Nobel: The prize for peace that leaders go to war for

Special Nobel: The prize for peace that leaders go to war for
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, right, handed US President Donald Trump an envelope with a letter he reportedly sent to the Nobel committee during their July 7 meeting in the White House Blue Room. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 10 July 2025

Nobel: The prize for peace that leaders go to war for

Nobel: The prize for peace that leaders go to war for
  • Israeli PM’s nomination of Trump has reopened debate over the Nobel Peace Prize’s meaning and credibility
  • As Gaza burns and indictments loom, a wartime leader endorsing a recipient raises questions, says analyst

LONDON: In what supporters have called a symbol of solidarity and detractors a humiliating act of fealty, Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu this week revealed he had nominated Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize — an award long sought by the US president.

The decision by Netanyahu appears designed to help bolster ties between the two long-term allies and ease reported tensions over Israel’s 21-month-long war in Gaza and its bruising 12-day conflict with Iran last month.

Netanyahu presented the nomination letter to Trump at the White House on Monday, and was met with a look of surprise from the US president.

“It’s nominating you for the Peace Prize, which is well deserved, and you should get it,” Netanyahu said.

“Wow, coming from you, in particular, this is very meaningful. Thank you very much, Bibi,” Trump responded.

FASTFACTS:

• The Nobel Peace Prize was founded by Alfred Nobel, the inventor of dynamite.

• Regret over his invention partly drove Nobel to create the prize to promote peace.

• Carl von Ossietzky, Aung San Suu Kyi, and Liu Xiaobo, were imprisoned when awarded.

• The youngest Nobel Peace laureate is Malala Yousafzai, who received it in 2014 at age 17.

For Dania Koleilat Khatib, a specialist in US-Arab relations, Netanyahu’s decision to nominate the president rests on his desire to “do anything to court Trump.”

She told Arab News that Netanyahu arrived in Washington with a set of demands covering almost every regional file of interest to Israel: Syria, Turkiye, Gaza, the West Bank and Iran.

Netanyahu is also seeking US guarantees relating to arms supplies, especially after Iran’s ballistic missile barrages last month placed substantial pressure on Israeli air defense systems, Khatib said.

“He wants to show Trump that he is the best ally he can have; he also knows that Trump is really looking after getting the Nobel Peace Prize,” she added.




President Donald Trump looks at a document during a meeting with Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House on July 7, 2025, in Washington. (AP)

Trump has made no secret of his yearning for the prestigious prize, yet the nomination itself is only the first part of an extensive, secret process that winds up in the stately committee room of Oslo’s Nobel Institute.

The distinction and tradition of the Nobel name, however, is arguably a far cry from the reputation of Trump’s nominator.

Netanyahu, alongside former defense minister Yoav Gallant, is the subject of an arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court over allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity relating to the conduct of Israel’s military in Gaza.




Protesters demonstrate on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC., during Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's visit to the United States on July 24, 2024, amid Israel's war bombardment of civilian homes in Gaza on July 24, 2024. (AFP/File)

That fact would no doubt weigh on the minds of the five Norwegian Nobel Committee members who deliberate over the prize.

For Khatib, the ICC arrest warrant alone means that Netanyahu’s gesture is “worthless.”

She told Arab News: “I am not sure whether the nomination will be discarded but it is ironic that someone wanted by the ICC for alleged war crimes and potentially genocide nominates someone for the Nobel Peace Prize.”

GUIDELINES ON NOBEL NOMINATIONS

• Only nominees put forward by qualified nominators are considered.

• Self-nominations are not accepted.

• The prize may be awarded to individuals or organizations.

Upholding the reputation of the prize is a tall order, in part due to the strictness of its rules. The committee’s choice for the annual award effectively ties the Nobel name to the future reputation of any recipient. The Nobel Foundation’s Statutes also forbid the revocation of any award.

Aung San Suu Kyi, the Burmese icon of democracy, fell from grace over her treatment of the Rohingya Muslim minority in the decades since she was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1991.

Former US President Barack Obama was controversially awarded the prize just nine months into his first term, to the dismay of figures including Trump, who called on the institution to retract the award.

The decision to award Obama for “extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples” soon appeared foolish after it emerged the president had told aides, referring to his use of drone strikes: “Turns out I’m really good at killing people.”




US President Barack Obama delivers a speech after receiving the Nobel Peace Prize at the Oslo City Hall in Oslo, Norway, on December 10, 2009. (AFP)

The Nobel Committee’s then secretary, Geir Lundestad, later expressed regret over the decision. “Even many of Obama’s supporters believed that the prize was a mistake,” he said. “In that sense the committee didn’t achieve what it had hoped for.”

Khatib told Arab News that the most basic requirement of the prize is that the recipient contributes to peace.

“I personally don’t know why Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize,” she told Arab News. “What was the achievement for which he was awarded the prize?”

The Obama controversy may well have sparked Trump’s desire to win the prize. He has referred to the 2009 award numerous times since, and has regularly expressed frustration over an accomplishment that he feels has eluded him.




This photo taken on December 10, 2009, shows protesters from the group The World Can't Wait during a 'coffin march' against US President Barack Obama's Nobel Peace Prize after his announcement of a troop surge in Afghanistan. (Getty Images via AFP)

Netanyahu’s nomination of Trump, however, is only the most recent that the US leader has received. He was nominated separately by a group of House Republicans in the US and two Norwegian lawmakers for his work to defuse nuclear tensions with North Korea in 2018.

In 2021, Trump was also nominated by one of the two Norwegian lawmakers and a Swedish official for his peace efforts in the Middle East, including the Abraham Accords, which established formal relations between Israel and several Arab states.

Shinzo Abe, the late former prime minister of Japan, also nominated Trump in 2019.

Earlier this year, Pakistan said that it had nominated Trump for the prize in recognition of his work to end the country’s brief conflict with India. New Delhi later denied that Washington played a role in mediation.

WHO CAN NOMINATE

• Members of national assemblies and governments.

• Members of international courts.

• University rectors, professors, and directors of peace research or foreign policy institutes.

• Past laureates and board members of laureate organizations.

* Current and former Norwegian Nobel Committee members and former advisers.

Trump is also working toward a diplomatic solution to the Russia-Ukraine conflict, which has so far defied his negotiators.

A day after Monday’s White House meeting, Netanyahu’s office released a copy of the nomination letter — dated July 1 — seen by Trump.

“President Trump has demonstrated steadfast and exceptional dedication to promoting peace, security and stability around the world,” it said.

“In the Middle East, his efforts have brought about dramatic change and created new opportunities to expand the circle of peace and normalization.”




President Donald Trump was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize when Bahrain and the UAE signed the so-called Abraham Accords with Israel at the White House in Washington, DC, on September 15, 2020. (AFP/file)

The prime minister’s letter singled out the Abraham Accords as Trump’s “foremost achievement” in the region.

“These breakthroughs reshaped the Middle East and marked a historic advance toward peace, security and regional stability,” it said.

The description of the region as having experienced a historic advance toward peace will raise eyebrows in many parts of the Middle East.

IN NUMBERS:

• 142 Individuals and organizations have received the prize since 1901.

• 19 Women have been awarded.

• 28 Organizations received the award.

• 19 Years the prize was not awarded.

(Source: NobelPrize.org)

Yet the strange circumstances of an alleged war criminal acting as a peace prize nominator has parallels with the Nobel name’s own peculiar past.

The prizes were established through the will of Alfred Nobel, a Swedish chemist, inventor and industrialist who amassed a fortune after inventing and patenting dynamite. The explosive was rapidly adopted for industrial use but was also soon prized for its utility as a tool of warfare.

The first awards bearing the Nobel name were handed out just after the turn of the century in 1901, five years after the Swedish visionary had died.




Alfred Nobel built an explosives empire and left much of his fortune to fund the Nobel Prizes. (Getty Images)

They cover medicine, physics, chemistry, literature and peace. An economics prize was later established by the Swedish Central Bank in 1968, but it is not considered a Nobel prize in the same manner.

Nobel’s wishes were for the peace prize to go to “the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.”

The strict codification of Nobel’s will resulted in the Nobel Statutes, a set of rules followed by the Nobel Foundation, which oversees the secretive process behind the five prizes. Judges are forbidden from discussing their deliberations for half a century after they take place.

The peace committee is the sole Nobel prize body in Norway, and its five members are appointed by the country’s parliament.

Nominations for the revered prize can only be submitted by specific people and organizations, including heads of state, national politicians, academic professors and company directors, among others. It is forbidden for people to nominate themselves.

Prominent Arab politicians have been awarded the peace prize.

Yasser Arafat was given the award in 1994 for his efforts toward reaching a peaceful settlement to the Israel-Palestine conflict. In 1978, Egypt’s Anwar Sadat was recognized for signing the Camp David Accords, which were witnessed by Jimmy Carter, the US president at the time, who was later awarded the prize in 2002 for his work to promote human rights after leaving office.

For Trump, however, hopes for his long-desired prize will have to wait until next year; nominations must be submitted before February for the prize to be awarded in the same year.

At the time of publishing, the Nobel Committee had not commented on Netanyahu’s nomination, whether they had any reservations, or whether they would accept it.


UK could give police more powers to curb chants at Palestine rallies: Keir Starmer

UK could give police more powers to curb chants at Palestine rallies: Keir Starmer
Updated 12 sec ago

UK could give police more powers to curb chants at Palestine rallies: Keir Starmer

UK could give police more powers to curb chants at Palestine rallies: Keir Starmer
  • Prime minister backs Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood’s announcement of review into rules around protests
  • Rights groups warn crackdown could mark continuation of authoritarian turn by UK government

LONDON: The UK government could give powers to police to crack down on chants at pro-Palestine protests.

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer told reporters new measures drawn up by Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood to take into account the “cumulative” impact of demonstrations could go even further than initially announced.

It comes after protests across the UK in support of the Palestinian cause and the banned group Palestine Action, which the prime minister had called for not to go ahead after a terrorist attack at a synagogue in Manchester killed two people last week.

Mahmood called the decision to press on with the protests “un-British” and “dishonourable,” and said new powers would let police re-route or ban marches in future if deemed too disruptive. The Metropolitan Police said 492 people were arrested in London for their part in the protests.

“I’ve asked the home secretary to look more broadly at what other powers are available, how they’re being used and whether they should be changed in any way,” Starmer told reporters in Mumbai. Among the chants that could come under scrutiny are “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” and “globalise the intifada,” both of which have been interpreted by some as calls to kill Jewish people.

“I think we need to go further than that in relation to some of the chants that are going on at some of these protests,” Starmer said.

He added that police could even be allowed to take more action to curb protests of their own volition, including placing time limits on protests or curbing the number of attendees.

“That has to be part of the review that we carry into what powers do we have and how they’re being exercised. And then the question of do any of these powers therefore need to be changed or enhanced?

“And that’s the exercise we’re going through. But we are talking at length to leaders of the Jewish community about this, as you would expect.”

He added: “I think we need to review more broadly public order powers and there will be a series of actions that we will agree in due course across Whitehall.”

The prime minister wrote in The Times on the anniversary of the Oct. 7 attack on Israel by Hamas, which marked the start of Israeli operations in Gaza, that more would be done to tackle antisemitism in the UK.

“We will continue to fund the security of Jewish schools and synagogues and take every possible step to stand up to this hatred wherever it is found,” he said.

The announcement has been met with criticism from several human rights organizations.

Ben Jamal, director of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, said: “The British government is spending more time considering how to restrict protests against genocide than stopping its own complicity.

“We will resist their attempts to restrict our fundamental democratic rights — on Saturday we march in London once again.”

Defend Our Juries, the group behind the protest on behalf of Palestine Action, said the prime minister’s statement “shows what we’ve warned about all along: that proscribing Palestine Action would pave the way for further authoritarian crackdowns on our rights to free speech in this country.”

Sam Grant, director of external relations at Liberty, said new laws on protests “have severely weakened people’s rights, caused mass confusion, and led to some spending many years in prison for non-violent demonstrations.”

He added: “If the government is serious about reviewing protest laws, it must actually engage with groups and people most impacted by the policing of protests and build policy based on their experiences.

“The only possible conclusion is that protest laws and related police powers are already too restrictive and must be rolled back to protect people’s fundamental rights, not added to further.”


France’s Le Pen vows to block any government

France’s Le Pen vows to block any government
Updated 14 min 47 sec ago

France’s Le Pen vows to block any government

France’s Le Pen vows to block any government
  • France has been mired in political deadlock ever since Macron took the gamble last year of snap elections he had hoped would consolidate power
  • Le Pen’s far-right National Rally has urged Macron to call new snap polls, or resign

PARIS: France’s far-right leader Marine Le Pen said Wednesday she would thwart all action by any new government, throwing into doubt Prime Minister Sebastien Lecornu’s ability to solve the country’s deepening political crisis with a coalition cabinet.
President Emmanuel Macron is facing the worst domestic crisis of his mandate, with the clock ticking down to a deadline Wednesday evening for a working government to be formed.
Macron has to decide whether to appoint another prime minister or dissolve the lower house of parliament and call new legislative elections.
Lecornu, who resigned in a shock move on Monday, arrived at the Elysee Palace on Wednesday evening to report to Macron on his efforts to find cross-party compromise to pull the country out of the crisis.
He is set to interviewed on French television at 1800 GMT.
Macron himself had no plans to speak or issue a statement on Wednesday evening, sources told AFP.

- Political deadlock -
France has been mired in political deadlock ever since Macron took the gamble last year of snap elections he had hoped would consolidate power. Instead, they ended in a hung parliament and more seats for the far right.
Le Pen’s far-right National Rally — the single biggest party in parliament — has urged Macron to call new snap polls, or resign.
Earlier Wednesday, she pledged to make the life of any new cabinet impossible.
“I vote against everything,” the three-time presidential candidate said, after her group refused to take part in talks to end the crisis.
Speaking at a livestock fair in central France, she compared French political life to a “rodeo.”
Their idea is “how long can I hold on while the horse tries to throw me off?” the 57-year-old said.
Le Pen’s anti-immigration party senses its best ever chance of winning power in the next presidential elections due in 2027, with Macron barred from running.
Since the snap 2024 vote, the legislative chamber has toppled two prime ministers in a standoff over next year’s austerity budget.

- ‘Convergence’ -
Lecornu resigned on Monday after criticism of his new cabinet line-up.
But with public debt at an all-time high, Macron convinced him to stay on until Wednesday evening to try to break the impasse.
After meeting centrists and right-wing politicians, Lecornu said on Wednesday morning there had been consensus so far on “a desire to have a budget for France before December 31.”
He also reported a “convergence that pushes back the prospect of dissolution” of parliament, before meeting left-wing leaders.
If Lecornu cannot reach a solution, Macron said on Monday that he would “assume his responsibilities,” apparently referring to early parliamentary elections.
It was not clear if the Socialists, a key swing group in parliament, would be on board with any compromise.
Leaving the premier’s office, Socialist party leader Olivier Faure seemed disillusioned a deal would not include scrapping a deeply unpopular 2023 pensions reform.
Former prime minister Elizabeth Borne, now outgoing education minister, had said late Tuesday it could be on the table.
The measure to raise the age of retirement from 62 to 64, which she passed through parliament without a vote by using a controversial constitutional power, sparked months of angry protests.

- Far right leads in polls -
Macron is under huge pressure to end the protracted crisis, even from his former allies.
Macron’s former prime minister Edouard Philippe on Tuesday said early presidential polls should be held as soon as a budget was passed.
Macron, who was first elected in 2017, has repeatedly said he would serve until the end of his second term.
Le Pen is currently barred from standing in elections due to a corruption conviction that she is appealing.
But her anti-immigration National Rally leads voting intentions for a possible early presidential election, regardless of its candidate, a new poll published on Wednesday suggested.
The far-right party would come out well ahead in the first round, according to the Toluna Harris Interactive poll for broadcaster RTL.
If Le Pen’s protege 30-year-old Jordan Bardella ran, he would win 35 percent of the vote, followed by former centrist prime minister Edouard Phillipe with 16 percent.
The poll of 1,289 people was carried out on Tuesday with a margin of error of between 1.4 and 3.1 points.
Macron’s domestic isolation contrasts with his visibility on the international stage.
Last month he recognized Palestinian statehood and he is seeking to end Russia’s invasion of Ukraine together with US President Donald Trump.


Haiti children displaced by violence nearly double in a year, UNICEF says

Haiti children displaced by violence nearly double in a year, UNICEF says
Updated 23 min 13 sec ago

Haiti children displaced by violence nearly double in a year, UNICEF says

Haiti children displaced by violence nearly double in a year, UNICEF says
  • The agency estimates that over 6 million people now need humanitarian assistance
  • “Children in Haiti are experiencing violence and displacement at a terrifying scale,” said Russell

PORT-AU-PRINCE, Haiti: Spiraling violence in Haiti has displaced 680,000 children, nearly twice as many as a year ago, as armed groups tighten control and public services collapse, UNICEF said on Wednesday.
The agency estimates that over 6 million people — more than half the population, including 3.3 million children — now need humanitarian assistance.

WHY IT’S IMPORTANT
The surge in displacement, combined with deteriorating health and education services and rising gang violence, underscores the growing risks to millions of Haitians, particularly children.

KEY QUOTE
“Children in Haiti are experiencing violence and displacement at a terrifying scale,” said UNICEF Executive Director Catherine Russell.
“Each time they are forced to flee, they lose not only their homes but also their chance to go to school, and simply to be children.”

BY THE NUMBERS
According to UNICEF, more than 1 million children face critical levels of food insecurity. Around 288,500 children under age 5 are projected to suffer from acute malnutrition in 2025. Some 2.7 million people are living in areas controlled by armed groups, while internal displacement has climbed to 246,000 so far this year.
More than 1.3 million people have been forced from their homes, with children increasingly bearing the brunt of the crisis, the agency warned.

CONTEXT
Armed gangs have expanded their control across large parts of Haiti, overwhelming local police forces and pushing humanitarian groups to scale back operations. Last month, the UN Security Council approved a US-backed plan to expand an international security mission deployed to support Haitian authorities. The force, launched more than 15 months ago, remains short on funding, personnel and equipment.

WHAT’S NEXT
UNICEF is urging immediate international funding to expand life-saving aid, including shelter, health care, education and clean water. Its appeal remains severely underfunded, threatening critical programs for Haiti’s children.


UK universities accused of monitoring students’ social media for arms firms

UK universities accused of monitoring students’ social media for arms firms
Updated 41 min 2 sec ago

UK universities accused of monitoring students’ social media for arms firms

UK universities accused of monitoring students’ social media for arms firms
  • According to Liberty Investigates, 37 out of 154 UK universities launched disciplinary proceedings against pro-Gaza student and staff activists between October 2023 and March 2025

LONDON: Several British universities assured major defense companies that they would monitor students’ chat groups and social media accounts amid fears of campus protests, according to newly released emails.

under freedom of information laws show that Loughborough, Heriot-Watt, and Glasgow universities responded to concerns raised by firms including Rolls-Royce, Raytheon UK, and BAE Systems ahead of careers fairs.

At Loughborough, officials told a recruitment firm hosting a “Rolls-Royce roadshow” that security teams were carrying out “active monitoring of social media to provide early intelligence about protests,” adding that “protest has been a concern for employers in recent times.”

A university spokesperson said previous masked demonstrations by the Loughborough Action for Palestine group had left some students feeling unsafe amid allegations of antisemitism.

“We observe the group’s public feed occasionally so as to forewarn those who may be affected in advance of any protests. We are unapologetic for this. We do not surveil students’ social media,” the spokesperson said.

In response, LAFP said: “We are extremely concerned but unsurprised that a few peaceful protests on campus have been perceived as threats to student safety and have been weaponised to ‘justify’ surveillance of students by university management.”

Emails from Heriot-Watt University suggest Raytheon UK asked it to “monitor university chat groups” before a visit, with the institution agreeing to “implement the measures you have suggested.”

A spokesperson for Heriot-Watt said the university “strongly refuted” any claims it monitored students’ private correspondence, adding that safeguarding staff had no access to private chat groups or forums.

Further correspondence indicates that BAE Systems required the University of Glasgow to complete a “security questionnaire” before attending events, asking if it was “aware of any social media protests posts or videos.”

In May, Glasgow’s careers staff met representatives from defense firm Leonardo, whose employee later wrote: “It’s reassuring to know that we’re not going to have the (sic) step back because we can’t find a route to engaging with students and keep (sic) our staff safe.”

In a separate case, Cardiff University moved a careers event online “in agreement with BAE” after spotting a social media post calling for a protest.

A Cardiff spokesperson said: “We reject the suggestion that we’ve put students ‘under surveillance.’ The protest was posted on a public-facing social media account. This was picked up as part of our day-to-day media monitoring.”

The statement added: “We routinely monitor mentions of Cardiff University, including those made on social media platforms, to measure engagement with our communications activity and in relation to reputation management. This type of activity is not unique to Cardiff University and is used by other universities and organisations.”

Jo Grady, general secretary of the University and College Union, criticized the practice, saying: “Student protesters should be supported by their universities, not surveilled by them. It is utterly shameful that so many universities have spent time and resources surveilling students who are engaged in peaceful protest against a genocide, and that some have seemingly done so on the say-so of defence companies.”

The Association of University Chief Security Officers, which represents security staff at more than 140 universities, also confirmed it had coordinated efforts to prevent protests “affecting our students’ career advancement.”

Notes from a January 2025 presentation to Universities UK said members “monitor(ed) media/social media” and used “static officers (at entrance points near the targeted company)” and “mobile officers (to monitor surrounding areas and for rapid response)” during events.

According to Liberty Investigates, 37 out of 154 UK universities launched disciplinary proceedings against pro-Gaza student and staff activists between October 2023 and March 2025, with up to 200 people affected.


French court sets November ruling in Sarkozy campaign finance appeal

French court sets November ruling in Sarkozy campaign finance appeal
Updated 08 October 2025

French court sets November ruling in Sarkozy campaign finance appeal

French court sets November ruling in Sarkozy campaign finance appeal
  • Sarkozy has been embroiled in legal problems since losing the 2012 presidential election
  • In November, Sarkozy will learn if his conviction is overturned or confirmed

PARIS: France’s top court said Wednesday it will rule in November on embattled former president Nicolas Sarkozy’s final appeal over illegal campaign financing in 2012, in a case that could cement his second criminal conviction.
Sarkozy, who remains an influential figure on the right, has been embroiled in legal problems since losing the 2012 presidential election.
Last month, Sarkozy was sentenced to five years in prison over a scheme for late Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi to fund his 2007 presidential run. He will be the first French postwar leader to serve jail time.
Sarkozy has denied the charges and appealed that conviction, though under French law his sentence will be implemented even as his appeal plays out. He will learn on Monday when his prison term will begin.
Separately, the right-wing politician in 2021 received a one-year jail sentence in the so-called “Bygmalion affair” for the financing of his 2012 presidential campaign.
An appeals court in 2024 confirmed the conviction but lightened his sentence to six months with another six months suspended. He has appealed that ruling.
In November, Sarkozy will learn if his conviction is overturned or confirmed.
On Wednesday, the country’s highest appeals court examined his final appeal in the case.
If the Court of Cassation upholds Sarkozy’s conviction in its ruling expected on November 26 — as demanded by the prosecutor’s office at the hearing Wednesday — he will serve a six-month term with an electronic bracelet.
The former head of state was sentenced on charges that his right-wing party worked with a public relations firm, Bygmalion, to hide the true cost of his 2012 re-election bid.
Prosecutors said Sarkozy spent nearly 43 million euros on his 2012 campaign, almost double the permitted amount of 22.5 million euros.
Sarkozy has accused Bygmalion of having enriched itself behind his back and dismissed the allegations against him as “lies.”
His lawyers on Wednesday reiterated that stance.
“Nothing was materially established by the court of appeal regarding active involvement of President Sarkozy” in the overspending of campaign accounts, said one of Sarkozy’s lawyers, Emmanuel Piwnica.
Sarkozy’s latest hearing comes at a sensitive moment for France, with the country thrown into uncertainty by the shock resignation of Prime Minister Sebastien Lecornu after less than a month in power.