Trump, in a new interview, says he doesn’t know if he backs due process rights

Trump, in a new interview, says he doesn’t know if he backs due process rights
US President Donald Trump. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 05 May 2025

Trump, in a new interview, says he doesn’t know if he backs due process rights

Trump, in a new interview, says he doesn’t know if he backs due process rights
  • Says courts are getting in his way as he moves to deport “some of the worst, most dangerous people on Earth”
  • Thinks military action against Canada is ‘highly unlikely.’ As for Greenland, “something could happen”

WEST PALM BEACH, Florida: President Donald Trump is circumspect about his duties to uphold due process rights laid out in the Constitution, saying in a new interview that he does not know whether US citizens and noncitizens alike deserve that guarantee.
He also said he does not think military force will be needed to make Canada the “51st state” and played down the possibility he would look to run for a third term in the White House.
The comments in a wide-ranging, and at moments combative, interview with NBC’s “Meet the Press” came as the Republican president’s efforts to quickly enact his agenda face sharper headwinds with Americans just as his second administration crossed the 100-day mark, according to a recent poll by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.
Trump, however, made clear that he is not backing away from a to-do list that he insists the American electorate broadly supported when they elected him in November.
Here are some of the highlights from the interview with NBC’s Kristen Welker that was taped Friday at his Mar-a-Lago property in Florida and aired Sunday.
Trump doesn’t commit to due process
Critics on the left have tried to make the case that Trump is chipping away at due process in the United States. Most notably, they cite the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran man who was living in Maryland when he was mistakenly deported to El Salvador and imprisoned without communication.
Trump says Abrego Garcia is part of a violent transnational gang. The Republican president has sought to turn deportation into a test case for his campaign against illegal immigration despite a Supreme Court order saying the administration must work to return Abrego Garcia to the US
Asked in the interview whether US citizens and noncitizens both deserve due process as laid out in the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution, Trump was noncommittal.
“I don’t know. I’m not, I’m not a lawyer. I don’t know,” Trump said when pressed by Welker.
The Fifth Amendment provides “due process of law,” meaning a person has certain rights when it comes to being prosecuted for a crime. Also, the 14th Amendment says no state can “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
Trump said he has “brilliant lawyers ... and they are going to obviously follow what the Supreme Court said.”
He said he was pushing to deport “some of the worst, most dangerous people on Earth,” but that courts are getting in his way.
“I was elected to get them the hell out of here, and the courts are holding me from doing it,” Trump said.
Military action against Canada is ‘highly unlikely’
The president has repeatedly threatened that he intends to make Canada the “51st state.”
Before his White House meeting on Tuesday with newly elected Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, Trump is not backing away from the rhetoric that has angered Canadians.
Trump, however, told NBC that it was “highly unlikely” that the US would need to use military force to make Canada the 51st state.
He offered less certainty about whether his repeated calls for the US to take over Greenland from NATO-ally Denmark can be achieved without military action.
“Something could happen with Greenland,” Trump said. “I’ll be honest, we need that for national and international security. ... I don’t see it with Canada. I just don’t see it, I have to be honest with you.”
President bristles at recession forecasts
Trump said the US economy is in a “transition period” but he expects it to do “fantastically” despite the economic turmoil sparked by his tariffs.
He offered sharp pushback when Welker noted that some Wall Street analysts now say the chances of a recession are increasing.
“Well, you know, you say, some people on Wall Street say,” Trump said. “Well, I tell you something else. Some people on Wall Street say that we’re going to have the greatest economy in history.”
He also deflected blame for the 0.3 percent decline in the US economy in the first quarter. He said he was not responsible for it.
“I think the good parts are the Trump economy and the bad parts are the Biden economy because he’s done a terrible job,” referring to his Democratic predecessor, Joe Biden.
Trump doubled down on his recent comments at a Cabinet meeting that children might have to have two dolls instead of 30, denying that is an acknowledgment his tariffs will lead to supply shortages.
“I’m just saying they don’t need to have 30 dolls. They can have three. They don’t need to have 250 pencils. They can have five.”
Trump plays down third-term talk
The president has repeatedly suggested he could seek a third term in the White House even though the 22nd Amendment of the Constitution says that “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice.”
Trump told NBC there is considerable support for him to run for a third term.
“But this is not something I’m looking to do,” Trump said. “I’m looking to have four great years and turn it over to somebody, ideally a great Republican, a great Republican to carry it forward.”
Trump’s previous comments about a third term sometimes seem more about provoking outrage on the political left. The Trump Organization is even selling red caps with the words “Trump 2028.”
But at moments, he has suggested he was seriously looking into a third term. In a late March phone interview with NBC, Trump said, “I’m not joking. There are methods which you could do it.”
So JD Vance in 2028? Marco Rubio? Not so fast.

Trump said in the interview that Vice President JD Vance is doing a “fantastic job” and is “brilliant.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio, whom Trump last week tasked to simultaneously serve as acting national security adviser, is “great,” the president said.
But Trump said it is “far too early” to begin talking about his potential successor.
He is confident that his “Make America Great Again” movement will flourish beyond his time in the White House.
“You look at Marco, you look at JD Vance, who’s fantastic,” Trump said. “You look at — I could name 10, 15, 20 people right now just sitting here. No, I think we have a tremendous party. And you know what I can’t name? I can’t name one Democrat.”
Hegseth is ‘totally safe’
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has been under fire for his participation in Signal text chains in which sensitive information about military planning was shared. But Trump said he is not looking to replace his Pentagon chief.
“No. Not even a little bit. No. Pete’s going to be great,” Trump said. Hegseth’s job is “totally safe.”
The president also said his decision to nominate national security adviser Mike Waltz to be the US ambassador to the United Nations was not punishment for starting the chain to which Waltz inadvertently added a reporter.
“No. I just think he’ll do a nice job in the new position,” Trump said. He said his decision to have Rubio take over Waltz’s duties will likely be temporary.
“Marco’s very busy doing other things, so he’s not going to keep it long term. We’re going to put somebody else in,” Trump said, adding that it would nonetheless be possible to do both jobs indefinitely. “You know, there’s a theory. Henry Kissinger did both. There’s a theory that you don’t need two people. But I think I have some really great people that could do a good job.”
One person he said he is not considering for the post? Top policy aide Stephen Miller.
“Well, I’d love to have Stephen there, but that would be a downgrade,” he said. “Stephen is much higher on the totem pole than that, in my opinion.”
Trump insists he’s not profiting from the presidency, plans to donate his salary once again
Trump denied he is profiting from the presidency, even as he continues to promote a series of business ventures, including cryptocurrency holdings.
“I’m not profiting from anything. All I’m doing is, I started this long before the election. I want crypto. I think crypto’s important because if we don’t do it, China’s going to. And it’s new, it’s very popular, it’s very hot,” Trump said, adding that he hasn’t even “even looked” at how much he’s made from the venture.
Just days before taking office, Trump launched his own meme coin, which surged in value after it announced that top holders would be invited to an exclusive dinner at the president’s Washington-area golf club later this month and a tour of the White House. He also helped launch World Liberty Financial, another cryptocurrency venture, last year.
That’s in addition to a long list of other business ventures, from Trump Media & Technology Group, which runs his Truth Social site, to branded sneakers, watches and colognes and perfumes.
“Being president probably cost me money if you really look,” Trump said. “In fact, I do something that no other president has done, they think maybe George Washington has done.”
He added: “I contribute my entire salary to the government, back to the government. And I’m doing it again.”
Another TikTok deal extension
Trump said he is open to extending the deadline for a deal on TikTok once again.
“I’d like to see it done,” he said. “I have a little warm spot in my heart for TikTok. TikTok is — it’s very interesting, but it’ll be protected.
He later added: “If it needs an extension, I would be willing to give it an extension, might not need it.”
Last month, Trump used executive action to keep TikTok running in the US for another 75 days to give his administration more time to broker a deal to bring the social media platform under American ownership.
White House officials had believed they were close to a deal in which the app’s operations would have been spun off into a new company based in the US and owned and operated by a majority of American investors. But Beijing hit the brakes after Trump slapped wide-ranging tariffs on nations across the globe.
“We actually have a deal. We have a group of purchasers, very substantial people. They’re going to pay a lot of money. It’s a good thing for us. It’s a good thing for China. It’s going to be, I think, very good,” he said. “But because of the fact that I’ve essentially cut off China right now with the tariffs that are so high that they’re not going to be able to do much business with the United States. But if we make a deal with China I’m sure that’ll be a subject, and it’ll be a very easy subject to solve.”


Trump told Netanyahu that striking Hamas inside Qatar was not wise, WSJ reports

Trump told Netanyahu that striking Hamas inside Qatar was not wise, WSJ reports
Updated 32 sec ago

Trump told Netanyahu that striking Hamas inside Qatar was not wise, WSJ reports

Trump told Netanyahu that striking Hamas inside Qatar was not wise, WSJ reports
  • But in the second call,Trump was asking Netanyahu if the attack had proven successful, the Journal reported

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that his decision to target Hamas inside Qatar wasn’t wise, the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday, citing senior administration officials.

Trump made the comments during what the Journal described as a heated phone call on Tuesday after the attack.

According to the newspaper, Netanyahu responded that he had a brief window to launch the strikes and took the opportunity.

A second call between the men later on Tuesday was cordial, with Trump asking Netanyahu if the attack had proven successful, the Journal reported.

In a video footage posted on YouTube by The Associated Press, Trump said on Tuesday that he was “very unhappy” about the Israeli military strike on Doha.

“Well I’m not thrilled, I’m not thrilled about it. .., I’ not thrilled about the whole situation. It’s not a good situation. We want have the hostages back, but we are not thrilled with the way that went down,” he said.

Israel launched the strike targeting Hamas’ leadership in Qatar as they considered a US proposal for a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip.

 


 


Ghana accepting west Africans deported from US

Ghana accepting west Africans deported from US
Updated 28 min 57 sec ago

Ghana accepting west Africans deported from US

Ghana accepting west Africans deported from US
  • Ghana has long been home to Nigerian immigrants

ACCRA: Ghana is accepting west Africans deported from the United States, Ghanaian President John Mahama said Wednesday.
Deporting people to third countries — in many cases places they’ve never lived — has been a hallmark of US President Donald Trump’s crackdown on undocumented immigrants, notably by sending hundreds to a notorious prison in El Salvador.
Mahama told reporters Wednesday that Ghana had agreed to take in nationals from west Africa, where a regional agreement allows visa-free travel.
“We were approached by the US to accept third-party nationals who were being removed from the US. And we agreed with them that west African nationals were acceptable,” Mahama said.
He said a “first batch” of 14 people had come to Ghana, including “several” Nigerians who have since returned to their home countries though he did not provide a timeline for when that occurred. Another arrived from The Gambia.
Ghana has long been home to Nigerian immigrants, though recent weeks have seen sporadic anti-Nigerian protests in several cities where groups of demonstrators demanded their expulsion, blaming them for rising crime, prostitution and unfair economic competition.
In late July, Nigeria sent a special envoy and its foreign ministry urged calm while Ghanaian and Nigerian officials held talks to defuse tensions.

Deal comes amid tariff, visa pressure 

The deportation agreement comes as Washington has hiked tariffs on Ghanaian goods and restricted visas issued to its nationals.
Mahama described relations between Accra and Washington as “tightening,” though he said relations remained positive.
Neighbouring Nigeria, for its part, has pushed back against accepting third-party deportees.
“The US is mounting considerable pressure on African countries to accept Venezuelans to be deported from the US, some straight out of prisons,” Nigerian Foreign Minister Yusuf Tuggar said in an interview with local broadcaster Channels Television in July.
“It will be difficult for Nigeria to accept Venezuelan prisoners,” he said, going on to suggest that recent tariff threats were related to the issue of deportations.
In an unprecedented move, Trump has overseen the deportation of hundreds of people to Panama, including some who were sent away before they could have their asylum applications processed.
Hundreds have also been sent to El Salvador, with the US administration invoking an 18th century law to remove people it has accused of being Venezuelan gang members.
Some were sent despite US judges ordering the planes carrying them to turn around.
The White House has also deported third-country nationals to South Sudan, a war-torn, impoverished country.


Trump offers ambiguous initial response to Russian drone incursion into Poland’s airspace

Trump offers ambiguous initial response to Russian drone incursion into Poland’s airspace
Updated 11 September 2025

Trump offers ambiguous initial response to Russian drone incursion into Poland’s airspace

Trump offers ambiguous initial response to Russian drone incursion into Poland’s airspace
  • Poland said some of the drones came from Belarus, a close Moscow ally, where Russian and Belarusian troops have begun gathering for war games scheduled to start Friday

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump on Wednesday offered an ambiguous initial response to Russia’s drone incursion into Poland’s airspace, a provocative act by Moscow that has put the United States’ NATO allies in Europe on edge.
“What’s with Russia violating Poland’s airspace with drones? Here we go!” Trump posted on his Truth Social platform late Wednesday morning, nearly a half-day after Poland announced that several Russian drones entered its territory over the course of many hours and were shot down with help from NATO allies.
White House officials did not immediately respond to queries about Trump’s cryptic comments about the incursion. It was the first time the transatlantic alliance has confronted a potential threat in its airspace, scrambling jets to shoot the Russian drones out of the sky.
But Trump’s comment stood in sharp contrast to the strong condemnation by several European leaders and was notably less robust than that of his ambassador to NATO, Matthew Whitaker.
“We stand by our @NATO Allies in the face of these airspace violations and will defend every inch of NATO territory,” Whitaker posted on X.
The incursion occurred as the US leader is struggling to persuade Russian President Vladimir Putin to engage in direct peace talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to end Russia’s more than 3-year-old war in Ukraine.
Trump spoke Wednesday with Polish President Karol Nawrocki, who was at the White House last week for talks in which the two leaders discussed expanding the US military presence i n Poland. Following the call, Nawrocki posted on X that the conversation ”confirmed the unity of our alliance.”
French President Emmanuel Macron said in an X post that he also spoke by phone with Trump about the ″worrying developments in the Russian war of aggression in Ukraine, in particular following the incursion of Russian drones in Poland.″ The leaders also discussed Israel’s strikes in Qatar on Tuesday targeting Hamas’ leadership, a stunning escalation that risked upending a Trump administration-led effort at winding down the Gaza war and freeing hostages.
The US president last month held a summit with Putin in Alaska and then met with Zelensky and key European allies about finding a pathway to end the war — something that Trump vowed to get done quickly during his 2024 White House campaign.
Trump emerged from those high-level talks to announce he was arranging a Putin-Zelensky meeting and potentially a three-way summit in which he would take part. But Trump’s confidence in arranging a peace summit has fizzled as Putin has only intensified air strikes on Ukraine over the past few weeks.
After Wednesday’s incursion, Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina urged Trump to move forward with new sanctions on Moscow.
“Mr. President, Congress is with you,” Graham posted on X. “We stand ready to pass legislation authorizing bone crushing new sanctions and tariffs that can be deployed at your discretion. Our goal is to empower you as you deal with this mounting threat.”
Poland said some of the drones came from Belarus, a close Moscow ally, where Russian and Belarusian troops have begun gathering for war games scheduled to start Friday. Russia’s Defense Ministry said it did not target Poland, while Belarus said it tracked some drones that “lost their course” and entered Poland because they were jammed.
But European officials did not accept Moscow’s explanation and argued the incident suggests Putin is escalating his war on Ukraine. Polish airspace has been violated many times since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, but never on this scale in Poland or anywhere else in NATO territory.
“What Putin wants to do is to test us,” European Union foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas told reporters in Brussels. “What happened in Poland is a game changer.” She added that the Russian action should result in stronger sanctions.
NATO allies swiftly held talks Wednesday on the incursion with the alliance’s 32 member states. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk told Parliament that the consultations came under Article 4 of the treaty that founded NATO in 1949 in the aftermath of World War II.
Article 4, the shortest of the NATO treaty’s 14 articles and infrequently invoked, states that: “The Parties will consult together whenever, in the opinion of any of them, the territorial integrity, political independence or security of any of the Parties is threatened.”


UK trade unions call for government ban on Palestine Action to be overturned

UK trade unions call for government ban on Palestine Action to be overturned
Updated 11 September 2025

UK trade unions call for government ban on Palestine Action to be overturned

UK trade unions call for government ban on Palestine Action to be overturned
  • Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s Labour government banned the group under antiterrorism laws in July after members of the group allegedly damaged jets at a military base
  • Hundreds of protesters showing support for Palestine Action have been arrested at demonstrations in recent months, including more than 800 in London last weekend alone

LONDON: British trade unions have demanded that the UK government reverses its ban on a pro-Palestinian protest group.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s Labour government proscribed Palestine Action under antiterrorism laws in July after members of the group allegedly damaged jets at a military base.

Public displays of support for the group are outlawed under the ban, as a result of which hundreds of protesters have been arrested at demonstrations over the summer, including more than 800 in London last weekend alone.

Delegates at the annual conference of the Trades Union Congress, which concluded in Brighton on Wednesday, voted unanimously to demand that the government “repeal the authoritarian proscription of Palestine Action.”

The decision by the TUC, a federation that represents 47 unions with about 5.5 million members, is the latest sign of growing tensions over the conflict in Gaza between Starmer’s government and left-wing groups traditionally allied with the Labour Party. Many Labour MPs are also angry about the lack of tough action from UK authorities against Israel.

The TUC call for the ban on Palestinian Action to be overturned was part of an amendment to a broader motion calling on UK authorities to help secure an urgent ceasefire agreement and facilitate the delivery of aid into Gaza.

The amendment was proposed by the Public and Commercial Services Union, which represents civil servants. It also called for the government to “uphold and strengthen the right to peaceful protest, following the arrest of activists.”

Martin Cavanagh, president of the PCSU, said: “We believe this proscription represents a significant abuse of counterterrorism powers and a direct attack on our rights to protest against the genocidal Israeli regime.

“Since the proscription, it is clear that the policing has been particularly heavy-handed."


UK PM Starmer condemned for meeting Israel’s Herzog ‘while children starve’

UK PM Starmer condemned for meeting Israel’s Herzog ‘while children starve’
Updated 10 September 2025

UK PM Starmer condemned for meeting Israel’s Herzog ‘while children starve’

UK PM Starmer condemned for meeting Israel’s Herzog ‘while children starve’
  • MP Stephen Flynn berates Keir Starmer for meeting Israel’s head of state
  • Politicians question legality of allowing Israeli leader into the country amid genocide allegations

LONDON: British MPs berated UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer for hosting the Israeli president on Wednesday “while children starve” in Gaza.

Starmer met Isaac Herzog in London for talks despite dozens of politicians, including from his own party, questioning how he was allowed into the country. 

During prime minister’s questions in parliament, the Scottish National Party’s Westminster leader, Stephen Flynn, angrily condemned Starmer over the meeting.

“Gaza is a graveyard,” he said. “What does it say of this prime minister that he will harbor this man whilst children starve?”

The MP said that Starmer had welcomed into his home a man who “called for the collective punishment of the Palestinian people and who signed the artillery shells that destroyed their homes, their families and their friends.”

He said that Starmer was opting to meet Herzog rather than ending arms sales to Israel and extending sanctions against the country in response to its war that has killed tens of thousands of civilians. 

The prime minister responded, saying that he “would not give up on diplomacy” in trying to bring peace to the region.

The British government has been accused of failing to take meaningful measures agains Israel for the war, which many academics, observers and governments describe as a genocide.

Starmer has threatened to recognize a Palestinian state if Israel does not comply with certain conditions over the conflict. The UK has also sanctioned extremist members of the Israeli government and suspended arms exports licenses for certain weapons used in Gaza.

However, there are widespread calls across the political spectrum for stronger action.

Sixty MPs and Lords called on the government to deny Herzog entry to the UK and said that his visit risked the government being complicit in genocide in Gaza, under a UN treaty.

Green Party leader Zack Polanski accused Herzog of being “complicit while the Israeli government has engaged in committing genocide in Gaza.”

He said that the Israeli president should be met with “handcuffs not handshakes” when he arrived for his meeting.

Herzog has previously said that there are “no innocent civilians in Gaza” and “it is an entire nation that is responsible.”

In December 2023, he signed an artillery shell with the words “I rely on you” before it was fired into Gaza as part of the war that started in October 2023.