Rohingya mothers in despair as UN slashes food rations to 20 cents a day

Special Rohingya mothers in despair as UN slashes food rations to 20 cents a day
This photo taken on Nov. 26, 2023 shows a Rohingya woman at her house in the Nayapara refugee camp at Teknaf, in Bangladesh's southeastern district of Cox's Bazar. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 08 March 2025

Rohingya mothers in despair as UN slashes food rations to 20 cents a day

Rohingya mothers in despair as UN slashes food rations to 20 cents a day
  • World Food Program will cut food rations from $12.50 to $6 per month in April after failing to secure funding
  • Daily ration per person will become equivalent to the cost of two eggs

Dhaka: Rohingya mothers in refugee camps in Bangladesh say they fear for the fate of their already malnourished children as their food rations are set to be halved from next month.

The UN World Food Program announced earlier this week that “severe funding shortfalls” would mean that the monthly food allowance for refugees would be cut from $12.50 to $6 per person.

The new daily ration will equal 24 Bangladeshi taka — the price of two eggs in the market. A single thin flatbread costs around 8 taka, while one liter of milk costs at least 80.

Refugees estimate that, at current costs, the most food that WFP vouchers will allow them to buy each month is 10 kilograms of rice, 1.5 kg of lentils and 500 grams of salt.

Uzala Bibi, a mother of two living in a camp in Cox’s Bazar in southeastern Bangladesh — the world’s biggest refugee settlement — told Arab News she was in “deep fear” over the situation her family will face from next month.

“I will be unable to feed my children,” she said. “How will my children survive on only rice and lentils?”

The WFP’s announcement left Bangladeshi authorities dumbfounded, with the government’s Refugee Relief and Repatriation Commission observing that malnutrition in the camps already ranges from “severe acute” to “moderate acute” levels.

“The situation will further deteriorate with the budget cut, weakening the immunity of the Rohingya population and leading to a rise in infectious and waterborne diseases ... The Rohingya will not be able to survive,” said Dr. Abu Toha Md. Rizuanul Haque Bhuiyan, the commission’s health coordinator.

“It is absurd and beyond imagination how anyone can prepare a diet plan with just 24 taka per day. We are at a loss for what to do, and our office is deeply concerned about the situation.”

More than 1.3 million Rohingya are cramped inside 33 camps in Cox’s Bazar, where they have limited access to job opportunities and education.

A mostly Muslim ethnic minority, the Rohingya have lived for centuries in Myanmar’s western Rakhine state, but were stripped of their citizenship in the 1980s. Since then, many have fled to Bangladesh, with about 700,000 arriving in 2017, after a military crackdown that the UN has been referring to as a “textbook case” of ethnic cleansing by Myanmar.

International aid for the Rohingya community has been dropping over the years — particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. But the current funding gap is unprecedented.

A previous temporary round of ration cuts to Rohingya in 2023, which reduced monthly food rations from $12 to $8, led to a sharp increase in hunger and malnutrition, Bhuiyan said.

“With half of the food budget now cut, our health-sector budget is also being squeezed ...
I can’t imagine how we will cope with this situation, or what strategies should be taken to address it.”

Hason Begum, a refugee mother of five, said she had no idea how she will manage to feed her family.

“To me, it’s completely unimaginable that a person could survive on just 24 taka per day when a single egg costs 12 taka. I am forced to serve plain rice three times a day,” she said.

“My children are already suffering from malnutrition, and the situation will become unbearable next month,” she added. “How can a mother endure the pain of watching her children starve? Sometimes, I feel it would be better to embrace death.”


As world leaders enter climate talks, people in poverty have the most at stake

Updated 21 sec ago

As world leaders enter climate talks, people in poverty have the most at stake

As world leaders enter climate talks, people in poverty have the most at stake
RIO DE JANEIRO: When summer heat comes to the Arara neighborhood in northern Rio, it lingers, baking the red brick and concrete that make up many of the buildings long after the sun has gone down. Luis Cassiano, who’s lived here more than 30 years, says he’s getting worried as heat waves become more frequent and fierce.
In poor areas such as Arara, those who can afford air conditioning — Cassiano is one — can’t always count on it because of frequent power outages on an overloaded system. Cassiano gets some relief from the green roof he installed about a decade ago, which can keep his house up to 15 degrees Celsius (about 27 degrees Fahrenheit) cooler than his neighbor’s, but he still struggles to stay comfortable.
“The sun in the summer nowadays is scary,” Cassiano said.
As world leaders come to Brazil for climate talks, people like Cassiano are the ones with the most at stake. Poor communities are often more vulnerable to hazards like extreme heat and supersized storms and less likely to have the resources to cope than wealthier places.
Any help from the climate talks depends on countries not just laying out pledges and plans to lower emissions. They also need to find the political will to implement them, as well as come up with the billions of dollars needed to adapt everything from harvests to houses to better withstand human-caused climate change.
All of it is sorely needed for the 1.1 billion people around the world who live in acute poverty, according to the United Nations.
That’s why many have lauded the choice of Belem, a relatively poor city, to host these talks.
“I am pleased that we will be going to a place like this, because this is where climate meets poverty, meets demand, meets financing needs, and meets the reality of the majority of the population of this world that are impacted by climate change,” said Inger Andersen, executive director of the UN Environment Programme.
Even in wealthy countries, the poor face climate impacts

It’s not just poor people in poor countries who suffer when poverty and climate change collide. A UN Development Programme report found that even in highly developed countries, 82 percent of people living in poverty will be exposed to at least one of four climate hazards: high heat, drought, floods and air pollution.
People in poverty are more vulnerable to climate change for several reasons, said Carter Brandon, a senior fellow at the World Resources Institute who works on the economics of climate change and the finances of adapting to it.
They might not have the money to leave areas like inundated deltas or floodplains, landslide-prone hillsides or farmlands regularly scorched by drought. Nor to rebuild after a disaster hits. And those financial hits can be worsened by other problems like health issues, lack of education or lack of social mobility.
“It’s not just, climate destroys buildings or bridges or property. It destroys the livelihoods of families. And if you don’t have savings, that’s really devastating,” Brandon said.
Crop yields suffer in many places, but worst in poor countries

Even relatively developed countries with more ways to adapt will see some farm yields drop significantly, according to a UNDP analysis of global agriculture under different warming scenarios.
But poorer countries will be more severely affected, said Heriberto Tapia, head of research and strategic partnerships adviser at the UNDP Human Development Report Office.
Tapia said Africa, with more than 500 million people in poverty, is a big concern. Many depend on crop yields for their livelihoods.
Most of the world’s 550 million small agricultural producers are in low- or middle-income countries, working in marginal environments and more vulnerable to climate hazards, said Ismahane Elouafi, executive managing director of CGIAR, the Consultative Group for International Agriculture Research.
Elouafi thinks technology can help ease the climate pressure on many of those farmers, but also noted that many can’t afford it. She’s not confident that this year’s COP will provide enough money to help with that.
Will holding COP30 in the Global South make a difference?
Brazilian officials thought Belem, on the edge of the Amazon and not a rich city, would be a forceful reminder for negotiators of the difficulty that climate change and rising extreme weather are bringing to millions of people every day.
“I heard there were a lot of negotiators who have been complaining of being put on a bunk bed, or in terms of sharing a room, but this is the reality of most people around the world,” said Nafkote Dabi, climate policy lead at global development organization Oxfam. “So I think it makes things real.”
But some experts were skeptical, despite the recent UNDP report saying the need to take action is urgent.
“I wish that they had said more about what exactly is the rapid action that needs to be taken, because I don’t think rapid action is going to come out of COP,” said Kimberly Marion Suiseeya, an associate professor at Duke University who studies how international policies impact people in rural and forested areas.
With poverty ‘not budging,’ why focus on climate change?
Although the public narrative has long been that humankind has generally been making progress on alleviating poverty, numbers show that now there’s a “stagnation,” said Pedro Conceição, director of the Human Development Report Office at the UNDP. “The numbers are high and they are not budging.”
In a memo ahead of COP30, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates called for a shift from prioritizing reducing emissions to focus on reducing human suffering. On climate change, “there’s no apocalyptic story for rich countries,” he said. “The place where it gets really tough is in these poor countries.”
But Conceição said it’s wrong to think about poverty reduction and climate as a tradeoff.
The idea that climate is only a future problem, “or it’s about things out there like glaciers melting, needs to be completely thrown out and replaced with the notion that actually the two agendas are one and the same,” he said.