How Trump’s history with Russia and Ukraine set the stage for a blowup with Zelensky

US President Donald Trump and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky meet in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, February 28, 2025. (AFP)
US President Donald Trump and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky meet in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, February 28, 2025. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 04 March 2025

How Trump’s history with Russia and Ukraine set the stage for a blowup with Zelensky

How Trump’s history with Russia and Ukraine set the stage for a blowup with Zelensky
  • Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation wrapped up in 2019 and left no doubt that Russia had interfered in the 2016 election in sweeping and criminal fashion and that the Trump campaign had welcomed the help

WASHINGTON: As his White House meeting with his Ukrainian counterpart devolved into a stunning blowup, President Donald Trump leaned on a familiar refrain to explain his unique kinship with Russian leader Vladimir Putin.
“Putin went through a hell of a lot with me,” Trump said Friday, raising his voice and gesturing with his hands as he recounted the long-since-concluded saga of a federal investigation in which both he and the Russian president played starring roles.
“He went through a phony witch hunt where they used him and Russia. Russia, Russia, Russia, ever hear of that deal?” Trump said.
The pointed reference to the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election underscored the extent to which Trump’s lingering fury over an inquiry he has misleadingly branded a “hoax” remains top of mind more than eight years after it began.
It also made clear that Trump’s view of a war Russia launched against Ukraine three years ago is colored not only by his relationship with Putin and the alliance he believes they share but also by his fraught past with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who was a central player in the first of two impeachment cases against Trump during his first four years in office.
Here’s a look at what the American president means when he says “Russia, Russia, Russia“:
Investigations tied to Putin connections
Questions over Trump’s connections to Putin followed him into his first presidency and hung over him for most of his term, spurring investigations by the Justice Department and Congress and the appointment of a special counsel who brought criminal charges against multiple Trump allies.
While running for office, Trump cast doubt on the idea that Russian government hackers had stolen the emails of Democrats, including his 2016 rival Hillary Clinton, and orchestrated their public release in an effort to boost his candidacy and harm hers.
Then, as president, he broke with his own intelligence community’s firm finding that Russia and Russia alone was to blame for the hack. Even when he begrudgingly conceded that Russia might be responsible, he also suggested the culprit might be a “400-pound genius sitting in bed and playing with his computer.”
In July 2018, while standing alongside Putin in Helsinki, Trump appeared to embrace the Russian leader’s protestations over the conclusions of US intelligence officials by saying, “I have great confidence in my intelligence people, but I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today.”
He added that “I don’t see any reason why it would be” Russia.
All the while, he memorably raged against the investigation, calling it a “hoax” and “witch hunt” and, as he did at the White House last week, repeatedly deriding all the “Russia, Russia, Russia” attention.
Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation wrapped up in 2019 and left no doubt that Russia had interfered in the 2016 election in sweeping and criminal fashion and that the Trump campaign had welcomed the help. But the inquiry did not find sufficient evidence to prove that the two sides had illegally colluded to tip the outcome of the election.
‘Do us a favor’
If Trump’s history with Russia appears to have contributed to his worldview of the current conflict, so too has his past with Ukraine.
He held a call in 2019 with Zelensky and pushed him to investigate corruption allegations against Democratic rival Joe Biden and Biden’s son Hunter ahead of the 2020 election, which Joe Biden went on to win.
The call — which included Trump’s memorable line: “I would like you to do us a favor, though” — was reported by a CIA officer-turned-whistleblower who alleged that the president appeared to be soliciting interference from a foreign country in the US election.
After Trump’s call with Zelensky, the White House temporarily halted US aid to the struggling ally facing hostile Russian forces at its border. The money was eventually released as Congress intervened.
Trump was subsequently impeached by the House but acquitted by the Senate.
The president’s skepticism of Ukraine went beyond the call. During his first term, he also seemingly bought into a long-discredited conspiracy theory that connects Ukraine, not Russia, to the 2016 political interference and the hacking of the Democratic National Committee and repeatedly accused the FBI of a lackluster investigation that led to the blaming of the Kremlin.
What happens next?
The long-term repercussions of the Oval Office spat, in which Trump called Zelensky “disrespectful” in the most hostile public exchange in memory between world leaders at the White House, remain to be seen.
But the immediate consequences are clear, with Trump on Monday directing a “pause” to US assistance to Ukraine as he seeks to pressure Zelensky to engage in peace talks with Russia. Earlier, the US president again blasted the Ukrainian leader after Zelensky noted that a deal to end the war “is still very, very far away.”
Zelensky, meanwhile, left Washington without signing a minerals deal that Trump said would have moved Ukraine closer to ending its war with Russia. He’s not welcome back, Trump said on social media, until he’s “ready for Peace.”
With the US-Ukraine relationship now in jeopardy, Zelensky has used a series of posts on X to express his thanks to the American people, Trump and Congress for “all the support.”
European leaders, including British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, have embraced Zelensky in the aftermath of the White House fight.
In Russia, officials are relishing the conflict, sensing an opportunity to move closer to the US That window seemed to open last month when the US, in a dramatic reversal in position, split from European allies by refusing to blame Russia for its invasion of Ukraine in votes on UN resolutions seeking an end to the war.
In an interview with a Russian state TV reporter that aired Sunday, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said the new US administration is “rapidly changing all foreign policy configurations.”
“This largely coincides with our vision,” he added.


Countries agree to end mercury tooth fillings by 2034

Countries agree to end mercury tooth fillings by 2034
Updated 12 sec ago

Countries agree to end mercury tooth fillings by 2034

Countries agree to end mercury tooth fillings by 2034
  • Parties at this week’s conference adopted amendments “establishing a global phase-out of dental amalgam by 2034,” the closing statement said

GENEVA: Countries have agreed to phase out the use of mercury-based dental amalgams in tooth fillings by 2034, a move that will change dentistry worldwide.
At a conference in Geneva, signatories to a treaty aimed at protecting human health and the environment from mercury pollution called time on the use of mercury amalgams.
Nations agreed “to end the use of dental amalgam by 2034, marking a historic milestone in reducing mercury pollution,” the conference announced in its closing statement.

FASTFACT

The World Health Organization considers mercury one of the top 10 chemicals of major public health concern, calling it ‘toxic to human health.’

The World Health Organization considers mercury one of the top 10 chemicals of major public health concern, calling it “toxic to human health.”
Some countries have already banned its use in dental amalgam, a common filling material used for more than 175 years.

US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. attends an event as U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks in the Oval Office of the White House on October 16, 2025 in Washington, DC. (AFP)

The Minamata Convention on Mercury is an international treaty to protect human health and the environment from the adverse effects of mercury and mercury compounds.
More than 150 countries are parties to the convention, adopted in 2013 and entered into force in 2017.
Parties at this week’s conference adopted amendments “establishing a global phase-out of dental amalgam by 2034,” the closing statement said.
“This science-based, time-bound agreement marks a decisive step toward the total elimination of mercury use in dentistry and a safer future for all communities.”
The treaty already stipulated that signatories must take measures to phase out the use of mercury-based dental amalgams.
However, a bloc of African countries wanted a deadline, with a ban on their production, import, and export, starting in 2030.
As the conference opened on Monday, US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. asked why mercury was deemed “dangerous in batteries, in over-the-counter medications and make-up,” but acceptable in dental fillings.
“It’s inexcusable that governments around the world still allow mercury-based compounds in health care — and safe alternatives exist,” he said in a video message.
A few countries opposed the idea of a phase-out by 2030, including Iran and India, and Britain, which said it was too soon.
But countries came together and agreed on a phase-out by 2034.
“We have just opened the door to another chapter of the mercury history book,” said the convention’s executive secretary, Monika Stankiewicz.
“Mercury pollution is a scourge.”
However, “by understanding one another and bridging our differences, we can make a difference in the lives of people everywhere.”
The EU’s representative called it “an important milestone in making mercury history: a step that will bring lasting benefits for human health and the environment globally.”
Mexico, speaking for the Latin American and Caribbean countries, called it an “ambitious but realistic step toward a future free from mercury.”
Overall, the conference adopted 21 decisions aimed at better protecting human health and the environment from mercury pollution.
Countries also agreed to step up efforts to eliminate skin-lightening cosmetics containing mercury, through curbing illegal trade and strengthening enforcement.
When added to cosmetics, mercury lightens the skin by suppressing melanin production. However, the process is not permanent and is dangerous to health.
The conference heard that sales of such products have soared, especially online.
Countries are also moving away from the use of mercury in small-scale gold mining, and the feasibility of mercury-free catalysts for the production of vinyl chloride monomer — a key component of PVC plastic.
The conference’s president, Osvaldo Alvarez Perez, said: “We have set ambitious new goals, and left mercury a little further behind.”