Trump’s Oval Office thrashing of Zelensky shows limits of Western allies’ ability to sway US leader

Trump’s Oval Office thrashing of Zelensky shows limits of Western allies’ ability to sway US leader
President Donald Trump, center right, meets with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, at the White House in Washington on Feb. 28, 2025. (AP Photo)
Short Url
Updated 02 March 2025

Trump’s Oval Office thrashing of Zelensky shows limits of Western allies’ ability to sway US leader

Trump’s Oval Office thrashing of Zelensky shows limits of Western allies’ ability to sway US leader
  • White House blowout capped a week of largely futile efforts by US allies to steer Trump away from his flirtations with Moscow
  • Sen. Lindsey Graham said he had warned Zelensky before the meeting “not to take the bait” in his dealings with Trump

WASHINGTON: All it took was 90 seconds for weeks of tortured diplomacy to unwind in spectacular fashion.
President Donald Trump’s Oval Office thrashing of Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky on Friday laid bare the limits of a full-court press by America’s allies aimed at reshaping Trump’s determination to end Russia’s invasion even if the terms are not to Ukraine’s liking.
It also stressed the profound ways Trump feels emboldened to redirect US foreign policy priorities toward his “America First” agenda in ways that extend well beyond those of his tumultuous first term.
The sudden blowup was the most heated public exchange of words between world leaders in the Oval Office in memory, as the usual staid work of diplomacy descended into finger-pointing, shouting and eye-rolling.
The encounter left the future of the US-Ukraine relationship, and Kyiv’s ability to defend itself in the brutal conflict with Russia, in mortal jeopardy.
“You either make a deal or we are out,” Trump told Zelensky, underscoring the American leader’s plans to dictate a swift end to the war or leave its longtime ally to continue the fight without its strongest backer.
Less than a day later, Zelensky used a series of posts on X to express his thanks to the American people, Trump and Congress for “all the support,” which he said Ukrainians “have always appreciated,” especially during the war.
“Our relationship with the American President is more than just two leaders; it’s a historic and solid bond between our peoples. That’s why I always begin with words of gratitude from our nation to the American nation,” he added. Ukrainians want “only strong relations with America, and I really hope we will have them,” he said.
Zelensky was in London to meet with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer before a summit Sunday of European leaders.
Episode capped intense lobbying effort by American allies
The stunning episode in Washington had capped a week of what turned out to be largely futile efforts by US allies to paper over differences between Washington and Kyiv and to try to steer Trump away from his flirtations with Moscow.
On Monday, French President Emmanuel Macron huddled with Trump to lay the groundwork for an eventual European-led peacekeeping force in Ukraine aimed at deterring future Russian aggression and to encourage the US president to be more skeptical of Vladimir Putin.
But even as Trump and Macron greeted each other with a vise-like grip, the US was splitting with its European allies at the United Nations by refusing to blame Russia for its invasion of Ukraine in a series of resolutions marking the third anniversary of the war.
On Thursday, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer visited Washington and appealed to Trump for a US “backstop” for European nations who would provide front-line security for Ukraine. He was in essence looking for insurance that, should a peace deal be reached, Russia won’t restart the fighting in the future. Starmer brought flattery and a state visit invitation from King Charles III to soften the ask.
The approach seemed to work, as Trump struck a more conciliatory tone toward Ukraine, calling America’s support for the country against Russia’s invasion “a very worthy thing to do” and disclaiming any memory that he had called the Ukrainian leader a “dictator.”
But Trump also brushed aside Putin’s past broken diplomatic promises, claiming they occurred under different presidents, and saying the Russian leader had never violated a commitment to him. It came as his aides were planning a series of negotiating sessions with Russian officials to lay the groundwork for a potential meeting between Trump and Putin in the coming weeks.
Mineral deal pursued by Trump goes by the wayside, for now
All the while, Trump was focused on securing a financial stake in Ukraine’s critical minerals to recoup the tens of billions the US has given to Kyiv to defend itself. Zelensky, meanwhile, wanted more than Washington’s vague promises that the US would work to preserve its economic interest in Ukraine under the agreement and pushed for more concrete security guarantees.
But Trump would not budge, and US officials repeatedly said Zelensky would not be welcome to meet with the president to discuss Trump’s push for negotiations with Russia until it was signed. After weeks of browbeating, Zelensky’s government on Wednesday formally agreed to the proposal, clearing the path for Friday’s meeting.
It started off cordially enough, as Trump and Zelensky spoke politely, even with admiration, of one of another for the first half-hour of the meeting. Trump even suggested he would continue some military assistance to Ukraine until he could secure an enduring peace deal with Russia.
But when the Ukrainian leader raised alarm about trusting any promises from Putin to end the fighting, Vice President JD Vance rebuked him for airing disagreements with Trump in public. It instantly shifted the tenor of the conversation. Zelensky grew defensive, and Trump and his vice president blasted him as ungrateful and “disrespectful” and issued stark warnings about future American support.
A warning before the meeting ‘not to take the bait’
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., a defense hawk and Trump ally, said he had warned Zelensky before the meeting “not to take the bait” in his dealings with Trump, who has repeatedly shown a penchant for throwing criticism but a deep resistance to receiving it.
It was Vance — a longtime critic of American support for Ukraine — who dangled it, when he insisted diplomacy was the only way forward.
“What kind of diplomacy, JD, you are speaking about?” Zelensky said, listing Russia’s past violations of ceasefires. “What do you mean?”
“I’m talking about the kind of diplomacy that’s going to end the destruction of your country,” Vance responded before tearing into the Ukrainian leader. “Mr. President, with respect, I think it’s disrespectful for you to come into the Oval Office to try to litigate this in front of the American media.”
Trump then let loose, warning the Ukrainian leader, “You’re gambling with World War III, and what you’re doing is very disrespectful to the country, this country that’s backed you far more than a lot of people say they should have.”
At another point, Trump declared himself “in the middle,” seeming to formally break from years of American support for Ukraine. He went on to deride Zelensky’s “hatred” for Putin as a roadblock to peace.
“You see the hatred he’s got for Putin,” Trump said. “That’s very tough for me to make a deal with that kind of hate.”
“It’s going to be a very hard thing to do business like this,” Trump said to Zelensky as the two leaders talked over each other.
Latest example of major shift in US foreign policy
The episode was just the latest instance of Trump’s brazen moves to shift long-held American policy positions in his first six weeks back in office, portending even more uncertainty ahead for longtime American allies and partners who have already felt pressed to justify their place in Trump’s eyes. It comes just weeks after Trump floated a permanent relocation of Palestinians in Gaza and an American takeover of the territory, and as he has doubled down on plans to put stiff tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada starting next week.
After the Oval Office dustup, Zelensky was asked to leave the White House by top Trump advisers — scrapping plans for a lunch, a joint press conference and the signing of the economic agreement, even as the Ukrainian leader and his aides pushed for a “reset” on the meeting.
Trump later told reporters he didn’t want to “embolden” the Ukrainian leader if he didn’t want “peace” with Russia — flipping what Ukraine had seen as an inducement for security guarantees into a cudgel.
“You can’t embolden somebody who does not have the cards,” Trump said.
After the disastrous encounter, Zelensky appeared on Fox News on Friday evening and told Bret Baier that his public spat with Trump and Vance was “not good for both sides.” But Zelensky said Trump — who insists Putin is ready to end the three-year grinding war — needs to understand that Ukraine can’t change its attitudes toward Russia on a dime.
Zelensky added that Ukraine won’t enter peace talks with Russia until it has security guarantees against another offensive.
“Everybody (is) afraid Putin will come back tomorrow,” Zelensky said. “We want just and lasting peace.”
“It’s so sensitive for our people,” Zelensky said. “And they just want to hear that America (is) on our side, that America will stay with us. Not with Russia, with us. That’s it.”
Zelensky acknowledged that without US support, his country’s position would grow “difficult.”
After repeatedly declining opportunities to apologize to Trump, Zelensky closed his Fox appearance with a sheepish expression of remorse as he struggled with the reality of Trump’s new direction in Washington: “Sorry for this.”


Russia slams UN vote to reimpose Iran nuclear sanctions

Russia slams UN vote to reimpose Iran nuclear sanctions
Updated 17 sec ago

Russia slams UN vote to reimpose Iran nuclear sanctions

Russia slams UN vote to reimpose Iran nuclear sanctions
  • The UN Security Council voted on Friday, after European pressure, to reimpose the UN sanctions on Iran

MOSCOW: Russia has slammed the UN Security Council vote to reimpose economic sanctions on Iran over its nuclear program and warned of a risk of an “escalation of tensions.”
“The Russian side has repeatedly pointed out the provocative and illegal nature of the actions of the European countries participating in the JCPOA,” the Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement.
Britain, France, and Germany were among the parties to a 2015 deal known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, which provided Iran with relief from UN sanctions in exchange for UN-monitored restrictions on its nuclear activities.

FASTFACTS

• Russia has warned that the reimposition of sanctions against Iran risked ‘irreparable consequences.’

• Amir Saeid Iravani, Iran’s envoy to the UN, described the vote as the ‘politics of coercion.’

The three governments claim Iran has reneged on its commitments under the deal, which has been effectively moribund since Washington pulled out in 2018.
The UN Security Council voted on Friday, after European pressure, to reimpose the UN sanctions on Iran.
“These actions have nothing to do with diplomacy and lead exclusively to a further escalation of tensions surrounding the Iranian nuclear program,” the Russian ministry said.
Amir Saeid Iravani, Iran’s envoy to the UN, described the vote as the “politics of coercion.”
“Today’s action is hasty, unnecessary and unlawful. Iran recognizes no obligation to implement it,” he told the Security Council. 
In August, Moscow warned that the reimposition of sanctions against Iran risked “irreparable consequences.”
Tehran and Moscow have been strengthening their political, military, and economic ties over the past decade.
Also on Saturday, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian vowed that Iran would overcome any reimposition of sanctions on it through a so-called “snapback” process.
“Through the ‘snapback’ they block the road, but it is the brains and the thoughts that open or build the road,” Pezeshkian said in remarks carried by state television.
“They cannot stop us. They can strike our Natanz or Fordow (nuclear installations attacked by the US and Israel in June), but they are unaware that it is humans who built and will rebuild Natanz,” Pezeshkian said.
“We will never surrender in the face of excessive demands because we have the power to change the situation,” Pezeshkian was quoted as saying by state media.
The “snapback” process would reimpose UN sanctions on Iran unless an agreement is reached on a delay between Tehran and key European powers within about a week.
The snapback would reimpose an arms embargo, a ban on uranium enrichment and reprocessing, a ban on activities with ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear weapons, a global asset freeze, and travel bans on Iranian individuals and entities.
“We urge (Iran) to act now,” said British Ambassador Barbara Woodward after casting a vote against a resolution that would have extended the current suspension of the sanctions.

 


‘Better late than never’: Palestinian FM says UK recognition of state a ‘courageous step’

‘Better late than never’: Palestinian FM says UK recognition of state a ‘courageous step’
Updated 10 min 20 sec ago

‘Better late than never’: Palestinian FM says UK recognition of state a ‘courageous step’

‘Better late than never’: Palestinian FM says UK recognition of state a ‘courageous step’
  • The UK, alongside France, Canada and Australia, is preparing to formally recognize the State of Palestine at the UN

LONDON: The UK will be taking “a courageous step at a very difficult time” by officially recognizing a Palestinian state, the Palestinian Authority’s foreign minister has said, predicting the move will inspire other countries to follow suit.

that the UK’s expected announcement in the coming days was “better late than never.”

She added: “Britain, with its weight, can influence other countries to come forward and recognise, because that is the right thing to do.”

The UK, alongside France, Canada and Australia, is preparing to formally recognize the State of Palestine at the United Nations.

Aghabekian said the move should be seen as upholding international law and supporting the rights of both Israelis and Palestinians.

“Britain has been supporting the existence and flourishing of Israel for some time,” she said. “But today Britain is looking at the matter objectively — in terms of people’s rights, in terms of complying with international law, and in terms of the future of this area.”

She dismissed claims that recognition rewards Hamas terrorism, arguing that withholding recognition would only “reward extremists.”

She added: “If we wait until Israel decides it wants to go into negotiations with the Palestinians, then it won’t happen.” Aghabekian also said she expected Gaza to eventually return to Palestinian governance.

Three-quarters of UN member states already recognize Palestine, which comprises the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip — collectively known as the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

The West Bank has been under Israeli occupation since 1967, while Gaza has endured repeated bombardment since Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, attacks on Israel, which killed nearly 1,200 people and saw around 250 taken hostage. Since then, more than 65,000 people have been killed in Gaza, according to Palestinian figures, while 48 hostages remain in captivity, 20 of whom are believed to be alive.

Aghabekian confirmed that Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas has provided assurances to world leaders that Hamas will not be part of Gaza’s governance.

But she cautioned against talk of eliminating the group entirely.

“Hamas is an ideology, not a building that you bring down,” she said. “Those who support Hamas need to see a future … that there might be a state in which their children and grandchildren might prosper. What people see today is darkness and destruction, violation of rights, helplessness and hopelessness. People need to see progress, and once that happens, the mood will shift.”


Austrian energy executive fired over alleged Russian spying links — magazine report says

Updated 20 September 2025

Austrian energy executive fired over alleged Russian spying links — magazine report says

Austrian energy executive fired over alleged Russian spying links — magazine report says
The OMV employee allegedly attracted attention through meetings with a Russian diplomat
OMV told Reuters it had terminated the employee’s contract with immediate effect

VIENNA: Austrian oil, gas and chemicals group OMV has fired an executive over allegations of spying for Russia and a Russian diplomat has been summoned to the Foreign Ministry in Vienna as a result of the affair, news magazine Profil reported.
Profil magazine said the OMV employee allegedly attracted attention through meetings with a Russian diplomat suspected by Western intelligence services of being an agent of Russia’s domestic intelligence service FSB.
The magazine said that Austria’s Directorate of State Security and Intelligence had been monitoring the OMV executive, who was not identified, for several months.
OMV told Reuters it had terminated the employee’s contract with immediate effect and the company was cooperating fully with the relevant authorities.
“For data protection reasons, we cannot comment on further details regarding individual employment relationships,” an OMV spokesman said.
The Austrian Foreign Ministry told Reuters it was aware of the allegations and the pending criminal proceedings against a Russian diplomat.
The chargé d’affaires of the Russian embassy in Vienna has been summoned to the Foreign Ministry, and asked to waive the diplomat’s immunity.
“Otherwise, he would have been considered persona non grata and would have to leave Austria,” the Ministry told Reuters.
The Russian Foreign Ministry could not be reached for comment.

Dutch police use tear gas against anti-immigration protesters

Dutch police use tear gas against anti-immigration protesters
Updated 20 September 2025

Dutch police use tear gas against anti-immigration protesters

Dutch police use tear gas against anti-immigration protesters
  • Thousands of people had joined a protest organized by a rightwing activist in demand of stricter migration policies
  • A police car was set on fire and a group of protesters briefly blocked a highway

AMSTERDAM: Dutch police used tear gas and a water cannon to disperse violent anti-migration protesters in The Hague on Saturday, a spokesperson for local government said.
Thousands of people had joined a protest organized by a rightwing activist in demand of stricter migration policies and a clampdown on asylum seekers, just over a month before a national election.
Large groups of protesters, many waving Dutch flags and flags associated with far-right groups, clashed violently with the police, throwing rocks and bottles, footage from broadcaster NOS showed.
A police car was set on fire and a group of protesters briefly blocked a highway near the site of the demonstration.
Local media reported that protesters also smashed several windows at the headquarters of the center-left D66 party, viewed by many on the far right as a party that serves a progressive elite.
Anti-migration populist Geert Wilders, who won the previous election in the Netherlands and in recent weeks retained his lead in opinion polls ahead of the October 29 vote, was invited to speak at the demonstration but did not attend.
Instead he condemned the violence on X, saying the use of force against police was “utterly unacceptable,” and calling those involved “idiots.”


Serbia stages a large military parade to showcase tanks, jets and missile systems

Serbia stages a large military parade to showcase tanks, jets and missile systems
Updated 20 September 2025

Serbia stages a large military parade to showcase tanks, jets and missile systems

Serbia stages a large military parade to showcase tanks, jets and missile systems
  • President Aleksandar Vucic reviewed the parade saying the show of force underscored Serbia’s ability to defend its independence and sovereignty
  • Serbia is mostly surrounded by NATO-member states

BELGRADE: Serbia on Thursday staged a large-scale military parade in the capital Belgrade, showcasing tanks, missile systems and fighter jets in what officials described as the country’s biggest display of army strength in its history.
President Aleksandar Vucic reviewed the parade, which included about 10,000 troops, saying the show of force underscored Serbia’s ability to defend its independence and sovereignty and act as a deterrent against any foreign aggressor. Serbia is mostly surrounded by NATO-member states.
Columns of troops marched through the New Belgrade district of the capital as crowds waved national flags, while aircraft roared overhead.
The event featured both domestically produced weapons as well as rocket launchers from Israel, drones purchased from the United Arab Emirates as well as tanks supplied by Russia and anti-aircraft systems from China, reflecting Belgrade’s close ties with Moscow and Beijing despite its declared goal of joining the European Union.
What caught most of the attention of military experts was the Israeli PULS system, a versatile rocket artillery platform capable of launching a range of munitions with varying ranges and payloads. Its range is up to 300 kilometers (185 miles), meaning it can reach most of the Balkan capitals.
`Another surprise appearance was a couple of the French air force’s Rafale fighter jets. Serbia has ordered 12 such multi-purpose aircraft that are due for delivery in the coming years.
Critics said the parade was designed less to showcase the strength of the military than to bolster Vucic’s populist rule that has been challenged by student-led protests and growing international scrutiny of his increasingly authoritarian grip on power.
Opposition leaders accused the government of using the army as a political prop, while rights groups noted that some state employees were pressured to attend the parade and were transported in hundreds of buses.
Hundreds of university students and other opposition supporters, who have for more than 10 months staged anti-corruption protests against Vucic and his government, were prevented by riot police from joining other spectators of the parade.
Vucic has refused a student demand to call an early parliamentary election. He has instead stepped up a crackdown on the protests, which have drawn hundreds of thousands of people in the past months.
The anti-government protests first started in November last year after a concrete canopy collapse at a renovated train station in the northern city of Novi Sad killed 16 people. It ignited a nationwide movement seeking justice for the victims and blaming corruption-fueled negligence for the tragedy.