US must keep control of migrants sent to South Sudan in case removals were unlawful, judge rules

Update The Department of Homeland Security and the White House did not immediately return messages seeking comment. (AFP/File)
The Department of Homeland Security and the White House did not immediately return messages seeking comment. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 21 May 2025

US must keep control of migrants sent to South Sudan in case removals were unlawful, judge rules

US must keep control of migrants sent to South Sudan in case removals were unlawful, judge rules
  • Judge Murphy said the government must “maintain custody and control of class members currently being removed to South Sudan or to any other third country”
  • While Murphy left the details to the government’s discretion, he said he expects the migrants “will be treated humanely”

WASHINGTON: A federal judge has ruled that US officials must retain custody and control of migrants apparently removed to South Sudan in case he orders their removals were unlawful.

US District Judge Brian E. Murphy in Massachusetts issued the ruling late Tuesday after an emergency hearing, after attorneys for immigrants said the Trump administration appears to have begun deporting people from Myanmar and Vietnam to South Sudan — despite a court order restricting removals to other countries.

Murphy said the government must “maintain custody and control of class members currently being removed to South Sudan or to any other third country, to ensure the practical feasibility of return if the Court finds that such removals were unlawful.”

While Murphy left the details to the government’s discretion, he said he expects the migrants “will be treated humanely.”

Attorneys for the migrants told the judge that immigration authorities may have sent up to a dozen people from several countries to Africa, which they argue violates a court order saying people must get a “meaningful opportunity” to argue that sending them to a country outside their homeland would threaten their safety.

The apparent removal of one man from Myanmar was confirmed in an email from an immigration official in Texas, according to court documents. He was informed only in English, a language he does not speak well, and his attorneys learned of the plan hours before his deportation flight, they said.

A woman also reported that her husband from Vietnam and up to 10 other people were flown to Africa Tuesday morning, attorneys from the National Immigration Litigation Alliance wrote.

The attorneys asked Murphy for an emergency court order to prevent the deportations. Murphy, who was appointed by President Joe Biden, previously found that any plans to deport people to Libya without notice would “clearly” violate his ruling, which also applies to people who have otherwise exhausted their legal appeals.

Murphy said in his Tuesday order that US officials must appear in court Wednesday to identify the migrants impacted, address when and how they learned they would be removed to a third country, and what opportunity they were given to raise a fear-based claim. He also ruled that the government must provide information about the whereabouts of the migrants apparently already removed.

The Department of Homeland Security and the White House did not immediately return messages seeking comment.

South Sudan’s police spokesperson Major General James Monday Enoka told The Associated Press Wednesday that no migrants had arrived in the country and that if they arrive, they would be investigated and again “re-deported to their correct country” if found not to be South Sudanese.

Some countries do not accept deportations from the United States, which has led the Trump administration to strike agreements with other countries, including Panama, to house them. The Trump administration has sent Venezuelans to a notorious prison in El Salvador under an 18th-century wartime law hotly contested in the courts.

South Sudan has suffered repeated waves of violence since gaining independence from Sudan in 2011 amid hopes it could use its large oil reserves to bring prosperity to a region long battered by poverty. Just weeks ago, the country’s top UN official warned that fighting between forces loyal to the president and a vice president threatened to spiral again into full-scale civil war.

The situation is “darkly reminiscent of the 2013 and 2016 conflicts, which took over 400,000 lives,” Nicholas Haysom, head of the almost 20,000-strong UN peacekeeping mission.

The US State Department’s annual report on South Sudan, published in April 2024, says “significant human rights issues” include arbitrary killings, disappearances, torture or inhumane treatment by security forces and extensive violence based on gender and sexual identity.

The US Homeland Security Department has given Temporary Protected Status to a small number of South Sudanese already living in the United States since the country was founded in 2011, shielding them from deportation because conditions were deemed unsafe for return. Secretary Kristi Noem recently extended those protections to November to allow for a more thorough review.

South Sudan’s diplomatic relations with the USgrew tense in April when a deportation row led to the revocation of visas and a ban on South Sudanese nationals.

The USis one of the biggest donors to South Sudan’s humanitarian aid programs with the total funding in 2024 standing at over $640 million, according to the USembassy in South Sudan.


Georgia charges top opposition leaders over 'coup plot'

Georgia charges top opposition leaders over 'coup plot'
Updated 15 sec ago

Georgia charges top opposition leaders over 'coup plot'

Georgia charges top opposition leaders over 'coup plot'
  • Ex-president Mikheil Saakashvili, who is serving a 12.5-year sentence for abuse of office, is among them
  • Georgia has been mired in political crisis since last year’s disputed parliamentary elections

TBILISI: Georgia on Thursday charged eight top opposition figures including jailed ex-president Mikheil Saakashvili with plotting to overthrow the government, sabotage and aiding foreign powers, in an intensifying crackdown on opponents.
Those targeted slammed the ruling Georgian Dream party for escalating an intense crackdown on dissent in the Black Sea nation, in what one branded a “war on democracy.”
Georgia has been mired in political crisis since last year’s disputed parliamentary elections, which the opposition says were rigged in favor of Georgian Dream.
Thursday’s proceedings target Saakashvili — who is serving a 12.5-year sentence for abuse of office, a conviction denounced by rights groups as politically motivated — as well as a string of opposition leaders, Prosecutor General Giorgi Gvarakidze told reporters.
The most serious charges — “assisting a foreign state ... in hostile activities” — carries a maximum prison sentence of 15 years.
Many are already behind bars on prosecutions widely seen as political retribution, including opposition leaders Nika Gvaramia, Nika Melia and Elene Khoshtaria.
Gvaramia dismissed the charges as “absurd political theater,” and accused Georgian Dream of “waging war on democracy.”
“The oligarchy must fall,” he wrote on social media.
Another of those charged, Zurab Japaridze, a leader of the Girchi party, said the government “has crossed the final line into authoritarianism.”
Khoshtaria of the Droa party vowed: “No intimidation will stop us from defending Georgia’s European future.”
Prosecutor Gvarakidze alleged the politicians had “engaged in activities directed against Georgia’s constitutional order and national security” by providing information about energy and defense to Western governments that helped them sanction Georgian officials.
He also alleged that several of them had sought to “radicalize street protests” following elections in October last year by calling for the overthrow of the government and the seizure of state buildings.
Saakashvili, a reformist pro-Western ex-president, is accused of urging his supporters via social media “to resist and topple the regime.”
The European Union has heavily criticized Tbilisi’s democratic backsliding in recent years.
Last month, Georgian Dream asked the Constitutional Court to ban the country’s three main opposition forces.
The party, in power since 2012, originally cast itself as liberal and pro-European, but has faced accusations of drifting toward Russia and derailing Georgia’s bid to join the EU.
The party rejects the allegations, saying it is safeguarding stability in the country following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.