After Harvard rejects Trump demands, Columbia still in talks over federal funding

Graduating students hold Palestinian flags and chant as they walk out in protest over the 13 students who have been barred from graduating due to protest activities, during commencement in Harvard Yard, at Harvard University, in Cambridge, Mass., Thursday, May 23, 2024. (AP)
Graduating students hold Palestinian flags and chant as they walk out in protest over the 13 students who have been barred from graduating due to protest activities, during commencement in Harvard Yard, at Harvard University, in Cambridge, Mass., Thursday, May 23, 2024. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 15 April 2025

After Harvard rejects Trump demands, Columbia still in talks over federal funding

After Harvard rejects Trump demands, Columbia still in talks over federal funding
  • Shipman did not address the assertions by Harvard and some Columbia professors, who are suing the Trump administration through their labor unions, that the government's actions are illegal

NEW YORK: Columbia University said it was holding "good faith" negotiations with U.S. President Donald Trump's administration to regain federal funding, hours after Harvard rejected the administration's demands to audit the "viewpoint diversity" of its students and faculty, among other overhauls.
Columbia's interim president, Claire Shipman, on Monday night said the private New York school would not cede ground on its commitment to academic freedom during talks with the administration.
Beginning with Columbia, the Trump administration has threatened universities across the country over their handling of pro-Palestinian protests that roiled campuses last year following the 2023 Hamas-led attack inside Israel and the subsequent Israeli attacks on Gaza.
The Trump administration has said antisemitism flared amid the protests. Demonstrators say their criticism of Israel and U.S. foreign policy has been wrongly conflated with antisemitism.

HIGHLIGHTS

• Columbia says funding negotiations with government are in 'good faith'

• Harvard rejects Trump administration's demands as lawless, unconstitutional

• Columbia says some academic freedoms are 'not subject to negotiation'

• Trump mulls trying to end Harvard's tax-exempt status

In a Monday letter, Harvard President Alan Garber rejected the Trump administration's demands that Harvard end diversity efforts and take other steps to secure funding as unprecedented "assertions of power, unmoored from the law" that violated the school's constitutional free speech rights and the Civil Rights Act.
He wrote that the threatened funding supported medical, engineering, and other scientific research that has led to innovations that "have made countless people in our country and throughout the world healthier and safer."
Hours after Garber released his letter, the Trump administration's Joint Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism said it was freezing contracts and grants to Harvard, the country's oldest and richest university, worth more than $2 billion, out of a total of $9 billion.
Later on Monday, Shipman, a Columbia trustee, said Columbia will continue with what it viewed as "good faith discussions" and "constructive dialog" with the U.S. Justice Department's antisemitism task force, which began with the government's announcement in early March that it was terminating Columbia grants and contracts worth $400 million.
"Those discussions have not concluded, and we have not reached any agreement with the government at this point," Shipman wrote. She wrote that some of the things the Trump administration has demanded of universities, including changes to shared governance and addressing "viewpoint diversity," were "not subject to negotiation."
"We would reject any agreement in which the government dictates what we teach, research, or who we hire," she wrote.
She also wrote that Harvard, in Massachusetts, had rejected demands by the government that "strike at the very heart of that university's venerable mission."
Shipman did not address the assertions by Harvard and some Columbia professors, who are suing the Trump administration through their labor unions, that the government's actions are illegal.
Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination by recipients of federal funding based on race or national origin, federal funds can be terminated only after a lengthy investigation and hearings process, which has not happened at Columbia.
One of Columbia's most famous alumni, former U.S. President Barack Obama, praised Harvard's response to an "unlawful and ham-handed attempt to stifle academic freedom."
"Let's hope other institutions follow suit," Obama, a Democrat, wrote in a Monday night statement.
Trump, a Republican, said in a social media post on Tuesday he was mulling whether to seek to end Harvard's tax-exempt status if it continued pushing what he called "political, ideological, and terrorist inspired/supporting 'Sickness?'"
The standoff between the Trump administration and universities comes as he faces court challenges to his immigration policies, and pushback from state attorneys general trying to block his firing of government workers and suspension of trillions of dollars in federal grants, loans and financial support.
Later on Tuesday, one of the immigration cases that has raised questions about whether the administration will respect judges and the constitutional order could come to a head as U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis considers her next steps on what she called Trump's failure to update her on efforts to return a man illegally deported to El Salvador.
The U.S. Supreme Court last week upheld an order from Xinis that the administration facilitate Kilmar Abrego Garcia's return from El Salvador, where he is being housed in a high-security prison. The Trump administration has said it is powerless to bring Abrego Garcia back.


Gifted Gazan students set to arrive in UK to take up scholarships at British universities

Gifted Gazan students set to arrive in UK to take up scholarships at British universities
Updated 41 min 20 sec ago

Gifted Gazan students set to arrive in UK to take up scholarships at British universities

Gifted Gazan students set to arrive in UK to take up scholarships at British universities
  • They include Palestinian recipients of the Chevening scholarship, a highly competitive program for foreign students that aims to recognize potential leaders
  • Officials say the support recognizes the roles the students might play in eventual reconstruction of the territory and building a better future for Israelis and Palestinians

LONDON: Gazan students awarded prestigious scholarships to study in the UK will begin arrive in the country this autumn, after support from the British government enabled them to leave the war-torn territory, ministers said on Monday.

They include Palestinian recipients of the Chevening scholarship, a highly competitive program for foreign students that aims to recognize potential leaders, and other gifted individuals, and provide them with fully funded places on undergraduate and master’s degree courses at leading UK universities.

Officials said the educational support for Gazan students is recognition of the roles they might play in the eventual reconstruction of the territory and building a better future for Israelis and Palestinians.

Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper said the conflict in Gaza had devastated education, and praised students for their “incredible resilience and unwavering determination” to continue their studies.

She thanked the government’s international partners, including the Jordanian government and Israeli authorities, for helping the students to leave Gaza, adding: “Our support also reflects the UK’s commitment to the future of postwar Gaza, where educating the next generation will play a vital role.”

Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said she was “relieved” the students will be able to study in safety.

“These students have lived through an appalling ordeal, with many losing loved ones and having their studies torn apart by the devastating impact of war,” she said.

“Education offers hope and opportunity and we are determined to ensure that all young people, whatever their circumstances, are able to benefit from it.”

The government said the move was part of wider UK efforts to help vulnerable groups leave Gaza amid the ongoing humanitarian catastrophe in the enclave.

British authorities officially recognized a Palestinian state on Sunday, and continue to call for an immediate ceasefire agreement in the territory, the release of all hostages, unrestricted deliveries of humanitarian aid, and a pathway to long-term peace in the wider conflict between Israelis and Palestinians.


Palestinian mission in UK celebrates statehood recognition, raises flag in London

Palestinian mission in UK celebrates statehood recognition, raises flag in London
Updated 3 min 4 sec ago

Palestinian mission in UK celebrates statehood recognition, raises flag in London

Palestinian mission in UK celebrates statehood recognition, raises flag in London
  • Palestinian ambassador says British recognition comes at a time of ‘unimaginable pain and suffering’ for Palestinians in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank
  • First Minister of Scotland John Swinney attended the event along with former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn
  • Palestine, a former British colony for nearly 30 years, was never recognized when the mandate ended, despite the UK’s recognition of the fledgling State of Israel in 1950

LONDON: Palestinians marked the announcement of the UK government’s formal recognition of the State of Palestine with a flag-hoisting ceremony attended by senior UK officials, members of Parliament, ambassadors, and members of the Palestinian community on Monday.

The official ceremony in the London borough of Hammersmith featured a speech by Husam Zomlot, the Palestinian ambassador, outside the Palestine Mission to the UK, soon to be upgraded into an embassy.

“In the same capital of the Balfour Declaration, after more than a century of ongoing denial, dispossession and erasure, the UK government has finally taken the long overdue step of recognizing the State of Palestine,” Zomlot began his speech.

Palestine, a former British colony for nearly 30 years, was never recognized when the mandate ended, despite the UK’s recognition of the fledgling State of Israel in 1950, an entity that was envisioned in the Balfour Declaration of 1917, which promised to establish a homeland for the Jewish people in Palestine.

This moment stands as a defiant act of truth, a refusal to let genocide be the final word; a refusal to accept that occupation is permanent

Husam Zomlot, Palestinian ambassador

The historic and long-awaited decision was announced on Sunday by Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who described it as “a pledge to the Palestinian and Israeli people that there can be a better future.”

It marks a shift in policy in the UK and some European countries, which have long stated that recognizing Palestine will occur only at the conclusion of peace negotiations. Hamas attacks in October 2023, followed by an ongoing campaign of vengeance by Israeli forces in the Gaza Strip, signaled to Starmer that “the hope for a two-state solution is fading.”

Zomlot said that British recognition comes at a critical time of “unimaginable pain and suffering” for Palestinians, a population of 5.5 million in Gaza and the occupied West Bank.

Since August, Israeli forces have conducted a demolition campaign targeting high-rise buildings in Gaza City, continuing nearly two years of assaults on the coastal enclave, where over 65,000 people have been killed. Officials from the UN and the EU, along with the mayor of London, have recently described Israeli actions in Gaza as genocide. In the West Bank, the Israeli government announced its approval of the E1 settlement, which would divide the territory in half and severely undermine any hope for a Palestinian state.

The Palestinian Mission to the UK in London held a special ceremony on Monday to mark British recognition of Palestinian statehood. (AN Photo/Mustafa Abu Sneineh)

“It comes as our people in Gaza are being starved, bombed, and buried under the rubble of their homes; as our people in the West Bank are being ethnically cleansed, brutalized by daily state-sponsored terrorism, land theft and suffocating oppression,” Zomlot said.

Palestinians hope that the UK’s recognition will be more than merely “symbolic” and will contribute to a resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that has embroiled the Middle East since 1948.

The UK, a permanent member of the Security Council and a G7 country, joined Canada, Australia, and Portugal on Sunday in recognizing Palestinian statehood, while France is expected to follow suit this week at the UN General Assembly.

“This moment stands as a defiant act of truth, a refusal to let genocide be the final word; a refusal to accept that occupation is permanent; a refusal to be erased and a refusal to be dehumanized,” Zomlot said.

“(It is) righting historic wrongs and committing together to a future based on freedom, dignity and fundamental human rights.”

A defining moment in securing self-determination for Palestine and peace through a two-state solution

John Swinney, Scotland’s first minister

The impassioned speech quoted the famous lines, “On This Land, There Are Reasons to Live,” a poem by the national poet Mahmoud Darwish.

“Please join me as we raise the flag of Palestine with its colors representing our nation: black for our mourning, white for our hope, green for our land and red for the sacrifices of our people,” Zomlot concluded.

John Swinney, the first minister of Scotland, attended the event along with former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. Swinney wrote on X that it was “a defining moment in securing self-determination for Palestine and peace through a two-state solution.”

Corbyn, an independent MP, congratulated those “who have tirelessly campaigned for the recognition of Palestine,” which he described as an “inalienable right” of the Palestinian people, in a post on the X platform.

He called on the UK government to “recognize the genocide in Gaza, end its complicity in crimes against humanity, and stop arming Israel.”

and France are co-hosting a one-day event at the UN in New York this week to advance the two-state solution, as more countries are expected to recognize the State of Palestine.

The long road to Palestinian statehood
An Arab News Deep Dive
Enter
keywords

Experts question Albania’s AI-generated minister

Experts question Albania’s AI-generated minister
Updated 22 September 2025

Experts question Albania’s AI-generated minister

Experts question Albania’s AI-generated minister
  • Edi Rama: ‘Diella never sleeps, she doesn’t need to be paid, she has no personal interests, she has no cousins, because cousins are a big issue in Albania’
  • Appointment made headlines, something the PM excels at whether by attending international meetings in sneakers, announcing a TikTok ban, or creating a Bektashi State

TIRANA, Albania: Last week, Albania announced that an AI-generated minister would take charge of a new public tenders portfolio.
“Diella” is touted as the world’s first virtual minister, and Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama promised the appointment would end rampant corruption in government contracts — a major obstacle to the Balkan nation’s accession to the European Union.
But serious technical, political and ethical questions have been raised about the virtual lawmaker.

Truly incorruptible?

In announcing Diella’s appointment, Rama claimed that public tenders would now be “100 percent free of corruption.”
“Diella never sleeps, she doesn’t need to be paid, she has no personal interests, she has no cousins, because cousins are a big issue in Albania,” according to the prime minister, whose country ranks 80th out of 180 in Transparency International’s corruption index.
Albanian politicians are frequently implicated in corruption scandals linked to public funds.
The former mayor of the capital Tirana was detained while in office and remains in custody, suspected of corruption in connection with the awarding of government contracts.
The opposition leader and former prime minister Sali Berisha is also suspected of awarding public contracts to his associates.

Is Diella the solution?

Not really, according to experts.
“Like any AI system, she depends entirely on the quality and consistency of the data and the reliability of the models behind her,” said Erjon Curraj, an expert in digital transformation and cybersecurity.
The exact workings of Diella remain unknown, but it likely relies on Large Language Models (LLM) to respond to queries — similar to the vast amounts of text that power generative chatbots such as ChatGPT or Gemini.
But if input data is incomplete, biased, or outdated, the AI’s decisions will reflect those flaws, and it “might misinterpret documents, wrongly flag a supplier, or miss signs of collusion,” Curraj said.
“LLMs reflect society; they have biases. There’s no reason to believe it solves the problem of corruption,” computer scientist and artificial intelligence specialist Jean-Gabriel Ganascia said.
“Assuming a machine has no biases implies we must submit to the machine,” Ganascia said.

Who has control?

The Albanian opposition has appealed to the Constitutional Court over concerns about who would be accountable for the AI’s decisions.
“Who will control Diella?” Berisha asked the parliament.
Ganascia agrees that questions of accountability and control are key when it comes to AI.
“If public decision-making is entrusted to a machine, it means there is no longer accountability; we are reduced to the state of slaves.”
“What worries me is the idea of a machine governing, offering the ‘right’ answer, and preventing any deliberation,” the researcher, who is also a philosopher, said.
“A politician takes responsibility, but here, the idea is that the machine is perfect, and we cannot go against its decisions anyway.”
Appearing to address these concerns, a decree published Thursday states that Rama “also holds responsibility for the creation and operation of the virtual Ministry of Artificial Intelligence Diella.”

Old corruption, new software

The appointment grabbed headlines around the world, something the prime minister excels at whether by attending international meetings in sneakers, announcing a TikTok ban, creating a Bektashi State modelled on the Vatican, or opening migrant camps to house people intercepted at sea by the Italian government.
But achieving his goals is a different issue.
TikTok remains easily accessible in Albania, only a few dozen men have been transferred to the migrant camps and the initiative’s legality is still being contested by Italian courts.
Little public progress has been made either on the Bektashi State since its announcement a year ago.
As for Diella, whose face is that of the well-known Albanian actress Anila Bisha, who signed a contract expiring in December for the use of her image, it is unclear whether her appointment will survive the Constitutional Court’s scrutiny.
It is also uncertain whether it will comply with the standards of the European Union, which Albania hopes to join within the next five years.
“So far, there is no information about how Diella actually works,” Albanian political scientist Lutfi Dervishi said.
“If a corrupt system provides manipulated data, or filters are set up on what it must not see, Diella will merely legitimize old corruption with new software.”


Once overlooked, K-halal gains traction in Korea’s mainstream

Once overlooked, K-halal gains traction in Korea’s mainstream
Updated 22 September 2025

Once overlooked, K-halal gains traction in Korea’s mainstream

Once overlooked, K-halal gains traction in Korea’s mainstream
  • Kim Jin-woo has been spearheading halal industry in South Korea for 20 years
  • Halal footprint is steadily increasing in a country where only 0.2% are Muslim

SEOUL: It was in 2006 when Kim Jin-woo saw an opportunity where few others in South Korea were looking: the global halal industry. Nearly two decades later, he stands at the forefront of the country’s growing K-halal scene, introducing new trends in lifestyle, fashion, and food.

The idea to enter a niche market in a country where the Muslim population is less than 0.2 percent came to Kim while he was living in Malaysia and understood the industry’s scale.

“Halal is not just about food. It is a lifestyle that includes fashion, beauty, culture and how we live every day. The magnitude of this economy is about $3 trillion and affects about 1.9 billion people’s lives,” he told Arab News.

“I saw Malaysia doing that and thought Korea could definitely engage in the halal economy too.”

It took years of trials and various initiatives — from modest fashion shows to advising Korean firms on halal certification and exports — before Kim’s efforts bore fruit in bridging Muslim consumers and Korean businesses closer together.

Returning to Korea in 2015, Kim faced skepticism. “Eight out of 10 people asked me why I was working on halal,” he recalled. “I (even) got phone calls from the police.” But he believed Korea, with its booming food, beauty, and cultural exports, could not afford to ignore the Muslim market.

He started linking Korean employers with a growing Muslim migrant community. In 2015, he partnered with the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries to host a halal expo, and later with the Seoul Business Agency to provide halal industry training for thousands of workers.

“The reason why the halal economy is not working here, and what makes my work difficult, is that 96 percent of Koreans do not even know the meaning of halal. So, there is a lot of effort put into raising awareness,” Kim said.

“Halal is about inclusion. Halal is a lifestyle. So, Koreans should be naturally exposed to it, and that is what I am trying to do.”

The CEO of Halal Korea and chair of the Overseas Korean Entrepreneurs’ Cooperative, he spearheaded last month the K-Halal Food Festa in Seoul’s Coex Magok Exhibition Hall.

Over 100 booths from across Korea and abroad drew not only industry buyers, but also students curious about halal cuisine, and families eager to try something new.

They left the venue with bags full of halal-certified ramen, sauces, and iconic K-beauty items.

The halal footprint is steadily increasing in South Korea. In the food sector alone, halal products accounted for 11.1 percent of the country’s total agri-food exports in 2023 — up 1.7 percentage points from 9.4 percent in 2022, according to data released by the Korea Food Research Institute.

In January this year, Seoul expanded its halal certification institutions from four to six, in a bid to support companies seeking entry into Muslim-majority markets.

“I think people now have opened their eyes a bit to the fact that halal is not only about food but that it is about the economy. So, that is a positive change,” Kim said, forecasting that in the years to come, South Korea’s halal exports will grow 10 percent year-on-year.

However, the expansion of the halal industry has also seen its fair share of backlash. In the late 2010s, talks were underway to build a halal food factory cluster in Iksan, a city 170 km south of Seoul, to supply both exports and domestic demand. Yet the plan has faced protests and still has not materialized.

Kim acknowledges the challenges but sees opportunity in sending Koreans to Muslim countries to learn and create joint ventures.

He foresees a Korea- halal cluster or a Korea-UAE halal cluster, “where Korean corporations foray there to produce the goods, and their local partners take care of the marketing and halal certifications.”

Another strategy would be to follow in the footsteps of Japan, which attracts about 6 to 7 million Muslim tourists each year.

In Korea, the number is roughly half that.

“If we create the right environment — halal food, halal cosmetics, halal fashion — we can make Korea not just a K-pop destination for teenagers, but also a welcoming place for Muslim families with real purchasing power,” Kim said.

“When more Muslims come to Korea, there will be an increase in demand for halal beauty products, fashion products ... So, naturally, the halal market will thrive.”


Singapore to sanction Israeli settler leaders, supports Palestine statehood

A view of the Parliament House in Singapore. (File/Reuters)
A view of the Parliament House in Singapore. (File/Reuters)
Updated 22 September 2025

Singapore to sanction Israeli settler leaders, supports Palestine statehood

A view of the Parliament House in Singapore. (File/Reuters)
  • Singapore’s Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan chided those Israeli politicians who have spoken about annexing parts of the West Bank or Gaza

SINGAPORE: Singapore said on Monday it will impose targeted sanctions on leaders of Israeli settler groups and would recognize a Palestine state under the right conditions.
Western and other nations have been taking an increasingly hard line against settler groups and some Israeli officials they accuse of fomenting violence, while global recognition is growing of Palestinians’ aspiration for an independent homeland.
Singapore’s Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan, speaking in parliament, chided those Israeli politicians who have spoken about annexing parts of the West Bank or Gaza, the two Israeli-occupied Palestinian territories.
“We call on the Israeli government to cease settlement construction and expansion,” he said, citing the so-called E1 settlement project as fragmenting the West Bank.
“We oppose ongoing attempts to create new facts on the ground which undermine the prospects for a two-state solution.”
More details on the sanctions would be released at a later date, he said.
Balakrishnan said it was a matter of when not if Singapore recognizes a Palestinian state and that the nation is waiting for an “appropriate constellation” of factors, including a need for an effective Palestinian government that accepts Israel’s right to exist and categorically renounces terrorism.
“Ultimately, to resolve this long-standing conflict in a comprehensive, just and durable manner, there needs to be a negotiated settlement which results in two states, one Israeli (and) one Palestinian, with their peoples living alongside each other in peace, security and dignity,” he added.
Most of the international community considers Israeli settlements in the West Bank illegal under international law. Israel disputes this, citing historical and biblical ties to the area and saying the settlements provide security.
While Singapore and Israel have shared close diplomatic and military ties since the former gained independence in 1965, the city-state in 2024 voted in favor of numerous resolutions expressing support for UN recognition of a Palestinian state.