Syria conference lays out post-Assad priorities, but Kurds not invited

Participants in Syria's national dialogue conference gather at the Dama Rose hotel in Damascus, Syria, Monday Feb. 24, 2025. (AP)
Participants in Syria's national dialogue conference gather at the Dama Rose hotel in Damascus, Syria, Monday Feb. 24, 2025. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 26 February 2025

Syria conference lays out post-Assad priorities, but Kurds not invited

Participants in Syria's national dialogue conference gather at the Dama Rose hotel in Damascus, Syria, Monday Feb. 24, 2025. (AP
  • Assad’s fall in a lightning rebel offensive in December — had been in flux up until the last minute

DAMASCUS: A national dialogue conference held Tuesday in Damascus set out a path for the new Syria following the fall of Bashar Assad but did not receive support from Kurdish leaders, who were not invited.
Among the principles agreed to was a state monopoly on arms, which came with Syria’s Kurds at odds with the new government over the future of their armed units.
Interim President Ahmed Al-Sharaa, in a speech to attendees, said the country was at a “new historic phase” after more than a decade of civil war.
A closing statement, which is expected to be advisory rather than binding, included 18 points that “will serve as a basis” for the reform of state institutions and touch on Syria’s political life, economy, defense policy and rights.
The statement read out by Houda Atassi, a member of the conference’s preparatory committee, called for “a monopoly on weapons by the state” and a new professional national army.
Any “armed formations outside the official institutions” would be “outlawed,” according to the statement — an implicit reference to Kurdish-led forces and other factions that have refused to lay down their arms since Assad’s toppling.
It also rejected “provocative statements” by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who said his country “will not allow” Syrian armed forces to be deployed south of Damascus, and condemned “the Israeli incursion into Syrian territory.”
While the conference was ongoing, protesters gathered in cities across Syria including the capital and Suwayda in the south to protest against Netanyahu, state news agency SANA reported.
The statement also rejected “all forms of discrimination based on race, religion or sect and the achievement of the principle of equal opportunities.”
Civil society, religious communities, opposition figures and artists were represented at the hastily organized conference — an initiative unheard of under Assad.
However, officials from the semi-autonomous Kurdish administration that controls swathes of the country’s north and northeast criticized being shut out of the event, decrying the “token representation” for minority groups.
The Kurdish administration said in a statement that it will “not be a part” of implementing the recommendations of the conference which “does not represent the Syrian people.”
Addressing the conference earlier, Sharaa said: “Syria has invited all of you today... to consult with each other on the future of your country.”
“Syria is indivisible; it is a complete whole, and its strength lies in its unity,” the interim president declared, adding that “the unity of arms and their monopoly by the state is not a luxury but a duty and an obligation.”
Sharaa also said authorities would “work on forming a transitional justice body to restore people’s rights, ensure justice and, God willing, bring criminals to justice.”

Organizers said the semi-autonomous Kurdish administration and affiliated bodies were not invited due to the exclusion of armed groups, a reference to the US-backed, Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF).
Kurdish administration official Hassan Mohammed Ali told AFP that the exclusion would have “negative repercussions and will not lead to solutions to the problems and crises that Syria has been suffering from for decades.”
Swathes of northern and northeastern Syria are controlled by the SDF, which spearheaded the territorial defeat of the Daesh group in Syria in 2019.
Sharaa, whose Islamist group Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham (HTS) led the rebel alliance that toppled Assad in December, has previously said Kurdish-led forces should be integrated into Syria’s national army, rejecting any Kurdish autonomy.
Organizers of the national dialogue conference announced on Sunday that the event would start the following day.
After the event, organizers said that around 10,000 people attended online, many of them from abroad, with workshops addressing issues including freedoms and the constitution.

Caretaker authorities have been charged with managing affairs until March 1, when a new government is due to be formed.
In his speech, Sharaa emphasized the importance of the rule of law and highlighted the interim authorities’ work “pursuing those who committed crimes against Syrians.”
“We must build our state on the rule of law, and the law must be respected by those who establish it,” he said.
Sharaa’s HTS has its roots in Syria’s former Al-Qaeda affiliate, and is proscribed as a terrorist organization by many governments including the United States.
But the group has moderated its rhetoric and vowed to protect Syria’s religious and ethnic minorities.
Sharaa said earlier this month that it could take four to five years to organize elections in Syria and two to three years to rewrite the constitution.
Syria is also without a parliament, after the Assad-era legislature was dissolved following his December 8 ousting.


Palestinian NGO cannot appeal UK court ruling over F-35 parts to Israel

Updated 15 sec ago

Palestinian NGO cannot appeal UK court ruling over F-35 parts to Israel

Palestinian NGO cannot appeal UK court ruling over F-35 parts to Israel
Al-Haq unsuccessfully challenged Britain’s Department for Business and Trade over its decision
The Court of Appeal refused permission, ruling that it was a matter for the government to decide

LONDON: A Palestinian NGO was on Wednesday refused permission to appeal a court ruling that Britain lawfully allowed F-35 fighter jet parts to be indirectly exported to Israel, despite accepting they could be used to breach international humanitarian law.
Al-Haq, a Palestinian rights group based in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, unsuccessfully challenged Britain’s Department for Business and Trade over its decision last year to exempt F-35 components when it suspended export licenses for arms that could be used in the war in Gaza.
The group last month asked the Court of Appeal for permission to challenge a lower court ruling that found Britain’s decision was lawful and dismissed Al-Haq’s challenge.
The Court of Appeal refused permission, ruling that it was a matter for the government to decide whether national security issues relating to the supply of F-35 components outweighed an assessment that Israel was not committed to complying with international humanitarian law.
When it suspended export licenses in 2024, Britain assessed that Israel was not committed to complying with such law in its military campaign, which Gaza health officials say killed more than 68,000 Palestinians.
But Britain did not suspend licenses for British-made F-35 components, which go into a pool of spare parts Israel can use on its existing F-35 jets.
London’s High Court rejected the challenge in June, saying in its ruling that then-business minister Jonathan Reynolds was “faced with the blunt choice of accepting the F-35 carve-out or withdrawing from the F-35 program and accepting all the defense and diplomatic consequences which would ensue.”
The Court of Appeal heard Al-Haq’s application for permission to appeal as Israel and Palestinian militant group Hamas signed an agreement last month to cease fire and free Israeli hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners.
In a similar case earlier this month, a Dutch appeals court confirmed a decision to throw out a case brought by pro-Palestinian groups to stop the Netherlands exporting weapons to Israel and trading with Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian territories.