Gulf diplomacy with Iran helped limit conflict with Israel, Middle East experts say
Pursuit of pragmatic relations between GCC nations and Tehran prevented fighting from escalating âout of handâ
Trump-brokered peace agreement offers âopportunitiesâ for further steps toward regional security, according to academics specializing on the region
LONDON: Improved relations between Arab Gulf countries and Iran helped contain the recent conflict with Israel, Middle East experts said on Wednesday during a discussion about regional developments.
Israel attacked Iran on June 13 with airstrikes targeting its nuclear program and military sites. Iran retaliated during the 12-day conflict by launching salvos of missiles toward Israeli cities.
Many feared the war might escalate, dragging in other countries in the region, especially after the US joined the airstrikes on June 22 by dropping bombs on key Iranian nuclear sites.
While Iran did retaliate against the US by attacking Al-Udeid airbase in Qatar on June 23, President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire two days later, and Iran has refrained from attacking other US targets in the region.
When the war started, Gulf countries condemned Israelâs attacks on Iran and called for deescalation. There has been a shift in the region in recent years away from an adversarial relationship with Iran to one of more pragmatic relations, cemented by a Chinese-brokered agreement between Riyadh and Tehran in March 2023.
âThat reintegration of Iran into the Gulf security complex has played a really prominent role in preventing this from getting out of hand,â Simon Mabon, a professor of international politics and director of the SEPAD peace and conflict research center at Lancaster University, said during a discussion about developments in the Middle East this year.
This approach showed Gulf states building a regional security architecture from the inside that is âinclusive,â he added. It is viewed as a more âpragmatic and more sustainable way of building a longer-term form of prosperity,â and the approach speaks to șÚÁÏÉçÇűâs Vision 2030 reforms program and the economic pragmatism of Gulf states, he added during the online event organized by SEPAD and the Foreign Policy Centre in London.
Eyad Alrefai, a lecturer in political science at King Abdulaziz University in Jeddah and a SEPAD fellow, said the efforts to forge new relationships between Gulf countries and Iran meant that the nations had been able to âmanage their differences diplomatically,â and this included economic issues.
There had been less Iranian interference in the domestic affairs of GCC countries, and also in the wider Arab region, he added. This included Iranâs decision not to get involved in Syria when President Bashar Assad, an Iranian ally, was removed from power by opposition fighters in December last year.
The Westâs position on the Iran-Israel conflict, largely seen to be one of support of Israel, was symptomatic of the fact that those countries continue to adopt a âtacticalâ outlook toward the region rather than a strategic one, Alrefai said. He urged those countries to engage with the Middle East as a socioeconomic, sustainable project moving forward.
If the truce between Iran and Israel continues to hold, many see the end of the brief war as a potential opportunity for more stability in the region.
Lina Khatib, an associate fellow at Chatham Houseâs Middle East and North Africa Program, said there was âa real possibility for an integrated economic and security and political partnershipâ to emerge. She said a weakened Iran also opens up the chance to restart the Israeli-Palestinian peace process.
Trump said on Tuesday that Israel had agreed to the terms of a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza, where more than 57,000 Palestinians have been killed during a devastating military campaign launched by Israeli authorities in response to the Hamas-led attacks against Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, during which 1,200 people were killed and dozens taken hostage.
Khatib said a shift in domestic Israeli politics, with pressure from Trump, could reopen a pathway toward a long-term agreement between Israel and Palestine. This would also lead to further normalization of relations between Israel and Arab countries, she added.
âThis will in turn encourage the flow of funding to places like Lebanon and Syria for reconstruction, which could only be good news for these countries economically, but also will help with stability,â Khatib said.
âHaving a stable region is very much in the interest of countries in the Gulf as well.â
Clive Jones, a professor of regional security and director of the Institute for Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies at Durham University, said Israel had scored a huge win against Iran but ran the risk of failing to convert it into a diplomatic opportunity.
âThe challenge for Israel now is how you actually cash in those military gains for diplomatic advantage,â he said.
âI think Israel is actually missing a huge opportunity, for example by not engaging more proactively with the new regime in Syria.â
He said Israelâs reliance on its military superiority would not be enough to secure long-term security.
US sanctions on key Indian project in Iran take effect
Move reflects Washingtonâs willingness to punish longstanding partner New Delhi in quest to pressure TehranÂ
Sanctions target Iranâs Chabahar port, billed as alternate gateway to Afghanistan that bypasses Indiaâs rival Pakistan
Updated 13 sec ago
AFP
WASHINGTON: US sanctions went into effect Monday on a major Indian port project in Iran, as President Donald Trump again showed his willingness to punish longstanding partner New Delhi in aid of his wider regional goals â in this case to pressure Tehran.
The sanctions on the Chabahar port come a day after wide UN sanctions also came back into force on Iran, as Trump, European allies and Israel have all targeted the country over its nuclear program.
The first Trump administration issued a rare exemption in 2018 to allow Indian companies to keep developing Chabahar when the United States imposed sweeping unilateral sanctions on Iran, whose main port at Bandar Abbas is overcapacity.
But much has changed since 2018. Kabul was then still controlled by a government backed by Washington, the European Union and India, who viewed Pakistanâs role in Afghanistan with suspicion, accusing it of having ties to the Taliban.
Chabahar had been billed as an alternate gateway to Afghanistan, bypassing Pakistan, which has long controlled the lionâs share of transit trade into Afghanistan.
The Taliban retook control of Afghanistan in 2021, as US forces withdrew under a peace deal signed by Trump.
The US president has also broken with decades of US deference to India, in which his predecessors declined to press New Delhi on disagreements as they saw the rising power as a counterweight to China.
Trump, who appeared peeved after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi declined to praise him over a ceasefire in a four-day conflict with Pakistan, has imposed major tariffs on India due to its purchases of oil from Russia.
State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott announced the end of the sanctions exemption on Chabahar in an earlier statement that said it was effective September 29.
The decision is âconsistent with President Trumpâs maximum pressure policy to isolate the Iranian regimeâ and the exemption had been made âfor Afghanistan reconstruction assistance and economic development,â Pigott said.
INDIA WEIGHS NEXT MOVE
Under US law, companies including state-run India Ports Global Limited will have 45 days to exit Chabahar or risk having any US-based assets frozen and US transactions barred.
Joshua Kretman, a counsel at law firm Dentons who formerly worked on sanctions at the State Department, said any inclusion of an Indian firm on the sanctioned list âhas the potential to create a kind of cascading effect where banks and other companies may not transact with the designated business.â
âIf that sanctioned entity operates globally, needs access to major banks or dollar clearing, there is legitimate reason for concern,â he said.
Commenting on the decision, Indian foreign ministry spokesman Randhir Jaiswal said only: âWe are presently examining the implications that this revocation has for India.â
Despite the closing of Afghanistan, India last year signed a 10-year contract in which the state-run India Ports Global Limited (IPGL) promised $370 million of investment in Chabahar.
The port remains strategic for India as it lies near the border with longtime adversary Pakistan, in the troubled Balochistan region.
Barely 200 kilometers (125 miles) away on the Pakistani side, China is building a major port in Gwadar, which will give Beijing major new access into the Arabian Sea and Indian Ocean.
Chabahar âhas strategic value for India: regional connectivity with Iran and Afghanistan and the Middle East without being held backâ by âfriction with Pakistan,â said Aparna Pande, a research fellow at the Hudson Institute.
But India is always careful not to violate sanctions, she said.
âAt a time when there is an American administration which is imposing sanctions and tariffs as punitive action, India will likely adopt a wait-and-watch approach,â she said.
India begrudgingly stopped buying Iranian oil after Trump imposed sanctions in his first term.
Nonetheless Kadira Pethiyagoda, a geopolitical strategist who has written on Indian foreign policy, said that India could use Iran ties as âleverage in its dealings with the US, Gulf states and Israel.â
âIndia may choose to wear the sanctions as part of a broader effort among non-Western Great Powers, including China and Russia, to reduce reliance on the US economy and decouple from Western-controlled financial networks,â he said.
Libyan coast guard chase in the Mediterranean leaves 1 migrant dead, says NGO
Sea-Watch argues that Italyâs requirement for permission from the Libyan coast guard for rescue operations violates international law
Updated 30 September 2025
AP
ROME: The German nongovernmental organization Sea-Watch said on Monday that one migrant drowned and three others were rescued in the Mediterranean off the Libyan coast after their dinghy capsized during a chase by the Libyan coast guard.
On Sunday, a patrol boat from the Libyan coast guard intercepted a crowded dinghy carrying around 30 people off the Libyan coast, intending to return them to Libya, according to the NGO, which filmed the scene from its aircraft. The boat then tried to resist and flee, causing four people to fall into the water due to high waves.
âOne person drowned under the eyes of our air crew ⊠the person was basically abandoned at sea and all the other survivors were at first rescued by a merchant vessel which was in the surroundings,â Sea-Watch spokesperson Giorgia Linardi told The Associated Press. The survivors were then transferred to the Libyan coast guard patrol vessels and brought back to Libya, she added.
The Tripoli-based government and the Libyan coast guard didnât respond to a request for comment.
Linardi also noted that these kinds of incidents are commonplace in the Libyan search-and-rescue area. However, this was one of the rare ones captured on video.
Mondayâs incident follows a previous one, in which the vessel Sea-Watch 5 came under fire while rescuing 66 people at sea earlier this month. âAt night, we were threatened by a Libyan militia vessel and ordered to leave their waters. Minutes after everyone was safely on board, a shot was fired,â the group said.
Sea-Watch argues that Italyâs requirement for permission from the Libyan coast guard for rescue operations violates international law. This is because the Libyan coast guard usually forces migrants back to Libya, a country not recognized as safe by Italian courts.
Italian authorities have accused Sea-Watch crews and other NGOs of being uncooperative with the Libyan coast guard, which is responsible for coordinating search and rescue efforts in the region.
Italyâs tough policies at illegal migration â pushed by right-wing Premier Giorgia Meloni â have also included the detention of rescue ships for extended periods.
How farming in the West Bank became a battle for survival and an act of resistance
Since the Gaza war began, Israeli restrictions and settler attacks have barred Palestinian farmers from vast tracts of land
For Palestinians, farming amid violence and restrictions is an existential act, asserting identity, sovereignty, and the right to remain
Updated 30 September 2025
ANAN TELLO
LONDON: Abu Hassan was born in 1950 among the olive shrubs that his family had planted shortly after they were uprooted by the 1948 war. When he died last June, he was clutching a broken cane carved from the wood of those same trees.
His family says he died of âqahrâ â heartbreak and oppression.
Before his death at age 75, Abu Hassan spent his life in Deir Istiya, a village in the northern West Bank where his family resettled after displacement.
A Palestinian farmer checks on spoiled plants in a maize field in the area of al-Hijreh near the village of Dura west of Hebron in the occupied West Bank on August 24, 2023. (AFP)
They bought land near Kafr Qara, planted olive trees, and raised livestock. The groves became a symbol of endurance, passed down like an inheritance.
That land was Abu Hassanâs pride and joy, as was his cherished cane, which he inherited from his father. But year by year, life on the land had become intolerable.
Local activists told Arab News that Israeli settlers, some as young as 12, regularly harassed Abu Hassan and his family.
INNUMBERS
3.5k+
Palestinian structures demolished, confiscated, or sealed since Oct. 2023.
3k+
Settler attacks against Palestinians during that same period.
38k+
Palestinians displaced across the West Bank.
They hurled insults, beat him, dumped his food, stormed his home, and unleashed their dog in the spring that his family used for drinking water. When the municipality tried to bring him fresh water, settlers allegedly destroyed the pipelines.
Still, Abu Hassan and his children refused to retaliate, fearing any response would result in their eviction. Their resistance was simply to remain.
People check the damage in an agricultural installation owned by a Palestinian farmer, following an attack by Israeli settlers in the village of Sinjil, north of the occupied West Bank city of Ramallah on April 23, 2025. (AFP)
On June 20, witnesses say a 13-year-old settler snatched Abu Hassanâs cane and broke it in two. Moments later, Abu Hassan collapsed from a heart attack, still gripping the splintered wood.
His death encapsulates the broader reality faced by thousands of Palestinian families in the Israeli-occupied West Bank.
Since the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas-led attack against Israel triggered the war in Gaza, Israeli restrictions and settler violence have escalated.
Israeli soldiers stand guard as Palestinian farmers leave their land after they were attacked by Israeli settlers as they farmed in Salem village east of Nablus in the occupied West Bank on November 28, 2024. (AFP)
Those pressures have prevented Palestinian farmers from reaching farmland and pasture. What was once a season of harvest has become a period of uncertainty.
The UN human rights office, OHCHR, warned in August that such restrictions are devastating the local economy and displacing thousands of farmers and herders, creating what it called âconditions that may amount to forcible transfer.â
The olive harvest is not only a cornerstone of the economy but also an essential part of Palestinian heritage. Yet for many farmers, livelihoods have been cut off entirely.
This yearâs harvest season is marked by uncertainty and livelihoods are under unprecedented risk, says Ciro Fiorillo, FAOâs head of office in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. (Supplied)
One of them is Hashem, whose name has been changed for his safety. His land near El-Matan, an illegal Israeli settlement, was his sole source of income.
Locals told Arab News that settlers harassed him and then occupied part of his property under the pretext of creating a nature reserve.
Since October 2023, Hashem has been barred from reaching his fields. The fate of the 300 olive trees he inherited from his father is uncertain.
Israeli soldiers stand guard as Israeli troops deny access to Palestinian farmers to harvest olives, in Burqa near Ramallah in the Israeli-occupied West Bank October 20, 2024. (REUTERS)
Experts say his case is far from unique. Fuad Abu Saif, an expert in agriculture and development, likened the situation in the occupied Palestinian territories to an âopen-air prison.â
He cited systematic settler violence; military checkpoints and the separation barrier that block access to fields; confiscations and bulldozing under the guise of âmilitary zonesâ or settlement expansion; and water deprivation, âeven in times of severe drought.â
Abu Saif told Arab News: âDuring last yearâs olive harvest, hundreds of families were denied access to their groves behind the wall, while farmers in Hebron and Ramallah endured armed settler attacks that destroyed thousands of trees.
Palestinians check a car burned by Israeli settlers during clashes near Ramallah in the Israeli-occupied West Bank May 26, 2023. (REUTERS)
âThis year, under the (Gaza) war, such assaults have doubled, forming part of a deliberate policy to drive Palestinians off their land.â
The separation barrier, dubbed the âapartheid wallâ by Palestinians and rights groups, cuts deep into the West Bank.
Although Israel says it follows the pre-1967 Green Line, about 85 percent of the wall runs inside Palestinian territory, isolating towns, farmland and residential areas, according to the UN.
A demonstrator takes part in a protest in support of Palestinian farmers and against Israeli settlements, in Beita, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank October 10, 2021. (REUTERS)
âThe main constraint farmers face now is severe restriction of access to Area C and to agricultural activity there,â Eng. H. Barakat, a food security expert, told Arab News.
âRestrictions differ by location. In some areas, farmers cannot access land because it is declared a military zone (for firing drills or operations).
âIn other areas, settlers control access and prevent Palestinian farmers from going there; if farmers do go, settlers may burn crops or damage infrastructure.â
A boy looks at Israeli soldiers during a protest in support of Palestinian farmers and against Israeli settlements, in Beita, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, October 10, 2021. (Reuters)
Area C constitutes about 61 percent of the occupied West Bank, and it is home to the majority of agricultural lands. This area remains under full Israeli control.
Diana Mardi, a field researcher with the Israeli nongovernmental organization Bimkom, Planners for Planning Rights, says Palestinian farmers face both physical and bureaucratic barriers, from settler violence to military orders blocking access to their land.
Settlers seize farms by claiming them as âstate land,â sometimes erecting physical barriers or structures, making even privately owned land inaccessible, she told Arab News.
A fire blazes in an olive grove in the village of Salem, east of Nablus in the occupied West Bank on May 25, 2025, after Israeli settlers reportedly started a fire near the road to the Israeli settlement of Alon Moreh, according to eyewitnesses and the local village council. (AFP)
âLand takeovers take many forms â some overt, like visible construction and barriers, and others covert, such as bureaucratic restrictions or intimidation that prevent landowners from accessing private plots.
âEven when land is privately owned, Palestinians may be blocked from reaching it,â she said, adding that even where there are no tangible restrictions, âsettlersâ violence in itself is enough reason not to access the lands.â
In some cases, settlers are directly enabled by authorities.
Palestinian farmer Ahmad Khalil reacts as he stands amid the charred remains of his agricultural installation, following an attack by Israeli settlers in the village of Sinjil, north of the occupied West Bank city of Ramallah on April 23, 2025. (AFP)
In Oyoun Kafr Qara, or Arab Al-Khawleh, activists said officials brought in a settler identified as Ben Shai and provided him with 85 cows. They say the herd roams freely through Palestinian olive groves, destroying trees and crops.
âWhat the cows donât eat or trample, Ben Shai and his companions damage themselves,â local activists told Arab News.
Before the Gaza war began, Palestinians were sometimes granted limited permits to reach land inside or near settlements â one or two times a year for planting or harvesting. Now access has become nearly impossible.
Palestinians run for cover from a stun grenade as Israeli troops deny access to farmers to harvest olives, in Burqa near Ramallah in the Israeli-occupied West Bank October 20, 2024. (REUTERS)
âEven reaching lands that are technically under Palestinian control can be made difficult by barriers and checkpoints placed by the army,â Mardi said.
Israeli officials consistently deny that security forces turn a blind eye to settler violence or target Palestinian farmers without justification, arguing that operations and restrictions in the West Bank are necessary responses to security threats and attacks against Israelis.
The Israel Defense Forces say the ongoing âIron Wallâ operation is aimed at dismantling militant infrastructure, preventing attacks, and defending Israeli civilians and settlements from terrorist factions.
Israeli government spokespeople have called settler violence âunacceptableâ and say perpetrators are pursued where evidence supports prosecution, but stress these are isolated events that do not reflect state policy.
The economic fallout for Palestinians is nevertheless severe. Many villages depend on agriculture, especially since Israel has tightened restrictions on movement.
âBefore the war, there were periods when working in Israel was common (for Palestinians) and encouraged, which led some to move away from farming,â Mardi said.
However, this option âis gone for many, so people are returning to family land as a last resort to recover losses and survive economically.â
Palestinians are now often denied entry permits, leaving many without work. âTo recover financially, people returned to their land to plant and harvest,â she said.
However, since October 2023, Palestinian farming has been treated as a form of provocation.
âIn the early days of the ongoing Gaza war, some settlers treated any Palestinian agricultural activity as if it were a political or celebratory act tied to the conflict,â Mardi said.
âPalestinians return to their land because it is their right and because it is their livelihood. For Palestinian farmers, the land is a sacred inheritance from their fathers and grandfathers, and they will protect it even with their blood.
âCultivating it is not only a way of life but also a symbol of duty and belonging â to the land and to themselves.
âFor Palestinians, working the land is not provocation â it is survival and the exercise of a legal and economic right.â
Abu Saif agrees that farming is both an economic necessity and a statement of resilience. âThey continue to farm because farming itself is a statement of survival and resistance,â he said.
âFor us, protecting agriculture is not only about food; it is about sovereignty, dignity, and the future of Palestine.â
Yet Palestinian farmers face another challenge: the climate crisis.
âRepeated droughts, rising temperatures, and declining rainfall have hit wheat, barley, and olive yields hard,â said Abu Saif. âWith Israel controlling water, farmers are left unable to adapt.
âIn the Jordan Valley last year alone, cereal crops lost more than 35 percent due to water shortages. Occupation policies of âthirstâ make climate change an even sharper tool of control.â
Barakat agreed that climate stress is compounding hardships.
âLast year, rainfall was very poor, and the expected olive season in 2025 may be less than 20 percent of the average,â he said. âDroughts, occasional floods, and early severe winters also hurt crops, and farmers are often not allowed to build terraces or other protective measures.â
The World Health Organization says the West Bankâs mean annual temperature could rise by 4.4 degrees Celsius by the end of the century, annual rainfall could fall by about 30 percent, while droughts could grow more frequent and severe.
Under these combined pressures, local and international bodies have become lifelines for Palestinian farmers.
âDespite these conditions, cooperatives and national networks have been crucial to sustaining farmers,â said Abu Saif. âThe Union of Agricultural Work Committees, through its Solidarity Shields volunteer campaign, has provided collective protection during the olive harvest.â
He added that local cooperatives have revived community seed exchanges, protecting food sovereignty against what he described as âattempts by the occupation to impose imported and genetically modified seeds.
âThis solidarity has allowed families to stay rooted,â he said. âIn the northern Jordan Valley, for example, dozens of families worked collectively to harvest threatened lands, defying fear and settler intimidation.â
Still, experts caution that such efforts cannot replace systematic support.
Barakat said NGOs have become the primary players on the ground as the Palestinian Authority faces a financial crisis. âInternational, national and UN agencies are offering support, but often without a sustainability approach,â he said.
Because long-term projects such as permanent farm roads, new wells or durable infrastructure are often blocked, aid is usually limited to short-term supplies â tools, fodder, and mobile or plastic water tanks that can be removed if demolition orders or settler attacks occur.
Institutional barriers add another layer. Mardi said NGOs and security institutions âface major hurdles when trying to help, and military security claims often shut down discussion.â
Still, she said, âmany farmers are motivated to return because the land is theirs, it provides for their families, and there are few alternatives.â While some have given up, others continue to risk their lives to feed their children.
Barakat observed that younger generations, who are finding work in Israel or settlements increasingly unsustainable, are also turning to farming.
âCasual day labor in cities is irregular, and many government employees are not receiving salaries,â he said. âFor many families, farming is the only source of income after other options collapsed.â
That return to the land, some argue, is more than economic. Some even see farming now as a form of resistance and a shield against land confiscation, Barakat said.
Abu Saif agrees.
âWhen our people in Gaza are subjected to a documented genocide and the West Bank faces an unprecedented campaign of ethnic cleansing, farming is no longer only an economic or social activity â it has become an existential national act, tied to our right to land and survival.
âInitiatives like Peasant Seed Producers re-engage young people with seeds and soil, while new urban farming projects in cities like Jenin and Bethlehem prove that agriculture is not confined to rural areas â it is part of a larger project of sovereignty, even inside urban spaces.â
For Palestinians, Abu Saif says farming is about identity as much as livelihood. âDespite the possibility of destruction tomorrow, the farmer continues to plant an olive tree as a declaration of presence,â he said.
âAfter their crops are torched, we have seen farmers return the next day to replant. Families haul water across long distances to irrigate a few dunums in the Jordan Valley â not for profit, but to affirm their right to remain.
âLand is the last anchor of a people under assault. Defending it through cultivation is a form of national struggle.â
Babies in Gaza City incubators at risk as Israeli assault intensifies: UNICEF
In Gaza City, there are more babies than incubators, and some of them are sharing, he said, adding that Israel had denied some requests to import more. Pires said he saw four in one incubator last month
Updated 29 September 2025
Reuters
GENEVA: The UN childrenâs charity called on Monday for an immediate evacuation to save at least 25 ill or premature babies in incubators in Gaza City as Israel steps up its ground offensive, shelling a hospital housing around half of them.
Palestinian health officials say tanks are surrounding the area near Al-Helo Hospital, where at least 12 babies are in incubators.
Medics said the site was shelled. Video obtained by Reuters showed hospital rooms and beds there strewn with debris. âIt is time to move them because Gaza City again has become a combat zone, but moving them where? There is no safe place for them to go,â said UNICEF spokesperson Ricardo Pires.
Evacuation of the babies, many of them newborns, will mean moving them to makeshift carts, wrapped in blankets with portable oxygen supplies and drips, Pires said.
Still, they could be exposed to infection, variable temperatures, or supplies could run out during the transfer.
âMoving them seems like the best option we have now ... but at the same time, itâs a very risky one.â
Pires was in Gaza City last month, where he saw one of the babies â a premature girl named Narges who, he said, had been removed from the womb of her dead mother, who had been shot in the head.
âWeâre very concerned not only about her, but all the other babies,â he said, saying efforts to reach her father and her doctors since the shelling had been unsuccessful.
In Gaza City, there are more babies than incubators, and some of them are sharing, he said, adding that Israel had denied some requests to import more. Pires said he saw four in one incubator last month.
Hundreds of thousands of Gazans have been displaced by the offensive on Gazaâs famine-struck north, where shortages are worsening.
Israel has said it will not halt fighting unless Hamas frees all hostages and permanently surrenders. The assault on Gaza City has worsened a dire humanitarian crisis that has increased Israelâs international isolation.
Several Western countries, including Britain and France have recognized Palestinian independence, defying Israeli objections.
Israeli tanks advanced on Monday to within a few hundred meters of Gaza Cityâs main Al-Shifa Hospital, where doctors say hundreds of patients were still being treated despite Israeli orders to leave.
Israel has said it will not halt fighting unless Hamas frees all hostages and permanently surrenders its weapons.
Hamas says it is willing to free its hostages in return for an end to the war, but will not give up its arms as long as Palestinians are still fighting for a state.
In Israelâs latest offensive, troops have flattened Gaza City neighborhoods, dynamiting buildings which they said were used by Hamas.
Hundreds of thousands of residents have fled, though many say there is nowhere to go. Israel has told them to head south, where other cities have already been razed.
The military said in a Monday statement it was continuing to target militant groups.
Medics said the military had killed at least 18 people across Gaza on Monday, most of them in Gaza City.
Previous ceasefire efforts have fallen apart due to a failure to bridge the gaps between Israel and Hamas.
Netanyahuâs far-right allies in the Israeli government want the war to continue until Hamas has been defeated. But the Gaza City offensive is also a source of domestic political tension, with families of hostages saying it is time to seek a peace deal to bring their loved ones home.
The Hostages Families Forum, representing many relatives of those held captive in Gaza, sent a letter to Trump ahead of his meeting with Netanyahu, urging him not to let anyone sabotage the deal he is putting forward to end the war.
âThe stakes are too high, and our families have waited too long for any interference to derail this progress,â they wrote.
UN Security Council meets on Palestine as Trump, Netanyahu hold talks
US Ambassador Mike Waltz stands as lone voice in support of Israel
UN official: âAlarmingâ violence in West Bank while Gaza âbeyond breaking pointâ
Updated 29 September 2025
Caspar Webb
NEW YORK: The US ambassador to the UN stood as a lone voice in support of Israel on Monday, as he repeated accusations that the countries that recognized Palestine last week had ârewarded Hamas.â
Mike Waltz was addressing a UN Security Council meeting on the situation in the Middle East as US President Donald Trump was set to meet Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House.
Waltz accused the UNSC of having an âobsessive focusâ on Israel. âThe US continues to work tirelessly to free all 48 hostages and end the war ⊠If we want to end the war, we need to place accountability where it belongs, with the terrorist organization known as Hamas,â he said.
âMembers of this body rewarded Hamas for its horrible atrocities, including Oct. 7, by unilaterally recognizing a Palestinian state.â
Hamas âsees actions like that as winning and as a win for them,â Waltz said, calling on the council and UN member states to âpressure Hamas to end the bloodshed.â
A stable West Bank âkeeps Israel secure, and is in line with this administrationâs goal to achieve peace in the region,â Waltz said.
Last week, Trump reportedly promised Arab and Muslim leaders at a closed-door UN meeting that the US will not allow Israel to annex the West Bank.
In Mondayâs meeting, Ramiz Alakbarov, the UNâs deputy special coordinator for the Middle East peace process, outlined the status of Resolution 2334, adopted in 2016, which calls for an end to Israeli settlement building in the Occupied Territories, among other stipulations.
This year, from June 18 to Sept. 19, Israeli planning authorities advanced or approved about 20,810 housing units in the West Bank, including in East Jerusalem, he said.
âDemolitions and seizures of Palestinian-owned structures also accelerated ⊠Israeli authorities demolished, seized or forced people to demolish 455 structures in the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem, displacing 420 people, including 175 children and 118 women,â he added.
During the same period, Gazaâs Health Ministry reported the deaths of at least 7,579 Palestinians and at least 37,201 injured, mostly women and children, Alakbarov said.
Despite the worldâs focus on events in Gaza, violence in the West Bank is continuing âat an alarming rate,â he added.
Alakbarov described a series of incidents across cities in the West Bank, notably Tulkarem and Jenin, in which large-scale operations by Israeli forces killed Palestinian children.
âAfter 23 months of fighting, the humanitarian situation in Gaza is beyond breaking point,â he added.
Alakbarov shared the views of UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on the implementation of Resolution 2334.
âIsraeli settlement expansion continues to accelerate alongside the proliferation of outposts and steps in the Israeli Knesset (parliament) promoting the annexation of the West Bank,â Guterres said.
âIsraeli settlements have no legal validity and constitute a flagrant violation of international law and UN resolutions.
âTheyâre systematically shrinking the territory of the Palestinian state and further entrenching Israelâs unlawful occupation.
âIâm appalled at the horrific humanitarian situation in Gaza, with unbearable levels of suffering and untenable living conditions. Famine in Gaza is a man-made disaster.â
The UNSC meeting included remarks from permanent and non-permanent states, including Russia, France, China and Slovenia.
The latter, which recognized Palestine last year, is serving as a non-permanent member of the council for 2024â2025.
Samuel Zbogar, Sloveniaâs ambassador to the UN, said âthe horrors of Gaza dominated all discussionsâ at the UN General Assembly over the past week, highlighting the almost unanimous message that âthe suffering in Gaza must end.â
He said Slovenia supports the Palestinian Authority and the UN Relief and Works Agency as crucial bodies in any postwar governance of Gaza.
Zbogar described UNRWA as an âindispensable part of the fiber of Palestinian society that âmust be protected.â
Each national recognition of Palestine over the past week â which included France, the UK, Canada and Australia â strengthens the âlegitimacy of Palestine and moves us closer to a just settlement,â he said.
âI want to underline that we also hear voices for peace in Israel ⊠We hear families of hostages calling for ceasefire,â Zbogar added.
âWe hear voices of so many Israelis understanding that their safety and future is intertwined with the safety and future of Palestinians ⊠We hear Jewish voices around the globe emphasizing that peace canât be achieved through war.â
Asim Iftikhar Ahmad, Pakistanâs ambassador to the UN, told the council meeting that Israel continues to violate Resolution 2334 âwith impunity.â
Israelâs use of âsystematic military operations, illegal settlements and forced displacementâ are aimed at âextinguishing the very prospect of a two-state solution,â he said.
âThe people of Palestine canât wait. The cause of peace, and the credibility of this council, depend on what we do in this moment.â