US Supreme Court won’t let Trump withhold payment to foreign aid groups

US Supreme Court won’t let Trump withhold payment to foreign aid groups
A Rohingya girl feeds a child from a jar with the USAID logo on it, at a refugee camp in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh, February 11, 2025. (REUTERS)
Short Url
Updated 05 March 2025

US Supreme Court won’t let Trump withhold payment to foreign aid groups

US Supreme Court won’t let Trump withhold payment to foreign aid groups

WASHINGTON: A divided US Supreme Court on Wednesday declined to let President Donald Trump’s administration withhold payment to foreign aid organizations for work they already performed for the government as the Republican president moves to pull the plug on American humanitarian projects around the world.
Handing a setback to Trump, the court in a 5-4 decision upheld Washington-based US District Judge Amir Ali’s order that had called on the administration to promptly release funding to contractors and recipients of grants from the US Agency for International Development and the State Department for their past work.
Conservative Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh dissented from the decision.
The order by Ali, who is presiding over an ongoing legal challenge to Trump’s policy, had originally given the administration until February 26 to disburse the funding, which it has said totaled nearly $2 billion that could take weeks to pay in full.
Chief Justice John Roberts paused that order hours before the midnight deadline to give the Supreme Court additional time to consider the administration’s more formal request to block Ali’s ruling. The Supreme Court’s 6-3 conservative majority includes three justices Trump appointed during his first presidential term.
Acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris said in a Supreme Court filing on March 3 that blocking Ali’s order “is warranted to prevent reinstatement of a new, short-fused deadline that would unlawfully commandeer federal payment processes anew.”
Harris argued that the judge’s order amounted to judicial overreach and had given the administration too little time to scrutinize the invoices “to ensure the legitimacy of all payments.” Lawyers representing the administration said in a separate February 26 filing that full payments could take weeks.
The Republican president, pursuing what he has called an “America First” agenda, ordered a 90-day pause on all foreign aid on his first day back in office on January 20. That order, and ensuing stop-work orders halting USAID operations around the world, have jeopardized delivery of life-saving food and medical aid, throwing global humanitarian relief efforts into chaos.
Aid organizations accused Trump in lawsuits of exceeding his authority under federal law and the US Constitution by effectively dismantling an independent federal agency and canceling spending authorized by Congress.
Aid organizations said in a Supreme Court filing on February 28 that they “would face extraordinary and irreversible harm if the funding freeze continues,” as would their employees and those who depend on their work.
The organizations’ “work advances US interests abroad and improves — and, in many cases, literally saves — the lives of millions of people across the globe. In doing so, it helps stop problems like disease and instability overseas before they reach our shores,” lawyers for the foreign aid groups wrote.
“The government’s actions have largely brought this work to a halt,” the lawyers wrote, adding that the Trump administration “comes to this court with an emergency of its own making.”
Among the plaintiffs in the litigation are the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition, Journalism Development Network, international development company DAI Global and refugee assistance organization HIAS.
The Trump administration had kept the disputed payments largely frozen despite a temporary restraining order from Ali that they be released, and multiple subsequent orders that the administration comply. Ali’s February 25 enforcement order at issue before the Supreme Court applied to payment for work done by foreign aid groups before February 13, when the judge issued his temporary restraining order.
Ali, who was appointed by Democratic former President Joe Biden, issued his temporary restraining order to prevent irreparable harm to the plaintiffs while he considers their claims.
Trump and his adviser Elon Musk, the world’s wealthiest person, have taken dramatic steps to reshape and shrink the federal government. They have dismantled some agencies, fired thousands of workers, dismissed or reassigned hundreds of officials and removed the heads of independent agencies, among other actions.
As he moves to end American-backed humanitarian efforts in numerous countries, Trump’s administration has sent funding termination notices to key organizations in the global aid community. Global aid groups have said the US retreat endangers the lives of millions of the world’s most vulnerable people including those facing deadly diseases and those living in conflict zones.


India pushes ahead with US trade talks despite tariff hike to 50 percent

India pushes ahead with US trade talks despite tariff hike to 50 percent
Updated 25 sec ago

India pushes ahead with US trade talks despite tariff hike to 50 percent

India pushes ahead with US trade talks despite tariff hike to 50 percent
  • Goods trade between the US and India was about $87 billion in the last fiscal year, according to Indian government data
  • An Indian minister earlier said 55 percent of India’s exports would be covered by the new tariff, factoring in previous 25 percent levy

NEW DELHI/MUMBAI: India hopes trade talks with the US will continue even as the US hiked tariffs on its exports to 50 percent due to New Delhi’s purchase of sanctioned Russian oil, two lawmakers said on Monday, citing a briefing to a parliamentary panel on foreign affairs.

Last week, President Donald Trump imposed an additional 25 percent tariff on Indian goods due to Delhi’s continued purchase of Russian oil, bringing the total duty on Indian exports to the US to 50 percent — among the highest of any American trading partner.

“Our relations with the US are multi-dimensional, and should not be seen only through the prism of trade,” one of the lawmakers said, citing the foreign secretary’s briefing to the panel.

Shashi Tharoor, an opposition Congress party leader, who heads the panel, said trade talks would continue.

“As of now, there is no change in the existing plans for the sixth round,” he said, referring to a scheduled visit of a US trade delegation to New Delhi from August 25.

Earlier, junior finance minister, Pankaj Chaudhary told lawmakers that about 55 percent of India’s merchandise exports to the United States would be covered by the new tariff.

His estimate factored in the initial 25 percent levy, he said in a written response to a lawmaker’s query.

“The Department of Commerce is engaged with all stakeholders” for their assessment of the situation, Chaudhary added.

Goods trade between the United States and India — the world’s biggest and fifth-largest economies, respectively — was worth about $87 billion in the last fiscal year, according to Indian government estimates.

The panel separately voiced concerns over Pakistani army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir’s reported remarks on nuclear threats in South Asia during a visit to the US

“Nuclear blackmail will not work with India, and no party, or representative disagrees with this view,” Tharoor said, adding the external affairs ministry had condemned the comments.


Norway sovereign wealth fund drops investments in 11 Israeli firms

Norway sovereign wealth fund drops investments in 11 Israeli firms
Updated 11 August 2025

Norway sovereign wealth fund drops investments in 11 Israeli firms

Norway sovereign wealth fund drops investments in 11 Israeli firms
  • Norway’s wealth fund is the biggest in the world with a value of around $1.9 trillion, with investments in over than 8,600 companies
  • Monitoring of Israeli companies had been intensified in the autumn of 2024 and as a result, the fund manager sold investments in several Israeli companies

OSLO: Norway’s sovereign wealth fund said Monday that it was selling its investments in 11 Israeli companies following reports it had invested in an Israeli jet engine maker even as the war in Gaza raged.
Nicolai Tangen, chief of Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM), which manages the fund, said the decision was taken “in response to extraordinary circumstances.”
“The situation in Gaza is a serious humanitarian crisis. We are invested in companies that operate in a country at war, and conditions in the West Bank and Gaza have recently worsened,” Tangen said in a statement.
He said the move would reduce the number of Israeli companies the fund’s Council of Ethics needed to supervise.
Norway’s wealth fund is the biggest in the world with a value of around $1.9 trillion, with investments in more than 8,600 companies spanning the globe.
Last week, Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten reported that the fund had invested in Israeli Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings, which makes parts for engines used in Israeli fighter jets.
Tangen later confirmed the reports, and said the fund had increased its stake after the Israeli offensive in Gaza began.
The revelations led Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store to ask Finance Minister and former NATO secretary general Jens Stoltenberg for a review.
NBIM said it had investments in 61 Israeli companies at the end of the first six months of this year, 11 of which were not in its “equity benchmark index” — which is set by the finance ministry and used to gauge the wealth fund’s performance.
NBIM added that it had decided last week that “all investments in Israeli companies that are not in the equity benchmark index will be sold as soon as possible.”
Going forward, “the fund’s investments in Israel will now be limited to companies that are in the equity benchmark index,” it said.
NBIM also said that all investments in Israeli companies managed by external managers would be moved in-house, and that it was “terminating contracts with external managers in Israel.”
In addition, NBIM said the finance ministry had asked it to review “its investments in Israeli companies, and to propose new measures that it deems necessary.”
It said it initiated the review and would present its findings before an August 20 deadline.
The fund also said that it had “long paid particular attention to companies associated with war and conflict.”
“Since 2020, we have been in contact with more than 60 companies to raise this issue. Of these, 39 dialogues were related to the West Bank and Gaza,” NBIM said.
It said that monitoring of Israeli companies had been intensified in the autumn of 2024, and that “as a result, we have sold our investments in several Israeli companies.”
Speaking at a press conference later Monday, Stoltenberg said he was glad Norges Bank had “acted quickly.”
“The fund’s ethical guidelines stipulate that it shall not invest in companies that contribute to violations of international law by states,” he told reporters.
“Therefore, the pension fund should not hold shares in companies that contribute to Israel’s warfare in Gaza or the occupation of the West Bank,” he said.
Also on Monday, Norwegian pension fund KLP said it had excluded Israeli company NextVision Stabilized Systems “from its investments because the company supplies key components for military drones used in the war in Gaza.”


Indian journalists face criticism at home after meeting Netanyahu amid Gaza war

Indian journalists meet Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem, Aug. 7, 2025. (Office of PM of Israel)
Indian journalists meet Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem, Aug. 7, 2025. (Office of PM of Israel)
Updated 36 min 54 sec ago

Indian journalists face criticism at home after meeting Netanyahu amid Gaza war

Indian journalists meet Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem, Aug. 7, 2025. (Office of PM of Israel)
  • Several Indian reporters met Netanyahu during Israel tour last week
  • New Delhi has largely remained quiet since Israel launched its deadly assault on Gaza in October 2023

NEW DELHI: A recent visit by a group of Indian reporters to Israel, and their meeting with its Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, has sparked outrage at home, with senior journalists calling out both the reporters and their publications for violating professional standards and ethics.

Photos posted on social media by Netanyahu’s office showed him last week receiving journalists from India, including Sidhant Sibal from WION TV, Manash Pratim Bhuyan from the Press Trust of India, Aditya Raj Kaul, former senior executive editor at TV9 network, Shubhajit Roy from the Indian Express, and Abhishek Kapoor from Republic TV.

The fact that they accepted the Israeli prime minister’s invitation was “deplorable,” one of the most prominent figures in Indian journalism N. Ram, publisher of The Hindu Group, which includes The Hindu, Frontline, and Sportstar, told Arab News.

“They should have boycotted a man like Netanyahu. And, also, to accept this kind of invitation at this juncture shows the complete lack of sensitivity towards what ethical journalism is about,” he said.

“It only speaks poorly of these journalists and the organizations they represent.”

In the face of Israel’s ongoing war in Gaza, the killing of tens of thousands of Palestinians, imposed starvation, and assassination of more than 200 journalists since October 2023, revealing war crimes is what, according to Ram, could help restore some credibility to the Indian journalists who met Netanyahu.

“Everybody can see what kind of war crimes have been committed,” he said

 

 

“If they use the opportunity to expose the atrocities, then that will to some extent redeem their journalism, but I don’t know if they’ve done that.”

For Manoj Sharma, a member of the Press Club of India, seeing his colleagues shake hands with Netanyahu was shocking — not only because Netanyahu is wanted by the International Criminal Court for war crimes, but also given the mass killing of fellow journalists by the Israeli regime.

“That is totally unpardonable,” he said. “As journalists we have a moral responsibility toward all our journalist friends across the globe … We should stand in solidarity with them.”

Arab News reached out for comment to the journalists who participated in the Israel trip, but none were available.

New Delhi has largely remained quiet since Israel launched its deadly assault on Gaza in October 2023.

But India’s civil society, including the younger generation, is increasingly involved in raising awareness of Israeli war crimes, organizing solidarity protests as well as on-the-ground and online campaigns — in contrast to the mainstream media that often reflects the government’s silence.

“Mainstream journalists have gone way beyond ethics and their moral compass is now completely unhinged,” Ghazala Wahab, executive editor of the Force magazine, told Arab News.

“A good journalist should be on the side of justice, whether it’s within the country or outside the country, but our mainstream media doesn’t stand on the side of justice. It always stands on the side of the powerful. I don’t think it is journalism any longer.”


Bangladesh court hears graft case against ex-PM Sheikh Hasina

A court in Bangladesh on Monday heard cases brought by the anti-corruption organization against ex-leader Sheikh Hasina.
A court in Bangladesh on Monday heard cases brought by the anti-corruption organization against ex-leader Sheikh Hasina.
Updated 11 August 2025

Bangladesh court hears graft case against ex-PM Sheikh Hasina

A court in Bangladesh on Monday heard cases brought by the anti-corruption organization against ex-leader Sheikh Hasina.
  • Hasina has been named in six corruption cases, along with her US-based son Sajeeb Wazed Joy, and her daughter Saima Wazed
  • Her daughter has been serving as the World Health Organization’s Southeast Asia chief in New Delhi

DHAKA: A court in Bangladesh on Monday heard cases brought by the anti-corruption organization against ex-leader Sheikh Hasina and her family, including her daughter who has served as a top UN official.
Three officials from the Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) read out testimonies in three separate cases over an alleged land grab of lucrative plots in a suburb of the capital Dhaka.
Hasina, 77, fled Bangladesh by helicopter on August 5, 2024, after weeks of student-led protests against her autocratic rule.
She has defied orders to return from India, including to attend her separate and ongoing trial on charges amounting to crimes against humanity, over the deadly crackdown on the uprising.
Hasina has been named in six corruption cases, along with her US-based son Sajeeb Wazed Joy, and her daughter Saima Wazed, who has been serving as the World Health Organization’s Southeast Asia chief in New Delhi.
“If found guilty, Sheikh Hasina, her son Sajeeb Wazed Joy, and Saima Wazed could face up to 14 years in prison,” ACC lawyer Khan Mohammad Mainul Hossain told AFP.
Wazed is on leave from the WHO and a new official has taken up a post as “officer-in-charge.”
In total, six cases have been filed of alleged corruption connected to Hasina.
Among those named in other cases, some slated to be heard later in August, are Hasina’s sister, Sheikh Rehana, and her children — including British lawmaker Tulip Siddiq.
Tulip Siddiq resigned as the UK government’s anti-corruption minister in January, denying any wrongdoing after being named in multiple probes in Bangladesh.
Siddiq’s lawyers have said the allegations against her are false.


Neo-Nazi in Scotland pretended to convert to Islam ahead of planned mosque massacre

Neo-Nazi in Scotland pretended to convert to Islam ahead of planned mosque massacre
Updated 11 August 2025

Neo-Nazi in Scotland pretended to convert to Islam ahead of planned mosque massacre

Neo-Nazi in Scotland pretended to convert to Islam ahead of planned mosque massacre
  • Teenager was caught by police, pleaded guilty under Terrorism Act
  • His final manifesto said he would attack when ‘the mosque will be at its fullest’

LONDON: The imam of a Scottish mosque has described how a neo-Nazi teenager pretended to convert to Islam as a way to carry out a massacre inside.

The boy, 16 years old at the time of the incident, was caught by detectives in January as he traveled to burn down the Inverclyde Muslim Centre in Greenock, Sky News reported on Monday.

He later pleaded guilty under the Terrorism Act at the Glasgow High Court and will be sentenced at a later date.

The teenager, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was inspired by Norwegian mass murderer Anders Breivik and hoped that the mosque, with a capacity of 275 worshippers, would be full during his attack. He had planned to livestream the massacre after becoming radicalized online aged 13.

He told Imam Mohammed Bilal that he intended to become a Muslim. “I gave him the Qur’an to get more knowledge,” Bilal said.

“He told me that he wanted a balanced life. I asked, ‘What do you mean?’ He said, ‘I want (to be) closer to my Creator if I become Muslim.’”

Hamid Akhtar, also from the mosque, said the planned attack had served as a wake-up call for the area’s Muslim community.

“The frightening bit was that somebody was so nice and so conning. Making us a fool that he wanted to convert, and we were helping him in every way and trusting him,” he told Sky News.

“It gives us a lesson in future about who comes in and what their intentions are. We have more security cameras now.”

The boy, who has an autism diagnosis, believed that Europeans are in a “war” against other races. He authored a “manifesto” on his mobile phone and pledged to “die for my land.”

His final manifesto said he would attack when “the mosque will be at its fullest.” But the door to the mosque was locked, and police were waiting to arrest him after being tipped off.

The rucksack he took contained a German air pistol, ball bearings, gas cartridges and four cans of aerosol spray.

A raid of his home uncovered a copy of Adolf Hitler’s book “Mein Kampf,” knives and bomb-making ingredients.

Local Muslim Adeel Naeen told Sky News: “The event is an isolated event, but I look at the community today and you see the number of people that come through the doors, so we are glad that the police were able to stop anything from happening. The community is still strong in terms of it’s not putting people off from gathering here.”