Okinawa marks 80 years since end of one of harshest WWII battles with pledge to share tragic history

Okinawa marks 80 years since end of one of harshest WWII battles with pledge to share tragic history
A photo released by US Marines showing a Marine looking back at the body of a dead Japanese soldier while his platoon passes a small village on Okinawa, Japan. (US Marines/AP)
Short Url
Updated 23 June 2025

Okinawa marks 80 years since end of one of harshest WWII battles with pledge to share tragic history

Okinawa marks 80 years since end of one of harshest WWII battles with pledge to share tragic history
  • The Battle of Okinawa killed a quarter of the island’s population, leading to a 27-year US occupation and a heavy American troop presence to date

TOKYO: Okinawa marked the 80th anniversary of the end of one of the harshest battles of World War II fought on the southern island.
With global tensions escalating, its governor said on Monday it is the Okinawan “mission” to keep telling the tragic history and its impact today.
The Battle of Okinawa killed a quarter of the island’s population, leading to a 27-year US occupation and a heavy American troop presence to date.
Monday’s memorial comes one day after US attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, adding to a sense of uncertainty on the island about the heavy American military presence and in its remote islands, already worried about getting embroiled in a potential conflict in Taiwan.
Gov. Denny Tamaki, noting the escalating global conflicts and nuclear threats, made a resolve to contribute to global peace studies, disarmament and the preservation of war remains. “It is our mission, as those living in the present, to preserve and pass on the reality and lessons to future generations.”
Fierce battle and civilian deaths
US troops landed on the main Okinawa island on April 1, 1945, beginning a battle in their push toward mainland Japan.
The Battle of Okinawa lasted nearly three months, killing some 200,000 people — about 12,000 Americans and more than 188,000 Japanese, half of them Okinawan civilians including students and victims forced into mass suicides by Japan’s military.
Okinawa was sacrificed by Japan’s Imperial Army to defend the mainland, historians say. The island group remained under US occupation until its reversion in 1972, two decades longer than most of Japan.
Monday’s memorial was held at the Mabuni Hill in Itoman City, where the remains of most of the war dead reside.
Remembering the tragedy
Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba was in a hot seat when he attended Monday’s ceremony. Weeks earlier, one of his ruling party lawmakers Shoji Nishida, known for whitewashing Japan’s wartime atrocities, denounced an inscription on a famous cenotaph dedicated to students as “rewriting history” by portraying the Japanese army as having caused their deaths, while Americans liberated Okinawa. Nishida also called Okinawa’s history education “a mess.”
His remark triggered an uproar in Okinawa, forcing Ishiba days later to apologize to the island’s governor, who had criticized the remark as outrageous and distorting history.
The Himeyuri Cenotaph commemorates student nurses who were abandoned near the end of the battle and killed, some in group suicides with teachers. Japan’s wartime military told the people never to surrender to the enemy, or die.
Nishida’s remarks add to concerns about the whitewashing of Japan’s embarrassing wartime past as memories of the tragedy fade and ignorance about the suffering grows.
Ishiba, at Monday’s memorial, said Japan’s peace and prosperity is built on the sacrifices of Okinawa’s history of hardship and that it is the government’s responsibility to “devote ourselves to achieve a peaceful and prosperous Okinawa.”
Postwar years and growing fear
Okinawa remained under US occupation from 1945 until the 1972 reversion to Japan. The US military maintains a heavy presence there due to Okinawa’s strategic importance for security in the Pacific. Their presence serves not only to help defend Japan but also for missions elsewhere, including in the South China Sea and the Middle East.
Private properties were confiscated to build US bases, and the base-dependent economy has hampered the growth of local industry.
Fear of a Taiwan conflict rekindles bitter memories of the Battle of Okinawa. Historians and many residents say Okinawa was used as a pawn to save mainland Japan.
There are also ancient tensions between Okinawa and the Japanese mainland, which annexed the islands, formerly the independent kingdom of the Ryukus, in 1879.
Burden of history
Okinawa remains home to the majority of about 50,000 US troops stationed in Japan under a bilateral security pact. The island, which accounts for only 0.6 percent of Japanese land, hosts 70 percent of US military facilities.
Even 53 years after its reversion to Japan, Okinawa is burdened with the heavy US presence and faces noise, pollution, aircraft accidents and crime related to American troops, the governor said.
Nearly 2,000 tons of unexploded US bombs remain in Okinawa, with some regularly dug up. A recent explosion at a storage site at a US military base caused minor injuries to four Japanese soldiers.
Remains of hundreds of war dead are still unrecovered on Okinawa, as the government’s search and identification effort is slow to make progress.


A Spanish town’s ban on religious gatherings in sports centers becomes a flashpoint

A Spanish town’s ban on religious gatherings in sports centers becomes a flashpoint
Updated 13 sec ago

A Spanish town’s ban on religious gatherings in sports centers becomes a flashpoint

A Spanish town’s ban on religious gatherings in sports centers becomes a flashpoint
The ban — approved last week by the conservative local government of Jumilla, a town of 27,000 — has since become a flashpoint
Spain’s Migration Minister Elma Saiz said on Friday the ban was “shameful”

MADRID: Spain’s government on Friday criticized a ban enacted in a southeastern town that prohibits religious gatherings in public sports centers, a measure that will mainly affect members of the town’s Muslim community who in recent years have used the spaces to celebrate religious holidays.

The ban — approved last week by the conservative local government of Jumilla, a town of 27,000 — has since become a flashpoint. Its critics, including Spain’s leftwing national government, have condemned the measure as discriminatory while some on the right are celebrating it as a means to uphold the nation’s Christian culture.

Spain’s Migration Minister Elma Saiz said on Friday the ban was “shameful,” and urged local leaders to “take a step back” and apologize to local residents.

Saiz told Spain’s Antena 3 broadcaster that the measure is “attacking and harming people, citizens who have been living for decades in our towns, in our cities, in our country, contributing and perfectly integrated without any problems of coexistence.”

The ban is the latest controversy involving Spain’s hot-button issues of immigration and multi-culturalism, following clashes last month in the southern Murcia region between far-right groups and local residents and migrants. They erupted after an elderly resident in the town of Torre-Pacheco was beaten up by assailants believed to be of Moroccan origin, which prompted far-right groups to call for retribution on the area’s large migrant population.

Conservative officials in Jumilla, an agriculture-based economy of rolling vineyards, olive and almond trees, defended the ban on Friday.

The town’s mayor Seve González told Spain’s El País newspaper that the measure did not single out any one group and that her government’s wanted to “promote cultural campaigns that defend our identity.”

The measure was initially proposed by the far-right Vox party and then amended and approved by the center-right Popular Party, to which the mayor belongs. It stipulates that municipal sports facilities — where the town’s Muslim community has held religious celebrations — cannot be used for cultural, social or religious activities unrelated to the city council.

Mohamed El Ghaidouni, secretary of the Union of Islamic Communities of Spain that represents more than 900 Muslim communities in the country, called the ban “institutionalized Islamophobia.”

He criticized the local government’s justification for the motion and its allegation that two main Muslim festivals traditionally celebrated in the sports centers — Eid Al-Fitr, which marks the end of Islamic holy month of Ramadan, and Eid Al-Adha, or “Feast of the Sacrifice” — were “foreign to the town’s identity.”

The ban, he added, “clashes with the institutions of the Spanish state” that protect religious freedom.

Vox’s branch in the Murcia region celebrated it, saying Wednesday on X that “Spain is and always will be a land of Christian roots!”

“We must protect public spaces from practices foreign to our culture and our way of life,” the party’s leader Santiago Abascal wrote Friday, adding that “Spain is not Al Andalus,” referencing the historic name for Islamic Spain.

For centuries, Spain was ruled by Muslims, whose influence is present both in the Spanish language and in many of the country’s most celebrated landmarks, including Granada’s famed Moorish Alhambra Palace. Islamic rule ended in 1492 when the last Arab kingdom in Spain fell to the Catholics.

Right-wing governments elsewhere in Europe have passed measures similar to the ban in Jumilla, striking at the heart of ongoing debates about nationalism and religious pluralism.

Last year in Monfalcone, a large industrial port city in northeastern Italy with a significant Bangladeshi immigrant population, its far-right mayor, Anna Maria Cisint, banned prayers outside of places of worship. The move led to protests involving some 8,000 people. The city’s Muslim community is appealing the ban in a regional court.

Ukrainian troops have little hope for peace as Trump’s deadline for Russia arrives

Ukrainian troops have little hope for peace as Trump’s deadline for Russia arrives
Updated 08 August 2025

Ukrainian troops have little hope for peace as Trump’s deadline for Russia arrives

Ukrainian troops have little hope for peace as Trump’s deadline for Russia arrives
  • Ukrainian forces are locked in intense battles along the 1,000-kilometer front line
  • In the Pokrovsk area of Donetsk, a commander said he believes Moscow isn’t interested in peace

DNIPROPETROVSK, Ukraine: Ukrainian soldiers on the battlefield expressed little hope for a diplomatic solution to the war with Russia, as US President Donald Trump’s Friday deadline for the Kremlin to make peace arrived and he eyed a possible summit meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin to discuss Moscow’s invasion of its neighbor.

Trump, exasperated that Putin didn’t heed his calls to stop bombing Ukrainian cities, almost two weeks ago moved up his ultimatum to impose additional sanctions on Russia, as well as introduce secondary tariffs targeting countries that buy Russian oil, if no Kremlin moves toward a settlement were forthcoming. It was unclear what steps Trump intended to take Friday.

Trump’s efforts to pressure Putin into stopping the fighting have so far delivered no progress. Russia’s bigger army is slowly advancing deeper into Ukraine at great cost in troops and armor while it relentlessly bombards Ukrainian cities. Russia and Ukraine are far apart on their terms for peace.

Ukrainian forces are locked in intense battles along the 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line that snakes from northeast to southeast Ukraine. The Pokrovsk city area of the eastern Donetsk region is taking the brunt of punishment as Russia looks to break out from there into the neighboring Dnipropetrovsk region. Ukraine has significant manpower shortages.

Intense fighting is also taking place in Ukraine’s northern Sumy border region, where Ukrainian forces are engaging Russian soldiers to prevent reinforcements being sent from there to Donetsk.

In the Pokrovsk area of Donetsk, a commander said he believes Moscow isn’t interested in peace.

“It is impossible to negotiate with them. The only option is to defeat them,” Buda, the Spartan Brigade commander, told The Associated Press. He used only his call sign, in keeping with the rules of the Ukrainian military.

“I would like them to agree and for all this to stop, but Russia will not agree to that; it does not want to negotiate. So the only option is to defeat them,” he said.

In the southern Zaporizhzhia region, a howitzer commander using the call sign Warsaw, said troops are determined to thwart Russia’s invasion.

“We are on our land, we have no way out,” he said. “So we stand our ground, we have no choice.”

Trump said Thursday that he would meet with Putin even if the Russian leader will not meet with his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky. That has stoked fears in Europe that Ukraine could be sidelined in efforts to stop the continent’s biggest conflict since World War II.

The Institute for the Study of War, a Washington think tank, said in an assessment Thursday that “Putin remains uninterested in ending his war and is attempting to extract bilateral concessions from the United States without meaningfully engaging in a peace process.”

“Putin continues to believe that time is on Russia’s side and that Russia can outlast Ukraine and the West,” it said.

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán said Friday that Europe should take the lead in efforts to
end the conflict.

Orbán said the leaders of Germany and France should go to Moscow “to negotiate on behalf of Europe.” Otherwise, “we will be sidelined in managing the security issues of our own continent,” Orbán told Hungary’s state broadcaster.

Orbán, who is a harsh critic of the European Union to which his country belongs, said Europe’s concerns that a Trump-Putin summit might not address the continent’s interests meant it should seize the diplomatic initiative.

“This war cannot be ended on the front line, no solution can be concluded on the battlefield,” he said. “This war must be ended by diplomats, politicians, leaders at the negotiating table.”


’Prepare for the worst’: Russians skeptical of progress at Putin-Trump summit

’Prepare for the worst’: Russians skeptical of progress at Putin-Trump summit
Updated 08 August 2025

’Prepare for the worst’: Russians skeptical of progress at Putin-Trump summit

’Prepare for the worst’: Russians skeptical of progress at Putin-Trump summit
  • “Hope for the best, prepare for the worst,” Irina, a 57-year-old lawyer, told AFP
  • “I don’t think we’ll get any clarity next week, unfortunately,” said Arseniy, a 21-year-old student

MOSCOW: Russians on the streets of Moscow on Friday held little hope that an upcoming summit between their president, Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart Donald Trump would help end the conflict in Ukraine.

Both presidents have said they are set to meet, possibly as early as next week, as Trump intensifies his bid to convince Moscow to halt its more than three-year-long military offensive.

The former reality TV star has spent his first months in office trying to broker peace — after initially boasting that he could end the conflict in 24 hours.

Multiple rounds of peace talks, telephone calls and diplomatic visits have failed to yield a breakthrough.

“Hope for the best, prepare for the worst,” Irina, a 57-year-old lawyer, told AFP in sunny central Moscow.

“To be honest, I have no hopes,” she added.

The fighting will likely go on until both sides run out of resources, she said.

Tens of thousands have been killed since Russia launched its offensive in February 2022, with millions forced to flee their homes and much of east and southern Ukraine destroyed.

Though Sergei, a 28-year-old car parts merchant welcomed the move toward peace, he said, “the conflict has got bogged down, it will definitely not end now.”

“I don’t think we’ll get any clarity next week, unfortunately,” said Arseniy, a 21-year-old student.

Noone that AFP spoke to agreed to give their surname, with Moscow having introduced strict censorship laws that prohibit any criticism of its offensive on Ukraine or comments that could be seen as going against the Kremlin.

Putin has stuck to his maximalist claims, demanding that Ukraine cede more territory if it wants his army to stop advancing on the ground.

“Whether you like it or not, we have to go all the way,” said Natalya, 79, a retired medical worker.

Russia will have to “clean up Ukraine — absolutely everything, including the western part,” she added.

At talks in June, Russia demanded that Ukraine pull its forces out of four regions Moscow claims to have annexed, shun Western military support and be excluded from joining NATO.

For Tatiana, 39, who works on Russia’s railways, talks felt like they had been ongoing for an “eternity,” without anything to show for them.

She had little interest in where the front line was or what land Russia might secure in a peace deal.

“It doesn’t matter. I’d rather it be frozen already,” she said.

“We have enough of our territory.”

Kyiv wants an immediate ceasefire and has said that it will never recognize Russian control over its land — although it has acknowledged that it would likely have to try to secure the return of land captured by Russia through diplomacy, not on the battlefield.

Leonid, a 70-year-old retiree with a short grey goatee beard, was one of the few to show a degree of optimism.

“Putin and Trump may agree on something, at least on some kind of ceasefire,” he told AFP.

“Any kind of peace is better than a quarrel.”


Philippines says 3 Chinese ships spotted near islets close to Taiwan

Philippines says 3 Chinese ships spotted near islets close to Taiwan
Updated 08 August 2025

Philippines says 3 Chinese ships spotted near islets close to Taiwan

Philippines says 3 Chinese ships spotted near islets close to Taiwan
  • China considers self-ruled Taiwan to be part of its territory and has threatened to seize it by force.
  • The three Chinese vessels were spotted near Batanes province

MANILA: Three Chinese coast guard vessels were being monitored in the waters off remote islands in the northern Philippines near Taiwan, maritime officials in Manila said on Friday.

The vessels were first spotted on Thursday, a day after a YouTube video appeared in which Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos said there was no way Manila could stay out of conflict if China invaded Taiwan.

China considers self-ruled Taiwan to be part of its territory and has threatened to seize it by force.

The three Chinese vessels were spotted near Batanes province, a remote group of sparsely populated islets north of the Philippines’ largest island, Luzon.

An aircraft was deployed on Friday to monitor the “irregular movements” of the three Chinese ships near the Batanes islands, the Philippine Coast Guard said in a statement.

China Coast Guard ship 4304 was located about 140 kilometers (85 miles) west of Sabtang town but bad weather prevented authorities from getting close to the locations of the other two vessels, it said.

Marcos said in an interview with Indian news agency Firstpost that, in the event of a confrontation between China and the United States over Taiwan, “there is no way that the Philippines can stay out of it simply because of our physical geographic location.”

“If there is an all-out war, then we will be drawn into it,” he said in the interview, which was uploaded on YouTube on Wednesday.

He also said many Filipinos living in Taiwan would need to be rescued and repatriated.

China has lodged a protest with the Philippines over Marcos’s remarks.

“We urge the Philippines to earnestly abide by the one-China principle... and refrain from playing (with) fire on issues concerning China’s core interests,” a foreign ministry spokesperson said on Friday.


Reintegrating millions of Afghan refugees is critical to a peaceful future, a UN official says

Reintegrating millions of Afghan refugees is critical to a peaceful future, a UN official says
Updated 08 August 2025

Reintegrating millions of Afghan refugees is critical to a peaceful future, a UN official says

Reintegrating millions of Afghan refugees is critical to a peaceful future, a UN official says
  • Stephanie Loose, a country program manager at UN Habitat, said reintegrating these millions was critical for a peaceful future in Afghanistan
  • It is important for people to understand that those returning are not a burden

ISLAMABAD: Reintegrating Afghan refugees is critical to the country’s peaceful future as social cohesion will be reduced without it, a UN official said Friday.

Some 2.2 million Afghans have crossed the border from Iran and Pakistan since the start of the year, according to the latest figures from the UN refugee agency. They arrive in a country struggling with climate change, a stagnant economy and a humanitarian crisis. Some 60 percent of those returning to Afghanistan are under 18.

Stephanie Loose, a country program manager at UN Habitat, said reintegrating these millions was critical for a peaceful future in Afghanistan.

“If you come back to a country where resources are already scarce, there’s a lot of competition already for jobs, land, housing, any sort of services, it’s clear that if you don’t foster dialogue between the local population and those arriving, this feeling of competition will grow and reduce social cohesion, which is like creating another root cause for war and conflicts,” Loose told a media briefing in Geneva. “And the country has seen enough of that.”

It is important for people to understand that those returning are not a burden, she added. They come with skills and are part of a solution for social and economic stability.

People bring what they can carry from Iran and Pakistan, leaving behind their homes and the majority of their belongings. Afghan authorities offer support at the border with cash, food, shelter, health care and onward transport to settlements across the country.

The Taliban have urged their neighbors to avoid forcibly returning Afghans and to treat them with dignity. Iran and Pakistan deny targeting Afghans, saying they are expelling foreigners living in their countries illegally.

Women and girls are particularly hard hit once they return to Afghanistan, where education is banned for females beyond grade six and the Taliban restrict access to many jobs and public spaces.

Loose said Afghan women and girls lacked social, educational and economic development opportunities. Requirements to have a male guardian when leaving the home created further barriers for women-headed households.