EU leaders commit to working together after Trump signals that Europe must defend itself

EU leaders commit to working together after Trump signals that Europe must defend itself
Short Url
Updated 07 March 2025

EU leaders commit to working together after Trump signals that Europe must defend itself

EU leaders commit to working together after Trump signals that Europe must defend itself
  • “Europe faces a clear and present danger, and therefore Europe has to be able to protect itself, to defend itself,” said European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen
  • Pledge underscores sea change in geopolitics spurred on by Trump, who has undermined 80 years of cooperation

BRUSSELS: European Union leaders on Thursday committed to working together to bolster the continent’s defenses and to free up hundreds of billions of euros for security after US President Donald Trump’s repeated warnings that he would cut them adrift to face the threat of Russia alone.
With the growing conviction that they will now have to fend for themselves, countries that have faltered on defense spending for decades held emergency talks in Brussels to explore new ways to beef up their security and ensure future protection for Ukraine.
“Today history is being written,” European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen told reporters after the summit ended.
She said the 27 EU leaders are “determined to ensure Europe’s security and to act with the scale, the speed and the resolve that this situation demands. We are determined to invest more, to invest better and to invest faster together.”
The pledge underscored a sea change in geopolitics spurred on by Trump, who has undermined 80 years of cooperation based on the understanding that the US would help protect European nations following World War II.
The leaders signed off on a move to loosen budget restrictions so that willing EU countries can increase their military spending. They also urged the European Commission to seek new ways “to facilitate significant defense spending” in all member states, a statement said.
The EU’s executive branch estimates that around 650 billion euros ($702 billion) could be freed up that way.
The leaders also took note of a commission offer of loans worth 150 billion euros ($162 billion) to buy new military equipment and invited EU headquarters staff “to examine this proposal as a matter of urgency.”
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, a staunch supporter of Trump and considered to be Russian President Vladimir Putin’s closest ally in Europe, refused to endorse part of the summit statement in favor of Ukraine.
But the 26 other EU leaders approved the bloc’s stance that there can be no negotiations on Ukraine without Ukraine and that the Europeans must be involved in any talks involving their security. The Europeans have so far been sidelined in the US-led negotiations with Russia.

In other developments, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said talks between Ukraine and the US on ending the war will take place in next week. In his nightly address, Zelensky said he would travel to on Monday to meet the country’s crown prince, and his team would stay on to hold talks with US officials.
In recent weeks, Trump has overturned old certainties about the reliability of the US as a security partner as he embraces Russia, withdraws American support for Ukraine and upends the tradition of cooperation with Europe that has been the bedrock of Western security for generations.
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk, whose country holds the EU’s rotating presidency, said that three years of war in Ukraine and a shift in attitudes in Washington “pose entirely new challenges for us, and Europe must take up this challenge ... and it must win.”
“We will arm ourselves faster, smarter and more efficiently than Russia,” Tusk said.
Spending plans win early support
Zelensky welcomed the plan to loosen budget rules and expressed hopes that some of the new spending could be used to strengthen Ukraine’s own defense industry, which can produce weapons more cheaply than elsewhere in Europe and closer to the battlefields where they are needed.
“We are very thankful that we are not alone, and these are not just words. We feel it. It’s very important,” Zelensky said, looking far more relaxed among Europe’s leaders in Brussels than almost a week ago when he received a verbal lashing from Trump in Washington.
Friedrich Merz, the likely next chancellor of Germany, and summit chairman Antonio Costa discussed ways to fortify Europe’s defenses on a short deadline. Merz pushed plans this week to loosen his nation’s rules on running up debt to allow for higher defense spending.

Others too appeared ready to do more.
“Spend, spend, spend on defense and deterrence. That’s the most important message,” Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen told reporters.
The call is a sharp departure from decades of decline in military spending in Europe, where defense often ranked low in many budgetary considerations after the Cold War.
In an address to his country Wednesday evening, French President Emmanuel Macron said the bloc would “take decisive steps.”
“Member states will be able to increase their military spending,” he said, noting that “massive joint funding will be provided to buy and produce some of the most innovative munitions, tanks, weapons and equipment in Europe.”
Macron conferred with his EU counterparts about the possibility of using France’s nuclear deterrent to protect the continent from Russian threats.
Helping EU countries find more money
The short-term benefits of the budget plan offered by von der Leyen were not obvious. Most of the increased defense spending would have to come from national budgets at a time when many countries are already overburdened with debt.
Part of the proposal includes measures to ensure struggling member states will not be punished for going too deep into the red if additional spending is earmarked for defense.
“Europe faces a clear and present danger, and therefore Europe has to be able to protect itself, to defend itself,” she said.

France is struggling to reduce an excessive annual budget deficit of 5 percent of GDP, after running up its total debt burden to 112 percent of GDP with spending on relief for businesses and consumers during the COVID-19 pandemic and the energy crisis that followed Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
Five other countries using the euro currency have debt levels over 100 percent of GDP: Belgium, Greece, Spain, Italy and Portugal.
Europe’s largest economy, Germany, has more room to borrow, with a debt level of 62 percent of GDP.
Pressing security needs in Ukraine
Part of any security plan would be to help Ukraine defend itself from Russian attacks such as the one that hit Zelensky’s hometown overnight.
A Russian missile killed four people staying at a hotel in Kryvyi Rih, in central Ukraine, shortly after volunteers from a humanitarian organization moved in. The volunteers included Ukrainian, American and British nationals, but it wasn’t clear whether those people were among the 31 who were wounded.
Early this week, Trump ordered a pause in US military supplies being sent to Ukraine as he sought to press Zelensky to engage in negotiations to end the war with Russia. The move brought fresh urgency to Thursday’s summit.
But the meeting in Brussels did not address Ukraine’s most pressing needs. It was not aimed at drumming up more arms and ammunition to fill any supply vacuum created by the US freeze. Nor will all nations agree to unblock the estimated 183 billion euros ($196 billion) in frozen Russian assets held in a Belgian clearing house, a pot of ready cash that could be seized.


Frankly Speaking: Does anyone still trust ‘Brand UN’?

Frankly Speaking: Does anyone still trust ‘Brand UN’?
Updated 11 sec ago

Frankly Speaking: Does anyone still trust ‘Brand UN’?

Frankly Speaking: Does anyone still trust ‘Brand UN’?
  • Stephane Dujarric admits the Security Council has harmed the UN’s credibility, weakening global confidence and underscoring need for reform
  • Secretary-general’s spokesperson stresses the UN is not a single centralized body, which is why Guterres cannot declare Gaza war a genocide

RIYADH: The UN’s credibility has been battered by paralysis at the Security Council, the war in Gaza, and accusations of inaction.

Stephane Dujarric, spokesperson for UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, admits the body’s failures have damaged “Brand UN.” While he insists reforms are on the agenda, he stresses that the world organization is not a single monolith.

Appearing on the Arab News current affairs program “Frankly Speaking,” during the UN General Assembly’s High-level Week in New York City, Dujarric acknowledged the perception of dysfunction.

“The credibility of the Security Council has taken a lot of hits recently,” he told “Frankly Speaking” host Katie Jensen.

“We’ve seen a lack of unity on the part of the Security Council, not just on Gaza, but on Ukraine, on Syria when the Assad regime was in power, on Sudan. And that does hurt the UN brand in that sense, you are correct.”

Yet, he cautioned against treating the UN as a single actor. “It is not an organization under a unified command,” he said. “If the United Nations could speak with one voice, it would not be the United Nations we have today.”

The question of Gaza and whether Israel’s military campaign constitutes genocide has brought these contradictions into sharp relief. A UN Commission of Inquiry issued a landmark report on September 16 using the term, but Guterres has himself avoided using it.

Dujarric explained why. “The secretary-general himself does not have the authority to declare something a genocide or not,” he said. “That is, as far as we are concerned, and not just for Antonio Guterres, for every secretary-general, up to a judicial body.”

“We should not be focused on semantics and on words. We are focused on the situation on the ground, regardless of whether or not you call it a genocide, what we do know is that civilians continue to be targeted and killed every day.

“People are under the state of famine in parts of Gaza and not enough aid is getting in. That’s the reality.”

Pressed on whether words matter, especially when Jewish scholars of the Holocaust are using the term, Dujarric rejected the idea that silence equates to complicity. “I mean, anyone who calls the secretary-general silent on Gaza, frankly, hasn’t been listening,” he said.

He noted that Guterres has paid a price for his language already. “You’re talking about a man who has been declared persona non grata in Israel because of the words he’s been using to describe the situation in Gaza,” he said.

“I think he has been a highly vocal advocate in terms of what is going on in Gaza. And he has been a very strong leader in ensuring that the men and women of the UN stay in Gaza to help the people.”

Another flashpoint is the wave of states now announcing formal recognition of the State of Palestine, including the UK and France. Some critics, including US President Donald Trump, say doing so rewards Hamas for the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel.

Dujarric dismissed the idea. “I don’t really understand that argument, frankly, because Hamas’ goal is not a two-state solution. I don’t see that in the Hamas Charter or in the rhetoric from Hamas,” he said.

“So again, it’s not a gift to Hamas. On the contrary, it is recognizing the rights of the Palestinian people to have their state just as the Israelis have a right to have their state. And in fact, recognizing the two-state solution is a statement against extremists.”

Outrage over Israel’s conduct in Gaza has revived prospects for the two-state solution, with and France arranging a UN summit pledging time-bound steps for an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel with no role for Hamas in its leadership.

While Israel and the US remain opposed, most world leaders now see two states as the only path to peace and regional stability after the Gaza war.

Dujarric was unequivocal that statehood is a Palestinian right. “Let’s put it frankly, it’s not a gift to the Palestinian people, but the right that they have to have a state, just like the Israelis have a right to have a state,” he said.

While diplomatic wrangling at the Security Council dominates, Dujarric said the daily humanitarian work that UN staff continue to undertake in Gaza and the West Bank remains critical.

“Even if there’s a deadlock in the Security Council, it doesn’t mean that our own people are not in Gaza trying to exploit the little humanitarian space they’re being given to try to help the people of Gaza,” he said.

Dujarric said the UN Relief and Works Agency remains at the forefront of that response, despite attacks on its reputation and a squeeze on its funds after Israel accused members of its staff in Gaza of participating in the Oct. 7, 2023, attack.

“We have UNRWA who is helping and supporting the Palestinian Authority. We will continue to do whatever we can,” he said.

However, he did stress that illegal Israeli settlement expansion, including the government’s approval for the new E1 settlement east of Jerusalem that will effectively bisect the West Bank, was creating new “facts on the ground” that would undermine hope of a Palestinian state.

The dysfunction of the Security Council, dominated by the veto power of its five permanent members, China, France, Russia, the UK, and the US, has prompted renewed calls for reform. Dujarric agreed that the system no longer reflects today’s realities.

“We need a reform of the Security Council because … the Security Council is the beating heart of the UN in terms of peace and security,” he said. “It remains a reflection of the world of 1945. The fact that it continues that way keeps hurting the UN brand globally.”

While he admitted reform remains distant, he said momentum is building. “The membership is much more engaged in it now than it was from where I stood more than 10 years ago. So there is movement,” he said.

“The secretary-general has been advocating very strongly for an African seat. The fact that Africa is the only continent that is not represented on the Security Council is abhorrent.”

“Some critics suggest that Guterres, frustrated by repeated US vetoes on Gaza ceasefire resolutions, should resign in protest. Dujarric dismissed this outright.

“I think resigning, for the secretary-general to resign, would be a gift for those people who find him a little too annoying. So he has absolutely no plans to resign. He’s determined not to give up,” he said.

Instead, Guterres will continue to push on every possible diplomatic front, including quiet back-channel talks.

“He has been very much in contact with the Qataris, the mediators. He stays in contact with the Egyptians. We’ve been using a lot of back channels and we will continue to push for a ceasefire to get humanitarian aid in, to see an end to the conflict and to see the hostages released,” he said.

Asked if the UN has become powerless, unable to fulfill its founding promise after the Second World War of “never again,” Dujarric acknowledged failings, but defended Guterres’ resolve.

“I think the Security Council has not lived up to its promises in terms of being the focus of stopping wars and of peace and security,” he said.

“We have to keep the promise of an end to conflict alive. The secretary-general will continue to advocate for it and not only advocate for it but to work for it through different means. And he will do so until the very last day of his mandate.”

For Dujarric, the UN’s future credibility depends not only on the secretary-general’s persistence, but on whether member states are willing to modernize the system they created.

“Member states need to find a way to adapt their own organization, the UN, the one they created, to make it more effective, to make it more credible and to make it more representative of the world of 2025.”


Netanyahu to meet Trump as Israel faces isolation over Gaza war

Netanyahu to meet Trump as Israel faces isolation over Gaza war
Updated 43 min 33 sec ago

Netanyahu to meet Trump as Israel faces isolation over Gaza war

Netanyahu to meet Trump as Israel faces isolation over Gaza war
  • Israel’s international isolation has deepened in recent days, with countries including the UK, France, Canada and Australia officially recognizing Palestinian statehood

JERUSALEM: Facing increasing isolation abroad and mounting pressure at home, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will defend his intention to “finish the job” in Gaza when he meets US President Donald Trump on Monday.
The meeting comes days after Trump unveiled a 21-point plan aimed at ending the war in the Palestinian territory during discussions with Arab and Muslim leaders on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly.
On Sunday, Trump hinted at “something special” to come in Middle East talks, adding in a post on his Truth Social platform: “WE WILL GET IT DONE!!!“
On Friday, Trump had told reporters in Washington “I think we have a deal” on Gaza, even as Netanyahu, speaking at the UN, vowed to “finish the job” in Israel’s war against Hamas.
But experts told AFP that Netanyahu appeared to be cornered, facing growing international and domestic calls to end the war.
“He has no other choice but to accept” Trump’s plan for a ceasefire, said Eytan Gilboa, an expert on US-Israel relations at Israel’s Bar-Ilan University.
“Simply because the United States and Trump have remained almost his only ally in the international community.”
“Comprehensive agreement”
In Israel, tens of thousands of protesters have pressured Netanyahu to agree to a ceasefire, and on Saturday they urged Trump to use his influence.
“The only thing that can stop the slide into the abyss is a full, comprehensive agreement that ends the war and brings all the hostages and the soldiers home,” said Lishay Miran-Lavi, wife of Omri Miran, who remains captive in Gaza.
Directly addressing Trump, she urged: “Use your influence with Prime Minister Netanyahu.”
Israel’s international isolation has deepened in recent days, with countries including the UK, France, Canada and Australia officially recognizing Palestinian statehood, breaking with longstanding US-led diplomatic protocols.
Trump’s 21-point plan, according to a diplomatic source, envisions a permanent ceasefire, the release of hostages, an Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and a major influx of humanitarian aid.
Hamas political bureau member Hossam Badran said Sunday evening that the group “had not received any official proposal from Qatari or Egyptian mediators.”
Arab and Muslim leaders have welcomed the proposal, but have also called for an immediate halt to Israel’s military operations and any occupation of Gaza.
Some elements of the plan will prove hard for Netanyahu to swallow, and could even lead to the collapse of his right-wing government coalition.
Among the most controversial is the involvement of the Ramallah-based Palestinian Authority (PA) in the future governance of Gaza.
The PA ruled the territory until Hamas seized control in 2007, and its potential restoration represents a red line for Netanyahu’s hard-line coalition partners.
While the US proposal conditions the PA’s return on implementing reform programs, these changes “could take years” to materialize, Gilboa warned.
“Broad consensus”
Several far-right ministers in Netanyahu’s coalition have threatened to collapse the government if he agrees to the PA’s return, or if he ends the war without defeating Hamas.
However, opposition leader Yair Lapid has offered a parliamentary “safety net,” promising his centrist Yesh Atid party would support a ceasefire and hostage-release deal — but it is not clear whether other opposition parties would follow suit.
“This kind of broad plan would need a broad consensus,” said Ksenia Svetlova, a former Knesset member who now heads the regional cooperation NGO ROPES.
Svetlova predicted Netanyahu would only accept parts of the deal, while trying to negotiate or postpone decisions on other elements “seem difficult in this moment.”
Another contentious point in the US proposal is who would guarantee security in the Gaza Strip once the Israeli army pulls out and Hamas is disarmed.
The proposal envisions an international security force comprising Palestinian personnel alongside troops from Arab and Muslim nations.
However, critical details about command structure and operational control remain unclear.
“This plan is internationalizing the Gaza conflict in an unprecedented way,” Svetlova said, “but without a clear plan on who will be the guiding star, what the end goals are, who will see it through.”
“The unpredictability factor runs wild here, really.”


Vietnam to evacuate 250,000 from coast ahead of Typhoon Bualoi

Vietnam to evacuate 250,000 from coast ahead of Typhoon Bualoi
Updated 28 September 2025

Vietnam to evacuate 250,000 from coast ahead of Typhoon Bualoi

Vietnam to evacuate 250,000 from coast ahead of Typhoon Bualoi
  • ‘This is a fast-moving storm with very strong intensity and a wide area of impact’

HANOI: Vietnam plans to evacuate more than 250,000 residents from coastal areas on Sunday ahead of the arrival of Typhoon Bualoi, which is expected to lash the country’s steel-producing central belt.

The storm — the 10th to affect Vietnam this year — is currently at sea generating winds of 130 kilometers per hour and is expected to make landfall at 7:00 p.m. (12:00 GMT), according to the meteorology agency.

Central Vietnam’s largest city Danang plans evacuate more than 210,000 residents, state media reported, while more than 32,000 residents of Hue living near coastal areas are also set to be moved to safer areas.

More than 15,000 residents in Ha Tinh — known as a key steel production hub — have been slated for evacuation to schools and medical centers converted into temporary shelters, authorities said.

Nearly 117,000 military personnel have been mobilized. Four domestic airports were shut and all fishing boats in the typhoon’s path have been called back to harbor.

“I feel a bit anxious but still hopeful that everything will be fine in the aftermath. We were all safe after the recent typhoon Kajiki. I hope this one will be the same or less severe,” Nguyen Cuong, 29, a resident of Ha Tinh City, told AFP.

The typhoon is expected to pack winds of around 133 kph as it makes landfall on Sunday evening, Vietnam’s National Center for Hydro-Meteorological Forecasting said on its website.

“This is a fast-moving storm with very strong intensity and a wide area of impact, capable of causing a combination of various types of natural disasters such as strong winds, heavy rain, floods, landslides, and coastal inundation,” state media quoted center director Mai Van Khiem. 


Seychelles presidential vote going to runoff

A woman casts her vote at Bel Eau Primary School, Bel Air, Seychelles, on Saturday, Sep. 27, 2025. (AP)
A woman casts her vote at Bel Eau Primary School, Bel Air, Seychelles, on Saturday, Sep. 27, 2025. (AP)
Updated 28 September 2025

Seychelles presidential vote going to runoff

A woman casts her vote at Bel Eau Primary School, Bel Air, Seychelles, on Saturday, Sep. 27, 2025. (AP)
  • The 115-island archipelago in the Indian Ocean has become synonymous with luxury and environmental travel, which has bumped Seychelles to the top of the list of Africa’s richest countries by gross domestic product per capita, according to the World Bank

VICTORIA: With no outright winner in Seychelles’ presidential election, the country will hold a rerun vote between the two main contenders, the electoral authority said on Sunday.
Opposition figure Patrick Herminie received 48.8 percent of the vote, while the incumbent, Wavel Ramkalawan, garnered 46.4 percent, according to official results. A candidate must win more than 50 percent of the vote to be declared the winner.
The runoff will take place from Oct. 9-11, according to the electoral authority.
Ramkalawan stated that he wants a debate with his rival to help voters make an informed decision.
“State House does not belong to me,” he said, referring to the official residence of the president. 
“State House does not belong to you. State House will always belong to the people of Seychelles.”
Herminie said that he hopes to win in the second round of voting, because the people “are very unhappy with the way the country is being run.”
Herminie represents the United Seychelles party, which dominated the country’s politics for decades before losing power five years ago. 

It was the governing party from 1977 to 2020.
Trying to prevent United Seychelles from returning to power, Ramkalawan seeks a second term as the leader of Africa’s smallest country. 
His governing Linyon Demokratik Seselwa party campaigned on economic recovery, social development, and environmental sustainability.
Early voting began on Thursday, but most people voted on Saturday.
The 115-island archipelago in the Indian Ocean has become synonymous with luxury and environmental travel, which has bumped Seychelles to the top of the list of Africa’s richest countries by gross domestic product per capita, according to the World Bank.
But opposition to the governing party has been growing.
A week before the election, activists filed a constitutional case against the government, challenging a recent decision to issue a long-term lease for part of Assomption Island, the country’s largest, to a foreign company for a luxury hotel development.
The lease, which includes the reconstruction of an airstrip to facilitate access for international flights, has ignited widespread criticism that the agreement favors foreign interests over Seychelles’ extended welfare and sovereignty over its land.
With its territory spanning approximately 390,000 sq. km, the Seychelles is particularly vulnerable to climate change, including rising sea levels, according to the World Bank and the UN Sustainable Development Group.
Another concern for voters was a growing drug crisis fueled by addiction to heroin. 
A 2017 UN report described the country as a major drug transit route, and the 2023 Global Organized Crime Index said that the island nation has one of the world’s highest rates of heroin addiction.
An estimated 6,000 people out of Seychelles’ population of 120,000 use the drug, while independent analysts say addiction rates approach 10 percent. 
Most of the country’s population lives on the island of Mahé, home to the capital, Victoria.

 


Starmer urges Labour party to unite for ‘fight of our lives’

Starmer urges Labour party to unite for ‘fight of our lives’
Updated 28 September 2025

Starmer urges Labour party to unite for ‘fight of our lives’

Starmer urges Labour party to unite for ‘fight of our lives’
  • Britain’s sluggish economy means a tax-raising budget is reportedly looming, while Starmer has U-turned on welfare reforms and scrapping energy benefits for millions of pensioners following anger among Labour’s left-wing base

LIVERPOOL: A pep-talk from Australian leader Anthony Albanese kick-started UK Labour’s annual conference on Sunday, with Prime Minister Keir Starmer struggling to convince nervous members that he can lead the “fight of our lives” against the insurgent hard-right.
Although the ex-lawyer led Labour back to power in July last year after 14 years in opposition, scandals, policy missteps, and plummeting poll ratings have already raised doubts about his future.
The four-day gathering in Liverpool, northwest England, comes amid chatter about a possible leadership challenge and follows two recent high-profile departures from government in the wake of embarrassing revelations.
The conference, which concludes on Wednesday, is taking place with Labour lagging well behind the upstart anti-immigrant Reform UK party, led by anti-EU firebrand Nigel Farage, in national surveys.
Going into the conference, Labour trailed Reform by 12 points, while Starmer’s satisfaction ratings hit the lowest recorded by Ipsos for any prime minister since 1977.
Starmer said on Sunday that the party had “got the fight of our lives ahead of us.”
“We’ve got to take on Reform, we’ve got to beat them. The effects will be there for generations,” he told the BBC.
He also called Reform’s plan to make migrants reapply for new visas with tougher rules “racist,” adding it would “tear our country apart.”
Despite some success on the international stage in helping coordinate European support for Ukraine, Starmer has endured a largely disappointing first 14 months domestically as prime minister.
Britain’s sluggish economy means a tax-raising budget is reportedly looming, while Starmer has U-turned on welfare reforms and scrapping energy benefits for millions of pensioners following anger among Labour’s left-wing base.
Meanwhile, small boat crossings to England of undocumented migrants are at record levels, fueling support for Reform.
Starmer’s attempts to reboot his government earlier in September were quickly overshadowed by Angela Rayner’s resignation as deputy prime minister for underpaying property tax.
Starmer then sacked Peter Mandelson as Britain’s ambassador in Washington over his friendship with late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, with the row raising questions about his judgment.
“His leadership is in crisis, really,” said political scientist Steven Fielding. “And the conference isn’t really going to resolve that. It’ll give people occasion to air their discontent with Starmer,” he said.
Australian leader Albanese offered words of support for his “friend” in one of the conference’s first speeches.
“Being a party of government means grappling with uncertainty and complexity. .., it means making, and yes, owning tough decisions,” he told members.
“But friends, we wouldn’t have it any other way. We’re better for all of that, because in the end, the hard road is the only one that takes us anywhere,” he added, taking a swipe at “the low politics of fear and resentment.”
Seeking to follow Albanese’s example, Starmer will aim to spark a turnaround in his fortunes when he delivers the keynote speech at the gathering on Tuesday.
“The conference is a pivotal moment because it’s an opportunity for him to lay out a clear vision of where he is taking the country,” said Patrick Diamond, politics professor at Queen Mary, University of London.
He is expected to pitch the next general election, due in 2029, as a straight fight between Labour and Reform, saying the choice is between “patriotic renewal” and “toxic division.”
Regional mayor Andy Burnham has called on Starmer to put forward a more leftist vision for Labour, claiming in interviews this week that lawmakers have been urging him to run for leader.
Burnham would first have to find a way to get elected to parliament, and 80 MPs would then have to nominate him to trigger a contest, meaning Starmer is unlikely to face a challenge soon.
The Gaza conflict is also likely to burst onto the agenda with demonstrations planned by pro-Palestinian groups in Liverpool over the weekend.