeting this fall would have been off the table if the two failed to reach a deal on TikTok in Madrid. The talks took place as Washington demands that its allies place tariffs on imports from China over Chinese purchases of Russian oil, which Beijing on Monday said was an attempt at coercion. Bessent said the issue of Russia was briefly discussed. Beijing separately announced on Monday that a preliminary investigation of Nvidia found the US chip giant had violated its anti-monopoly law. Bessent said the announcement on Nvidia was poor timing.
The probe is widely seen as a retaliatory shot against Washington’s curbs on the Chinese chip sector.