From dabke to digital: How South Koreans mobilize for Palestine

Special From dabke to digital: How South Koreans mobilize for Palestine
1 / 2
South Koreans join a Palestine solidarity protest in Seoul on March 9, 2025. (AN photo)
Special From dabke to digital: How South Koreans mobilize for Palestine
2 / 2
South Koreans participate in a Palestine solidarity protest in Seoul, March 9, 2025. (AN Photo)
Short Url
Updated 02 April 2025

From dabke to digital: How South Koreans mobilize for Palestine

From dabke to digital: How South Koreans mobilize for Palestine
  • More than 230 groups are part of Urgent Action by Korean Civil Society in Solidarity with Palestine
  • Creativity of their campaigns is an inherent trait of South Korea’s civic activism in the 21st century

SEOUL: From one-man protests to mass demonstrations, performances and literature, South Koreans are increasingly raising awareness on Palestine, with activists outdoing each other in creative expression as the solidarity movement quickly grows.

Advocacy for Palestine has been present in South Korea for several decades, but it has never been as prominent as it is now. While it began to gain some traction in the wake of the US invasion of Iraq in 2003, only a handful of activists were involved.

“It was difficult to mobilize back then. Sometimes we had just two members, usually five,” Deng Ya-ping, leader of BDS Korea — a group affiliated with the global Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement — told Arab News.

Korean civil society groups used to get together to denounce Israel, but only in response to particular incidents.

“When the situation was over, the groups would return to advocating for their own agendas,” Deng said.




South Koreans participate in a Palestine solidarity protest in Seoul, March 9, 2025. (AN Photo)

“But now, because the massacre and genocide have been going on for the past 15 months and it’s becoming serious, so many groups — to new magnitudes — have been collaborating to show solidarity.”

It started out as marches in downtown Seoul and soon evolved into a multifaceted awareness campaign as Israel’s response to the attack by the Palestinian group Hamas in October 2023 reached a genocidal scale.

More than 230 civil society groups have joined together as Urgent Action by Korean Civil Society in Solidarity with Palestine, transforming what was once a little-known cause into a dynamic and visible movement that incorporates diverse advocacy methods.

Every day, members of the movement choose one person to hold a banner reading “Stop Genocide” in front of the Israeli Embassy in Seoul and encourage passersby to call for an end to Israel’s onslaught, massacres, and occupation of Palestine.

They also host readathons of Palestinian literature, screen documentaries exposing the realities of life under Israeli occupation, organize meetings with Palestinian refugees, and learn about Palestine’s culture, as they perform the dabke — a traditional dance and a symbol of Palestinian resistance and identity.

Social media has played a major role in amplifying these efforts. A recent Instagram campaign went viral after Korean activists filmed themselves posing as Yahya Sinwar, the head of Hamas’s political bureau, who remained defiant to the end. The footage released by Israeli forces showed Sinwar with severe injuries and one hand severed, but still fighting the combat drone they had sent to kill him.




South Korean activists participate in a Palestine solidarity protest in Seoul on March 9, 2025. (AN photo)

The creativity displayed by the Palestine solidarity movement is an inherent trait of South Korea’s civic activism.

“South Korea’s demonstration culture has become highly creative in the 21st century. This is also reflected in the Palestinian solidarity movement here,” said Eom Han-jin, sociology professor at Hallym University in Chuncheon.

“Towards the end of the 1990s, South Korea had already become a democracy, so it had the capability to focus on not only domestic issues, but issues that occur in other regions. The Palestine issue was one of the major international solidarity movements at the time, and people in Korea started to take interest in the Israeli occupation and atrocities in 2000 … Then, the US invaded Iraq, and South Korea sent troops, making it a major agenda for social movements.”

As people who have also experienced colonial occupation, Koreans feel a sense of connection to Palestinians, which has lately been fueled by the influx of foreign workers and students from Palestine and the Middle East who share their stories firsthand.

What strengthens the movement further is the current situation in Korea as well.

“As anti-government protests intensify, the pro-Palestine movement has become part of this larger wave of resistance,” Eom said.

“Unlike in other countries where activism is focused around Middle Easterners and people who sympathize with them, a very diverse set of groups have been collaborating and advocating in South Korea.”

By blending digital advocacy with cultural and grassroots activism, the South Korean movement has attracted a broad and varied base of supporters.

“I was shocked when I saw children being killed and hospitals being attacked,” said Kim Seok-gyu, a 22-year-old observer of the movement.

“I was dumbfounded, because how can they (Israelis) possibly do something like this in the 21st century?”




This photo shows a flag waving during a Palestine solidarity protest in Seoul, March 9, 2025. (AN Photo)

He is not alone. A recent study by Hankook Research found that 62 percent of its respondents felt more sympathetic toward the Palestinian cause. Support for Israel, on the other hand, has plummeted.

Joo Jeon-ja, a 30-year-old not affiliated with any activist group, has been joining the protests they organize.

“In the news, I have seen little children being killed by the Israelis. I just couldn’t believe my eyes. I thought I had to act,” she said.

“I can’t make large donations or go help the kids, so I just want to do my best from what I can. That is why I participate. I plan to participate more often in the future.”

Joo is also trying to get more people involved.

“I want to bring more people to the protests with me in the future,” she said.

“I realized that collective efforts are important in making a change. It is voices like ours that (can) … make a real difference. And that is what I strive to do.”

Another driving force behind the solidarity movement’s expansion is student activism, which engages especially the younger generations.




South Koreans participate in a Palestine solidarity protest in Seoul, March 9, 2025. (AN Photo)

Unlike their US counterparts, who have largely relied on mass demonstrations and sit-ins, South Korean students have diversified their activism by running advocacy booths, collecting signatures for petitions, and hosting discussion forums. Online campaigns, inter-university collaborations, and hashtag movements have also gained traction.

One of the organizations is Yalla Yonsei at Yonsei University, one of Seoul’s top institutions.

“There are student groups like ours across several universities in Seoul. We often collaborate on events. For example, there is Soobak (‘watermelon’ in Korean) at the Seoul National University, and we sometimes hold educational seminars with them,” said Lim Jae-kyung, who leads Yalla Yonsei. 

“I want to keep doing what we are doing in order to give support to the people suffering in Palestine. It is those people who are really suffering. The hardships we go through here are nothing compared to what the people are feeling there. There is not much we can do from Korea, but we will keep on fighting.”


Tuesday’s races were a quiet rebuke of Trump for many voters, AP Voter Poll finds

Tuesday’s races were a quiet rebuke of Trump for many voters, AP Voter Poll finds
Updated 7 sec ago

Tuesday’s races were a quiet rebuke of Trump for many voters, AP Voter Poll finds

Tuesday’s races were a quiet rebuke of Trump for many voters, AP Voter Poll finds
  • Most voters disapproved of Trump’s performance as president, and many thought his aggressive approach to immigration had “gone too far”

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump wasn’t on the ballot in Tuesday’s elections, but many voters in key races made their choice in opposition to him or considered him to be irrelevant, according to the AP Voter Poll.
It was hardly an endorsement of his nearly 10 months back in the White House.
That theme played out in the governor races in New Jersey and Virginia, the mayoral contest in New York City and a state proposition to redraw congressional districts in California.
The AP Voter Poll, which surveyed more than 17,000 voters in those places, found that most voters disapproved of Trump’s performance as president, and many thought his aggressive approach to immigration had “gone too far.” Republicans and those who lean toward the Republican Party were more likely to say Trump wasn’t a factor for their vote, even though most approve of his job performance.
Few cast a vote to support Trump, while more wanted to oppose him
Most presidents fare poorly in the off-cycle elections that come a year after their White House wins, and Trump fit solidly into that pattern as Democrats boasted victories in Tuesday’s key races.
In both Virginia and New Jersey, slightly fewer than half of voters said Trump was “not a factor” in their respective votes for governor. Beside some social media posts and tele-rallies Monday night, Trump did little to help Republican candidates in those states.

About 6 in 10 voters in New York City’s mayoral race said Trump did not play a role in their decision. That’s despite his threat to withdraw federal funding if Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani won, and his social media endorsement of Andrew Cuomo, the former New York governor. New York City voters picked Mamdani to be their next mayor, setting up a possible showdown with the Trump administration.
For those who did identify Trump as a factor, it was to his disadvantage.
Roughly 4 in 10 voters in New Jersey and Virginia said they were casting ballots to oppose Trump. Fewer said they were voting to show their support for the Republican president.
Trump weighed more heavily in the minds of California voters, who were voting on a proposition to determine whether to redistrict the state’s congressional seats in favor of Democrats. The whole effort is designed to rebut Trump’s efforts to redraw congressional districts in Republican states with the specific goal of preserving the GOP House majority in next year’s midterm races.
Only about 4 in 10 California voters said Trump did not factor into their decision. But about half said they were voting to object to Trump. Roughly 1 in 10 California voters said they were voting with support for him.
Voters largely disapproved of Trump, and many cast ballots accordingly
Many voters disapprove of how Trump has performed since returning to the White House in January. That could be a problem for Republican candidates, as Trump has made loyalty to him a must for GOP candidates.
Only about 4 in 10 voters across Virginia and New Jersey approve of how the president is handling his job. Approval was even lower in the Democratic strongholds of California and New York City, where close to two-thirds of voters disapprove of his leadership so far.
Not surprisingly, the voters who were likeliest to disapprove of him were more likely to say they were signaling their dislike of him when casting a ballot. Meanwhile, voters who like Trump’s job performance were more likely to say the president wasn’t a factor in their choice.
Most Republican voters in Virginia and New Jersey approved of Trump’s performance as president, but that didn’t mean they saw him as a major motivator. About 6 in 10 Republicans in both states said Trump wasn’t a factor in their vote.
Many voters were unhappy with Trump’s immigration approach
In 2024, Trump capitalized on voters’ concerns about border crossings by immigrants without legal status.
This year, immigration fell far behind economic issues for voters when they were asked to think about what’s the most important issue facing their state or city. It wasn’t a top concern for voters in any of the four states where the AP Voter Poll was conducted. The survey also found that many voters were unhappy with Trump’s aggressive approach on deportations and arrests of immigrants believed to be in the country illegally.
Voters in California, New Jersey, New York City and Virginia were more likely to say that the Trump administration’s actions on immigration enforcement had “gone too far” than “been about right” or “not gone far enough.”
But voters in Virginia and New Jersey were about evenly split on whether their next governor should cooperate with the Trump administration on immigration enforcement.
Voters in New York City and California were more definitively opposed. About 6 in 10 voters in each place said their leaders should not be cooperating with the White House on immigration enforcement.