Spain’s PM urges Washington to reconsider tariff ‘nonsense’

Spain’s PM urges Washington to reconsider tariff ‘nonsense’
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez and European Commission Vice President Teresa Ribera on Friday urged the US to reconsider new tariffs on goods from Europe and open a dialogue with Brussels to stop what Sanchez described as “nonsense.”(AFP)
Short Url
Updated 28 March 2025

Spain’s PM urges Washington to reconsider tariff ‘nonsense’

Spain’s PM urges Washington to reconsider tariff ‘nonsense’
  • “Today, from here, I’d like to make a call again to the US administration to reconsider and open dialogue with the European Commission,” Sanchez told an economic event in Madrid
  • Ribera likened Trump’s trade policy to the behavior of a “schoolyard bully“

MADRID: Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez and European Commission Vice President Teresa Ribera on Friday urged the United States to reconsider new tariffs on goods from Europe and open a dialogue with Brussels to stop what Sanchez described as “nonsense.”
President Donald Trump said on Wednesday the United States will charge a 25 percent import tariff on all cars. On Thursday, the Commission said the European Union was preparing a “robust, calibrated” response.
“Today, from here, I’d like to make a call again to the US administration to reconsider and open dialogue with the European Commission and stop this nonsense,” Sanchez told an economic event in Madrid.
Speaking at the same event, Ribera — who served as energy minister under Sanchez and is now the bloc’s antitrust chief — said the EU “misses the relationship of solidarity with the United States and we hope we can return to it,” adding there was always space to talk and find solutions.
She likened Trump’s trade policy to the behavior of a “schoolyard bully.”
“Europe cannot remain silent in the face of such aggression,” she added. “We’re reaching our limit and the next steps will require more Europe, and more unity in terms of security.”


How mass return of refugees is compounding Afghanistan’s humanitarian crisis

How mass return of refugees is compounding Afghanistan’s humanitarian crisis
Updated 7 sec ago

How mass return of refugees is compounding Afghanistan’s humanitarian crisis

How mass return of refugees is compounding Afghanistan’s humanitarian crisis
  • Few Afghans are heading back to their crisis-wracked homeland by choice or with a destination in mind
  • Women and children face particular risks, with restricted rights, food insecurity, and a lack of documentation

DUBAI: Afghan refugees are returning in their thousands — few of them by choice or with a destination in mind. Many of the youngest have never set foot in Afghanistan before. Others are returning to find their homes and livelihoods no longer exist.

What were once considered places of refuge from the unrelenting turmoil back home, neighboring states are now expelling Afghans in waves of forced returns that are pushing crisis-wracked Afghanistan to the brink.

According to Babar Baloch, global spokesperson for the UNHCR, the UN refugee agency, more than 2.1 million Afghans have returned or been forced back to Afghanistan this year alone, including 1.6 million from Iran and more than 352,000 from Pakistan.

Sami Fakhouri, head of delegation for Afghanistan at the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, witnessed the impact first-hand.

“We are anticipating that an additional 1 million people, possibly more, may return from Iran to Afghanistan by the end of this year,” he told a briefing in Geneva. “The majority didn’t have a say in coming back. They were put on buses and driven to the border.”

Fakhouri said he had seen busloads of families being dropped off at the Islam Qala border in Herat province in recent days, many with no idea where to go. He also sounded the alarm over a critical funding shortfall.

The IFRC’s $31.4 million appeal to support returnees is only 10 percent funded. “Whether we can maintain support at this pace is a real concern,” he said.

At the same time, Afghanistan is in no position to absorb the influx of people after four decades of war, occupation, civil unrest and economic crisis have left the country extremely fragile.

The US military withdrawal and the return of the Taliban government in 2021 led to Afghanistan’s global isolation, a freeze on foreign aid and assets, and the near-collapse of public services.

Compounding these challenges is one of the worst droughts Afghanistan has seen in decades, which has devastated crops, depleted water sources, and crippled rural livelihoods.

With more than half the population reliant on agriculture, many returnees have little to go back to in their home villages — forcing them to remain in transit areas or drift toward overcrowded cities.

Aid agencies warn that without climate-resilient recovery plans, the drought will deepen food insecurity and drive even more internal displacement.

These overlapping crises have already pushed more than two-thirds of the population into poverty.

Baloch described the expulsions as “a broader, worrying regional trend,” adding that “refugee-hosting countries have issued return orders with deadlines for Afghans to depart, or face deportation.”

Since those announcements, the situation for Afghans in both Iran and Pakistan has deteriorated rapidly.

These mass returns follow a shift in regional policy, beginning in March when Iran issued a deadline for undocumented Afghans to leave or face arrest.

In June, Pakistan launched its second phase of deportations targeting unregistered Afghans. Both countries cited national security concerns and internal pressure to expel large refugee populations.

Pakistan has defended its forced expulsions, with Talal Chaudhry, an adviser to Islamabad’s Interior Ministry, stating in April that the policy targets only “illegal foreigners.”

In February, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Shafqat Ali Khan rejected claims that Afghan nationals were being mistreated during the repatriation process.

“In this connection, we also extensively engaged the Afghan side to ensure the smooth repatriation of Afghan nationals,” he told Voice of America.

Iran, meanwhile, has justified its expulsions as a response to national security and economic pressures, particularly following its recent conflict with Israel. Rhetoric on social media has increasingly blamed Afghans for shortages and social issues.

Abdul Rahman Rashid, the Taliban government’s deputy minister for refugees and repatriation, has rebuked host countries for the mass expulsions. And described the removal of Afghans as a “serious violation of international norms, humanitarian principles, and Islamic values.”

“The scale and manner in which Afghan refugees have been forced to return to their homeland is something Afghanistan has never before experienced in its history,” Rashid said in Kabul on July 31.

For the hundreds of thousands now crossing back into Afghanistan each month, the journey does not end at the border. Many are stepping into a future marked by uncertainty, deprivation and loss, without hope, safety or dignity.

Even so, the pace of returns has surged in recent weeks.

On July 4 alone, more than 50,000 people crossed into Afghanistan from Iran — a dramatic increase from the daily average of 5,000 between January and June.

From July 10 to 16, the average was more than 29,000 per day. Inevitably, the scale of arrivals has overwhelmed aid operations at border crossings.

“Our teams are at the borders, receiving and assisting streams of exhausted, hungry, and scared people every day,” Baloch told Arab News.

“Staff and structures are absolutely inundated,” he said, adding that the UN agency has deployed additional personnel and is distributing essential relief items, hot meals, and emergency financial assistance to meet immediate needs.

“But amid funding constraints, and given the scale and pace of returns, we will not be able to sustain support for more than a few weeks,” said Baloch.

In addition to the operational burden, the nature of these returns has raised serious concerns. Many of those arriving say they had little choice.

Baloch described the situation as “a complex protection crisis,” noting that returns are taking place under difficult and often involuntary conditions.

He said many Afghans felt forced to leave after seeing others deported, and “returnees who arrived in the country in recent months have been sharing concerning stories of increased restrictions, harassment and discrimination.”

Once back, many find themselves in provinces that lack even the most basic services, forcing thousands into temporary transit sites, informal settlements, or already strained households. Many arrive without identity papers, making access to support even more difficult.

“Immense challenges lie ahead for returnees — from accessing documentation, housing, healthcare and education, to rebuilding their lives in a country they do not know,” said Baloch.

Those challenges are already visible. Shelter is scarce, and schools and clinics are either closed or inaccessible to women and girls. Meanwhile, job opportunities are limited — especially for those who have spent years or decades abroad.

“For women and girls in particular, life in Afghanistan brings extreme restrictions,” said Baloch.

Under the Taliban government, most secondary schools and universities remain closed to girls. Women are banned from most forms of employment, including in the nongovernmental organization sector. For many returnee women, it means a life of near-total invisibility.

Even female aid workers have been forced into the shadows. One Afghan humanitarian worker, speaking anonymously to a UN publication, described living in fear while continuing to serve her community.

“I feel depressed,” she said. “As an aid worker, I don’t feel safe, and I am afraid for my life… I am worried that I might be targeted because of my job.”

She described being stopped at checkpoints, harassed for not having a male guardian, and being unable to access work or support systems freely.

“It is so unfair to be deprived of your rights because of your gender. Working is not only my dream or a human right, it is also the way I support my family. Women are half of a country … Let us work, let us learn, let us live.”

Aid workers have also reported a growing number of unaccompanied or separated children among recent returnees — some born abroad and unable to navigate legal systems or school enrolment.

Data for June published by UNICEF, the UN children’s fund, indicates that more than 5,000 unaccompanied or separated Afghan children returned from Iran, many arriving without guardians or legal identity.

The lack of functioning child protection mechanisms places these vulnerable children at risk of exploitation, statelessness, and abuse at a critical stage in their lives.

Human rights experts have also warned of broader risks facing returnees.

Richard Bennett, the UN special rapporteur on human rights in Afghanistan, has said the nation “is not a safe country for returnees, given the constantly deteriorating human rights situation since the Taliban seized control.”

Rights groups have documented cases in which returnees — particularly those with foreign residency or links to international organizations — have faced interrogation or detention upon arrival, fueling fears of surveillance and reprisals.

Despite urgent warnings from aid agencies, the international response has fallen short. The UNHCR has appealed for $71 million to support returnees in the region over a nine-month period.

The IFRC and other aid actors have made separate appeals for immediate assistance at border crossings and for longer-term reintegration support. But donor interest remains weak, with many countries reducing their funding to Afghanistan over governance concerns and competing global crises.

Roza Otunbayeva, the UN secretary-general’s special representative for Afghanistan, called the mass returns “a test of our collective humanity,” warning of further displacement, famine, and instability without urgent action.

She called for an “integrated approach” that combines emergency aid with long-term support for return areas, and stressed that regional dialogue with Iran, Pakistan, and Central Asian states is essential to ensure returns remain voluntary, safe, and dignified.

Baloch echoed those concerns. “We are in touch with the authorities in Iran and Pakistan. UNHCR urges countries in the region to ensure protection for Afghans and that returns to Afghanistan are voluntary, safe, and dignified.”

“We are also calling on the international community to urgently and substantially increase funding — to meet both critical needs at the border upon arrival, and provide longer-term assistance to help returnees settle in Afghanistan,” he said.


Malian army roots out alleged anti-junta plotters

Malian army roots out alleged anti-junta plotters
Updated 8 min 49 sec ago

Malian army roots out alleged anti-junta plotters

Malian army roots out alleged anti-junta plotters
  • Since 2012, Mali has been wracked with crises on various fronts, with extremists linked to Al-Qaeda or Daesh carrying out violent attacks across the Sahel nation

BAMAKO: Mali’s junta has carried out arrests to quash an alleged plot to overthrow the government within the army’s ranks, sources said, but the circumstances of the detentions remain unexplained.
The junta, which itself came to power in back-to-back coups in 2020 and 2021, has made 55 arrests, mainly among the National Guard, the military branch from which Defense Minister General Sadio Camara hails.
The military-backed government has yet to officially comment on the crackdown, which comes as the army is locked in fighting with terrorists and separatists.
The arrests, which began last week and continued into early Monday, were carried out by the junta following what a security and military source said were “destabilization” attempts.
While Defense Minister Camara, a key figure within the ruling junta, has not been questioned, observers say several of those apprehended are believed to be officers close to him.
According to a Malian security source, civilians could also be questioned soon.
Two generals were among those detained, including Abass Dembele, a former governor of the central Mopti region and a respected military officer.
Gen. Nema Sagara, a rare woman to serve as brigadier general in the Malian Air Force, who also hailed from the center of the country, was the other.
“The situation is a bit complex,” one African diplomat stationed in Bamako said. 
“The government’s silence while arrests have been ongoing for at least four days deserves reflection.”
“Are we dealing with preventive arrests? Were the arrested soldiers in the phase of destabilizing the (junta), as we understand it?” the source asked.
Since 2012, Mali has been wracked with crises on various fronts, with extremists linked to Al-Qaeda or Daesh carrying out violent attacks across the Sahel nation.
Mali’s junta has ramped up repression of its critics in the face of the terrorist unrest.
For Malian sociologist Oumar Maiga, the spate of arrests within the army’s ranks was “proof that the officers are struggling to control the situation.”
When junta chief Gen. Assimi Goita took power after deposing President Ibrahim Boubacar Keita in 2020, he insisted he was committed to the fight against jihadist violence and initially pledged a return to civilian rule.
But the military ultimately reneged on its promise to cede power to elected civilians by the deadline it had set.
The junta announced in May the dissolution of all political parties and organizations, as well as a ban on meetings.
Then in July, Goita extended his military rule for at least five more years without an election.
Gen. Goita’s rule has marked a turning point in Mali’s relationship with the West. 
The country has broken ties with France and other former allies, pivoting toward Russia instead.
Mali and its junta-led neighbors Burkina Faso and Niger have teamed up to create their own confederation, the Alliance of Sahel States, or AES, and have announced the creation of a 5,000-strong force for joint military operations.
Meanwhile, the Malian army and its Russian mercenary allies, which are tasked in particular with tracking down extremists, are regularly accused of rights violations against civilians.

 


India pushes ahead with US trade talks despite tariff hike to 50 percent

India pushes ahead with US trade talks despite tariff hike to 50 percent
Updated 56 min 35 sec ago

India pushes ahead with US trade talks despite tariff hike to 50 percent

India pushes ahead with US trade talks despite tariff hike to 50 percent
  • Goods trade between the US and India was about $87 billion in the last fiscal year, according to Indian government data
  • An Indian minister earlier said 55 percent of India’s exports would be covered by the new tariff, factoring in previous 25 percent levy

NEW DELHI/MUMBAI: India hopes trade talks with the US will continue even as the US hiked tariffs on its exports to 50 percent due to New Delhi’s purchase of sanctioned Russian oil, two lawmakers said on Monday, citing a briefing to a parliamentary panel on foreign affairs.

Last week, President Donald Trump imposed an additional 25 percent tariff on Indian goods due to Delhi’s continued purchase of Russian oil, bringing the total duty on Indian exports to the US to 50 percent — among the highest of any American trading partner.

“Our relations with the US are multi-dimensional, and should not be seen only through the prism of trade,” one of the lawmakers said, citing the foreign secretary’s briefing to the panel.

Shashi Tharoor, an opposition Congress party leader, who heads the panel, said trade talks would continue.

“As of now, there is no change in the existing plans for the sixth round,” he said, referring to a scheduled visit of a US trade delegation to New Delhi from August 25.

Earlier, junior finance minister, Pankaj Chaudhary told lawmakers that about 55 percent of India’s merchandise exports to the United States would be covered by the new tariff.

His estimate factored in the initial 25 percent levy, he said in a written response to a lawmaker’s query.

“The Department of Commerce is engaged with all stakeholders” for their assessment of the situation, Chaudhary added.

Goods trade between the United States and India — the world’s biggest and fifth-largest economies, respectively — was worth about $87 billion in the last fiscal year, according to Indian government estimates.

The panel separately voiced concerns over Pakistani army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir’s reported remarks on nuclear threats in South Asia during a visit to the US

“Nuclear blackmail will not work with India, and no party, or representative disagrees with this view,” Tharoor said, adding the external affairs ministry had condemned the comments.


Norway sovereign wealth fund drops investments in 11 Israeli firms

Norway sovereign wealth fund drops investments in 11 Israeli firms
Updated 11 August 2025

Norway sovereign wealth fund drops investments in 11 Israeli firms

Norway sovereign wealth fund drops investments in 11 Israeli firms
  • Norway’s wealth fund is the biggest in the world with a value of around $1.9 trillion, with investments in over than 8,600 companies
  • Monitoring of Israeli companies had been intensified in the autumn of 2024 and as a result, the fund manager sold investments in several Israeli companies

OSLO: Norway’s sovereign wealth fund said Monday that it was selling its investments in 11 Israeli companies following reports it had invested in an Israeli jet engine maker even as the war in Gaza raged.
Nicolai Tangen, chief of Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM), which manages the fund, said the decision was taken “in response to extraordinary circumstances.”
“The situation in Gaza is a serious humanitarian crisis. We are invested in companies that operate in a country at war, and conditions in the West Bank and Gaza have recently worsened,” Tangen said in a statement.
He said the move would reduce the number of Israeli companies the fund’s Council of Ethics needed to supervise.
Norway’s wealth fund is the biggest in the world with a value of around $1.9 trillion, with investments in more than 8,600 companies spanning the globe.
Last week, Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten reported that the fund had invested in Israeli Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings, which makes parts for engines used in Israeli fighter jets.
Tangen later confirmed the reports, and said the fund had increased its stake after the Israeli offensive in Gaza began.
The revelations led Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store to ask Finance Minister and former NATO secretary general Jens Stoltenberg for a review.
NBIM said it had investments in 61 Israeli companies at the end of the first six months of this year, 11 of which were not in its “equity benchmark index” — which is set by the finance ministry and used to gauge the wealth fund’s performance.
NBIM added that it had decided last week that “all investments in Israeli companies that are not in the equity benchmark index will be sold as soon as possible.”
Going forward, “the fund’s investments in Israel will now be limited to companies that are in the equity benchmark index,” it said.
NBIM also said that all investments in Israeli companies managed by external managers would be moved in-house, and that it was “terminating contracts with external managers in Israel.”
In addition, NBIM said the finance ministry had asked it to review “its investments in Israeli companies, and to propose new measures that it deems necessary.”
It said it initiated the review and would present its findings before an August 20 deadline.
The fund also said that it had “long paid particular attention to companies associated with war and conflict.”
“Since 2020, we have been in contact with more than 60 companies to raise this issue. Of these, 39 dialogues were related to the West Bank and Gaza,” NBIM said.
It said that monitoring of Israeli companies had been intensified in the autumn of 2024, and that “as a result, we have sold our investments in several Israeli companies.”
Speaking at a press conference later Monday, Stoltenberg said he was glad Norges Bank had “acted quickly.”
“The fund’s ethical guidelines stipulate that it shall not invest in companies that contribute to violations of international law by states,” he told reporters.
“Therefore, the pension fund should not hold shares in companies that contribute to Israel’s warfare in Gaza or the occupation of the West Bank,” he said.
Also on Monday, Norwegian pension fund KLP said it had excluded Israeli company NextVision Stabilized Systems “from its investments because the company supplies key components for military drones used in the war in Gaza.”


Indian journalists face criticism at home after meeting Netanyahu amid Gaza war

Indian journalists meet Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem, Aug. 7, 2025. (Office of PM of Israel)
Indian journalists meet Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem, Aug. 7, 2025. (Office of PM of Israel)
Updated 11 August 2025

Indian journalists face criticism at home after meeting Netanyahu amid Gaza war

Indian journalists meet Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem, Aug. 7, 2025. (Office of PM of Israel)
  • Several Indian reporters met Netanyahu during Israel tour last week
  • New Delhi has largely remained quiet since Israel launched its deadly assault on Gaza in October 2023

NEW DELHI: A recent visit by a group of Indian reporters to Israel, and their meeting with its Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, has sparked outrage at home, with senior journalists calling out both the reporters and their publications for violating professional standards and ethics.

Photos posted on social media by Netanyahu’s office showed him last week receiving journalists from India, including Sidhant Sibal from WION TV, Manash Pratim Bhuyan from the Press Trust of India, Aditya Raj Kaul, former senior executive editor at TV9 network, Shubhajit Roy from the Indian Express, and Abhishek Kapoor from Republic TV.

The fact that they accepted the Israeli prime minister’s invitation was “deplorable,” one of the most prominent figures in Indian journalism N. Ram, publisher of The Hindu Group, which includes The Hindu, Frontline, and Sportstar, told Arab News.

“They should have boycotted a man like Netanyahu. And, also, to accept this kind of invitation at this juncture shows the complete lack of sensitivity towards what ethical journalism is about,” he said.

“It only speaks poorly of these journalists and the organizations they represent.”

In the face of Israel’s ongoing war in Gaza, the killing of tens of thousands of Palestinians, imposed starvation, and assassination of more than 200 journalists since October 2023, revealing war crimes is what, according to Ram, could help restore some credibility to the Indian journalists who met Netanyahu.

“Everybody can see what kind of war crimes have been committed,” he said

 

 

“If they use the opportunity to expose the atrocities, then that will to some extent redeem their journalism, but I don’t know if they’ve done that.”

For Manoj Sharma, a member of the Press Club of India, seeing his colleagues shake hands with Netanyahu was shocking — not only because Netanyahu is wanted by the International Criminal Court for war crimes, but also given the mass killing of fellow journalists by the Israeli regime.

“That is totally unpardonable,” he said. “As journalists we have a moral responsibility toward all our journalist friends across the globe … We should stand in solidarity with them.”

Arab News reached out for comment to the journalists who participated in the Israel trip, but none were available.

New Delhi has largely remained quiet since Israel launched its deadly assault on Gaza in October 2023.

But India’s civil society, including the younger generation, is increasingly involved in raising awareness of Israeli war crimes, organizing solidarity protests as well as on-the-ground and online campaigns — in contrast to the mainstream media that often reflects the government’s silence.

“Mainstream journalists have gone way beyond ethics and their moral compass is now completely unhinged,” Ghazala Wahab, executive editor of the Force magazine, told Arab News.

“A good journalist should be on the side of justice, whether it’s within the country or outside the country, but our mainstream media doesn’t stand on the side of justice. It always stands on the side of the powerful. I don’t think it is journalism any longer.”