şÚÁĎÉçÇř

What loss of US aid might mean for Daesh detainee camps in northeast Syria

Special What loss of US aid might mean for Daesh detainee camps in northeast Syria
1 / 2
The US has helped run Daesh prisons in northeastern Syria, but now aid cuts could weaken control, leading to escapes. (AFP file photo)
Special What loss of US aid might mean for Daesh detainee camps in northeast Syria
2 / 2
The US has helped run Daesh prisons in northeastern Syria, but now aid cuts could weaken control, leading to escapes. (AFP file photo)
Short Url
Updated 16 March 2025

What loss of US aid might mean for Daesh detainee camps in northeast Syria

What loss of US aid might mean for Daesh detainee camps in northeast Syria
  • US aid has been critical for the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces holding Daesh detainees in northeast Syria
  • Without sustained international support and repatriation efforts, Daesh camps could become a security threat

LONDON: Camps and prisons housing Daesh-linked detainees in the northeast of the Syrian Arab Republic have become a ticking time bomb, amid the power vacuum created by the collapse of the Assad regime and cuts to aid from the US.

The Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces, which helped the US defeat Daesh in 2019, has since then been overseeing Ghuwayran prison, Al-Hol camp and Al-Roj camp, which hold about 56,000 Daesh fighters, their wives and their children.




Members of the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) deploy around Ghwayran prison in Syria's northeastern city of Hasakeh on January 25, 2022, which was taken over by Daesh fighters days earlier. (AFP)

US assistance has been critical in efforts to secure the camps, which are widely considered to be breeding grounds for extremism and a regional security concern. But last month, Washington told the UN Security Council its support “cannot last forever.”

Dorothy Shea, the acting US ambassador to the UN, said: “The US has shouldered too much of this burden for too long. Ultimately, the camps cannot remain a direct US financial responsibility.”

Without a replacement for American aid, the resources of the SDF-affiliated Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria risk being stretched thin, leaving the camps and prisons vulnerable to revolt or mass escape attempts.

“If US financial assistance is cut without a replacement, it will create significant challenges,” Polat Can, a researcher in international relations and Middle Eastern security, told Arab News.




Ambassador Dorothy Shea. (AFP)

Even with US support, the camps and prisons had been starved of sufficient funding and manpower.

“External financial support has never fully covered the costs of maintaining prison security, managing detainees and sustaining camp residents,” said Can.

Other foreign donors have helped support the maintenance of camps and prisons but the US remains the largest contributor.

In 2021, the UK provided $20 million to expand a prison in Hasakah, according to the Iraq-based Rudaw news network. Meanwhile, the US spent the much larger sum of $155 million in 2022 alone to train, equip and pay the personnel guarding detainees.

The Syrian National Army offensive that began on Dec. 8 — which has displaced tens of thousands of civilians, many of them ethnic Kurds, from the Shebha region — has placed further strain on the SDF.

The Syrian National Army is backed by Turkiye, apparently as a bulwark against the perceived threat posed by Kurdish militants linked to the Kurdistan Workers’ Party, or PKK, which recently declared a ceasefire in its decades-old conflict with Ankara.

Washington-based Kurdish affairs analyst Mutlu Civiroglu told Arab News that the SDF has redeployed about half of its personnel that was guarding the prisons to “defend the region from Turkish attacks.”




Attacks by Turkish troops in Syria's northeastern Hasakeh province in the past few years had forced the Kurdish-led SDF to redeploy about half of its personnel that was guarding the prisons. (AFP file)

These developments have made it increasingly difficult for the SDF to contain the threat of a potential Daesh resurgence. As recently as November, a Daesh operative reportedly infiltrated Al-Hol camp and helped fighters to escape.

“The region’s resources are limited, and without external funding the ability to maintain security at these facilities will be increasingly strained,” Can said.

“In the worst-case scenario, this could lead to security vulnerabilities that Daesh cells may attempt to exploit, particularly as the group remains active in the Syrian desert and continues efforts to infiltrate” northeastern areas controlled by the autonomous administration.




Daesh inmates in SDF-run prisons in northern Syria are packed in overcrowded cells. (AFP file photo)




Daesh inmates in SDF-run prisons in northern Syria are packed in overcrowded cells. (AFP file photo)

The SDF has warned in recent months that the Daesh threat is greater than ever, citing the presence of active sleeper cells in Al-Hol camp and concerns about detainees escaping from Ghuwayran prison.

These fears have intensified since US President Donald Trump announced plans to withdraw US troops from northeastern Syria. “Syria is its own mess,” he said in late January. “They got enough messes over there. They don’t need us involved in every one.”

The SDF has also warned that Daesh is attempting to infiltrate the eastern Deir ez-Zor province from the western bank of the Euphrates River. The UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights has recorded at least 37 Daesh operations in the province since the start of the year, including armed attacks and bombings targeting security forces in areas controlled by the autonomous administration




Fears have intensified since US President Donald Trump announced plans to withdraw US troops from northeastern Syria. (AFP file photo)

Until Dec. 11, Deir ez-Zor was under SDF control. However, after a coalition led by Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham ousted the Assad regime on Dec. 8, it seized the oil-rich eastern city. The SDF remains a presence in parts of the countryside.

In a historic move on March 10, the SDF’s commander-in-chief, Mazloum Abdi, and Syria’s new president, Ahmad Al-Sharaa, signed a deal to integrate SDF-controlled civilian and military institutions with the new Damascus administration.

The agreement, signed as Al-Sharaa faced international pressure over the killing of Alawites by government-linked militias in western Syria, could ease the pressure on the SDF, particularly by securing a nationwide ceasefire.

However, the accord, which is set to be implemented by the end of this year, is unlikely to bring any immediate changes to the situation in the Daesh camps and prisons, said Can.




Until now, at least 42,000 women and children from 110 countries remain in overcrowded, squalid conditions in Al-Hol and Al-Roj, according to the UN. (AFP file)

“The issue of detainees — both militants in prisons and their families in camps — remains a major financial, logistical and security challenge in northeastern Syria,” he added.

The US aid freeze will not only affect prison management but also many humanitarian and civilian infrastructure projects, which had long eased some of the financial pressure on the autonomous administration.

Civiroglu said the suspension of aid from the US could create “further uncertainty, especially for initiatives related to displaced persons, refugees, rehabilitation and health services.”

He added: “Syria has long been under siege, embargo and civil war, and Rojava — Kurdish Syria — has been affected even worse. On one side, there’s the opposition group; on the other, the Turkish border, which stretches 910 kilometers and has been closed for years.”




People take part in a funeral in Syria's northeastern city of Hasakeh on February, 4, 2022, for Syrian Democratic Forces fighters killed in clashes during a jailbreak attempt by the Daesh group at the Ghwayran prison. (AFP file)

He warned that projects in northeastern Syria established by the US Agency for International Development “have been negatively affected, with many halted.” But Washington’s aid freeze will impact Syria as a whole, he added.

USAID was one of the first targets of the Department of Government Efficiency, which was established by the Trump administration to root out what it views as waste and fraud in the federal bureaucracy.

As a result, the organization and all of its programs essentially have been shut down, creating a massive black hole in the international humanitarian aid budget, with major consequences for fragile states such as Syria.

The Syrian economy is reeling after 14 years of civil war and sanctions. The interim government said the country owes between $20 billion and $23 billion in external debt, a figure that far exceeds its 2023 gross domestic product of $17.5 billion, according to the World Bank.

After the civil war broke out in 2011, Daesh exploited the chaos to expand, attracting tens of thousands of fighters from around the globe. By 2014, the group had conquered an area about the size of Great Britain, spanning Iraq and Syria, where it declared a caliphate.




This aerial picture taken on January 27, 2024 shows a view of al-Hol camp in Syria's northeastern Al-Hasakah Governorate. The al-Hol camp is the largest of two in northeastern Syria holding the families of Daesh fighters. (AFP)

However, US-led coalition efforts, an SDF ground offensive, and Russian airstrikes wore the group down until its eventual territorial defeat in Baghuz, eastern Syria, in March 2019.

After Daesh’s collapse, foreign fighters and their families were detained. Even now, at least 42,000 women and children — about 80 percent of all detainees — from 110 countries remain in overcrowded, squalid conditions in Al-Hol and Al-Roj, according to the UN.

Rights groups have consistently urged countries to repatriate their nationals who are detained in the camps. New York-based Human Rights Watch has said the continuing detention of these foreign nationals is “unlawful,” noting that they are held under “life-threatening conditions.”

Civiroglu said that “despite the US push and the SDF’s appeal to the international community, there has been little progress in that regard.”

Since 2017, Iraq has repatriated more than 17,796 of its nationals from Syria, according to the Rojava Information Center, but Western countries remain reluctant to do the same.

“The responsibility for these detainees extends beyond the region, as it is an international issue that should involve the UN, the UN Security Council, the Global Coalition to Defeat Daesh, the US, and the governments of the detainees’ home countries,” said Can.




Roj, one of two Kurdish-run displacement camps housing foreign family members of suspected Daesh fighters, is smaller and better guarded than its overcrowded counterpart Al-Hol, which has been rocked by assassinations and breakout attempts in recent months. ( AFP)

Harout Ekmanian, an international lawyer at Foley Hoag in New York, also believes that during this critical transitional period in Syria, countries with citizens in the camps have an obligation to repatriate them and ease the pressure on local authorities.

“States with citizens in these camps should take responsibility by facilitating the repatriation of their nationals, providing consular assistance, and ensuring that they are either prosecuted in accordance with fair trial standards or rehabilitated and reintegrated,” he told Arab News.

“With the collapse of the Syrian regime, the restoration of diplomatic channels has become more feasible, leaving no justifiable reason for countries in Europe and beyond to continue delaying the repatriation of their citizens and their families.

“This should not be seen as a favor or charity for Syria, but rather an international obligation for all states with citizens in these camps.”

UN Security Council Resolutions 2178 and 2396 explicitly call on states to prosecute, rehabilitate or reintegrate foreign terrorist fighters, underscoring the responsibility of countries to take action on this matter.

“These prisons house individuals responsible for some of the most egregious international crimes, including the Yazidi Genocide between 2014 and 2017,” said Ekmanian.




Children of Daesh inmates in northern Syria live in overcrowded condition. (AFP file)

“Syria is not adequately equipped to manage the accountability mechanisms and legal procedures required for such a large number of Daesh members. Therefore, states must ensure criminal accountability via their national courts for those responsible for these crimes, as part of their repatriation and reintegration efforts.

“Additionally, it would be ideal for Syria to collaborate with international partners to develop the necessary capabilities and mechanisms to prosecute Daesh members held in these camps. This issue is also closely tied to the broader need for transitional justice in Syria.”

Echoing similar concerns, Can, the Middle East security expert,Ěýsaid that while local authorities in northeastern Syria have engaged with international actors to seek long-term solutions, including efforts to repatriate foreign detainees, “many governments remain reluctant to take responsibility for their citizens.”

He added: “At this stage, there is no fully sufficient alternative plan that could compensate for the loss of international support. So, anyĚýmajor funding gap could deepen existing security risks and create further instability.

“Given the global implications of this issue, sustained international attention and responsibility-sharing are critical.”


Ěý


Israel army says killed two suspected militants in West Bank

Israel army says killed two suspected militants in West Bank
Updated 57 min 46 sec ago

Israel army says killed two suspected militants in West Bank

Israel army says killed two suspected militants in West Bank
  • In a joint operation, special forces from the border police, the army and the Shin Bet security agency “eliminated a terrorist cell that was planning to carry out an imminent terrorist attack,” the military said in a statement
  • It added that Israeli forces shot and killed the two men after encircling the building in which they had sought refuge

TAMMUN: Israeli forces shot dead two Palestinians in the occupied West Bank village of Tammun on Thursday, the military said, accusing the men of preparing an attack.
In a joint operation, special forces from the border police, the army and the Shin Bet security agency “eliminated a terrorist cell that was planning to carry out an imminent terrorist attack,” the military said in a statement.
The military said the two Palestinians were suspected of planning to carry out “shooting and explosive attacks” from the village, and were affiliated to Islamic Jihad, a Hamas ally.
It added that Israeli forces shot and killed the two men after encircling the building in which they had sought refuge.
Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967.
The Palestinian health ministry in the territory said it had been notified of the men’s deaths and identified them as Mohammed Suleiman, 29, and Alaa Joudat, 20.
It said Israeli forces still had Suleiman and Joudat’s bodies.
Tammun mayor Sameer Bisharat told AFP the two men were relatives, and were killed in a greenhouse in the east of the village after Israeli forces entered at around 1:00 am (2200 GMT Wednesday).
Tammun lies in a rural district of the northern West Bank where greenhouses are common.
In January, an Israeli drone strike killed two children and a 23-year-old relative in Tammun, AFP reported at the time. The army said it struck a “terrorist cell.”
Violence in the West Bank has soared since the Hamas attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war in October 2023.
Since then, Israeli troops and settlers have killed at least 983 Palestinians in the West Bank, including many militants, according to health ministry figures.
Over the same period, at least 36 Israelis, including members of security forces, have been killed in Palestinian attacks or during Israeli military operations, according to official figures.


Gulf states seek clearer US security assurances, former US envoy to şÚÁĎÉçÇř Michael Ratney says

Gulf states seek clearer US security assurances, former US envoy to şÚÁĎÉçÇř Michael Ratney says
Updated 25 September 2025

Gulf states seek clearer US security assurances, former US envoy to şÚÁĎÉçÇř Michael Ratney says

Gulf states seek clearer US security assurances, former US envoy to şÚÁĎÉçÇř Michael Ratney says
  • US envoy shares his insights on the implications of Israel’s strike on Qatar and the delicate balance of power in the Middle East

Gulf countries will continue security cooperation with the US, even as they seek clearer security assurances amid significant regional threats, former US Ambassador to şÚÁĎÉçÇř Michael Ratney .

In a region where alliances are constantly tested and geopolitical landscapes are rapidly shifting, he shared his insights on the implications of Israel’s strike on Qatar – a US ally – and the delicate balance of power in the Middle East.

Drawing on more than three decades of diplomatic experience, Ambassador Ratney sheds light on why he believes Gulf countries will remain committed to their historic security partnership with the United States, despite emerging challenges, and what they now seek most: clarity and reassurance in uncertain times.

He explores the political push and pull surrounding defense agreements, President Donald Trump’s promises versus political realities, and the rising frustration even among Israel’s traditional allies over what they see as the unrestrained policies of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Ambassador Ratney, who also served as US chargé d’affaires of the US embassy in Israel, says this frustration can be seen in the recent moves by France, the UK, Canada, Australia, among other Western states, to recognize a Palestinian state – a symbolic action, but one that clearly underscores their discontent with Netanyahu.

In light of the shocking strike by Israel against Qatar, a close US ally, do American security guarantees still carry weight in the Arabian Gulf?

It’s an important question, and one that’s surely on the minds of leaders throughout GCC countries and the Middle East right now. It’s quite unprecedented what happened. I think we should remember that security cooperation between the US military and the militaries of GCC countries dates back literally decades. This involves defense sales, exercises, training, and consultations. The level of cooperation likely exceeds that of military cooperation between the GCC and any other country. So it’s extremely important.

Historically, it offers a net advantage both for the United States and for our GCC partners, given the range of threats, whether it’s Iran or their proxies, terrorists, or other threats throughout the region. GCC countries likely view this security cooperation as extremely valuable. But when discussing the natural next step – transitioning from security cooperation to formal security guarantees – that’s actually something quite different.

Smoke billows after an Israeli attack in Qatar’s capital Doha in this frame grab taken from an AFPTV footage on Sept. 9, 2025. (AFPTV/AFP)

Although we don’t have a formal treaty relationship with any of our GCC allies, it is something that we were discussing. This topic has been discussed in the past two years with şÚÁĎÉçÇř under a broader discussion about normalization with Israel. And while normalization doesn’t seem very likely at this stage, it is indicative of the fact that GCC countries are looking for greater clarity about the nature of their relationship with us.

And while I understand that they would have concerns over the value of security cooperation with us after Israel’s strike on Qatar, I don’t think this would lead them to abandon their deep and longstanding security cooperation with the United States.

Do you think Israel’s attack on Doha might incentivize Gulf states to diversify their alliances?

I think Gulf countries have important relationships with many countries around the world. When you think about it, they’re sort of at the center of the world geographically, and around them are Europe and the United States, Asia, China, and India. And they must live in that part of the world forever, and they will form important relationships, including economic ones.

I believe the security partnership with the United States differs for a couple of reasons. One is that it’s so longstanding. The Gulf countries and the United States military have been cooperating, training, and buying defense articles of all sorts for decades. And so the level of integration between the two militaries is really unprecedented. It’s hard to simply undo that and switch to another partner.

I also think the quality of US technology and armaments is qualitatively better. I suppose you could say I’m biased on that point, but I think it’s true compared with Russian or Chinese or other sorts of armaments.

The third reason is that the US is one of the few countries willing to offer some measure of defense against the principal adversary of the Gulf, which is Iran and its regional proxies. Having said that, I could imagine Gulf countries trying to up their cooperation with China and Russia. We saw recently şÚÁĎÉçÇř and Pakistan sign a defense pact, but I don’t think any of those countries are going to offer security assurances in the event of an attack by Iran.

Do you think Israel’s strike on Doha was an operational failure on the part of Washington, or a foreign policy failure?

That’s a good question. I think of that strike as part of a broader effort by Israel to take the fight directly to its enemies. And obviously, Israel, as of late, has felt unrestrained in doing that.

At the same time, President Trump has said very clearly that he wants an end to the war. He wants an end to the war in Gaza. He publicly expressed his frustration with Israel about its attack in Doha, so I don’t know whether I would characterize it as a failure, but I do think it’s something that has deeply frustrated the United States.

Netanyahu may have calculated that the US would not constrain Israel (from attacking Qatar) and that the consequences would be worth the price

Michael Ratney, former US ambassador to şÚÁĎÉçÇř

It was both shocking and unprecedented. And President Trump, for his part, made clear that it should never happen again. He sees Qatar as an important partner as much as he sees Israel as an important partner. And he said quite clearly that this (the strike) was not in America’s interest nor Israel’s interest.

Netanyahu and his government have become so unrestrained over the past two years – not just in his war on Gaza but also in his attacks across the region. Given the fact that Israel’s image has taken a beating – not only in the Middle East but also in the world – what can the US do to change course?

I think the principal reaction right now among Israel’s traditional partners – which includes the United States, European countries and others – is one of extraordinary frustration. President Trump has expressed this himself. The recognition of Palestine by France, the UK, Canada, Australia, and other Western states is a demonstration of their frustration with Netanyahu.

Whether this recognition will impact Netanyahu’s calculations, I don’t know. The fact is, his calculations seem to be driven mostly by his domestic political considerations, his need to maintain his government and his sense that he has a historic opportunity with respect to Hamas.

He does seemingly feel unrestrained at this point. And I think what we’ll see is countries, European countries – traditional partners and allies of Israel – increasingly frustrated and looking for ways to influence Israeli government behavior. Whether it’ll have an effect, I don’t know. The record of the last two years has been limited.

Why do you think Netanyahu decided to carry out such a bold strike on a US ally in the region?

I don’t know the inner workings of Netanyahu’s mind, but he may have calculated that the US – or anyone else, for that matter – would not constrain Israel and that the consequences would be worth the price. Although I’m not sure if that’s true or not.

Do you think Netanyahu has a blank cheque to do whatever he wants in the region? Or do you think he was testing Trump’s red lines?

Good question. My sense is that Netanyahu and Trump seem to have a very complicated relationship. Let’s put it that way: on the one hand, President Trump wants very much to be seen as Israel’s greatest champion. He said more than once that no US president has done more for Israel than he has. I’m not sure if that’s true or not, but I do know that’s the perception he would like to project.

At the same time, he doesn’t always agree with everything Netanyahu does and says, and sometimes he expresses his frustration publicly. He even used a bad word to describe Netanyahu.

Has Netanyahu and his extremist government become a security threat to the region?

This is a complicated question, and at this point, we don’t have a clear answer to it. However, I suspect that the perception in the Arab world is that Israel has gone from being a potentially useful and practical partner to being somewhat of an unpredictable—and even a dangerous— actor in the region.

Certainly, if you’re the Qataris right now, you may feel that way. Other GCC countries might be concerned that if Israel can strike Qatar, what else is it prepared to do? But at the same time, I do think the Israelis understand the gravity of what they did.

Again, I don’t have insights into their internal thinking, but there are some rumors circulating that they understand that they may have overreached in this case and that they threatened not only something that’s very valuable to them, which is better relationships with Arab countries, but also something that’s of importance to their public, which is important to the United States as well, which is an end to the war and a release of the hostages, something the Qataris have been heavily involved in.

My last question to you, Ambassador Michael Ratney, is about the nature of US defense promises. We haven’t seen a timeline yet following Trump’s visit to Gulf countries earlier this year. What’s your reading of Mr. Trump’s promises about defense alliances and defense agreements in the Gulf? Do you think this will translate into action, or is it just talk?

I think there are two kinds of motivations pulling at him. The first is his sense that Gulf countries are important partners and offer huge opportunities for the United States and the region, both economically and in terms of security. This was evident when he visited şÚÁĎÉçÇř, the UAE, and Qatar, where he pledged cooperation, trade, and investment. In fact, he was very explicit about his pledge to protect the Qataris when he was in Doha, emphasizing their importance as a key partner.

On the other hand, he’s not a big fan of alliances. He has been critical of NATO and other alliances that the United States has entered into, as he believes the US bears the burden while other countries don’t bear their share of the responsibility. Also, I think that politically in the United States, he senses that the idea of increased alliances and increased responsibility for other countries is not a popular one.


Jordan’s army foils border infiltration attempt

Jordan’s army foils border infiltration attempt
Updated 25 September 2025

Jordan’s army foils border infiltration attempt

Jordan’s army foils border infiltration attempt
  • Border guards arrested the suspect, and transferred him to the authoritiesĚý

DUBAI: Jordan’s Northern Military Zone on Wednesday said it had thwarted an attempt by an individual to illegally cross the border on the kingdom’s northern front.
Border guards arrested the suspect, and transferred him to the authorities, a military source told Petra news agency. 
The army reaffirmed that it will continue to deal firmly with any attempts to undermine the security of Jordan’s borders.


US pledges support to build a unified Syria

US pledges support to build a unified Syria
Updated 25 September 2025

US pledges support to build a unified Syria

US pledges support to build a unified Syria
  • US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Washington wants a strong and unified Syria that reflects the diversity of its society

DUBAI: US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Wednesday that Washington and its partners want to give Syria “every possible opportunity” to become a strong, unified state that reflects the diversity of its society. 

Rubio said Syria’s stability was essential for regional peace, preventing extremists and foreign actors from using the country as a base for destabilizing activities.

This is a moment of “historic opportunity” to achieve progress that had seemed unimaginable just a few years ago, Rubio said during a meeting with Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) foreign ministers on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly. 

“President Donald Trump remains committed, not just from a unilateral US perspective, but in partnership with many countries, to giving Syria every opportunity to build a strong, unified state that respects the diversity of Syrian society, is a stable place, and is no longer a base of operations for extremists or foreign actors,” Rubio said.

GCC Secretary-General Jassim Mohammed Al-Budaiwi said the importance of safeguarding Syria’s sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity, and rejected foreign interference in its internal affairs. 

Budaiwi also condemned repeated Israeli strikes on Syrian territory and called for adherence to the 1974 Disengagement Agreement, noting that Syria’s security and stability are a cornerstone of stability for the wider region.


Palestinian leader to address UN General Assembly as peace push gathers steam

Palestinian leader to address UN General Assembly as peace push gathers steam
Updated 25 September 2025

Palestinian leader to address UN General Assembly as peace push gathers steam

Palestinian leader to address UN General Assembly as peace push gathers steam
  • President Mahmud Abbas will address UNGA three days after a slew of Western nations recognized a state of Palestine
  • TrumpĚýadministration adamantly rejected statehood andĚýbarred Abbas from traveling to New York for the annual gathering of world leaders

UNITED NATIONS: Palestinian leader Mahmud Abbas will address the United Nations virtually on Thursday as the United States, despite its opposition to him, weighs whether to try to stop Israeli annexation of the West Bank.
The veteran 89-year-old Palestinian Authority president will address the UN General Assembly three days after a slew of Western nations recognized a state of Palestine.
US President Donald Trump’s administration adamantly rejected statehood and, in a highly unusual step, barred Abbas and his senior aides from traveling to New York for the annual gathering of world leaders.
The General Assembly overwhelmingly voted to let Abbas address the world body with a video message.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has vowed not to allow a Palestinian state and far-right members of his cabinet have threatened to annex the West Bank in a bid to kill any prospect of true independence.
French President Emmanuel Macron, despite his disagreements with Trump on statehood, said Wednesday that the US leader joined him in opposing annexation.
“What President Trump told me yesterday was that the Europeans and Americans have the same position,” Macron said in an interview jointly with France 24 and Radio France Internationale.
Steve Witkoff, Trump’s golfing friend turned roving global negotiator, said that Trump in a separate meeting with a group of leaders of Arab and Islamic nations presented a 21-point plan for ending the war.
“I think it addresses Israeli concerns as well as the concerns of all the neighbors in the region,” he told the Concordia summit on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly.
“We’re hopeful, and I might say even confident, that in the coming days we’ll be able to announce some sort of breakthrough.”
A White House official told AFP that Trump wants to bring the conflict “to an expeditious close” and that foreign partners from the meeting “expressed the hope that they could work together with Special Envoy Witkoff to consider the President’s plan.”

Divide on Palestinian Authority 

Macron said that the US proposal incorporates core elements of a French plan including disarmament of Hamas and the dispatch of an international stabilization force.
A French position paper seen by AFP calls for the gradual transfer of security control in Gaza to a reformed Palestinian Authority once a ceasefire is in place.
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto, one of the leaders who met jointly with Trump, said that the world’s most populous Muslim-majority country was willing to offer at least 20,000 troops.
Abbas’s Palestinian Authority enjoys limited control over parts of the West Bank under agreements reached through the Oslo peace accords that started in 1993.
Abbas’s Fatah is the rival of Hamas, which controls the Gaza Strip, although Netanyahu’s government has sought to conflate the two.
Abbas in his address on Monday condemned the massive October 7, 2023, attacks by Hamas on Israel, which has responded with a relentless military offensive.
He also called on Hamas to disarm to the Palestinian Authority.
France and other European powers, while not joining Israeli and US efforts to delegitimize the Palestinian Authority, have said that it needs major reforms.
Netanyahu will address the UN General Assembly on Friday.