Ousted South Korean President Yoon embraces supporters after leaving presidential residence

Update Ousted South Korean President Yoon embraces supporters after leaving presidential residence
Ousted South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol, center, is greeted by college students before he leaves the presidential residence in Seoul on April 11, 2025. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 11 April 2025

Ousted South Korean President Yoon embraces supporters after leaving presidential residence

Ousted South Korean President Yoon embraces supporters after leaving presidential residence
  • Constitutional Court removed him from office over his ill-fated imposition of martial law in December
  • Yoon and his wife, Kim Keon Hee, returned to their private apartment in affluent southern Seoul

SEOUL: Former South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol left the presidential residence in Seoul on Friday for his private home, a week after the Constitutional Court removed him from office over his ill-fated imposition of martial law in December.
In recent days, moving trucks were seen driving in and out of the walled presidential compound in the Hannam-dong district, the site of a massive law enforcement operation in January that led to Yoon’s detainment. Yoon, who is facing a criminal trial on rebellion charges, was released from custody in March after a Seoul court canceled his arrest.
Yoon and his wife, Kim Keon Hee, along with their 11 dogs and cats, returned to their private apartment in affluent southern Seoul. As his black van arrived at the gate of the presidential compound, Yoon stepped out, smiling and waving to his supporters, shaking hands and embracing dozens of them, before getting back into the vehicle and leaving the site.
Arriving at the apartment complex where his private residence is located, Yoon stepped out of the van again and walked slowly through a crowd of supporters, shaking their hands as they chanted his name, as his wife closely followed.
Dozens of both supporters and critics of Yoon rallied in nearby streets amid a heavy police presence, holding signs that ran from “Your excellency Yoon, we will carry on with your spirit” to “Give Yoon Suk Yeol the death penalty!”
In a separate public message, Yoon expressed gratitude to his supporters who had protested for months calling for his reinstatement, and stressed that he will “continue to do my utmost” to build the “free and prosperous Republic of Korea that we have dreamed of together,” invoking South Korea’s formal name.
Yoon, a conservative who narrowly won the 2022 election, declared martial law on late-night television on Dec. 3, vowing to eradicate “anti-state” liberals whom he accused of abusing their legislative majority to obstruct his agenda. Yoon also declared a suspension of legislative activities and sent hundreds of troops to surround the National Assembly, but lawmakers still managed to form a quorum and voted to lift martial law just hours after it was imposed.
Yoon’s powers were suspended after the Assembly impeached him on Dec. 14. The Constitutional Court upheld impeachment and formally removed him from office last week, triggering a presidential election the government set for June 3.
Despite his self-inflicted downfall, it’s unlikely that Yoon will fade into the background, experts say. With the country entering election mode, he may try to rally his supporters while seeking to tighten his grip on the conservative People Power Party, whose leadership is stacked with loyalists.
Facing a separate criminal trial on rebellion charges, which are punishable by death or life in prison, Yoon would strongly prefer a conservative president who could pardon him if convicted and is likely to push to ensure the party’s primaries are won by a candidate he supports, experts say.


Russia is helping China to prepare for a potential invasion of Taiwan, defense institute says

Russia is helping China to prepare for a potential invasion of Taiwan, defense institute says
Updated 26 September 2025

Russia is helping China to prepare for a potential invasion of Taiwan, defense institute says

Russia is helping China to prepare for a potential invasion of Taiwan, defense institute says
  • Under President Xi Jinping, China has embarked upon a broad modernization program of its armed forces with the goal of transforming it into a “world-class” military by 2050
  • Equipment could be used to attack Taiwan

LONDON: Russia is selling military equipment and technology to China that could help Beijing prepare an airborne invasion of Taiwan, according to an analysis of leaked Russian documents by a UK-based defense and security forum.
The Royal United Services Institute’s analysis is based on around 800 pages of documents, including contracts and lists of equipment to be supplied by Moscow to Beijing, from the Black Moon hacktivist group, which previously published some of the documents online. It does not identify its members but describes itself in a manifesto as opposed to governments that carry out aggressive foreign policy.
The authors of the RUSI report shared some of the documents with The Associated Press and say they appear to be genuine, although parts of the documents may have been omitted or altered. AP is unable to independently verify their authenticity.
The mix of completed and apparent draft Russian documents reference meetings between Chinese and Russian delegations — including visits to Moscow — and payment and delivery timelines for high-altitude parachute systems and amphibious assault vehicles. They suggest that Russia has begun work on the products to be delivered but don’t contain direct evidence from the Chinese side that Beijing has paid any money or received any equipment.
The authors argue the equipment could be used to invade Taiwan. Under President Xi Jinping, China has embarked upon a broad modernization program of its armed forces with the goal of transforming it into a “world-class” military by 2050.
Equipment could be used to attack Taiwan
High ranking US officials have suggested Xi ordered his military to be prepared for a possible invasion of Taiwan as early as 2027. Beijing claims the self-governing democracy is rightfully a part of China and has not ruled out seizing the island by force.
The documents don’t mention Taiwan directly, but the analysis by the London-based institute suggests the deal would help China gain advanced parachuting capabilities that it would need to mount an invasion, potentially speeding up a timeline.
It’s not certain that China has decided to invade Taiwan, but access to Russian equipment and localized training in China means Beijing will be better equipped for a potential invasion, Danylyuk said.
“The Chinese school of airborne landing is very young,” he said, suggesting Moscow’s assistance could help speed up China’s airborne program by about 10 to 15 years.
Russia’s Kremlin, and China and Taiwan’s defense and foreign ministries did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
“The greatest value of the deal” to China is likely in the training and procedures for command and control of parachute forces, because Russia has “combat experience,” whereas China doesn’t, write Oleksandr Danylyuk and Jack Watling.
The analysts say Russia’s aim is to develop as a military supplier to China and fund its war in Ukraine. But Danylyuk also suggested that Moscow may want to draw Beijing into a conflict with Washington over Taiwan, distracting the US from Russia’s war with Ukraine.
While Beijing’s military capabilities largely surpass Moscow’s, the analysis says China has gaps which Russia can fill. Russia has a long history of airborne forces dating back decades, knowhow the authors say China needs.
Song Zhongping, a military commentator in Beijing, said China had superior equipment, but “Russia has more combat experience.”
Wen-Ti Sung, an expert on China and Taiwan with the Atlantic Council, said parachuting in forces would probably support the logistics of any invasion but would be unlikely to be the “main event.”
Instead, “China is playing the long game” by acquiring Russian equipment, Sung said. That’s because Beijing will find a way to reverse engineer the equipment and technology and develop it not just for airborne combat but also for advanced intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance which are critical for modern warfare, he said.
Russia agreed to provide training and equipment
According to a document dated September 2024, an initial 2021 agreement detailed timelines for payments and delivery. Stages one and two — analysis of technical specifications, software modifications and equipment manufacturing — have been completed, according to that document.
Russia also agreed to provide training in China and a complete set of equipment for an airborne battalion including the ability to carry out infiltration by special forces, the analysis says.
That includes the sale of 37 light amphibious assault vehicles, 11 amphibious anti-tank self-propelled guns, and 11 airborne armored personnel carriers, as well as command and observation vehicles. The total cost is listed as more than $210 million.
Beijing wants all the vehicles to be equipped with Chinese communication systems and to be prepared to use Chinese ammunition, the documents show.
Beijing seeks high-altitude parachute systems
Russia agreed to sell China systems which are designed for parachuting up to 190 kilograms (419 pounds) from an extremely high altitude, the RUSI analysis said.
The documents reference the minutes of a meeting from March 8, 2024 in Moscow where Russia agreed to provide China by the end of 2024 with details of how the system, known as Dalnolyot, performed under colder temperature conditions down to –60 degrees Celsius (–76 Fahrenheit.)
According to the documents, Beijing requested testing the parachute systems for drops from 8,000 meters (26,250 feet).
That height would allow Chinese forces to glide for up to 80 kilometers (50 miles) allowing “Chinese special forces groups to penetrate the territory of other countries without being noticed,” the RUSI report said.
Danylyuk suggested the Dalnolyot system could be used for a “stage zero” landing in Taiwan, in which Beijing secretly sends in equipment and special forces from aircraft outside Taiwanese airspace.
Russia’s parachute troops failed in Ukraine
Although Russia has a long history of parachute troops, Moscow did not deploy them successfully in Ukraine.
In February 2022, just days after Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered a full-scale invasion of Ukraine, his special forces soldiers tried to take over Hostomel airfield on the outskirts of Kyiv.
They planned to establish a base to fly in more troops, but several Russian helicopters were hit by missiles before they even got to Hostomel. An attempt to take control of a military air base south of Kyiv also failed.
Western officials and military experts suggest the failure to establish an air bridge from Russia to Ukraine turned what Moscow expected to be a swift victory into a grueling war three years and counting.
Now Moscow has dipped into its Soviet-era stocks to replace weapons on the battlefield and, like Ukraine, is ramping up its weapons production.
But that doesn’t mean Moscow is unable to sell equipment to China, Danylyuk said.
The airborne equipment described in the documents was necessary only for “the invasion stage,” he said. Russia doesn’t need such equipment for Ukraine, he said.
Lessons from Russian defeats
The analysts wrote that China’s “operational challenge” in Taiwan would be to do what Russia did not: suppress Taiwan’s air defenses and land sufficient troops and equipment to be able to build up a force to defeat the Taiwanese military before it mobilizes.
The report suggests China could do that by airdropping armored vehicles on golf courses near Taiwanese ports and airfields which could allow air troops to clear a path for landing forces.


Sarkozy conviction exposes political divide in crisis-hit France

Sarkozy conviction exposes political divide in crisis-hit France
Updated 26 September 2025

Sarkozy conviction exposes political divide in crisis-hit France

Sarkozy conviction exposes political divide in crisis-hit France
  • The conviction comes at a deeply sensitive moment, with France in political deadlock and the far-right sensing its best ever chance to come to power
  • Henri Guaino, a former special adviser to Sarkozy, called the conviction “a humiliation for the state and its institutions“

PARIS: The dramatic decision to send former president Nicolas Sarkozy to prison for criminal conspiracy has laid bare France’s stark political divisions, with the move cheered by the left but slammed by the ascendant right.
Sarkozy, seen as a mentor to many conservative politicians, was convicted on Thursday over a scheme enabling late Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi to fund his 2007 presidential run.
He must serve his sentence while awaiting the outcome of his appeal, and will be the first French postwar leader to serve jail time.
The conviction comes at a deeply sensitive moment, with France in political deadlock and the far-right sensing its best ever chance to come to power.
Speaking to broadcaster RTL, Henri Guaino, a former special adviser to Sarkozy, called the conviction “a humiliation for the state and its institutions.”
Guaino urged President Emmanuel Macron to pardon Sarkozy, who was president of France from 2007 to 2012, allowing him to avoid prison.
There was no immediate reaction from Macron’s office.
Despite his legal troubles, Sarkozy still enjoys considerable influence and popularity on the French right and has on occasion had private meetings with Macron.

- ‘It’s Nicolas who pays’ -

In an editorial, conservative French daily Le Figaro denounced the court ruling as “absurd and incomprehensible,” claiming there was no “tangible evidence” of Sarkozy’s wrong-doing.
Left-leaning Liberation featured Sarkozy’s face on its front page, with the words “The slammer” printed over it.
Far-right leader Marine Le Pen, who has herself been convicted of embezzlement and insists she is a target of a “witch hunt,” criticized Thursday’s ruling.
She argued on X that the use of provisional enforcement represented “a great danger, in view of the fundamental principles of our law, foremost among which is the presumption of innocence.”
In France, provisional enforcement means that a judicial decision will be implemented even as the appeals process plays out.
Le Pen drew parallels between her own case — which saw her banned from standing for office for five years, scuppering her chances of running in France’s 2027 presidential election unless she wins her appeal — and that of Sarkozy.
“A number of magistrates have a kind of scorecard where they try to pin down as many politicians as possible,” she told broadcaster LCI.
But some on the left expressed their satisfaction.
“In the end, it’s Nicolas who pays,” quipped hard-left lawmaker Anais Belouassa-Cherifi, referring to a right-wing viral meme denouncing the tax burden on ordinary French people.
But Liberation daily said it did not see the conviction as a cause for celebration.
In an editorial, the newspaper said Sarkozy’s case as well as various other political scandals only serve to widen the gap between the French people and the elites.
There is “only one winner in the long run: the far right.”
The court ordered that Sarkozy should be placed in custody at a later date, with prosecutors to inform him on October 13 when he should go to prison.
He has already been convicted in two separate trials but always avoided jail.


French niece of militant propagandists offers ‘apologies’ to victims

French niece of militant propagandists offers ‘apologies’ to victims
Updated 26 September 2025

French niece of militant propagandists offers ‘apologies’ to victims

French niece of militant propagandists offers ‘apologies’ to victims
  • Speaking in court on Friday, Jennyfer Clain, a niece of Jean-Michel and Fabien Clain offered her “apologies” to all “direct and indirect victims” of the militants
  • “I am not asking them to forgive me, it is unforgivable, but I offer them my deepest and most sincere apologies,” she said

PARIS: A niece of a notorious militant propagandists on trial for joining the Daesh group and taking her children with her apologized to all victims of the militants as well as her family.
Speaking in court on Friday, Jennyfer Clain, a niece of Jean-Michel and Fabien Clain, who publicly claimed responsibility on behalf of Daesh for the Paris attacks on November 13, 2015, offered her “apologies” to all “direct and indirect victims” of the militants, “in France, Syria, Iraq and elsewhere.”
During the worst attack on Paris since World War II, militant gunmen and suicide bombers killed 130 people at the Bataclan concert hall and elsewhere.
The Clain brothers are presumed to have died during the military campaign launched by US-backed Kurdish groups to defeat IS. In 2022, they were sentenced in absentia to life imprisonment without parole.
“I am not asking them to forgive me, it is unforgivable, but I offer them my deepest and most sincere apologies,” she said, referring to the victims.
Jennyfer Clain and two other French women went on trial in Paris last week, accused of traveling to the Middle East to join the Daesh group.
Jennyfer Clain went to the Middle East with four children, and her fifth baby was born in Raqqa, the Daesh group’s one time capital.
The two other women on trial are Jennyfer Clain’s sister-in-law, Mayalen Duhart, 42, and 67-year-old Christine Allain, the women’s mother-in-law.
Duhart brought her four children with her, and had a baby there, who died at seven months.
Weeping in court, Jennyfer Clain asked her five children, who have been placed in foster care since their return to France in 2019, for “forgiveness.”
“I am sorry for everything they have been through because of me,” she said. “I have failed in my role as a mother,” said the 34-year-old, who is also on trial for abandoning minors.
A representative of the National Anti-Terrorism Prosecutor’s Office has requested a 13-year prison sentence for her.
Duhart also sobbed in court.
Released on parole, she said that a return to prison would be a “disaster” for her children, who have also been placed in foster care.
Prosecutors requested a 10-year prison sentence for Duhart.
“I am not a victim,” she said. “The victims are the others, those who were tortured and massacred by the organization I belonged to. I am responsible.”
Earlier this week the presiding judge had pointed out to the three women that they had not said anything about “the victims of the attacks.”
Allain said that she had been “touched” by her meeting in prison with Georges Salines, the father of Lola Salines, one of the victims killed at the Bataclan.
Prosecutors have requested a 15-year prison sentence for her.
The verdict is expected later Friday.


Russia has ill intentions toward the whole world, Polish PM says

Russia has ill intentions toward the whole world, Polish PM says
Updated 26 September 2025

Russia has ill intentions toward the whole world, Polish PM says

Russia has ill intentions toward the whole world, Polish PM says
  • “European allies have never been so united... we need to be vigilant,” Tusk said

WARSAW: Russia has ill intentions toward the whole world and Europe is finally more united in its views on the threat from Moscow, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said on Friday.
“European allies have never been so united... we need to be vigilant. Russia has ill intentions toward the whole world, and those who border with it are the first to feel it,” Tusk told reporters when asked about recent drone incidents.


Germany’s Merz says Europe still far too dependent on software from US

Germany’s Merz says Europe still far too dependent on software from US
Updated 26 September 2025

Germany’s Merz says Europe still far too dependent on software from US

Germany’s Merz says Europe still far too dependent on software from US
  • Merz said rules are no longer being observed in the United States

BERLIN: Germany still depends far too much on software from the United States, Chancellor Friedrich Merz said on Friday, calling for Europe to focus more on digital sovereignty and its own data centers.
“I want us in Europe, not just us in Germany, but we in Europe as a whole, to become more independent, more sovereign, and to develop some of our strengths ourselves,” he told an audience at a summit in Berlin.
He said rules are no longer being observed in the United States, which has fundamentally transformed over the last few years so that changes will not revert after the next election.