G7 nations paper over differences on tariffs and Ukraine, agree to address ‘imbalances’

G7 nations paper over differences on tariffs and Ukraine, agree to address ‘imbalances’
1 / 2
Tiff Macklem (3rd L), governor of the Bank of Canada, looks as and Francois-Philippe Champagne, Canada's finance minister, points up as dignitaries pose for a family photo during a photo op at the G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors' Meeting in Banff, Alberta, Canada on May 21, 2025. (AFP)
G7 nations paper over differences on tariffs and Ukraine, agree to address ‘imbalances’
2 / 2
Short Url
Updated 23 May 2025

G7 nations paper over differences on tariffs and Ukraine, agree to address ‘imbalances’

G7 nations paper over differences on tariffs and Ukraine, agree to address ‘imbalances’
  • Statement condemned Russia’s continued brutal war against Ukraine,” yet that language was milder than last year’s
  • But they did agree that further sanctions on Russia could be imposed if no ceasefire with Ukraine is reached

BANFF, Alberta: Top finance officials from the world’s seven wealthiest democracies set aside stark differences on US tariffs after two days of talks and agreed to counter global “economic imbalances,” a swipe at China’s trade practices.
In a communiqué issued Thursday, the Group of Seven finance ministers and central bank governors, meeting in the Canadian Rockies, left out their traditional defense of free trade and toned down their references to Russia’s war in Ukraine, compared with last year. But they did agree that further sanctions on Russia could be imposed if the two countries don’t reach a ceasefire.
The communiqué said the G7 members would continue to monitor “nonmarket policies and practices” which contribute to imbalances in global trade. The statement did not mention China but nonmarket policies typically refer to that country’s export subsidies and currency policies that the Trump administration charges gives it an advantage in international trade.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent appears to have succeeded in steering the communiqué largely in the direction the Trump administration sought, particularly regarding China’s trade practices.
The high-profile gathering of officials from the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Japan, Germany, France, and Italy also appeared to be more congenial than an earlier meeting of G7 foreign ministers in March. Yet that meeting, also in Canada, occurred as President Donald Trump was in the midst of threatening stiff tariffs on Canada and suggesting it could become the 51st state.
Canada is president of this year’s G7 and the sessions this week are intended to lay the groundwork for a meeting of the heads of state on June 15-17 in Kananaskis, Canada. The White House said Thursday that Trump will attend that gathering.
“Throughout our G7 presidency, the tone of the discussions has become progressively more constructive,” Tiff Macklem, governor of the Bank of Canada, said at a news conference at the conclusion of the summit.
Yet that unity appears to have been achieved by jettisoning many items that in the past had been agreed to by the G7 countries. In addition to leaving out any mention of trade, the communiqué dropped sections on combating climate change and cooperating on international tax policy, issues the Trump administration has dismissed.
“There will always be tension around tariffs,” said Francois-Philippe Champagne, Canada’s finance minister. “But there are also places where you find common ground. ... This year our focus was to return to the G7 core mission, restoring global growth and stability.”




Tiff Macklem (L), governor of the Bank of Canada, looks on as Fracois-Philippe Champagne, Canada's minister of finance and national revenue, speaks at their closing press conference during the G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors’ Meeting in Banff, Alberta, Canada on May 22, 2025. (AFP)

The shift comes as Trump has slapped widespread tariffs on imports, including a 10 percent global duty on all goods, even those from the other G7 allies. Trump has also imposed 25 percent tariffs on steel, aluminum, and cars, and on April 2 imposed much steeper tariffs on about 60 nations, which he then paused until early July.
Valdis Dombrovskis, European Union Trade Commissioner, said that trade was “obviously a difficult topic” during the negotiations. The EU, which participates in the G7 but doesn’t serve as one of the rotating presidents, pushed for stronger language that would have highlighted the economic harms from tariffs.
“The US administration is having a somewhat different view of the situation,” Dombrovskis told reporters. He added that details about US tariffs weren’t discussed because the G7 members are negotiating individually with the Trump administration about duties.
On Ukraine, the communiqué condemned “Russia’s continued brutal war against Ukraine,” yet that language was milder than last year’s, which referred to Russia’s “illegal, unjustifiable, and unprovoked full-scale invasion.” Trump officials in the past have pushed to avoid antagonizing Russia while seeking peace talks.
Champagne, however, called the invasion “illegal” in Thursday’s news conference.
Bessent also successfully included an agreement in the statement that “no country or entity” that supported Russia’s war efforts would be able to profit from Ukraine’s reconstruction, a restriction that would bar Chinese companies from participating.
Dombrovskis said the EU had proposed to lower the current price cap on Russian oil — previously agreed to as part of early sanctions slapped on Russia in the wake of its 2022 invasion — to $50, from $60, but the communiqué says little about specific measures.
Still, the EU was largely satisfied with the G7’s agreements on Ukraine, Dombrovskis said, including the willingness to impose more sanctions. The group also agreed to continue freezing Russia’s financial assets until they can be used to help pay for Ukraine’s reconstruction.
Mark Sobel, a former top Treasury Department official and senior adviser to the Center for Strategic and International Studies, criticized the communiqué as “feeble.”
The statement “closes its eyes to the elephants in the room — the word ‘tariffs’ or a reference to destructive US trade policies are nowhere to be found,” Sobel said.
“On Ukraine, the G7 will ‘explore options’ if a ceasefire isn’t reached when the time for action is now,” he added. “This risible communiqué cannot hide the fissures in the G7 and hardly bodes well for the larger fractures looming for the upcoming G7 leaders’ summit.”
Still, John Kirton, a political scientist at the University of Toronto and director of the G7 Research Group, said it was a positive sign that a communiqué had even been issued. “That was in considerable doubt to the very end,” he said.
Yet both Sobel and Kirton noted there was no reference to US budget deficits and their role in the “global imbalances” the ministers seek to combat. The federal budget deficit, by contributing to higher US demand, worsens the US trade deficit that the Trump administration seeks to reduce.
The communiqué said that “economic policy uncertainty has declined from its peak,” a view that Kirton said was “puzzling,” given that the US Congress is considering a tax and spending package that has unnerved financial markets this week, pushing up the interest rate on US Treasury securities.
“There’s great uncertainty out there in financial markets,” Kirton said. “The dollar is going down, and we don’t know when that will end.”
Bessent held several bilateral meetings on the sidelines of the G7, including with Champagne and Japan’s Finance Minister Katsunobu Kato.
Bessent and Kato discussed trade and currencies, the Treasury Department said, with both sides agreeing that “exchange rates should be market-determined.” The US has often criticized Japan in the past for intervening in currency markets to lower the yen’s value.
Yet the two sides “did not discuss foreign exchange levels,” Treasury said, a sign the US isn’t pressuring Japan about the yen’s current value.


Chinese state media says Nvidia H20 chips not safe for China

Updated 10 sec ago

Chinese state media says Nvidia H20 chips not safe for China

Chinese state media says Nvidia H20 chips not safe for China
BEIJING: Nvidia’s H20 chips pose security concerns for China, a social media account affiliated with China’s state media said on Sunday, after Beijing raised concerns over backdoor access in those chips.
The H20 chips are also not technologically advanced or environmentally friendly, the account, Yuyuan Tantian, which is affiliated with state broadcaster CCTV, said in an article published on WeChat.
“When a type of chip is neither environmentally friendly, nor advanced, nor safe, as consumers, we certainly have the option not to buy it,” the article concluded.
Nvidia did not immediately respond to a request for comment. H20 artificial intelligence chips were developed by Nvidia for the Chinese market after the US imposed export restrictions on advanced AI chips in late 2023. The administration of US President Donald Trump banned their sales in April amid escalating trade tensions with China, but reversed the ban in July. China’s cyberspace watchdog said on July 31 that it had summoned Nvidia to a meeting, asking the US chipmaker to explain whether its H20 chips had any backdoor security risks — a hidden method of bypassing normal authentication or security controls.
Nvidia later said its products had no “backdoors” that would allow remote access or control.
In its article, Yuyuan Tantian said Nvidia chips could achieve functions including “remote shutdown” through a hardware “backdoor.”
Yuyuan Tantian’s comment followed criticism against Nvidia by People’s Daily, another Chinese state media outlet. In a commentary earlier this month, People’s Daily said Nvidia must produce “convincing security proofs” to eliminate Chinese users’ worries over security risks in its chips and regain market trust.

Ukraine drone attack kills one, damages industrial facility in Saratov, Russia says

Ukraine drone attack kills one, damages industrial facility in Saratov, Russia says
Updated 23 min 10 sec ago

Ukraine drone attack kills one, damages industrial facility in Saratov, Russia says

Ukraine drone attack kills one, damages industrial facility in Saratov, Russia says
  • Social media footage showed thick black smoke rising over what looked like an industrial zone
  • Rosneft-owned refinery in the Saratov forced to suspend operations earlier this year for safety reasons

One person was killed, and several apartments and an industrial facility were damaged in a Ukrainian drone attack on the south Russian region of Saratov, the governor said on Sunday.

Roman Busargin posted on the Telegram messaging app that residents were evacuated after debris from a destroyed drone damaged three apartments in the overnight attack.

“Several residents required medical assistance,” Busargin said. “Aid was provided onsite, and one person has been hospitalized. Unfortunately, one person has died.”

Russian air defense units destroyed 121 Ukrainian drones overnight, including eight over the Saratov region, the defense ministry said. It reports only how many drones its defense units down, not how many Ukraine launches.

Busargin did not specify what kind of industrial site was damaged.

Social media footage showed thick black smoke rising over what looked like an industrial zone. Reuters verified the location seen in one of the videos as matching file and satellite imagery of the area. Reuters could not verify when the video was filmed.

Ukrainian media, including the RBK-Ukraine media outlet, reported that the oil refinery in the city of Saratov, the administrative center of the region, was on fire after a drone attack.

Reuters could not verify those reports. There was no official comment from Russia.

The Rosneft-owned refinery in the Saratov city was forced to suspend operations earlier this year for safety reasons after Ukrainian drone attacks, industry sources told Reuters.

Russia’s SHOT Telegram channel, which often publishes information from sources in the security services and law enforcement, reported about eight explosions were heard over Saratov and Engels, cities separated by the Volga River.

Russia’s civil aviation authority Rosaviatsia said on Telegram that flights in and out of Saratov had been halted for about two hours early on Sunday to ensure air safety.

Both sides deny targeting civilians in their strikes on each other’s territory in the war that Russia launched with a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.

Kyiv says its attacks inside Russia are aimed at destroying infrastructure that is key to Moscow’s war efforts, including energy and military infrastructure, and are in response to Russia’s continued strikes.


Chile copper mine to restart operations after deadly collapse

Chile copper mine to restart operations after deadly collapse
Updated 51 min 38 sec ago

Chile copper mine to restart operations after deadly collapse

Chile copper mine to restart operations after deadly collapse
  • Chile is the world’s largest copper producer, responsible for nearly a quarter of global supply

SANTIAGO: The world’s largest underground copper mine was set to resume operating on Sunday, after a deadly cave-in suspended work for more than a week.
Chile’s Mining Ministry ordered El Teniente to halt activity on August 1 to allow rescuers to search for five miners trapped after a “seismic event” caused the collapse of a tunnel the day before.
All five were found dead.
Whether the cause of the shaking was due to an earthquake or drilling remains under investigation.
State-owned operator Codelco said normal operations would resume on Sunday.
Chile is the world’s largest copper producer, responsible for nearly a quarter of global supply, with about 5.3 million metric tons (5.8 million tons) in 2024.
El Teniente contributed 356,000 metric tons — nearly seven percent — of the country’s total copper.
The metal is critical for wiring, motors and renewable energy technology.
Chile’s mining industry is considered among the safest in the world, with a fatality rate of 0.02 percent in 2024, according to the National Geology and Mining Service of Chile.


After busy first 100 days, Germany’s Merz faces discord at home

After busy first 100 days, Germany’s Merz faces discord at home
Updated 51 min 4 sec ago

After busy first 100 days, Germany’s Merz faces discord at home

After busy first 100 days, Germany’s Merz faces discord at home
  • Having achieved his life’s ambition at age 69 to run Europe’s top economy, Friedrich Merz lost no time to push change
  • Merz’s heavy focus on global events has earned him the moniker of ‘foreign chancellor’ – but trouble looms at home

BERLIN: German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has driven sweeping changes in security, economic and migration policy during his first 100 days in office, but faces widening cracks in his uneasy coalition.

On election night in February, a jubilant Merz promised to bring a bit of “rambo zambo” to the post – using a colloquialism that can evoke a wild and joyous ride, or chaos and mayhem.

Having achieved his life’s ambition at age 69 to run Europe’s top economy, Merz lost no time to push change, mostly in response to transatlantic turbulence sparked by US President Donald Trump.

“Germany is back,” Merz said, vowing to revive the economy, the military and Berlin’s international standing after what he labelled three lackluster years under his center-left predecessor Olaf Scholz.

Even before taking office, Merz’s Christian Democrats (CDU/CSU) and their governing partners from Scholz’s Social Democratic party (SPD) loosened debt rules and unlocked hundreds of billions of euros for Germany’s armed forces and its crumbling infrastructure.

Merz vowed to build “Europe’s largest conventional army” in the face of a hostile Russia and keep up strong support for Ukraine in lockstep with Paris and London.

A promise to ramp up NATO spending endeared Merz to Trump, who greeted him warmly at a White House meeting in June, only weeks after a jarring Oval Office showdown with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

When Israel bombed Iranian targets, Merz, with a penchant for strong and often controversial one-liners, praised it for doing the “dirty work” – but last Friday he took the bold step of freezing arms exports to Israel over its Gaza campaign.

On the home front, Merz has pressed a crackdown on irregular migration, a sharp departure from the centrist course of his long-time party rival Angela Merkel.

He has said he must address voter concerns about immigration to stem the rise of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, which won a record 20 percent in February’s election.

Merz’s heavy focus on global events has earned him the moniker of “foreign chancellor” – but trouble looms at home, where his SPD allies have often felt overshadowed or sidelined.

To many of them, Merz’s right-wing positions have been hard to swallow in the marriage of convenience they entered following the SPD’s dismal election outcome of 16 percent.

German voters have not yet fallen in love with Merz either. His personal approval rating slipped 10 points to just 32 percent in the latest poll by public broadcaster ARD.

In an early sign of trouble, Merz’s inauguration on May 6 turned into a white-knuckle ride when rebel MPs opposed him in the first round of the secret ballot.

He was confirmed in the second round, but the debacle pointed to simmering resentment in the left-right coalition.

Many have chafed at his hard line on immigration, his vow to slash social welfare and his limited enthusiasm for climate protection.

Merz also sparked controversy when he dismissed plans to hoist an LGBTQ rainbow flag on the parliament building by saying the Reichstag was “not a circus tent.”

The biggest coalition crisis came last month, sparked by what should have been routine parliamentary business – the nomination of three new judges to Germany’s highest court.

Right-wing online media had strongly campaigned against one of them, SPD nominee Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf, calling her a left-wing activist on abortion and other issues.

The CDU/CSU withdrew support for her and postponed the vote, sparking SPD fury. The issue looked set to fester until Brosius-Gersdorf withdrew her candidature on Thursday.

Other trouble came when the CDU’s Bavarian sister party demanded sharp cuts to social benefits for Ukrainian refugees, a position the SPD opposes.

Vice Chancellor Lars Klingbeil of the SPD warned the conservatives to refrain from further provocations, telling Welt TV that “we already have far too many arguments in this government.”

Both coalition partners know that open squabbling will turn off voters after discord brought down Scholz’s three-party coalition, and play into the hands of the AfD, their common foe.

For now Merz and most other politicians are on summer holidays, leaving unresolved issues lingering.

Merz will need to pay attention, said Wolfgang Schroeder of Kassel University.

“The chancellor’s attitude is: I think big-picture and long term, I’m not interested in the small print,” he said.

But Schroeder added that all the coalition’s big troubles so far – from the judge row to Ukrainians refugees – “have been about the small print.”


Russia and Ukraine hold fast to their demands ahead of a planned Putin-Trump summit

Russia and Ukraine hold fast to their demands ahead of a planned Putin-Trump summit
Updated 10 August 2025

Russia and Ukraine hold fast to their demands ahead of a planned Putin-Trump summit

Russia and Ukraine hold fast to their demands ahead of a planned Putin-Trump summit
  • The maximalist demands reflect Putin’s determination to reach the goals he set when he launched the full-scale invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022

The threats, pressure and ultimatums have come and gone, but Russian President Vladimir Putin has maintained Moscow’s uncompromising demands in the war in Ukraine, raising fears he could use a planned summit with US President Donald Trump in Alaska to coerce Kyiv into accepting an unfavorable deal.
The maximalist demands reflect Putin’s determination to reach the goals he set when he launched the full-scale invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022.
Putin sees a possible meeting with Trump as a chance to negotiate a broad deal that would not only cement Russia’s territorial gains but also keep Ukraine from joining NATO and hosting any Western troops, allowing Moscow to gradually pull the country back into its orbit.
The Kremlin leader believes time is on his side as the exhausted and outgunned Ukrainian forces are struggling to stem Russian advances in many sectors of the over 1,000-kilometer (over 600-mile) front line while swarms of Russian missiles and drones batter Ukrainian cities.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky also has stood firm in his positions, agreeing to a ceasefire proposed by Trump while reaffirming the country’s refusal to abandon seeking NATO membership and rejecting acknowledgment of Russia’s annexation of any of its regions.
A look at Russian and Ukrainian visions of a peace deal and how a Putin-Trump summit could evolve:
Russia’s position
In a memorandum presented at talks in Istanbul in June, Russia offered Ukraine two options for establishing a 30-day ceasefire. One demanded Ukraine withdraw its forces from Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson — the four regions Moscow illegally annexed in September 2022 but never fully captured.
As an alternate condition for a ceasefire, Russia made a “package proposal” for Ukraine to halt mobilization efforts, freeze Western arms deliveries and ban any third-country forces on its soil. Moscow also suggested Ukraine end martial law and hold elections, after which the countries could sign a comprehensive peace treaty.
Once there’s a truce, Moscow wants a deal to include the “international legal recognition” of its annexations of Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula in 2014 and the four regions in 2022.
Russia says a peace treaty should have Ukraine declare its neutral status between Russia and the West, abandon its bid to join NATO, limit the size of its armed forces and recognize Russian as an official language on par with Ukrainian -– conditions reflecting Putin’s earliest goals.
It also demands Ukraine ban the “glorification and propaganda of Nazism and neo-Nazism” and dissolve nationalist groups. Since the war began, Putin has falsely alleged that neo-Nazi groups were shaping Ukrainian politics under Zelensky, who is Jewish. They were fiercely dismissed by Kyiv and its Western allies.
In Russia’s view, a comprehensive peace treaty should see both countries lift all sanctions and restrictions, abandon any claims to compensation for wartime damage, resume trade and communications, and reestablish diplomatic ties.
Asked Thursday whether Moscow has signaled any willingness to compromise to make a meeting with Trump possible, Putin’s foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov responded that there haven’t been any shifts in the Russian position.
Ukraine’s position
The memorandum that Ukraine presented to Moscow in Istanbul emphasized the need for a full and unconditional 30-day ceasefire to set stage for peace negotiations.
It reaffirmed Ukraine’s consistent rejection of Russian demands for neutral status as an attack on its sovereignty, declaring it is free to choose its alliances and adding that its NATO membership will depend on consensus with the alliance.
It emphasized Kyiv’s rejection of any restrictions on the size and other parameters of its armed forces, as well as curbs on the presence of foreign troops on its soil.
Ukraine’s memorandum also opposed recognizing any Russian territorial gains, while describing the current line of contact as a starting point in negotiations.
The document noted the need for international security guarantees to ensure the implementation of peace agreements and prevent further aggression.
Kyiv’s peace proposal also demanded the return of all deported and illegally displaced children and a total prisoner exchange.
It held the door open to gradual lifting of some of the sanctions against Russia if it abides by the agreement.
Trump’s positions
Trump has often spoken admiringly of Putin and even echoed his talking points on the war. He had a harsh confrontation with Zelensky in the Oval Office on Feb. 28, but later warmed his tone. As Putin resisted a ceasefire and continued his aerial bombardments, Trump showed exasperation with the Kremlin leader, threatening Moscow with new sanctions.
Although Trump expressed disappointment with Putin, his agreement to meet him without Zelensky at the table raised worries in Ukraine and its European allies, who fear it could allow the Russian to get Trump on his side and strong-arm Ukraine into concessions.
Trump said without giving details that “there’ll be some swapping of territories, to the betterment of both” Russia and Ukraine as part of any peace deal that he will discuss with Putin when they meet Friday.
Putin repeatedly warned Ukraine will face tougher conditions for peace if it doesn’t accept Moscow’s demands as Russian troops forge into other regions to build what he described as a “buffer zone.” Some observers suggested Russia could trade those recent gains for the territories of the four annexed by Moscow still under Ukrainian control.
“That is potentially a situation that gives Putin a tremendous amount of leeway as long as he can use that leverage to force the Ukrainians into a deal that they may not like and to sideline the Europeans effectively,” Sam Greene of King’s College London said. “The question is, will Trump sign up to that and will he actually have the leverage to force the Ukrainians and the Europeans to accept it?”
Putin could accept a temporary truce to win Trump’s sympathy as he seeks to achieve broader goals, Greene said.
“He could accept a ceasefire so long as it’s one that leaves him in control, in which there’s no real deterrence against renewed aggression somewhere down the line,” he said. “He understands that his only route to getting there runs via Trump.”
In a possible indication he thinks a ceasefire or peace deal could be close, Putin called the leaders of China, India, South Africa and several ex-Soviet nations in an apparent effort to inform these allies about prospective agreements.
Tatiana Stanovaya of the Carnegie Russia and Eurasia Center argued Putin wouldn’t budge on his goals.
“However these conditions are worded, they amount to the same demand: Ukraine stops resisting, the West halts arms supplies, and Kyiv accepts Russia’s terms, which effectively amount to a de facto capitulation,” she posted on X. “The Russian side can frame this in a dozen different ways, creating the impression that Moscow is open to concessions and serious negotiation. It has been doing so for some time, but the core position remains unchanged: Russia wants Kyiv to surrender.”
She predicted Putin might agree to meet Zelensky but noted the Kremlin leader would only accept such a meeting “if there is a prearranged agenda and predetermined outcomes, which remains difficult to imagine.”
“The likely scenario is that this peace effort will fail once again,” she said. “This would be a negative outcome for Ukraine, but it would not deliver Ukraine to Putin on a plate either, at least not in the way he wants it. The conflict, alternating between open warfare and periods of simmering tension, appears likely to persist for the foreseeable future.”