Trump administration bars Harvard from enrolling foreign students

Update Trump administration bars Harvard from enrolling foreign students
Demonstrators with signs stand around the John Harvard Statue in Harvard Yard in Cambridge, Massachusetts on April 17, 2025, during a rally against President Donald Trump’s attacks on Harvard University. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 23 May 2025

Trump administration bars Harvard from enrolling foreign students

Trump administration bars Harvard from enrolling foreign students
  • Kristi Noem: ‘This administration is holding Harvard accountable for fostering violence, antisemitism, and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party on its campus’
  • Harvard: ‘We are fully committed to maintaining Harvard’s ability to host international students and scholars, who hail from more than 140 countries and enrich the University’

WASHINGTON: The Trump administration revoked Harvard University’s ability to enroll international students in its escalating battle with the Ivy League school, saying thousands of current students must transfer to other schools or leave the country.
The Department of Homeland Security announced the action Thursday, saying Harvard has created an unsafe campus environment by allowing “anti-American, pro-terrorist agitators” to assault Jewish students on campus. It also accused Harvard of coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party, saying it hosted and trained members of a Chinese paramilitary group as recently as 2024.
“This means Harvard can no longer enroll foreign students and existing foreign students must transfer or lose their legal status,” the agency said in a statement.

Harvard enrolls almost 6,800 foreign students at its campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts, accounting for more than a quarter of its student body. Most are graduate students, coming from more than 100 countries.
Harvard called the action unlawful and said it’s working to provide guidance to students.
“This retaliatory action threatens serious harm to the Harvard community and our country, and undermines Harvard’s academic and research mission,” the university said in a statement.
The dispute stems from an April 16 request from Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. The letter demanded that Harvard turn over information about foreign students that might implicate them in violence or protests that could lead to their deportation.




Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem salutes as she arrives at the commencement for the United States Coast Guard Academy, Wednesday, May 21, 2025, in New London, Connecticut. (AP Photo)

In a letter to Harvard on Thursday, Noem said the school’s sanction is “the unfortunate result of Harvard’s failure to comply with simple reporting requirements.” It bars Harvard from hosting international students for the upcoming 2025-26 school year.
Noem said Harvard can regain its ability to host foreign students if it produces a trove of records on foreign students within 72 hours. Her updated request demands all records, including audio or video footage, of foreign students participating in protests or dangerous activity on campus.
“This administration is holding Harvard accountable for fostering violence, antisemitism, and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party on its campus,” Noem said in a statement.
The action revoked Harvard’s certification in the Student and Exchange Visitor Program, which gives the school the ability to sponsor international students to get their visas and attend school in the United States.
Students in Harvard College Democrats said the Trump administration is playing with students’ lives to push a radical agenda and to quiet dissent. “Trump’s attack on international students is text book authoritarianism — Harvard must continue to hold the line,” the group said in a statement.
The administration drew condemnation from free speech groups including the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, which said Noem is demanding a “surveillance state.”
“This sweeping fishing expedition reaches protected expression and must be flatly rejected,” the group said in a statement.
Noem’s sanction opens a new front in the Trump administration’s battle with Harvard. The nation’s oldest and wealthiest university, Harvard was the first to openly defy White House demands to limit pro-Palestinian protests and eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion policies.
The federal government has responded by cutting $2.6 billion in federal grants at Harvard, forcing it to self-fund much of its sprawling research operation. President Donald Trump has said he wants to strip the university of its tax-exempt status.

Many of Harvard’s punishments have come through a federal antisemitism task force that says the university failed to protect Jewish students from harassment and violence amid a nationwide wave of pro-Palestinian protests.
Homeland Security officials echoed those concerns in its Thursday announcement. It offered examples including a recent internal report at Harvard finding that many Jewish students reported facing discrimination or bias on campus.
It also tapped into concerns that congressional Republicans have raised about ties between US universities and China. Homeland Security officials said Harvard provided training to the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps as recently as 2024. As evidence, it provided a link to a Fox News article which in turn cited a letter from House Republicans.
Ted Mitchell, president of the American Council on Education, called the latest action an “illegal, small-minded” overreach.
“I worry that this is sending a very chilling effect to international students looking to come to America for education,” he said.
The Trump administration has leveraged the system for tracking international students’ legal status as part of its broader attempts to crack down on higher education. What was once a largely administrative database has become a tool of enforcement, as immigration officials revoked students’ legal status directly in the system.
Those efforts were challenged in court, leading to restorations of status and a nationwide injunction blocking the administration from pursuing further terminations.


India retires 'flying coffin' Soviet fighter jet after six decades

India retires 'flying coffin' Soviet fighter jet after six decades
Updated 36 sec ago

India retires 'flying coffin' Soviet fighter jet after six decades

India retires 'flying coffin' Soviet fighter jet after six decades
  • Crowds cheered as officials staged a grand farewell for the final two MiG-21 squadrons, totalling around 36 aircraft, in Chandigarh
  • The send-off came months after India signed multi-billion-dollar deal to purchase 26 Rafale fighter jets from France's Dassault Aviation

INDIA: India's Russian-built MiG-21s flew for the final time Friday, marking the end of an era for the country's first supersonic fighter jet -- lauded for its valour but tarnished by a legacy of some 400 crashes.

Crowds cheered as officials staged a grand farewell for the final two MiG-21 squadrons, totalling around 36 aircraft, at an air force base in the northern city of Chandigarh.

The send-off came a day after New Delhi signed a $7-billion deal to acquire 97 domestically designed and built Tejas jets as it seeks to modernise its Soviet-era fleet.

The farewell ceremony included a mock dogfight between Russian MiGs and a colourful display by the Surya Kiran aerobatic team.

The retired jets will likely be put up for public display, though the government has yet to announce any plans.

Defence minister Rajnath Singh, senior air force officials, including veterans who piloted the MiG-21, watched as the storied aircraft made their last pass.

First inducted in the 1960s, India operated a staggering 874 MiG-21s.

Plans to retire them in the 1990s were repeatedly delayed amid local production setbacks, bureaucratic obstacles and corruption scandals.

"MiG-21's legacy is undeniable. It was a capable -- if flawed -- fighter that formed the Indian Air Force's backbone for decades," former Air Marshal Raghunath Nambiar told AFP on the sidelines of the event.

He credited a key MiG-21 bombing campaign for hastening India's victory over Pakistan in the 1971 war that led to the creation of Bangladesh.

But age caught up with the Soviet-era jet.

'FLYING COFFIN'

"Designed for simplicity, the MiG-21 was meant to be rugged but faltered as it aged," Nambiar said.

Engine flameouts, hydraulic failures, and electrical faults were frequent and with no backup systems, emergency landings and ejections became all too common, he added.

The MiG-21's grim reputation earned it the infamous "flying coffin" moniker in its later years.

Over roughly 40 years, 482 MiG crashes were recorded, claiming the lives of 171 pilots in India as of 2012, according to defence ministry figures.

"It's time to let it go -- not as a flawless icon, but as a sobering reminder of the sacrifices made by those who flew it," Nambiar said.

With the MiG-21's retirement, India, the world's fifth-largest economy, is set to intensify its push for domestic arms production and new international partnerships.

In April, India signed a multi-billion-dollar deal to purchase 26 Rafale fighter jets from France's Dassault Aviation. They will join 36 Rafale fighters already acquired.

India is also working with a French company to develop and manufacture fighter jet engines at home.

Angad Singh, co-author of a book on the MiGs, told AFP the country faced an "unenviable position" given its current fighter shortfall.

He, however, added that India was putting its full weight behind the improved Tejas aircraft and was in talks to buy another 114 Rafales.

Regional security concerns loom large for India, especially after an intense four-day clash with arch-rival Pakistan in May, their worst standoff since 1999.

Both sides claimed victory, each boasting of downing the other's fighter jets.

 


Russia is helping China to prepare for a potential invasion of Taiwan, defense institute says

Russia is helping China to prepare for a potential invasion of Taiwan, defense institute says
Updated 26 September 2025

Russia is helping China to prepare for a potential invasion of Taiwan, defense institute says

Russia is helping China to prepare for a potential invasion of Taiwan, defense institute says
  • Under President Xi Jinping, China has embarked upon a broad modernization program of its armed forces with the goal of transforming it into a “world-class” military by 2050
  • Equipment could be used to attack Taiwan

LONDON: Russia is selling military equipment and technology to China that could help Beijing prepare an airborne invasion of Taiwan, according to an analysis of leaked Russian documents by a UK-based defense and security forum.
The Royal United Services Institute’s analysis is based on around 800 pages of documents, including contracts and lists of equipment to be supplied by Moscow to Beijing, from the Black Moon hacktivist group, which previously published some of the documents online. It does not identify its members but describes itself in a manifesto as opposed to governments that carry out aggressive foreign policy.
The authors of the RUSI report shared some of the documents with The Associated Press and say they appear to be genuine, although parts of the documents may have been omitted or altered. AP is unable to independently verify their authenticity.
The mix of completed and apparent draft Russian documents reference meetings between Chinese and Russian delegations — including visits to Moscow — and payment and delivery timelines for high-altitude parachute systems and amphibious assault vehicles. They suggest that Russia has begun work on the products to be delivered but don’t contain direct evidence from the Chinese side that Beijing has paid any money or received any equipment.
The authors argue the equipment could be used to invade Taiwan. Under President Xi Jinping, China has embarked upon a broad modernization program of its armed forces with the goal of transforming it into a “world-class” military by 2050.
Equipment could be used to attack Taiwan
High ranking US officials have suggested Xi ordered his military to be prepared for a possible invasion of Taiwan as early as 2027. Beijing claims the self-governing democracy is rightfully a part of China and has not ruled out seizing the island by force.
The documents don’t mention Taiwan directly, but the analysis by the London-based institute suggests the deal would help China gain advanced parachuting capabilities that it would need to mount an invasion, potentially speeding up a timeline.
It’s not certain that China has decided to invade Taiwan, but access to Russian equipment and localized training in China means Beijing will be better equipped for a potential invasion, Danylyuk said.
“The Chinese school of airborne landing is very young,” he said, suggesting Moscow’s assistance could help speed up China’s airborne program by about 10 to 15 years.
Russia’s Kremlin, and China and Taiwan’s defense and foreign ministries did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
“The greatest value of the deal” to China is likely in the training and procedures for command and control of parachute forces, because Russia has “combat experience,” whereas China doesn’t, write Oleksandr Danylyuk and Jack Watling.
The analysts say Russia’s aim is to develop as a military supplier to China and fund its war in Ukraine. But Danylyuk also suggested that Moscow may want to draw Beijing into a conflict with Washington over Taiwan, distracting the US from Russia’s war with Ukraine.
While Beijing’s military capabilities largely surpass Moscow’s, the analysis says China has gaps which Russia can fill. Russia has a long history of airborne forces dating back decades, knowhow the authors say China needs.
Song Zhongping, a military commentator in Beijing, said China had superior equipment, but “Russia has more combat experience.”
Wen-Ti Sung, an expert on China and Taiwan with the Atlantic Council, said parachuting in forces would probably support the logistics of any invasion but would be unlikely to be the “main event.”
Instead, “China is playing the long game” by acquiring Russian equipment, Sung said. That’s because Beijing will find a way to reverse engineer the equipment and technology and develop it not just for airborne combat but also for advanced intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance which are critical for modern warfare, he said.
Russia agreed to provide training and equipment
According to a document dated September 2024, an initial 2021 agreement detailed timelines for payments and delivery. Stages one and two — analysis of technical specifications, software modifications and equipment manufacturing — have been completed, according to that document.
Russia also agreed to provide training in China and a complete set of equipment for an airborne battalion including the ability to carry out infiltration by special forces, the analysis says.
That includes the sale of 37 light amphibious assault vehicles, 11 amphibious anti-tank self-propelled guns, and 11 airborne armored personnel carriers, as well as command and observation vehicles. The total cost is listed as more than $210 million.
Beijing wants all the vehicles to be equipped with Chinese communication systems and to be prepared to use Chinese ammunition, the documents show.
Beijing seeks high-altitude parachute systems
Russia agreed to sell China systems which are designed for parachuting up to 190 kilograms (419 pounds) from an extremely high altitude, the RUSI analysis said.
The documents reference the minutes of a meeting from March 8, 2024 in Moscow where Russia agreed to provide China by the end of 2024 with details of how the system, known as Dalnolyot, performed under colder temperature conditions down to –60 degrees Celsius (–76 Fahrenheit.)
According to the documents, Beijing requested testing the parachute systems for drops from 8,000 meters (26,250 feet).
That height would allow Chinese forces to glide for up to 80 kilometers (50 miles) allowing “Chinese special forces groups to penetrate the territory of other countries without being noticed,” the RUSI report said.
Danylyuk suggested the Dalnolyot system could be used for a “stage zero” landing in Taiwan, in which Beijing secretly sends in equipment and special forces from aircraft outside Taiwanese airspace.
Russia’s parachute troops failed in Ukraine
Although Russia has a long history of parachute troops, Moscow did not deploy them successfully in Ukraine.
In February 2022, just days after Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered a full-scale invasion of Ukraine, his special forces soldiers tried to take over Hostomel airfield on the outskirts of Kyiv.
They planned to establish a base to fly in more troops, but several Russian helicopters were hit by missiles before they even got to Hostomel. An attempt to take control of a military air base south of Kyiv also failed.
Western officials and military experts suggest the failure to establish an air bridge from Russia to Ukraine turned what Moscow expected to be a swift victory into a grueling war three years and counting.
Now Moscow has dipped into its Soviet-era stocks to replace weapons on the battlefield and, like Ukraine, is ramping up its weapons production.
But that doesn’t mean Moscow is unable to sell equipment to China, Danylyuk said.
The airborne equipment described in the documents was necessary only for “the invasion stage,” he said. Russia doesn’t need such equipment for Ukraine, he said.
Lessons from Russian defeats
The analysts wrote that China’s “operational challenge” in Taiwan would be to do what Russia did not: suppress Taiwan’s air defenses and land sufficient troops and equipment to be able to build up a force to defeat the Taiwanese military before it mobilizes.
The report suggests China could do that by airdropping armored vehicles on golf courses near Taiwanese ports and airfields which could allow air troops to clear a path for landing forces.


Sarkozy conviction exposes political divide in crisis-hit France

Sarkozy conviction exposes political divide in crisis-hit France
Updated 26 September 2025

Sarkozy conviction exposes political divide in crisis-hit France

Sarkozy conviction exposes political divide in crisis-hit France
  • The conviction comes at a deeply sensitive moment, with France in political deadlock and the far-right sensing its best ever chance to come to power
  • Henri Guaino, a former special adviser to Sarkozy, called the conviction “a humiliation for the state and its institutions“

PARIS: The dramatic decision to send former president Nicolas Sarkozy to prison for criminal conspiracy has laid bare France’s stark political divisions, with the move cheered by the left but slammed by the ascendant right.
Sarkozy, seen as a mentor to many conservative politicians, was convicted on Thursday over a scheme enabling late Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi to fund his 2007 presidential run.
He must serve his sentence while awaiting the outcome of his appeal, and will be the first French postwar leader to serve jail time.
The conviction comes at a deeply sensitive moment, with France in political deadlock and the far-right sensing its best ever chance to come to power.
Speaking to broadcaster RTL, Henri Guaino, a former special adviser to Sarkozy, called the conviction “a humiliation for the state and its institutions.”
Guaino urged President Emmanuel Macron to pardon Sarkozy, who was president of France from 2007 to 2012, allowing him to avoid prison.
There was no immediate reaction from Macron’s office.
Despite his legal troubles, Sarkozy still enjoys considerable influence and popularity on the French right and has on occasion had private meetings with Macron.

- ‘It’s Nicolas who pays’ -

In an editorial, conservative French daily Le Figaro denounced the court ruling as “absurd and incomprehensible,” claiming there was no “tangible evidence” of Sarkozy’s wrong-doing.
Left-leaning Liberation featured Sarkozy’s face on its front page, with the words “The slammer” printed over it.
Far-right leader Marine Le Pen, who has herself been convicted of embezzlement and insists she is a target of a “witch hunt,” criticized Thursday’s ruling.
She argued on X that the use of provisional enforcement represented “a great danger, in view of the fundamental principles of our law, foremost among which is the presumption of innocence.”
In France, provisional enforcement means that a judicial decision will be implemented even as the appeals process plays out.
Le Pen drew parallels between her own case — which saw her banned from standing for office for five years, scuppering her chances of running in France’s 2027 presidential election unless she wins her appeal — and that of Sarkozy.
“A number of magistrates have a kind of scorecard where they try to pin down as many politicians as possible,” she told broadcaster LCI.
But some on the left expressed their satisfaction.
“In the end, it’s Nicolas who pays,” quipped hard-left lawmaker Anais Belouassa-Cherifi, referring to a right-wing viral meme denouncing the tax burden on ordinary French people.
But Liberation daily said it did not see the conviction as a cause for celebration.
In an editorial, the newspaper said Sarkozy’s case as well as various other political scandals only serve to widen the gap between the French people and the elites.
There is “only one winner in the long run: the far right.”
The court ordered that Sarkozy should be placed in custody at a later date, with prosecutors to inform him on October 13 when he should go to prison.
He has already been convicted in two separate trials but always avoided jail.


French niece of militant propagandists offers ‘apologies’ to victims

French niece of militant propagandists offers ‘apologies’ to victims
Updated 26 September 2025

French niece of militant propagandists offers ‘apologies’ to victims

French niece of militant propagandists offers ‘apologies’ to victims
  • Speaking in court on Friday, Jennyfer Clain, a niece of Jean-Michel and Fabien Clain offered her “apologies” to all “direct and indirect victims” of the militants
  • “I am not asking them to forgive me, it is unforgivable, but I offer them my deepest and most sincere apologies,” she said

PARIS: A niece of a notorious militant propagandists on trial for joining the Daesh group and taking her children with her apologized to all victims of the militants as well as her family.
Speaking in court on Friday, Jennyfer Clain, a niece of Jean-Michel and Fabien Clain, who publicly claimed responsibility on behalf of Daesh for the Paris attacks on November 13, 2015, offered her “apologies” to all “direct and indirect victims” of the militants, “in France, Syria, Iraq and elsewhere.”
During the worst attack on Paris since World War II, militant gunmen and suicide bombers killed 130 people at the Bataclan concert hall and elsewhere.
The Clain brothers are presumed to have died during the military campaign launched by US-backed Kurdish groups to defeat IS. In 2022, they were sentenced in absentia to life imprisonment without parole.
“I am not asking them to forgive me, it is unforgivable, but I offer them my deepest and most sincere apologies,” she said, referring to the victims.
Jennyfer Clain and two other French women went on trial in Paris last week, accused of traveling to the Middle East to join the Daesh group.
Jennyfer Clain went to the Middle East with four children, and her fifth baby was born in Raqqa, the Daesh group’s one time capital.
The two other women on trial are Jennyfer Clain’s sister-in-law, Mayalen Duhart, 42, and 67-year-old Christine Allain, the women’s mother-in-law.
Duhart brought her four children with her, and had a baby there, who died at seven months.
Weeping in court, Jennyfer Clain asked her five children, who have been placed in foster care since their return to France in 2019, for “forgiveness.”
“I am sorry for everything they have been through because of me,” she said. “I have failed in my role as a mother,” said the 34-year-old, who is also on trial for abandoning minors.
A representative of the National Anti-Terrorism Prosecutor’s Office has requested a 13-year prison sentence for her.
Duhart also sobbed in court.
Released on parole, she said that a return to prison would be a “disaster” for her children, who have also been placed in foster care.
Prosecutors requested a 10-year prison sentence for Duhart.
“I am not a victim,” she said. “The victims are the others, those who were tortured and massacred by the organization I belonged to. I am responsible.”
Earlier this week the presiding judge had pointed out to the three women that they had not said anything about “the victims of the attacks.”
Allain said that she had been “touched” by her meeting in prison with Georges Salines, the father of Lola Salines, one of the victims killed at the Bataclan.
Prosecutors have requested a 15-year prison sentence for her.
The verdict is expected later Friday.


Russia has ill intentions toward the whole world, Polish PM says

Russia has ill intentions toward the whole world, Polish PM says
Updated 26 September 2025

Russia has ill intentions toward the whole world, Polish PM says

Russia has ill intentions toward the whole world, Polish PM says
  • “European allies have never been so united... we need to be vigilant,” Tusk said

WARSAW: Russia has ill intentions toward the whole world and Europe is finally more united in its views on the threat from Moscow, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said on Friday.
“European allies have never been so united... we need to be vigilant. Russia has ill intentions toward the whole world, and those who border with it are the first to feel it,” Tusk told reporters when asked about recent drone incidents.