Women peacekeepers gather in New Delhi for first Global South summit

Special Women peacekeepers gather in New Delhi for first Global South summit
Women peacekeepers take a group photo at the “Women in Peacekeeping: A Global South Perspective" conference in New Delhi on Feb. 24, 2025. (Indian Ministry of External Affairs)
Short Url
Updated 25 February 2025

Women peacekeepers gather in New Delhi for first Global South summit

Women peacekeepers gather in New Delhi for first Global South summit
  • Global South countries are top troop contributors to UN peacekeeping missions
  • India led the way, providing female peacekeeping troops in Liberia in 2007

NEW DELHI: Women peacekeepers are gathered in the Indian capital for the first summit of UN blue helmets representing the Global South.

Hosted by the Indian Ministry of External Affairs, Ministry of Defense, and the Centre for United Nations Peacekeeping, the two-day conference, “Women in Peacekeeping: A Global South Perspective,” brought together 35 women peacekeepers from 35 countries representing the developing world.

Global South countries are the leading contributors of troops to UN missions. India, alongside Bangladesh, Nepal, and Indonesia, has the biggest number of peacekeeping troops.

Women peacekeepers were sent to the field for the first time during the UN Operation in the Congo in 1960. However, their involvement at that time was limited to non-combat positions such as medical personnel and administrative staff.

India became a pioneer in the provision women peacekeeping troops when it sent an all-female Formed Police Unit to Liberia in 2007. Today, women make up more than 20 percent of its 5,000 deployed military observers and staff officers. 

“The participation of women in peace operations makes it more diverse and inclusive,” Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar told the participants during the conference’s opening session on Monday.

“It is essential that we continue to increase the representation of women in peacekeeping. This is not only a matter of quantity but equally of quality. Women peacekeepers often have unique access to local communities, acting as role models for women in conflict zones.”

The peacekeepers were also received by President Droupadi Murmu at her official residence, Rashtrapati Bhavan.

Those taking part in the conference told Arab News how important it was for them to meet and share their experiences.

“We learn (from) all the thoughts, ideas that each of us has — by their own experience. For me it is powerful,” said Lt. Marinliz Irene Chicas, a peacekeeper from El Salvador.

Maj. Mariam Thermite from the Republic of Guinea Armed Forces, who has served in the UN Mission in South Sudan and in the engineer corps in Western Sahara took part in the New Delhi meeting to share her insights.

“We need to improve women’s qualifications,” she said. “Women are very important in peace keeping ... These missions are very important for (the affected) women and children, and without women we can’t (access them).”

UN Security Council Resolution 1325, adopted in 2000, recognized the importance of female participation in peacekeeping and called for the inclusion of women in all levels of decision-making and peace processes as critical to such operations.

Women’s participation ensures that peacekeeping missions consider the security needs of all populations, including marginalized groups. Female peacekeepers help address issues such as the specific vulnerabilities faced by women and children in conflict areas.

“There is a degree of trust between military women and the (affected) population,” Maj. R. Salhi from the Tunisian Armed Forces told Arab News.

“Men cannot reach in the field (where) women can. For example, in the interaction with populations, investigations especially ... dealing with populations and families, children — the easiest way to contact these people is through women.”


Observation mission says Tanzanian election did not comply with AU standards

Updated 5 sec ago

Observation mission says Tanzanian election did not comply with AU standards

Observation mission says Tanzanian election did not comply with AU standards
  • President Samia Suluhu Hassan won the October 29 poll with 98 percent of the vote 
  • The opposition, which was barred from participating, branded the election a “sham”

NAIROBI, Kenya: African Union election observers said late Wednesday that the integrity of Tanzania’s recently concluded elections was “compromised,” citing incidents of “ballot stuffing at several polling stations.”
President Samia Suluhu Hassan won the October 29 poll with 98 percent of the vote, according to the electoral commission, but the opposition, which was barred from participating, branded the election a “sham.”
Violent protests broke out across the country on election day.
The government responded with a total Internet blackout and transport shutdown, and the opposition says hundreds were killed by security forces, though getting verified information remains difficult despite an easing of restrictions.

The AU Election Observation Mission said its observers witnessed voters being issued multiple ballots, with some allowed to cast their votes without their identities being verified against the registry.
“The 2025 Tanzania General Elections did not comply with AU principles, normative frameworks, and other international obligations and standards for democratic elections,” reads the initial report from the AU mission.
The mission said its observers were restricted from monitoring the vote count, noting that this “limited transparency.”
It added that in some polling stations observers “were asked to only observe voting for five minutes.”
The report also noted violent protests, gunfire, road closures, and tire burning in areas such as Dar es Salaam, Mbeya, Mwanza, Kagera, Dodoma, Kigoma, Tebora, Buhungwa, Singinda, among others.
The AU urged Tanzania to “prioritize electoral and political reforms to address the root causes of its democratic and electoral challenges.”
On Monday, African poll observers released an initial report saying Tanzanians had been unable to “express their democratic will” due to the barring of opposition candidates, censorship and intimidation, as well as signs of rigging on election day.