What is the International Court of Justice and why is it weighing in on humanitarian aid in Gaza?

What is the International Court of Justice and why is it weighing in on humanitarian aid in Gaza?
The International court of Justice delivers a non-binding ruling on the legal consequences of the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 27 April 2025

What is the International Court of Justice and why is it weighing in on humanitarian aid in Gaza?

What is the International Court of Justice and why is it weighing in on humanitarian aid in Gaza?
  • Israel’s retaliatory offensive has killed over 51,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry
  • The International Criminal Court was established in 2002 as the court of last resort to prosecute those responsible for the world’s most heinous atrocities

THE HAGUE: The top United Nations court on Monday will begin hearing from 40 countries on what Israel must do to provide desperately needed humanitarian assistance to Palestinians in Gaza and the occupied West Bank.
Last year, the UN General Assembly asked the International Court of Justice to weigh in on Israel’s legal obligations after the country effectively banned the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, the main provider of aid to Gaza, from operating. The United States, Israel’s closest ally, voted against the resolution.
Israel over a month ago again cut off all aid to Gaza and its over 2 million people. Israel has disputed that there is a shortage of aid in Gaza, and says it is entitled to block the aid because it says Hamas seizes it for its own use.
The Hague-based court has been asked to give an advisory opinion, a non-binding but legally definitive answer, in the latest judicial proceedings involving Israel and the 18-month war in Gaza. That is expected to take several months.
What is the International Court of Justice?
Set up in the aftermath of World War II, the ICJ is an organ of the UN and adjudicates disputes between countries. Certain UN bodies, including the General Assembly, can request advisory opinions from the court’s 15 judges.
All 193 UN member states are members of the ICJ, though not all of them automatically recognize its jurisdiction.
Last year, the court issued an unprecedented and sweeping condemnation of Israel’s rule over the occupied Palestinian territories, finding Israel’s presence unlawful and calling for it to end. The UN General Assembly sought the opinion after a Palestinian request. The ICJ said Israel had no right to sovereignty in the territories, was violating international laws against acquiring territory by force and was impeding Palestinians’ right to self-determination.
Two decades ago, the court in another advisory opinion held that Israel was violating international law by constructing a barrier between Israel and the West Bank. That opinion, also requested by the UN General Assembly, dismissed Israeli arguments that the wall was needed for security.
Israel has not participated in previous advisory opinion hearings but has submitted written statements.
What is the genocide case that Israel is facing at the ICJ?
South Africa went to the court last year to accuse Israel of genocide over its actions in the war in Gaza, which began when Hamas-led militants attacked southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing about 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducting 251.
Israel’s retaliatory offensive has killed over 51,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry, which does not say how many are civilians or combatants. The offensive has reduced much of Gaza to rubble, and most of its people remain homeless.
Israel rejects South Africa’s claim and accuses it of providing political cover for Hamas.
South Africa also asked judges to make nine urgent orders known as provisional measures. They are aimed at protecting civilians in Gaza while the court considers the legal arguments.
The court has ruled several times on that request, including ordering Israel to do all it can to prevent death, destruction and any acts of genocide in Gaza. The proceedings are ongoing and likely to take years to reach a conclusion.
How is the ICJ different from the International Criminal Court?
The International Criminal Court was established in 2002 as the court of last resort to prosecute those responsible for the world’s most heinous atrocities: war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide and the crime of aggression.
While the ICJ deals with disputes between two or more countries, the ICC seeks to hold individuals criminally responsible.
In November, a three-judge panel issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant and Hamas’ military chief, Mohammed Deif, accusing them of crimes against humanity in connection with the war in Gaza.
The warrants said there was reason to believe Netanyahu and Gallant have used “starvation as a method of warfare” by restricting humanitarian aid and intentionally targeted civilians in Israel’s campaign against Hamas, charges Israeli officials deny.
The warrant marked the first time a sitting leader of a major Western ally has been accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity by the global court of justice and has sparked major pushback from supporters of Israel, including the US
Israel and its top ally, the United States, are not members of the court. However, Palestine is, and judges ruled in 2021 that the court had jurisdiction over crimes committed on Palestinian territory.


Gaza health ‘catastrophe’ will last for ‘generations’: WHO chief

Gaza health ‘catastrophe’ will last for ‘generations’: WHO chief
Updated 5 sec ago

Gaza health ‘catastrophe’ will last for ‘generations’: WHO chief

Gaza health ‘catastrophe’ will last for ‘generations’: WHO chief
  • Despite ceasefire, aid deliveries remain far below target: Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus
  • He urges Israel to ‘de-link’ humanitarian supplies from wider conflict

LONDON: The health “catastrophe” in Gaza will last for “generations to come,” the World Health Organization’s chief has told the BBC Radio 4 “Today” program.

Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus called for a substantial surge in aid to the enclave in order to meet the needs of Palestinians.

Despite Israel allowing more medical aid and other supplies following the ceasefire with Hamas on Oct. 10, levels remain lower than needed to rebuild Gaza’s health system, he said.

The US, which brokered the ceasefire, has said the first phase of the plan should see the unlimited distribution of supplies “without interference.”

Yet the increase in aid has been smaller than anticipated, Ghebreyesus said, adding that Palestinians in Gaza have experienced famine, “overwhelming” injuries, the collapse of their healthcare system and disease outbreaks compounded by the destruction of sanitation infrastructure.

“On top of that, (there is) restricted access to humanitarian aid. This is a very fatal combination, so that makes (the situation) catastrophic and beyond words,” he said.

“If you take the famine and combine it with a mental health problem which we see is rampant, then the situation is a crisis for generations to come.”

Ghebreyesus called on Israel to “de-link” the supply of aid from the wider conflict, after it temporarily halted humanitarian deliveries following the killing of two soldiers on Sunday.

The Israel Defense Forces claimed that its personnel were killed in an ambush by Hamas, but the Palestinian group said it was unaware of the clashes. Substantial international pressure led to Israel reinstating aid deliveries the following day.

“There should be full access (for aid), there should not be any condition, especially after all the living hostages were released, and a good part of the remains are transferred. I did not expect there would be additional restrictions,” said Ghebreyesus, adding that “since the US has brokered the peace deal it has the responsibility of making sure that all sides are respecting” it.

Israel must also allow in aid groups that were previously denied entry to Gaza, he said, condemning the blocking of certain health supplies into the enclave after it claimed that they could have dual-use capabilities.

“If you are going to build a field hospital, you need the canvas and the pillars (for tents). So, if the pillars are removed, because of an excuse that they could be dual-use, then you can’t have a tent,” he said.

Ghebreyesus called for a ramping up of medical flights from Gaza, after 700 people died while waiting to be evacuated.

The UN’s official estimate of the cost to reconstruct Gaza after two years of war stands at $70 billion.

About 10 percent of that must be spent on rehabilitating the enclave’s damaged health system, Ghebreyesus said.

“We have been saying for a long time that peace is the best medicine. The ceasefire we have is a very fragile one and some people have died even after the ceasefire because it was broken a couple of times,” he added.

“What is very sad is many people were cheering in the streets because they were very happy there was a peace deal. Imagine, (some of) those same people are dead after they were told the war is over.”


Ryanair restarts 18 routes from Jordan, plans expansion

Ryanair restarts 18 routes from Jordan, plans expansion
Updated 15 min 29 sec ago

Ryanair restarts 18 routes from Jordan, plans expansion

Ryanair restarts 18 routes from Jordan, plans expansion
  • Ryanair is in talks with authorities in Jordan about increasing the number of routes

DUBLIN: Ryanair will run 84 weekly flights from Jordan’s capital Amman this winter after restarting operations paused by the war in Gaza and is in talks about a significant expansion, Europe’s largest low-cost carrier said on Wednesday.
Ryanair is in talks with authorities in Jordan about increasing the number of routes it flies from the country from 18 to 50, the airline said in a statement.


Turkiye pressing for Western fighter jets to claw back regional edge

Turkiye pressing for Western fighter jets to claw back regional edge
Updated 22 min 7 sec ago

Turkiye pressing for Western fighter jets to claw back regional edge

Turkiye pressing for Western fighter jets to claw back regional edge
  • Türkiye aims to leverage its best relations with the West in years to add to its aging fleet 40 Eurofighter Typhoons
  • Erdogan is expected to discuss the proposal on visits to Qatar and Oman on Wednesday and Thursday, with jet numbers, pricing, and timelines the main issues

ANKARA: Anxious to bolster its air power, Turkiye has proposed to European partners and the US ways it could swiftly obtain advanced fighter jets as it seeks to make up ground on regional rivals such as Israel, sources familiar with the talks say.
NATO-member Turkiye, which has the alliance’s second-largest military, aims to leverage its best relations with the West in years to add to its aging fleet 40 Eurofighter Typhoons, for which it inked a preliminary agreement in July, and later also US-made F-35 jets, despite Washington sanctions that currently block any deal.
Strikes by Israel — the Middle East’s most advanced military with hundreds of US-supplied F-15, F-16 and F-35 fighters — on Turkiye’s neighbors Iran and Syria, as well as on Lebanon and Qatar, unnerved Ankara in the last year. They laid bare key vulnerabilities, prompting its push for rapid air power reinforcement to counter any potential threats and not be left exposed, officials say.
Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan has sharply criticized Israel’s attacks on Gaza and elsewhere in the Middle East and once warm relations between the two countries have sunk to new lows. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has warned that Turkiye’s bases, rebel allies and support for the army in Syria posed a threat to Israel.
Greece, a largely symbolic but sensitive threat for Turkiye, is expected to receive a batch of advanced F-35s in the next three years. In years past, jets from the two NATO states engaged in scattered dogfights over the Aegean, and Greece has previously expressed concerns about Turkish military build-up.

TURKEY WOULD BUY SECOND-HAND PLANES TO GET THEM FAST
For the Typhoons, Turkiye is nearing a deal with Britain and other European countries in which it would promptly receive 12 of them, albeit used, from previous buyers Qatar and Oman to meet its immediate needs, according to a person familiar with the matter.
Eurofighter consortium members Britain, Germany, Italy and Spain would approve the second-hand sale proposal, in which they would provide Turkiye with 28 new jets in coming years pending a final purchase agreement, the person said.
Erdogan is expected to discuss the proposal on visits to Qatar and Oman on Wednesday and Thursday, with jet numbers, pricing, and timelines the main issues.
Erdogan is then expected to host British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz later this month, when agreements could be sealed, sources say.
A UK government spokesperson told Reuters that a memorandum of understanding that Britain and Turkiye signed in July paves the way “for a multibillion-pound order of up to 40 aircraft,” adding: “We look forward to agreeing the final contracting details soon.”
German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul, who was in Ankara last week, said Berlin supported the jets purchase and later told broadcaster NTV that a deal could follow within the year.
Turkiye’s defense ministry said no final agreement had been reached and that talks with Britain were moving in a positive direction, adding other consortium members backed the procurement. Qatar and Oman did not immediately comment.

TURKEY, US HAVE POLITICAL WILL TO RESOLVE ISSUES
Acquiring the advanced F-35s has proven trickier for Ankara, which has been barred from buying them since 2020 when Washington slapped it with CAATSA sanctions over its purchase of Russian S-400 air defenses.
Erdogan failed to make headway on the issue at a White House meeting with President Donald Trump last month. But Turkiye still aims to capitalize on the two leaders’ good personal ties, and Erdogan’s help convincing Palestinian militant group Hamas to sign Trump’s Gaza ceasefire agreement, to eventually reach a deal.
Separate sources have said that Ankara considered proposing a plan that could have included a US presidential “waiver” to overcome the CAATSA sanctions and pave the way for an eventual resolution of the S-400 issue and F-35 purchase.
Turkiye’s possession of the S-400s remains the main obstacle to purchasing F-35s, but Ankara and Washington have publicly stated a desire to overcome this, saying the allies have the political will to do so.
The potential temporary waiver, if given, could help Ankara increase defense cooperation with Washington and possibly build sympathy in a US Congress that has been skeptical of Turkiye in the past, the sources said.
“Both sides know that resolving CAATSA needs to be done. Whether it is a presidential waiver or a congressional decision, that is up to the United States,” Harun Armagan, vice chair of foreign affairs for Erdogan’s ruling AK Party, told Reuters.
“It looks awkward with all of the other diplomacy and cooperation happening at the same time.”
Turkiye’s foreign ministry did not respond to questions about floating a waiver to US counterparts or discussions on resolving the S-400 issue. The White House did not immediately comment on whether Ankara raised a waiver option.
A State Department spokesperson said Trump recognizes Turkiye’s strategic importance and that “his administration is seeking creative solutions to all of these pending issues,” but did not elaborate further.
Asked about Turkiye’s separate agreement to buy 40 F-16s, an earlier generation fighter jet, a US source said that talks have been dogged by Turkish concerns about the price and desire to buy the more advanced F-35s instead.

TURKEY HAS DEVELOPED ITS OWN STEALTH FIGHTER
Frustrated by past hot-cold ties with the West and some arms embargoes, Turkiye has developed its own KAAN stealth fighter. Yet officials acknowledge it will take years before it replaces the F-16s that form the backbone of its air force. Jet upgrades are part of a broader effort to strengthen layered air defenses that also includes Turkiye’s domestic “Steel Dome” project and an expansion of long-range missile coverage.
Yanki Bagcioglu, an opposition CHP lawmaker and former Turkish Air Force brigadier general, said Turkiye must accelerate plans for KAAN, Eurofighter and F-16 jets.
“At present, our air-defense system is not at the desired level,” he said, blaming “project-management failures.”


Australian visa holders trapped in Gaza

Australian visa holders trapped in Gaza
Updated 44 min 10 sec ago

Australian visa holders trapped in Gaza

Australian visa holders trapped in Gaza
  • Estimated 600-700 people in Palestinian enclave hold Australian visas
  • Israel’s bordure closures have prevented exits

LONDON: Australian visa holders in Gaza remain trapped in the Palestinian enclave due to closed borders, with refugee advocates calling on the government to assist them, The Guardian reported on Wednesday.

Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said 600-700 people in Gaza hold Australian visas, though it is uncertain how many are still alive after two years of war.

Israel has continued to prevent exits from the Rafah crossing, with the exception of a small number of evacuees who can leave on medical grounds.

Burke told ABC: “Some people in that number (of 600-700) will choose to stay, some people may end up with other options that they’d prefer to take, and there will be some people who we don’t hear from again — and there’s some on that case list that we haven’t heard from for a very long time.

“A significant number of them are part of split family groups where some of the family is in fact here in Australia, and they’re wanting to join.”

Australia’s government is doing “all it can to support Australians, permanent residents and their immediate family members still in Gaza who wish to depart,” a spokesperson said, adding that it is “coordinating with governments in the region” to facilitate the departure of Australian visa holders from Gaza, but exiting the territory “remains difficult.”

Sarah Dale of the Refugee Advice and Casework Service said of the Australian visa holders in Gaza who are eligible for consular assistance, border crossings “remain perilous” and “fraught,” adding: “It has required immense strength and courage of the people fleeing in order to get out.”


Iran ratifies law to join UN convention against terror financing

Iran ratifies law to join UN convention against terror financing
Updated 22 October 2025

Iran ratifies law to join UN convention against terror financing

Iran ratifies law to join UN convention against terror financing
  • Iran ratified a law joining a United Nations convention against terror financing, local media reported Wednesday
  • It hopes it will lead to access to global banking, an easing of trade and relieving pressure on its sanctions-hit economy

TEHRAN: Iran ratified a law joining a United Nations convention against terror financing, local media reported Wednesday, in hopes it will lead to access to global banking, an easing of trade and relieving pressure on its sanctions-hit economy.
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian was elected last year on a promise to ease relations with the West and secure the lifting of sanctions that are hurting the economy.
His administration is trying to bring the country into line with the demands of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), which monitors money laundering and terrorist financing.
Tehran has for years provided support to the Palestinian Hamas militant group, Lebanon’s Hezbollah group, and Yemen’s Houthis — all designated as “terrorist” groups by the United States, along with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).
Iran was returned to the FATF blacklist of non-cooperative countries in 2020, which includes North Korea and Myanmar.
Along with heavy international sanctions, particularly by the United States, Iran’s inclusion on the blacklist has isolated the country’s financial sector and severely restricted its access to the international banking system.
“President Masoud Pezeshkian has promulgated... the law on the Islamic Republic of Iran’s accession to the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism (CFT),” Tasnim news agency said on Wednesday.
It is unclear what the immediate economic impact would be if it were removed from the FATF.
Iranian lawmaker Mahdi Shariari said earlier this month that Iran’s non-membership in the FATF and CFT had “created difficulties” in trade, including with key allies Russia and China, according to the pro-labor news agency ILNA.
Reformists and moderates in Tehran view compliance with FATF standards as a vital step toward reconnecting with the international banking system and stabilising the economy.
However, international sanctions remain the primary obstacle to Iran’s global financial and trade activities.
Joining the treaty has been the subject of a heated debate in recent weeks, with ultra-conservatives arguing it could grant “enemy” countries access to sensitive economic and military information, particularly related to Iran’s support of regional militant groups.
Others argue that it will have the effect of stopping Iranian support for the Lebanese Hezbollah and the Palestinian Hamas, two movements classified as “terrorist” by the United States.
Local media reported on Tuesday that an Iranian representative attended an FATF meeting in Paris for the first time in six years.