Sanction on Harvard’s foreign students strikes at the heart of the university’s global allure

On the Harvard campus, international students said they were stunned, confused and deeply concerned about what the revocation means for their degrees.  (Reuters)
On the Harvard campus, international students said they were stunned, confused and deeply concerned about what the revocation means for their degrees. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 24 May 2025

Sanction on Harvard’s foreign students strikes at the heart of the university’s global allure

Sanction on Harvard’s foreign students strikes at the heart of the university’s global allure
  • Students say their hopes and dreams are at stake

CAMBRIDGE, Mass.: For students around the world, an acceptance letter to Harvard University has represented the pinnacle of achievement, offering a spot among the elite at a campus that produces Nobel Prize winners, captains of industry and global leaders.
That allure is now in jeopardy. In its intensifying fight with the White House, Harvard was dealt its heaviest blow yet on Thursday, when the government blocked the Ivy League school from enrolling foreign students. The move threatens to undermine Harvard’s stature, its revenue and its appeal among top scholars around the world.
Even more than the government’s $2.6 billion in research cuts, the administration’s action represents an existential threat for Harvard. The school summed it up in a lawsuit seeking to block the action: “Without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard.”
Within hours of the decision, the consequences started becoming clear. Belgium’s Princess Elisabeth, who just finished her first year in a Harvard graduate program, is waiting to find out if she can return next year, the royal palace said. The Chinese government publicly questioned whether Harvard’s international standing will endure.
“The relevant actions by the US side will only damage its own image and international credibility,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said at a briefing in Beijing.
A federal judge on Friday blocked the administration’s decision as the lawsuit plays out, but the order is only temporary.
Students say their hopes and dreams are at stake
On the Harvard campus, international students said they were stunned, confused and deeply concerned about what the revocation means for their degrees, their future plans and their legal status in the United States.
Walid Akef, a Harvard graduate student in art history from Egypt, said the Trump administration action would cost him “dreams, hopes and 20 years of my life.”
“Coming to Harvard, I’m not exaggerating. I planned for it for 15 years,” Akef said. He earned two master’s degrees and learned multiple languages before arriving at the university. He also worries what the changes will mean for his family, since his wife is pregnant and will soon be unable to travel.
“So this is absolutely disastrous. I’m going to lose not just stability, but I also lose my dreams and then lose, I don’t know, my beautiful life.”
Akef is cautiously optimistic that Harvard “will take care of this,” but he is also considering other options as US policy becomes increasingly inhospitable to foreign students.
A graduating law student from Asia said he had planned to stay in the United States and find work, “but not anymore.”
“I don’t know what I’ll do, but my future doesn’t appear to be here,” said the student, who spoke on condition of anonymity out of fear of retaliation.
Changes could erase a quarter of the student body
With a $53 billion endowment, Harvard has the means to weather federal funding losses that would cripple other institutions. But this new sanction strikes at the heart of its campus.
Already, the change is causing disarray, as thousands of students consider whether to transfer elsewhere or risk being in the country illegally. It could wipe out a quarter of the university’s total student body, while halving some of its graduate schools and threatening students who work as lab researchers and teaching assistants. Some sports teams would be left nearly empty.
For many, it has been a time of panicked calls home and huddles with fellow international students. For Kat, a data science math student from China, the news comes as she prepares to graduate from Harvard next week.
“My biggest fear is whether I would get deported immediately, because we’re not sure about our status,” said Kat, who spoke on the condition that she be identified only by her first name out of concern about retaliation.
If the government’s action stands, Harvard would be banned from admitting new international students for at least two school years. Even if it regains its place as a global magnet, top students may shy away for fear of future government reprisals, the school said in its lawsuit.
The university enrolls almost 6,800 foreign students at its campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts, near Boston. India and China send more students to the US than any other countries.
Asked if he was considering restrictions on other universities, President Donald Trump said, “We’re taking a look at a lot of things.”
“Harvard’s going to have to change its ways. So are some others,” the president told reporters in the Oval Office. He added, “We don’t want troublemakers here.”
A time to weigh other opportunities
In its court filing, Harvard listed some of its most notable alumni who enrolled as foreign students. The list includes Benazir Bhutto, the former prime minister of Pakistan; Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, the former president of Liberia; Empress Masako of Japan; and many leaders of major corporations.
While foreigners set to graduate from Harvard next week can still do so, the remaining current students and those bound for the university in the fall were weighing other opportunities. The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, for one, said Friday that it would welcome international students already at Harvard and those who have been admitted.
“It feels like my world has exploded,” said Fang, a Chinese student who was accepted to Harvard for a master’s program. She also spoke on the condition that only her first name be used out of fear that she could be targeted.
Her student visa to the US was approved the day before the latest Harvard news broke. “If America becomes a country that doesn’t welcome me, I don’t want to go there.”
The action has dominated news in countries around the world, said Mike Henniger, president and CEO of Illume Student Advisory Services, a company that works with colleges in the US, Canada and Europe to recruit international students. He is currently traveling in Japan and awoke to the news Friday with dozens of emails from colleagues.
The reactions from the international community, he said, were incredulous: “’Unbelievable!’ ‘Oh My God!’ ‘Unreal!’“
For incoming freshmen who just got accepted to Harvard — and already committed — the timing could not be worse, but they are such strong students that any top university in the world would want to offer them a spot, he said.
“I think the bigger story is the students around the country that aren’t a Harvard student, the students that scraped by to get into a state university and are thinking: ‘Are we next?’” he said. “The Harvard kids are going to be OK. It’s more about the damage to the American education brand. The view of the US being a less welcoming place for international students.”


Starmer defends Palestine recognition pledge

Starmer defends Palestine recognition pledge
Updated 29 sec ago

Starmer defends Palestine recognition pledge

Starmer defends Palestine recognition pledge
  • UK’s PM has faced criticism from Israeli officials over move
  • He is set to recognize Palestinian state next month unless set of conditions met

LONDON: UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has defended his pledge to potentially recognize a Palestinian state next month, The Independent has reported.

Starmer’s defence of his move came after Israeli officials criticized his plan, and as British family members of Hamas-held hostages are set to stage a protest in London against the government.

Starmer said that there was a “sense of revulsion” about the level of suffering in Gaza among the British public.

He highlighted his intentions to only recognize a Palestinian state if Israel failed to meet a set of conditions relating to the war in Gaza.

It must address the humanitarian disaster in the enclave, reach a ceasefire with Hamas, and commit to reviving the path toward a two-state solution, he said.

The pledge was not a propaganda boost to Hamas, Starmer said, denying that the “terrorist organization” could play any role in a future government of Gaza.

The pro-Israel protest is set to take place in the English capital this weekend. Demonstrators will march on Downing Street to demand the release of the remaining hostages before any formal recognition of Palestine.

Israeli Ambassador to the UK Tzipi Hotovely accused Starmer and the government of “rewarding” Hamas’ actions through the pledge.

Kemi Badenoch, the opposition Conservative leader, said on Tuesday that Starmer had “made a mistake” and “what we need to focus on now is a ceasefire and getting the hostages home.”

Starmer told Channel 5 that the hostages held by Hamas and other militant groups had been held for a “very, very long time in awful circumstances, unimaginable circumstances, and Hamas is a terrorist organization, and that’s why I’m really clear about Hamas.”

He added: “They should release the hostages straight away and they should play absolutely no part in the governance of Palestine at any point.”

The prime minister highlighted the terms of his pledge, and said: “We do, alongside that, have to do all that we can to alleviate the awful situation on the ground in Gaza. We need aid in volume and at scale.”

The government had to do “everything we can” to get aid in, working with other countries “and it’s in that context that I set out our position on recognition.” 


Kazakh cleric seeks to start new Orthodox church to rival Russia’s

Updated 3 min 52 sec ago

Kazakh cleric seeks to start new Orthodox church to rival Russia’s

Kazakh cleric seeks to start new Orthodox church to rival Russia’s
Vorontsov, a former priest at the Moscow-governed Orthodox Church of Kazakhstan, was dismissed last year after describing the war in Ukraine as a fratricidal “sin” on social media
He also called for Kazakhstan to “fence itself off” from Russia

ALMATY: A popular Kazakh cleric opposed to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine said Thursday he was attempting to start a new church independent of Moscow, after the Russian Orthodox Church defrocked him over his criticism of the Kremlin.

The row has become another headache for Russia, which has already seen other former Soviet states cut ties with the Russian Orthodox church.

Vladimir Vorontsov, a former priest at the Moscow-governed Orthodox Church of Kazakhstan, was dismissed last year after describing the war in Ukraine as a fratricidal “sin” on social media. He also called for Kazakhstan to “fence itself off” from Russia.

Vorontsov said Thursday he was collecting signatures to start a new church outside of Moscow’s orbit which he would send to the Patriarchate of Constantinople, the highest governing authority for the Orthodox Church outside of Moscow.

“I plan to send this letter next week,” he told AFP.

Kazakhstan, a former Soviet republic of around 20 million, is a majority Muslim country but home to a sizeable Orthodox Christian minority — around three million people, most of them ethnic Russians.

The Orthodox Church in Kazakhstan, the country’s largest Christian church, is subordinate to the Russian Orthodox Church and its pro-Kremlin leader Patriarch Kirill.

The Kazakhstan branch of the Russian Orthodox Church said earlier this week that Vorontsov had been dismissed for “serious canonical crimes.”

It accused him of attempting to create an illegal, “schismatic” church to rival the Moscow-governed one.

“Any of his speeches on behalf of the Orthodox Church are illegal. He misleads people, cunningly posing as an Orthodox priest,” it said.

The Russian Orthodox Church has itself been in schism with the Patriarchate of Constantinople since 2018 over the latter’s decision to grant autonomy to the Orthodox Church of Ukraine.

Since Russia launched its Ukraine invasion, several former Soviet countries — including Lithuania and Estonia — have cut ties with the Russian Orthodox Church, officially known as the Moscow Patriarchate.

The Russian Orthodox Church last month reminded its subordinate members in Kazakhstan and Belarus to include “Russian Orthodox Church” or “Moscow Patriarchate” in their official titles.

Germany to extend border controls in migration crackdown

Germany to extend border controls in migration crackdown
Updated 19 min 25 sec ago

Germany to extend border controls in migration crackdown

Germany to extend border controls in migration crackdown
  • Berlin also plans to deport more rejected asylum seekers with criminal records to Taliban-run Afghanistan and to war-scarred Syria, Dobrindt said
  • Merz has vowed a tough crackdown on irregular immigration

BERLIN: Germany will push on with temporary border controls beyond a September deadline as it cracks down on irregular immigration, Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt said Thursday.

Berlin also plans to deport more rejected asylum seekers with criminal records to Taliban-run Afghanistan and to war-scarred Syria, Dobrindt said in a podcast with media outlet Table.Today.

Germany’s conservative Chancellor Friedrich Merz has vowed a tough crackdown on irregular immigration, saying this is the only way to stem rising support for the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party.

A spate of deadly attacks blamed on asylum seekers and other foreign nationals fueled public fears during the campaign for the February election, in which the AfD scored a record 20 percent.

“We will continue to maintain the border controls” beyond the September 15 deadline, Dobrindt said about the measures first launched last year under the previous government of Olaf Scholz and extended by six months in March.

“We are in agreement with our European partners that this is a necessary measure until the (EU) external border protection system is fully operational,” he said.

Members of Europe’s Schengen area are allowed to temporarily reintroduce border controls for up to two years in response to serious threats such as terrorism or large-scale unauthorized migration.

Merz’s government further tightened the border checks when it took power in early May, moving to also reject most asylum seekers — a step that sparked an outcry from human rights groups.

Federal police numbers deployed daily at the borders were stepped up to 14,000 from 11,000.

According to ministry data, 9,254 people were turned back at German land borders between May 8 and July 31 — with most recorded cases from Afghanistan followed by Algeria, Eritrea and Somalia.

Germany’s border with France saw the most rejections, at more than 2,000 in that period, followed by Poland, Switzerland and Austria.

Germany has also twice deported migrants convicted of offenses to Afghanistan, most recently last month when 81 were sent back — a move Dobrindt said “cannot remain a one-off measure.”

Amnesty International criticized the deportations, saying the situation in Afghanistan was “catastrophic” and that “extrajudicial executions, enforced disappearances and torture are commonplace.”

Dobrindt also said Berlin was working to organize deportation flights to Syria, where an Islamist-led offensive toppled longtime Syrian ruler Bashar Assad in December.


3 charged in UK for supporting banned Palestine Action group

3 charged in UK for supporting banned Palestine Action group
Updated 14 min 26 sec ago

3 charged in UK for supporting banned Palestine Action group

3 charged in UK for supporting banned Palestine Action group
  • Jeremy Shippam, Judit Murray, Fiona Maclean charged under Terrorism Act for supporting a proscribed organization
  • Protests in support of the group set to take place this weekend, 500 people could attend

LONDON: Three people in the UK have been charged for supporting the banned group Palestine Action.

The trio, two women and a man, were detained on July 5 at a protest in Westminster in London. Twenty-six other people were also arrested.

Jeremy Shippam, 71, Judit Murray, 71, and Fiona Maclean, 53, were charged under section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000. They will appear at Westminster Magistrates Court on Sept. 16.

Palestine Action was proscribed as a terrorist group in the UK after activists broke into a Royal Air Force base at Brize Norton in England in June this year, causing £7 million ($9.38 million) of damage to two military aircraft.

Support for or membership of a banned group in the UK is a criminal offense punishable by up to 14 years in prison.

Despite the ban, the group is challenging its terrorism designation after the High Court ruled on July 30 it should be reviewed.

Around 500 people, meanwhile, are set to attend a demonstration in support of Palestine Action in London on Saturday.

It follows previous demonstrations after the group’s proscription in London, Manchester and several other major UK cities, at which more than 200 people were arrested.

The group Defend Our Juries, which is helping to organize the protest, said attendees would hold placards reading “I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action.”

A spokesperson for Defend Our Juries said: “Defend Our Juries has confirmed that 500-plus people have committed to holding ‘I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action’ signs on Saturday in central London, as part of the Lift the Ban campaign, to end the proscription of Palestine Action.

“Since the threshold for the conditional commitment requirement has been reached, the action will go ahead as planned.”

Dominic Murphy, head of Counter Terrorism Command at the Metropolitan Police, said: “Anyone who displays public support for Palestine Action, a proscribed organisation, is committing an offence under the Terrorism Act and can expect to be arrested and, as these charges show, will be investigated to the full extent of the law.

“These charges relate to three people arrested in central London on 5 July. We are also planning to send case files to the Crown Prosecution Service for the other 26 people arrested on the same day.

“I would strongly advise anyone planning to come to London this weekend to show support for Palestine Action to think about the potential criminal consequences of their actions.”


Sri Lankan activists call on govt to revoke visa-free policy for Israeli nationals

Sri Lankan activists join a Palestine solidarity protest in front of the presidential secretariat in Colombo on Aug. 5, 2025.
Sri Lankan activists join a Palestine solidarity protest in front of the presidential secretariat in Colombo on Aug. 5, 2025.
Updated 46 min 54 sec ago

Sri Lankan activists call on govt to revoke visa-free policy for Israeli nationals

Sri Lankan activists join a Palestine solidarity protest in front of the presidential secretariat in Colombo on Aug. 5, 2025.
  • Sri Lanka recently extended visa-free entry policy to 40 countries, including Israel, to boost tourism
  • Lawmaker says it is a ‘shameful decision’ that does not reflect nation’s historical support of Palestine

COLOMBO: Sri Lankan activists are calling on President Anura Kumara Dissanayake to revoke the government’s decision to grant visa-free entry to Israeli nationals, a policy they say contradicts the island nation’s long-standing solidarity with Palestine.

Sri Lanka has moved to extend its visa-free entry policy to tourists from 40 countries, including Israel, to attract more tourists and speed up the country’s economic recovery, Foreign Minister Vijitha Herath announced last month. 

The decision to include Israel was swiftly opposed by members of Sri Lanka’s civil society, who demanded that Dissanayake exclude Israelis from the policy.

Sri Lankans have also taken to the streets to protest the government’s decision, including a demonstration outside the presidential secretariat in Colombo on Tuesday, and a similar rally in front of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs last week.

Thanzeela Ousman, who participated in Tuesday’s protest, told Arab News: “This (visa-free) policy was introduced while the world is witnessing what many, including even Israeli human rights organizations, are calling a genocide in Gaza.

“These groups are urging the international community to impose political and economic pressure on Israel to stop the violence. Instead, our government is offering free access to Israeli nationals, effectively rewarding an aggressive state.

“At the very minimum, Sri Lanka should suspend this visa-free policy and re-evaluate all ties with Israel. We should be aligning with global calls for (a) ceasefire, humanitarian access, and justice, not offering red carpets.”

Swasthika Arulingam, a Sri Lankan lawyer and human rights activist, said that since Israel has mandatory military service for citizens over 18, effectively making most of them members of the Israel Defense Forces, the visa policy was a matter of national security.

“This is a terrible policy for the country … When they are being encouraged to come to a tourist area in Sri Lanka, that itself is a national security concern because they’re fighting in a foreign army,” she told Arab News.

Arulingam also highlighted how the Sri Lankan government has recognized Palestine as a state since 1988 and voted to support numerous UN resolutions opposing Israel.

“They can’t maintain a duplicity by essentially inviting the same IDF soldiers who are committing war crimes to the Palestinian people — committing genocide — to come to Sri Lanka for recreation. When you do that, you are directly complicit in the genocide,” she said.

“During the 1940s, it would have been like inviting the Nazis to come and have a holiday camp in Sri Lanka … It’s very similar to that.”

Concerns over tourists from Israel have been growing in Sri Lanka. The government has vowed to crack down on reported illegal activities carried out by Israeli tourists in the coastal town of Arugam Bay earlier this year, following a series of complaints regarding their arrival in the country.

Civil society groups have protested and petitioned for special screenings of Israelis, after at least one Israeli tourist was identified as a soldier accused of war crimes.

Israel has killed more than 61,100 Palestinians and wounded over 151,400 since October 2023. The true death toll is feared to be much higher, with research published in The Lancet medical journal in January estimating an underreporting of deaths by 41 percent.

The study says the toll may be higher, as it does not include deaths caused by starvation, injury and lack of access to healthcare, caused by the Israeli military’s destruction of most of Gaza’s infrastructure and the blocking of medical and food aid.

In a letter to Dissanayake, lawmaker Mujeebur Rahman described the government’s decision to include Israel in the visa-free policy as a “shameful decision.”

“This allows credibly accused war criminals to enter our motherland and possibly escape justice. It is further alarming to note that Palestine is not among the nations that can enter Sri Lanka without a visa. This is not what is expected from the leadership of a country that has consistently supported a free Palestine,” he wrote.

“Your government’s decision to open the country without due diligence, scrutiny and vetting to IDF members, war criminals, criminal settlers in (the) occupied West Bank and Zionist extremists will inevitably land you and Sri Lanka among the international rejects complicit in the genocide. This will certainly outweigh the currency you expect to gain from tourism.”

Despite the protests, Sri Lankan activists say there has been no response from the government.

Shaamil Hussein, a member of the Free Palestine Movement of Sri Lanka, told Arab News: “Many Sri Lankans over here … empathize with the Palestinian struggle for justice and self-determination.

“By allowing visa-free entry for Israelis, the government may be seen as compromising its historical support for Palestine.”

“It’s vital for Sri Lanka to maintain its principal stance against injustice and oppression.”