US discusses tariffs, critical minerals, immigration with Pakistan

US discusses tariffs, critical minerals, immigration with Pakistan
A collage of images created on April 8, 2024, shows US Secretary of State Marco Rubio (left) and Pakistan's Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 08 April 2025

US discusses tariffs, critical minerals, immigration with Pakistan

US discusses tariffs, critical minerals, immigration with Pakistan
  • US Secretary of State Marco Rubio speaks to Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar over telephone
  • Both discussed making progress toward a “fair and balanced” trade relationship, says State Department

WASHINGTON: US Secretary of State Marco Rubio spoke to Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar on Monday about tariffs, trade relations, immigration and prospects for engagement on critical minerals, the State Department and Pakistan’s foreign ministry said in separate statements.

President Donald Trump said last week that he would impose a 10 percent baseline tariff on all imports to the US and higher duties on dozens of other countries, including some of Washington’s biggest trading partners, rattling global markets and bewildering US allies. The Trump administration imposed a 29 percent tariff on Pakistan.

“They (Rubio and Dar) discussed US reciprocal tariffs on Pakistan and how to make progress toward a fair and balanced trade relationship,” the State Department said.

The US goods trade deficit with Pakistan was $3 billion in 2024, a 5.2  percent increase over 2023, according to the Office of the US Trade Representative.

“The Secretary raised prospects for engagement on critical minerals and expressed interest in expanding commercial opportunities for US companies.”

Pakistan’s foreign ministry said Rubio “reciprocated the desire to collaborate with Pakistan in trade and investment in various sectors, especially critical minerals.”

The Trump administration has also used prospects of engagement over critical minerals with other countries.

For example, it is attempting to strike an agreement over critical minerals with Ukraine as part of talks related to the Russia-Ukraine war. Washington has also said it is open to exploring critical minerals partnerships with Congo and help end a conflict raging in the African country’s east.

In the call with Dar, Rubio emphasized the importance of Pakistan’s cooperation with the US on law enforcement and addressing illegal immigration, the State Department said.

Last month, Pakistan highlighted its cooperation with Washington on countering extremism after the arrest of Mohammad Sharifullah, whom the US blames for a 2021 attack on its troops at Kabul airport, in a military operation along the border with Afghanistan.

The Pakistan foreign ministry said Rubio and Dar discussed the situation in Afghanistan.


Pakistan, Afghanistan resume peace talks in Türkiye as Islamabad seeks end to cross-border attacks

Pakistan, Afghanistan resume peace talks in Türkiye as Islamabad seeks end to cross-border attacks
Updated 7 sec ago

Pakistan, Afghanistan resume peace talks in Türkiye as Islamabad seeks end to cross-border attacks

Pakistan, Afghanistan resume peace talks in Türkiye as Islamabad seeks end to cross-border attacks
  • Pakistan’s defense minister reaffirms talks with Afghanistan center on ending cross-border militant attacks
  • Both sides earlier extended the ceasefire and agreed to establish a monitoring and verification mechanism

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s negotiating team is in Istanbul to begin a new round of peace talks with Afghanistan on Thursday, Defense Minister Khawaja Asif said, reaffirming that Islamabad was seeking an end to cross-border militant attacks.

The two countries engaged in deadly border clashes last month that killed dozens of people on both sides before reaching a tenuous ceasefire amid peace talks mediated by Qatar and Türkiye.

Pakistan has long accused Afghanistan of sheltering militants who launch cross-border attacks while urging the authorities in Kabul not to let their land be used by armed factions. Afghanistan has frequently denied Islamabad’s allegation of any militant presence in the past, describing Pakistan’s security challenges as its internal matter.

However, the Taliban abandoned their traditional position more recently, with spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid telling media Pakistan did not accept Kabul’s proposal “to expel individuals whom Islamabad considers a threat” from Afghanistan during the last round of negotiations, a claim dismissed by Pakistani authorities.

“The delegation left today and negotiations will start tomorrow,” the Pakistani minister told a group of journalists outside the parliament building on Wednesday, referring to his country’s negotiators and the talks with Afghanistan. “Let’s hope the Afghans also act with some prudence and peace can be restored in this region.”

The two countries had agreed to an extended ceasefire with a monitoring and verification mechanism developed with the help of the mediating nations at the end of the last round of negotiations.

The next round of talks was announced to be held in Istanbul on Nov. 6.

Asked about the prospects of a positive outcome, Asif said: “If there are chances of progress, dialogue is held. If there are no chances, it’s just a waste of time, right?”

He added that Pakistan had a single-point agenda that militant attacks should end from Afghan territory.

Pakistan challenged the Afghan version that Islamabad refused Kabul’s proposal to expel militants launching attacks against its people and security personnel earlier this month.

“Pakistan had demanded that terrorists in Afghanistan posing a threat to Pakistan be controlled or arrested,” the information ministry said in a social media post. “When the Afghan side said that they were Pakistani nationals, Pakistan immediately proposed that they be handed over through designated border posts, consistent with Pakistan’s long-standing position.”

It added that the Afghan narrative over the issue was both “false and misleading.”

The talks are taking place amid an atmosphere of distrust, with both sides accusing the other of not acting in good faith.

However, the two countries preferred to continue negotiations at the encouragement of the mediating nations after the last round hit a deadlock.