Venezuelan migrants deported by the US ended up in a Salvadoran prison. This is their legal status

Venezuelan migrants deported by the US ended up in a Salvadoran prison. This is their legal status
The US government used an 18th-century wartime law to deport more than 200 Venezuelan immigrants to El Salvador, where they were immediately transferred to the country's maximum-security gang prison. (AP/File)
Short Url
Updated 25 March 2025

Venezuelan migrants deported by the US ended up in a Salvadoran prison. This is their legal status

Venezuelan migrants deported by the US ended up in a Salvadoran prison. This is their legal status
  • El Salvador hasn’t had diplomatic relations with Venezuela since 2019
  • So the Venezuelans imprisoned there do not have any consular support from their government either

SAN SALVADOR: The US government used an 18th-century wartime law to deport more than 200 Venezuelan immigrants to El Salvador, where they were immediately transferred to the country’s maximum-security gang prison.
And while a federal judge in Washington tries to determine whether the US government defied his order to return the migrants while they were in the air and insists that they must get an opportunity to challenge their designations as alleged members of a notorious gang, there has been no word from El Salvador’s president or judiciary about what the prisoners’ legal status is in that country.
That may change soon. On Monday, lawyers hired by the Venezuelan government took legal action on behalf of the Venezuelan prisoners seeking their release from the prison, which US Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is scheduled to visit Wednesday.
The US says the Venezuelans were members of the Tren de Aragua gang, a criminal organization that US President Donald Trump declared an invading force, but has provided no evidence of their alleged membership. The Alien Enemies Act allows noncitizens to be deported without the opportunity to go before an immigration or federal court judge.
El Salvador hasn’t had diplomatic relations with Venezuela since 2019, so the Venezuelans imprisoned there do not have any consular support from their government either.
Even Salvadoran citizens have been living under a state of emergency that has suspended fundamental rights since 2022 and the country’s judiciary is not considered independent. All of which raises questions about the prisoners’ legal future in El Salvador.
What has El Salvador’s government said about the prisoners’ status in the country?
Nothing.
President Nayib Bukele announced Sunday that the United States had sent what he called “238 members of the Venezuelan criminal organization Tren de Aragua” to El Salvador and they were immediately sent to its maximum security gang prison. The US government would pay an annual fee for their incarceration, Bukele wrote in a post on X.
El Salvador’s Attorney General’s Office and Presidential Commissioner for Human Rights and Freedom of Expression did not respond to requests for comment about the status of the Venezuelan prisoners.
What do El Salvador’s laws say about the status of these prisoners?
Lawyer David Morales, legal director for the nongovernmental organization Cristosal, said there was no legal basis for the Venezuelans’ imprisonment in El Salvador. He said he knew of no Salvadoran law or international treaty that would support their imprisonment.
“They are illegal detentions because they haven’t been submitted to the jurisdiction of a Salvadoran judge, nor have they been prosecuted or convicted in El Salvador,” he said. As such, their imprisonment here is “arbitrary.”
He said El Salvador’s prosecutor’s office for human rights would have the authority to intervene, because it has a broad mandate when it comes to prisoners, “but we already know that it’s not playing its role because it is dominated, subjected to political power.”
What are lawyers doing?
Lawyers hired by the Venezuelan government filed a legal action Monday in El Salvador aimed at freeing 238 Venezuelans deported by the United States who are being held in a Salvadoran maximum-security prison.
Jaime Ortega, who says he represents 30 of the imprisoned Venezuelans, said his firm filed the habeas corpus petition with the Supreme Court’s Constitutional Chamber. He said that by extension they requested that it be applied to all Venezuelans detained in El Salvador.
Before it was filed, constitutional lawyer Enrique Anaya had suggested human rights organizations and the prisoners’ families should file habeas corpus petitions, essentially compelling the government to prove someone’s detention was justified “as a mechanism to denounce (the situation) as well as to pressure” the government.
Still, Anaya said the lack of judicial independence in El Salvador made success unlikely. Bukele’s party removed the justices of the Supreme Court’s Constitutional chamber in 2021 and replaced them with judges seen as more amenable to the administration.
“Who is going to decide these people’s freedom, US judges, Salvadoran judges?” Anaya asked. The habeas corpus petitions could at least “show the illegitimacy of this vacuum.”
How hard is it for Salvadorans to get out of prisons there?
El Salvador has lived under a state of emergency since March 2022, when Congress granted Bukele extraordinary powers to fight the country’s powerful street gangs.
Since then, some 84,000 people have been arrested, accused of gang ties. The state of emergency has allowed authorities to act without basic protections like access to a lawyer or even being told why they’re being arrested. They can be held for 15 days without seeing a judge.
Homicides have plummeted in El Salvador and the improved security has fueled Bukele’s popularity.
But while Bukele has said some 8,000 of those arrested have been freed for lack of evidence, many more have found no way out.
Last year, the Due Process Foundation published a report showing that the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court had “systematically” rejected more than 6,000 habeas corpus petitions made by families of people arrested under the state of emergency.


Nepal’s ousted PM calls for probe into deadly youth protests

Nepal’s ousted PM calls for probe into deadly youth protests
Updated 59 min 52 sec ago

Nepal’s ousted PM calls for probe into deadly youth protests

Nepal’s ousted PM calls for probe into deadly youth protests
  • Former leader says his government did not order police to open fire on protesters
  • Violence that erupted from demonstrations killed at least 73 people

KATMANDU: Nepal’s deposed prime minister KP Sharma Oli said Friday his government did not order police to open fire on protesters and called for a probe into violence that killed at least 73 people.
In his first statement since stepping down last Tuesday, the 73-year-old said “infiltrators” were responsible for inciting bloodshed during youth-led protests that swept the Himalayan nation beginning September 8.
The demonstrations were sparked by a short-lived ban on social media, but fueled by anger at corruption and long-standing economic woes.
At least 19 people were killed in a crackdown on the first day.
“Those who infiltrated (the protests) incited violence, resulting in the tragic loss of young lives,” Oli said in a post in Nepali on Facebook.
“The government did not issue orders to target the protesters and fire shots,” Oli said, as the country marked its constitution day Friday.
Mobs ransacked government offices, set fire to a newly opened Hilton hotel and attacked other symbols of authority – including Oli’s residence – as fury swept across towns and cities.
Some protesters were seen brandishing automatic rifles on the second day of the unrest.
“There should be an investigation on incidents of use of automatic weapons which the police did not have,” Oli said in his post.
“I will not say much about the conspiracy behind this today, time will tell itself,” he added.
Oli has not been seen in public since his removal, with allies saying he was under military protection.
“He was under the protection of the army and returned yesterday,” party colleague Agni Kharel from Oli’s CPN-UML said.
His successor, Prime Minister Sushila Karki, a 73-year-old former chief justice, has been tasked with restoring order and addressing demonstrators’ demands for a corruption-free future ahead of elections in six months.
“The demonstrations and movement led by youth reflect both the aspirations of our young generation, growing public awareness and, the dissatisfaction with prevailing corruption in the country,” Karki said in a speech to mark the country’s constitution day.
“The state machinery should (function) in accordance with the aspirations and expectations of the people.”


Over 800 Indonesian students suffer mass food poisoning from government free meals

Over 800 Indonesian students suffer mass food poisoning from government free meals
Updated 19 September 2025

Over 800 Indonesian students suffer mass food poisoning from government free meals

Over 800 Indonesian students suffer mass food poisoning from government free meals
  • One case affected more than 500 and was the biggest outbreak yet under President Prabowo Subianto’s flagship program

JAKARTA: Over 800 students fell sick in two cases of mass food poisoning this week after consuming free school meals sponsored by the Indonesian government, officials said on Friday.
One case affected more than 500 and was the biggest outbreak yet under President Prabowo Subianto’s flagship program. From January, when the program was launched, up to August, over 4,000 children have been hit by food poisoning after consuming the meals, according to Indonesian-based think tank, the Institute for Development of Economics and Finance, raising questions on oversight.
In Indonesia’s West Java province, 569 students from five schools in the Garut region experienced nausea and vomiting on Wednesday after consuming chicken and rice provided by one free meals kitchen a day earlier, Nurdin Yana, the secretary of Garut regional government, told Reuters.
“As of Friday, ten students are still being treated at the hospital and others have recovered,” Yana said. Initially, about 30 students had to be hospitalized, while the rest were treated at home, he added.
The local government will increase surveillance of the kitchen that provided the meals, Yana said, adding the program would not be halted but, instead, students would be given more basic food, such as bread, milk, boiled eggs and fruit for now.
Another mass food poisoning case linked to the program occurred on Wednesday in the Banggai Islands of Central Sulawesi province, affecting 277 students, the National Nutrition Agency, which oversees the program, said in a statement, adding that meal distribution in the area was temporarily halted.
Prabowo’s spokesperson Prasetyo Hadi said on Friday that the government apologized for the “re-occurrence of cases in several areas that are, of course, not what we had hoped for or intentional.”
Questions have been raised about standards and oversight of the program, which has expanded rapidly to reach over 20 million recipients, with an ambitious goal of reaching 83 million by year-end and a budget of 171 trillion rupiah ($10.32 billion).
The budget for the program will be doubled next year.


Taliban release British couple who had been held for months in Afghanistan on undisclosed charges

Taliban release British couple who had been held for months in Afghanistan on undisclosed charges
Updated 19 September 2025

Taliban release British couple who had been held for months in Afghanistan on undisclosed charges

Taliban release British couple who had been held for months in Afghanistan on undisclosed charges
  • The Taliban have not explained why they detained the couple. In July, United Nations experts warned about their deteriorating health
  • Earlier this month, the Taliban reached a prisoner exchange agreement with US envoys

DUBAI: The Taliban released on Friday a British couple held in Afghanistan for more than seven months on undisclosed charges, an official said, part of a wider effort to get their government recognized internationally years after taking power.
The case of Peter and Barbie Reynolds, aged 80 and 75, underlined the concerns of the West over the actions of the Taliban since they overthrew the country’s US-backed government in a 2021 lightning offensive. The Reynolds had lived in Afghanistan for 18 years and run an education and training organization in the country’s central province of Bamiyan, choosing to remain in the country after the Taliban seized power.
Qatar, an energy-rich nation on the Arabian Peninsula that mediated talks between the US and the Taliban before the American withdrawal, helped in releasing the Reynolds. The couple left Afghanistan on Friday, a diplomat said. The diplomat spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive negotiations in the case.
The Reynolds’ family members in the United Kingdom repeatedly called for the couple’s release, saying they were being mistreated and held on undisclosed charges. While the Taliban rejected the abuse allegations, they have never explained what prompted their detention.
There was no immediate comment from the Taliban government or the UK Foreign Office about the couple’s release.
In July, United Nations human rights experts warned the couple’s physical and mental health was deteriorating rapidly and that they were at risk of irreparable harm or even death.
Earlier this month, the Taliban said they had reached an agreement with US envoys on a prisoner exchange as part of an effort to normalize relations. The meeting came after the Taliban in March released US citizen George Glezmann, who was abducted while traveling through Afghanistan as a tourist.
Afghanistan remains a focus of US President Donald Trump. On Thursday, while visiting the UK, Trump suggested that he is working to reestablish a US presence at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan. Zakir Jalaly, an official at the Taliban’s Foreign Ministry, dismissed the idea.


Italy awards citizenship to pro-Trump US TV anchor

Italy awards citizenship to pro-Trump US TV anchor
Updated 19 September 2025

Italy awards citizenship to pro-Trump US TV anchor

Italy awards citizenship to pro-Trump US TV anchor
  • Interior Minister Matteo Piantedosi had put the proposal to the cabinet for the granting of citizenship “for special merits,” a government statement said
  • The proposal will now go to Italy’s ceremonial head of state, President Sergio Mattarella, for approval

ROME: Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s hard-right government has agreed to grant citizenship to a pro-Trump Fox News journalist for her work improving US-Italian ties.
The proposal concerning Maria Bartiromo, a prominent business journalist and news anchor with Italian roots, was agreed at a cabinet meeting late Thursday.
Interior Minister Matteo Piantedosi had put the proposal to the cabinet for the granting of citizenship “for special merits,” a government statement said.
“Throughout her more than 30-year career as a journalist, (Bartiromo) has significantly contributed to strengthening relations between Italy and the United States, maintaining her unwavering commitment to Italian institutions,” it said.
The proposal will now go to Italy’s ceremonial head of state, President Sergio Mattarella, for approval.
Bartiromo has spoken proudly about her Italian ancestors, recalling how her grandfather Carmine arrived in the United States at the age of 11.
Her father’s family is from Naples and her mother’s family is from Agrigento in Sicily.
Bartiromo’s citizenship is within the rules, even after Meloni’s government tightened the requirements for an Italian passport this year.
Previously, people proving blood ties of up to four generations could apply, but now they must have an Italian parent or grandparent.
However, the decision to award the journalist citizenship has made headlines in Italy, given her outspoken support for Trump and accusations that she peddles conspiracy theories.
Fox, the Rupert Murdoch-owned network, and Bartiromo were named in multi-billion-dollar defamation lawsuits launched by Smartmatic over baseless fraud claims involving their voting technology in the 2020 US presidential election.


France warns mayors against flying Palestinian flag next week

France warns mayors against flying Palestinian flag next week
Updated 19 September 2025

France warns mayors against flying Palestinian flag next week

France warns mayors against flying Palestinian flag next week
  • France’s interior ministry has ordered prefects to oppose the display of Palestinian flags on town halls and other public buildings next week when Paris is set to formally recognize Palestine

PARIS: France’s interior ministry has ordered prefects to oppose the display of Palestinian flags on town halls and other public buildings next week when Paris is set to formally recognize the Palestinian state.
“The principle of neutrality in public service prohibits such displays,” the interior ministry said in a telegram, a copy of which was seen by AFP on Friday.
Any decisions by mayors to fly the Palestinian flag should be referred to courts, the interior ministry said.
Israel’s war on Gaza is a hot-button issue in France, and several French mayors have already announced their intention to display the Palestinian flag on their town halls next week.
On Monday, France is set to formally recognize a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly.
The warning from the interior ministry came after Socialist leader Olivier Faure called for the Palestinian flag to be flown on town halls on Monday, when Jewish worshippers also celebrate the Rosh Hashanah holiday, the Jewish New Year.
However, the telegram said any such display would amount to “taking sides in an international conflict.”
“It is therefore appropriate,” the telegram said, “to ask mayors who display such flags on their public buildings to cease doing so and, in the event of refusal or non-compliance” to refer those mayors’ decisions to administrative courts.
Israel has been under mounting pressure to wrap up its campaign in Gaza, where the war has created a humanitarian crisis and devastated much of the territory, and to bring home Israeli hostages held there.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has accused Macron of pursuing a policy of “appeasement” of the Hamas militants. Macron said Thursday that recognizing a Palestinian state would isolate Hamas.
Several other leaders have announced their intent to formally recognize the Palestinian state during the UN summit.