Apple heads into annual showcase reeling from AI missteps, tech upheaval and Trump’s trade war

Apple heads into annual showcase reeling from AI missteps, tech upheaval and Trump’s trade war
In 2023, Apple unveiled a mixed-reality headset that has been little more than a niche product, and last year WWDC trumpeted its first major foray into the AI craze with an array of new features highlighted by the promise of a smarter and more versatile version of its virtual assistant, Siri. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 09 June 2025

Apple heads into annual showcase reeling from AI missteps, tech upheaval and Trump’s trade war

Apple heads into annual showcase reeling from AI missteps, tech upheaval and Trump’s trade war
  • The pre-summer rite is expected be more subdued than the feverish anticipation that surrounded the event in 2023 when Apple unveiled a mixed-reality headset
  • Now Apple is facing nagging questions about its ability to innovate and ability to navigate a gauntlet of other challenges as it heads into this year’s World Wide Developers Conference

CUP: After stumbling out of the starting gate in Big Tech’s pivotal race to capitalize on artificial intelligence, Apple will try to regain its footing Monday at its annual Worldwide Developers Conference.
The pre-summer rite, which attracts thousands of developers to Apple’s Silicon Valley headquarters, is expected to be more subdued than the feverish anticipation that surrounded the event during the previous two years.
In 2023, Apple unveiled a mixed-reality headset that has been little more than a niche product, and last year WWDC trumpeted its first major foray into the AI craze with an array of new features highlighted by the promise of a smarter and more versatile version of its virtual assistant, Siri.
But heading into this year’s showcase, Apple faces nagging questions about whether the nearly 50-year-old company has lost some of the mystique and innovative drive that turned it into a tech trendsetter. Instead of making a big splash as it did with the Vision Pro headset, Apple this year is expected to focus on an overhaul of its software that may include a new, more tactile look for the iPhone’s native apps and a new nomenclature for identifying its operating system updates.
Even though it might look like Apple is becoming a technological laggard, Forrester Research analyst Thomas Husson contends the company still has ample time to catch up in an AI race that’s “more of a marathon, than a sprint. It will force Apple to evolve its operating systems.”
If reports about its iOS naming scheme pan out, Apple will switch to a method that automakers have used to telegraph their latest car models by linking them to the year after they first arrive at dealerships. That would mean the next version of the iPhone operating system due out this autumn will be known as iOS 26 instead of iOS 19 — as it would be under the current sequential naming approach.
Whatever it’s named, the next iOS will likely be released as a free update in September, around the same time as the next iPhone models if Apple follows its usual road map.
Meanwhile, Apple’s references to AI may be less frequent than last year when the technology was the main attraction.
While some of the new AI tricks compatible with the latest iPhones began rolling out late last year as part of free software updates, Apple still hasn’t been able to soup up Siri in the ways that it touted at last year’s conference. The delays became so glaring that a chastened Apple retreated from promoting Siri in its AI marketing campaigns earlier this year.
“It’s just taking a bit longer than we thought,” Apple CEO Tim Cook told analysts last month when asked about the company’s headaches with Siri. “But we are making progress, and we’re extremely excited to get the more personal Siri features out there.”
While Apple has been struggling to make AI that meets its standards, the gap separating it from other tech powerhouses is widening. Google keeps packing more AI into its Pixel smartphone lineup while introducing more of the technology into its search engine to dramatically change the way it works. Samsung, Apple’s biggest smartphone rival, is also leaning heavily into AI. Meanwhile, ChatGPT recently struck a deal that will bring former Apple design guru Jony Ive into the fold to work on a new device expected to compete against the iPhone.
“While much of WWDC will be about what the next great thing is for the iPhone, the unspoken question is: What’s the next great thing after the iPhone?” said Dipanjan Chatterjee, another analyst for Forrester Research.
Besides facing innovation challenges, Apple also faces regulatory threats that could siphon away billions of dollars in revenue that help finance its research and development. A federal judge is currently weighing whether proposed countermeasures to Google’s illegal monopoly in search should include a ban on long-running deals worth $20 billion annually to Apple while another federal judge recently banned the company from collecting commission on in-app transactions processed outside its once-exclusive payment system.
On top of all that, Apple has been caught in the cross-hairs of President Donald Trump’s trade war with China, a key manufacturing hub for the Cupertino, California, company. Cook successfully persuaded Trump to exempt the iPhone from tariffs during the president’s first administration, but he has had less success during Trump’s second term, which seems more determined to prod Apple to make its products in the US.
“The trade war and uncertainty linked to the tariff policy is of much more concern today for Apple’s business than the perception that Apple is lagging behind on AI innovation,” Husson said.
The multi-dimensional gauntlet facing Apple is spooking investors, causing the company’s stock price to plunge by nearly 20 percent so far this year — a decline that has erased $750 billion in shareholder wealth. After beginning the year as the most valuable company in the world, Apple now ranks third behind long-time rival Microsoft, another AI leader, and AI chipmaker Nvidia.


Disney says Kimmel will return to the air Tuesday, six days after suspension

Disney says Kimmel will return to the air Tuesday, six days after suspension
Updated 23 September 2025

Disney says Kimmel will return to the air Tuesday, six days after suspension

Disney says Kimmel will return to the air Tuesday, six days after suspension
  • Disney’s move signals the first big push back against the Trump administration by big media

LOS ANGELES: Disney said “Jimmy Kimmel Live” will return to its ABC network lineup on Tuesday, six days after it suspended the talk-show host following threats by the Federal Communications Commission chairman over comments the host had made about the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
In announcing the decision to bring Kimmel back to the airwaves, ABC’s parent company said it had suspended production of the show “to avoid further inflaming a tense situation at an emotional moment for our country.”
The Disney statement went on to say the company felt some of Kimmel’s comments in question “were ill-timed and thus insensitive.”
However, after further discussions with the ABC late-night host, “we reached the decision to return the show on Tuesday,” Disney said.
Since returning to the White House in January, Donald Trump has used his office and the courts to attack unflattering speech about him that he has called defamatory or false.
Throughout both his terms, Trump has threatened to rescind licenses for local broadcast affiliates of the national networks — licenses that are approved by the Federal Communications Commission, a nominally independent regulatory body.
Disney’s move signals the first big push back against the Trump administration by big media.
Disney shares closed down 1 percent. ABC suspended Kimmel’s late-night talk show on Wednesday after Carr threatened investigations and regulatory action against licensed broadcasters who aired Kimmel. The owners of dozens of local TV stations affiliated with ABC said they would no longer carry the show, including Nexstar, which needs FCC approval for a $6.2 billion merger with Tegna.
On Friday, Senate Commerce Committee Chair Ted Cruz, a Republican, said Carr’s threat was dangerous.


Tunisian journalist Sonia Dahmani named recipient of 2025 International Press Freedom Award

Tunisian journalist Sonia Dahmani named recipient of 2025 International Press Freedom Award
Updated 22 September 2025

Tunisian journalist Sonia Dahmani named recipient of 2025 International Press Freedom Award

Tunisian journalist Sonia Dahmani named recipient of 2025 International Press Freedom Award
  • Ceremony in New York set to take place in her absence

LONDON: Tunisian journalist Sonia Dahmani has been named as a recipient of the 2025 International Press Freedom Award, the Committee to Protect Journalists has announced.

She was to receive the accolade later this year at a ceremony in New York, but the event is expected to take place in her absence.

A lawyer, writer, and prominent media commentator, Dahmani has received international attention for her advocacy of human rights and civil liberties in Tunisia.

She is currently serving a near-five-year sentence after her arrest in May 2024 on multiple charges related to public comments, including her remarks addressing racism in Tunisia.

“She has become a symbol of the shrinking space for dissent in Tunisia, once a beacon of media freedom,” the CPJ said in a statement.

Dahmani is widely recognized for her candid and insightful commentary on radio and television, where she has addressed Tunisia’s political climate, judicial independence, civil liberties, prison conditions, and migration policy.

Shortly before her arrest Dahmani raised concerns about Tunisia’s social conditions, questioning during a televised debate why migrants would choose to remain in a country “where half of young people want to leave.”

The CPJ noted that Dahmani’s media presence has made her an influential voice for public accountability as well as a target amid tightening governmental oversight of the press.

Rights organizations and journalist groups have called for her release, expressing concern about her treatment and conditions in detention, including limited access to medical care and restricted communication.

Dahmani is scheduled to stand trial for additional charges at the end of September. Under Tunisia’s Decree Law 54 she could face up to 20 years in prison if convicted.

Now in its 35th year, CPJ’s annual IPFA and benefit dinner “honors courageous journalists from around the world.”

This year’s event will take place on Thursday, Nov. 20, in New York.

Dahmani will be honored alongside Chinese journalist Dong Yuyu, Ecuadorian journalists Elvira del Pilar Nole and Juan Carlos Tito, and Kyrgyzstan’s investigative reporter Bolot Temirov.


Foreign journalists face uncertain future under Trump

Foreign journalists face uncertain future under Trump
Updated 22 September 2025

Foreign journalists face uncertain future under Trump

Foreign journalists face uncertain future under Trump
  • One foreign correspondent said Trump’s hostility toward the media was not concentrated on foreigners

WASHINGTON: When US President Donald Trump berated an Australian reporter for asking an unpleasant question, his colleagues took that as a warning.
With the administration planning to slash correspondent visas and issuing not-so-veiled warnings, foreign journalists find themselves under pressure in the United States.
Earlier this week, a journalist from the Australian Broadcasting Corporation asked Trump about his business dealings while in office. Trump was visibly irritated.
“In my opinion, you are hurting Australia very much right now, and they want to get along with me,” Trump told the reporter, John Lyons. “Your leader is coming over to see me very soon. I’m gonna tell him about you. You set a very bad tone.”
The exchange was widely discussed in Washington media circles.
One foreign correspondent, who spoke to AFP on condition of anonymity, said Trump’s hostility toward the media was not concentrated on foreigners.
“When Trump insults a journalist, it doesn’t matter to him whether it’s a foreigner or not,” the correspondent said.
What worries the reporter much more is the administration’s plan to slash journalists’ visas to a renewable 240-day period, down from five years — or just 90 days for Chinese media workers.
“How am I supposed to rent a flat? To get a driver’s license? To put my kids in school with a 240-day visa?” the correspondent wondered, adding that it takes time to build a network of sources in the country.
“It’s going to be a nightmare.”

Working ‘without fear’ 

Another journalist, a correspondent for a European media outlet, said that “the precariousness of foreign journalists doesn’t make them prime targets for this administration,” but “is part of a very worrying overall picture.”
The White House prefers journalists, wherever they come from, “who are committed to its stories or self-censor enough to normalize what’s happening,” the European correspondent said.
AFP contacted several foreign journalists for this article. Only a few responded, and each of them did only on condition of anonymity.
“The shortened timeframe for I-visa renewals creates a framework for possible editorial censorship in which the Trump administration can trade access for compliance in reporting,” Katherine Jacobsen with the Committee to Protect Journalism said in a statement.
Mike Balsamo, president of the Washington-based National Press Club echoed that view, adding that such actions could lead to reprisals against American journalists working abroad.
“A free press doesn’t stop at America’s borders. It depends on correspondents who can work here without fear their time will run out,” he wrote on X.
While the correspondents interviewed for this story did not notice any particular hostility from the White House itself toward them, they pointed out that political figures in Trump’s “Make America Great Again” (MAGA) movement have not hesitated to target foreign journalists.
A close associate of Donald Trump, former ambassador to Germany Richard Grenell, recently called for revoking the visa of a journalist from the German television channel ZDF.
“This radical Lefty German keeps calling for violence against people he politically disagrees with,” Grenell said on X, criticizing the journalist’s interview with influential White House adviser Stephen Miller. “He poses as a journalist in Washington, DC. His visa should be revoked. There is no place in America this type of inciter.”

A warning to foreigners 

Following last week’s assassination of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk — a close associate of the American president — a senior official issued a broad warning to foreigners who are seen “praising, rationalizing, or making light of the event.”
“Feel free to bring such comments by foreigners to my attention,” Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau said on X.
But Trump’s return to power has not been bad news for all foreign media outlets. Some news organizations who are known for sharing views similar to Trump’s in their home countries have been embraced by the White House.
British television channel GB News, whose stars include far-right leader Nigel Farage, was recently welcomed into the Oval Office, and its journalist was given a coveted seat on the US presidential plane during Trump’s visit to the UK this week.
When Trump appeared in the press box, the journalist said that the channel’s viewers had asked if he wanted to “swap jobs” with Prime Minister Keir Starmer.


Trump says his negative media coverage is ‘illegal’

Trump says his negative media coverage is ‘illegal’
Updated 21 September 2025

Trump says his negative media coverage is ‘illegal’

Trump says his negative media coverage is ‘illegal’
  • “They’ll take a great story and they’ll make it bad. See I think it’s really illegal, personally,” he said
  • Trump has sued multiple major news organizations this year for being critical of his governance

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump on Friday bashed US media coverage that he claimed was unduly negative and therefore “illegal,” stoking a debate over free speech following the suspension of comedian Jimmy Kimmel’s TV show by ABC.

“They’ll take a great story and they’ll make it bad. See I think it’s really illegal, personally,” Trump, who has sued multiple major news organizations this year, told reporters gathered in the Oval Office.

The 79-year-old Republican, an avid television watcher, chiefly focused his diatribe on US television networks, reiterating a claim that coverage of him and his administration is “97 percent bad.”

He also defended the head of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Brendan Carr, whose threats against broadcasters have sparked a national debate over free speech and caused some unease even among Republicans.

Carr on Wednesday criticized Kimmel’s remarks on the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk and threatened broadcasters who carry his show with possible sanctions.

Hours later, ABC announced Kimmel’s show was suspended indefinitely.

On Friday, Trump called Carr “an incredible American patriot with courage.”

Texas Senator Ted Cruz, a close Trump ally, meanwhile said he believes it’s dangerous for a government to put itself in a position to say what speech it may or may not like.

Commenting on Carr’s threat to fine broadcasters or pull their licenses over the content of their shows, Cruz referenced a Martin Scorsese gangster movie.

“I got to say that’s right out of ‘Goodfellas’,” Cruz said. “That’s right out of a mafioso coming into a bar going, ‘Nice bar you have here. It would be a shame if something happened to it.’“

Trump himself faced a setback in his personal anti-media crusade, with a federal judge issuing a scathing ruling and tossing out his $15 billion defamation lawsuit against The New York Times.


Killing of 31 Yemeni journalists by Israel is ‘deadliest global attack in 16 years,’ says media watchdog

Killing of 31 Yemeni journalists by Israel is ‘deadliest global attack in 16 years,’ says media watchdog
Updated 20 September 2025

Killing of 31 Yemeni journalists by Israel is ‘deadliest global attack in 16 years,’ says media watchdog

Killing of 31 Yemeni journalists by Israel is ‘deadliest global attack in 16 years,’ says media watchdog
  • They were killed by Israeli strikes that targeted a media complex in Yemen’s capital, Sanaa, on Sept. 10
  • Incident confirms pattern of Israeli authorities in labeling media workers as terrorists, says Committee to Protect Journalists

DUBAI: An Israeli attack on media offices in Yemen’s capital, Sanaa, on Sept. 10 that killed 31 journalists and media workers was the deadliest strike of its kind anywhere in the world in 16 years, according to media watchdog the Committee to Protect Journalists.

Thirty of those who died worked for one of two newspapers, 26 September and Yemen. The offices for both were in the headquarters of the Moral Guidance Directorate, the media arm of the Houthi-controlled government, the CPJ said.

The Houthi health ministry said 35 people in all were killed in the attack, and 131 injured.

Nasser Al-Khadri, the editor-in-chief of 26 September, the Yemeni army’s official media outlet, told the watchdog: “It is a brutal and unjustified attack that targeted innocent people whose only crime was working in the media field, armed with nothing but their pens and words.”

A child who had accompanied a journalist to work was among the dead, and 22 media workers were among the injured, he added.

The strikes occurred at around 4:45 p.m. as staff were finalizing publication of the weekly newspaper, Al-Khadri said. The attack destroyed its “facilities, printing presses and archives,” he added, resulting in “deeply painful” losses.

The CPJ described the incident as the “second-deadliest single attack on the press” it had ever recorded, after the 2009 Maguindanao massacre in the Philippines in which 32 journalists were among 58 people killed. It added that the attack on Sanaa “marks deadliest global attack in 16 years.”

Abdulrahman Mohammed Mutahar, a journalist who lives in the neighborhood where the strikes took place, told the CPJ that the assault caused “massive explosions unlike anything Sanaa had seen since 2015.”

About eight missiles reduced the headquarters of the Moral Guidance Directorate to rubble, underneath which the bodies of some of the journalists were buried, he added.

On Sept 16., the funerals of those killed on Sept. 10 were interrupted by additional Israeli strikes.

Yemeni journalists say they live in fear of both international and domestic aggressors. Yousef Hazeb, head of the National Organization of Yemeni Reporters, told the CPJ they were “paying a double price for their work,” at the mercy of “deadly Israeli airstrikes targeting journalists and media outlets,” as well as local forces, including the Houthis, “who use the war as a pretext to expand repression.”

Within hours of the Israeli strikes on Sept. 10, Yemen’s public prosecutor issued a ban on the publication of photos or videos taken at the scene of the attack.

In a message posted on social media platform X, the Israeli army said the strikes on Sanaa, and others in the northern province of Al-Jawf, were in “response to repeated attacks by the Iranian-backed Houthis.”

It added that the targets included the “Houthi Public Relations Department, responsible for distributing propaganda messages in the media, and psychological terror.”

The CPJ has classified the killing of the 31 media workers in Yemen as “murders” arising from the “deliberate targeting of journalists for their work.” The watchdog said Israel has been responsible for the killings of one in six journalists globally since 2016. It has documented the murders of 227 journalists globally in the past decade, and found Israel to be responsible for more than 16 percent of them through attacks on Gaza, Lebanon, Iran and Yemen.

The latest strikes confirms the long-standing pattern of Israeli authorities in “labeling journalists as terrorists or propagandists to justify their killings,” said Sara Qudah, the CBJ’s regional program director.

It also marks “an alarming escalation, extending Israel’s war on journalism far beyond the genocide in Gaza,” she added.

Qudah, like representatives of other press groups and human rights advocates, said strikes on news outlets and media workers violate the principles of international law.

Radio and television facilities are civilian objects and cannot be targeted, Human Rights Watch said. They cannot be considered military targets “simply because they are pro-Houthi or anti-Israel” because this does not directly contribute to military operations, it added.

The CPJ said that journalists, as civilians, are protected under the rule of international law, including those who work for state-run outlets or are affiliated with armed groups, unless they play a direct part in hostilities.

The strikes on Yemen show the continuous and repeated failure of Israeli authorities to “distinguish between military targets and journalists, justifying its assassinations by smearing journalists as terrorists or propagandists, without credible evidence,” the CPJ added.