Syrian government forces set to reenter Sweida province after renewed Druze-Bedouin clashes

Renewed clashes broke out overnight between Druze armed groups and members of Bedouin clans in southern Syria, and government forces were preparing to deploy again to the area Friday. (FILE/AFP)
Renewed clashes broke out overnight between Druze armed groups and members of Bedouin clans in southern Syria, and government forces were preparing to deploy again to the area Friday. (FILE/AFP)
Short Url
Updated 18 July 2025

Syrian government forces set to reenter Sweida province after renewed Druze-Bedouin clashes

Syrian government forces set to reenter Sweida province after renewed Druze-Bedouin clashes
  • Clashes have erupted again between Druze militias and Bedouin clans in southern Syria, Syrian Forces said they would deploy again to the area Friday after pulling out under a ceasefire agreement
  • Israel agreed to allow limited access by Syrian forces into the Sweida area of southern Syria for the next two days, an Israeli official said on Friday

MAZRAA: Renewed clashes broke out overnight between Druze armed groups and members of Bedouin clans in southern Syria, and government forces were preparing to deploy again to the area Friday after pulling out under a ceasefire agreement that halted several days of violence earlier this week, officials said.
Government security forces agreed with some of the Druze factions that they would re-enter the area to impose stability and protect state institutions, according to two Syrian officials who spoke Friday on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.
Israel agreed to allow limited access by Syrian forces into the Sweida area of southern Syria for the next two days, an Israeli official said on Friday after days of bloodshed in and around Syria’s Druze city of Sweida
“In light of the ongoing instability in southwest Syria, Israel has agreed to allow limited entry of the (Syrian) internal security forces into Sweida district for the next 48 hours,” the official, who declined to be named, told reporters.
Syrian government forces had largely pulled out of the Druze-majority southern province of Sweida after days of clashes with militias linked to the Druze religious minority that threatened to unravel the country’s fragile post-war transition.
The conflict drew airstrikes against Syrian forces by neighboring Israel before most of the fighting was halted by a truce announced Wednesday that was mediated by the US, Turkiye and Arab countries. Under that agreement, Druze factions and clerics would be left to maintain internal security in Sweida, Syria’s interim President Ahmad Al-Sharaa said Thursday.
The clashes initially began between Druze militias and local Sunni Muslim Bedouin tribes Sunday before government forces intervened, nominally to restore order, but ended up taking the Bedouins’ side against the Druze. The fighting killed hundreds of people over four days, with allegations that government-affiliated fighters executed Druze civilians and looted and burned homes.
Israel intervened, launching dozens of airstrikes on convoys of government fighters and striking the Syrian Defense Ministry headquarters in central Damascus in a major escalation of its involvement.
The Druze form a substantial community in Israel, where they are seen as a loyal minority and often serve in the Israeli military.
After the ceasefire and withdrawal of government forces, clashes once again flared between the Druze and Bedouin groups in parts of Sweida province. State media reported Druze militias carried out revenge attacks against Bedouin communities, leading to a wave of displacement.
The governor of neighboring Daraa province said in a statement that more than 1,000 families had been displaced to the area from Sweida as a result of “attacks on Bedouin tribes by outlaw groups.”
Meanwhile, Bedouin groups arrived Friday from other areas of Syria to join the fight.
On the outskirts of Sweida, groups of them gathered in front of buildings that had been set ablaze. An armed man who gave his name only as Abu Mariam (“father of Mariam“) said he had come from the eastern province of Deir ez-Zor to “support the oppressed.”
“We will not return to our homes until we crush Al-Hijri and his ilk,” he said, referring to a prominent Druze leader opposed to the government in Damascus, Sheikh Hikmat Al-Hijri. “We have nothing to do with civilians and innocent people as long as they stay in their homes.”
The Druze religious sect began as a 10th-century offshoot of Ismailism, a branch of Shiite Islam. More than half of the roughly 1 million Druze worldwide live in Syria. Most of the other Druze live in Lebanon and Israel, including in the Golan Heights, which Israel captured from Syria in the 1967 Mideast War and annexed in 1981.
While predominantly Druze, Sweida is also home to Bedouin tribes who are Sunni Muslim and have periodically clashed with the Druze over the years. The latest escalation began with members of a Bedouin tribe in Sweida setting up a checkpoint and attacking and robbing a Druze man, which triggered tit-for-tat attacks and kidnappings.
Ahmed Aba Zeid, a Syrian researcher who has studied armed groups in southern Syria, said there is “no specific reason” for the historic tensions between the groups.
“All of Syria is full of social problems that have no reason,” he said.
In this case, however, “The state exploited the latest problem to try to change the situation in Sweida, and this only increased the scope of it,” he said.
Israel’s deep distrust of Syria’s new Islamist-led leadership appears to be at odds with the United States, which said it did not support the recent Israeli strikes on Syria.
The US intervened to help secure the earlier truce between government forces and Druze fighters, and the White House said on Thursday that it appeared to be holding.
Syrian leader Ahmed Al-Sharaa, who has worked to establish warmer ties with the US, accused Israel of trying to fracture Syria and promised to protect its Druze minority.

(With Agencies)


Former Iraq PM Al-Maliki could heavily influence election despite troubled past

Updated 15 sec ago

Former Iraq PM Al-Maliki could heavily influence election despite troubled past

Former Iraq PM Al-Maliki could heavily influence election despite troubled past
Maliki, in his mid-70s, was pressured to step down in 2014 by an unusually broad array of critics
His political roots stretch back decades, shaped by opposition to Saddam Hussein’s authoritarian rule

BAGHDAD: Former Prime Minister Nouri Al-Maliki remains a potent force in Iraqi politics despite long-standing accusations that he fueled sectarian strife and failed to stop Islamic State from seizing large areas of the country a decade ago.
As leader of the influential State of Law, a Shiite Muslim coalition, he is seen as having enough clout to decide who will become Iraq’s next prime minister after a parliamentary election on November 11.
Maliki, in his mid-70s, was pressured to step down in 2014 by an unusually broad array of critics — the US, Iran, Sunni leaders and Iraq’s top Shiite cleric — after Islamic State’s rapid territorial gains in 2014.
His divisive years as premier were blamed by many Iraqis for fostering sectarian strife between majority Shiites and minority Sunnis, while chronic problems like joblessness, poor public services and graft were left to fester.

MALIKI SIGNED SADDAM’S EXECUTION ORDER
Yet despite the criticism, Al-Maliki — a shrewd political operator — staged a comeback in the years that followed, quietly building influence through ties to armed militias, the security services and the judiciary, analysts say.
His political roots stretch back decades, shaped by opposition to Saddam Hussein’s authoritarian rule and a long exile that forged his ideological convictions.
Sentenced to death under Saddam for his role in the outlawed Shiite Islamic Dawa Party, Al-Maliki spent nearly 25 years in exile, mostly in Syria and Iran, agitating for the dictator’s downfall.
Like many exiles, he returned to Iraq after Saddam’s fall — the end of a Sunni-led regime that had long oppressed Shiites and Kurds.
Maliki signed Saddam’s execution order in red ink, paving the way for masked gunmen to place a noose around his neck and pull a lever that quickly ended his life.
Maliki, a friend of Shiite power Iran, had fulfilled his life-long goal of wresting power from the country’s Sunnis, but his drive to entrench Shi’ite dominance proved his downfall.
He was blamed by Sunni leaders for not doing enough to crack down on Shi’ite militias and focusing instead on asserting authority over restless Sunni provinces such as Anbar in western Iraq.
Maliki, who served as premier from 2006-2014, denied that he has a sectarian outlook.
“I am not fighting in Anbar because they are Sunnis, as I have also fought Shi’ite militias. Al Qaeda and militias are one — they both kill people and blow them up. Both rely on perverts and deviants,” Al-Maliki told Reuters in 2014.

MALIKI’S POLICIES HELPED ALIENATE SUNNIS, CRITICS SAY
His term in office was marred by sectarian bloodshed and an anti-American and anti-government insurgency, and accusations that he marginalized Sunnis, one factor in the rise of Sunni Islamic State.
To detractors, the dour Al-Maliki threw down the gauntlet with stunning speed in 2011 when his Shi’ite-led government demanded the arrest of a Sunni Muslim vice president — seemingly moments after the departure of US troops in December of that year.
The move called into question Maliki’s commitment to any sort of democracy. The man who plotted from exile against Saddam for years now drew comparisons with his former enemy.
Critics say Maliki’s sectarian policies drove Sunnis into the arms of Islamic State.
Maliki left office reluctantly in 2014 after security forces crumbled and fled in the face of a lightning advance by Islamic State, which declared a medieval-style caliphate.
In 2015, an Iraqi parliamentary panel called for Al-Maliki and dozens of other top officials to stand trial over the fall of the northern city of Mosul to Islamic State.

MALIKI HAILS FROM POLITICALLY ENGAGED SOUTHERN IRAQI FAMILY
A little-known politician in Iraq before the US-led invasion, Al-Maliki was a compromise pick to lead a wobbly coalition government in 2006.
Initially seen as a Shiite Islamist, Maliki’s initial willingness to put aside sectarianism and quell violence was called into question in a leaked US government memo.
“Despite Maliki’s reassuring words, repeated reports from our commanders on the ground contributed to our concerns about Maliki’s government,” National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley wrote to President George W. Bush in the memo.
He went on to list problems including non-delivery of services to Sunni areas and the removal of Iraq’s most effective commanders on a sectarian basis.
Maliki was born in 1950 in Janaja, a southern village among date groves on the Euphrates, into a politically engaged family — his grandfather wrote poetry inciting rebellion against Iraq’s British occupiers and his father was a fervent Arab nationalist.
Maliki was briefly arrested in 1979 and then fled, narrowly escaping Saddam’s police. His family’s land was seized and dozens of his relatives were killed over the next decade. He did not see his home village again until after the 2003 invasion.
He became deputy head of the committee that purged former officials in Saddam’s widely feared Baath Party.