Federal judge blocks Elon Musk’s DOGE from accessing sensitive US Treasury Department material

Federal judge blocks Elon Musk’s DOGE from accessing sensitive US Treasury Department material
Federal workers and supporters hold signs as they demonstrate against Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) outside of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) headquarters on February 07, 2025 in Washington, DC. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 09 February 2025

Federal judge blocks Elon Musk’s DOGE from accessing sensitive US Treasury Department material

Federal judge blocks Elon Musk’s DOGE from accessing sensitive US Treasury Department material
  • US District Judge Paul Engelmayer issued the order after 19 Democratic attorneys general sued President Donald Trump

A federal judge early Saturday blocked Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency from accessing Treasury Department records that contain sensitive personal data such as Social Security and bank account numbers for millions of Americans.
US District Judge Paul Engelmayer issued the order after 19 Democratic attorneys general sued President Donald Trump. The case, filed in federal court in New York City, alleges the Trump administration allowed Musk’s team access to the Treasury Department’s central payment system in violation of federal law.
The payment system handles tax refunds, Social Security benefits, veterans’ benefits and much more, sending out trillions of dollars every year while containing an expansive network of Americans’ personal and financial data.
Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, also known as DOGE, was created to discover and eliminate what the Trump administration has deemed to be wasteful government spending.
DOGE’s access to Treasury records, as well as its inspection of various government agencies, has ignited widespread concern among critics over the increasing power of Musk, while supporters have cheered at the idea of reining in bloated government finances.
Musk has made fun of criticism of DOGE on his X social media platform while saying it is saving taxpayers millions of dollars.
New York Attorney General Letitia James, whose office filed the lawsuit, said DOGE’s access to the Treasury Department’s data raises security problems and the possibility for an illegal freeze in federal funds.
“This unelected group, led by the world’s richest man, is not authorized to have this information, and they explicitly sought this unauthorized access to illegally block payments that millions of Americans rely on, payments for health care, child care and other essential programs,” James said in a video message released by her office.
James, a Democrat who has been one of Trump’s chief antagonists, said the president does not have the power to give away American’s private information to anyone he chooses, and he cannot cut federal payments approved by Congress.
Also on the lawsuit are Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wisconsin.
The suit alleges that DOGE’s access to the Treasury records could interfere with funding already appropriated by Congress, which would exceed the Treasury Department’s statutory authority. The case also argues that the DOGE access violates federal administrative law and the US Constitution’s separation of powers doctrine.
It also accuses Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent of changing the department’s longstanding policy for protecting sensitive personally identifiable information and financial information to allow Musk’s DOGE team access to its payment systems.
“This decision failed to account for legal obligations to protect such data and ignored the privacy expectations of federal fund recipients,” including states, veterans, retirees, and taxpayers, the lawsuit says.
Connecticut Attorney General William Tong said it’s not clear what DOGE is doing with the information in the Treasury systems.
“This is the largest data breach in American history,” Tong said in a statement. “DOGE is an unlawfully constituted band of renegade tech bros combing through confidential records, sensitive data and critical payment systems. What could go wrong?”
The Treasury Department has said the review is about assessing the integrity of the system and that no changes are being made. According to two people familiar with the process, Musk’s team began its inquiry looking for ways to suspend payments made by the US Agency for International Development, which Trump and Musk are attempting to dismantle. The two people spoke with The Associated Press on condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation.
Separately, Democratic lawmakers are seeking a Treasury Department investigation of DOGE’s access to the government’s payment system.
Also, labor unions and advocacy groups have sued to block the payments system review over concerns about its legality. A judge in Washington on Thursday temporarily restricted access to two employees with “read only” privileges.


Indonesia court to rule on challenges to legislation allowing expanded military role

Indonesia court to rule on challenges to legislation allowing expanded military role
Updated 18 sec ago

Indonesia court to rule on challenges to legislation allowing expanded military role

Indonesia court to rule on challenges to legislation allowing expanded military role
  • Fears are growing that President Prabowo Subianto is turning increasingly to the armed forces to help deliver his ambitious agenda
  • Prabowo has appointed former generals to key posts and has deployed the military for various task
JAKARTA: An Indonesian court was scheduled to rule on Wednesday on challenges to the revision of a military law allowing a greater armed forces role in civilian affairs, among the sources of anger that have stoked widespread anti-government protests.
The Constitutional Court was due to decide on five petitions against amendments that plaintiffs say were bulldozed through parliament in March without proper public consultation, amid concerns of an expansion of the military’s involvement in civilian life under President Prabowo Subianto.
Fears are growing in Indonesia that former special forces commander Prabowo is turning increasingly to the armed forces to help deliver his ambitious agenda after just 11 months in office, reviving memories of the military-dominated 1966-1998 New Order era of authoritarian rule.
Prabowo has appointed former generals to key posts and has deployed the military for various tasks, including handling street protests, implementing initiatives on free school meals and food security, manufacturing medicines and seizing palm oil plantations for a new state-owned firm.
The rulings come at a time of festering anger following two weeks of at times violent demonstrations over issues from lawmakers’ allowances and state budget priorities to police conduct and perceptions of creeping militarization in Indonesia, presenting Prabowo with his first major test.
The petitions argue the amendments to Indonesia’s military law lacked transparency and public participation before being passed by a parliament overwhelmingly allied with the president, and have called for the changes to be annulled.
“We expect the court to repeal the military law because the process is not in accordance with another law regulating legislative process,” petitioner Ardi Manto Adiputra told Reuters, adding lawmakers had met in secret to discuss revisions to the law and had rushed its passage.
The petitioners include human rights and student groups and Inayah Wahid, the daughter of Indonesia’s former President Abdurrahman Wahid.
Indonesia law minister has said the legislative process was above board and public input had been sufficiently sought.
The court decision is not expected to address the revisions to the law, but the processes that took place before it was passed.
Ardi said his group planned to file another judicial review over the substance of the legislation at a later stage.
He also said the court decision would be delivered virtually, with neither plaintiffs nor the public permitted to attend the verdict in person.

King Charles III prepares to welcome Trump for historic second state visit at Windsor Castle

King Charles III prepares to welcome Trump for historic second state visit at Windsor Castle
Updated 11 min 42 sec ago

King Charles III prepares to welcome Trump for historic second state visit at Windsor Castle

King Charles III prepares to welcome Trump for historic second state visit at Windsor Castle

WINDSOR, England: It’s the sort of experience you just can’t buy.
The carriages are being polished, the family silver is being laid out, and diamonds are being dusted off as King Charles III prepares to offer a royal welcome to Donald Trump for what will be the highlight of the US president’s unprecedented second state visit to Britain.
Hundreds of soldiers, gardeners and chefs are putting the finishing touches on their preparations to make sure the president and first lady Melania Trump get the full royal treatment. But it’s a spectacle with a purpose: to bolster ties with a world leader known for a love of bling at a time when his America First policies are putting pressure on trade and security arrangements globally.
The second leg of the visit will take place on Thursday, when Trump and Starmer meet at Chequers, the 16th-century redbrick pile in the Chiltern Hills northwest of London that serves as the official country estate of British prime ministers. The government hopes a technology deal to be signed during the trip will underline the trans-Atlantic bond remains strong despite differences over Ukraine, the Middle East and the future of NATO.
The backdrop for day one will be Windsor Castle, an almost 1,000-year-old royal residence with gilded interiors, crenelated towers and priceless artworks.
It’s a scene that has seemed to enchant Trump, who ditched his trademark bluster and described the invitation to Windsor as “a great, great honor.”
“I think that also is why he seems so visibly excited about the second meeting, because it isn’t an invitation given to (just) anyone,” said George Gross, an expert on the British monarchy at King’s College London.
Trump said Tuesday after arriving in London that he loved being back in the United Kingdom, calling it a “very special place.” Asked if he had a message for Charles, he said the king was a longtime friend of his and well-respected.
While Britain’s royals long ago gave up real political power, their history, tradition and celebrity give them a cachet that means presidents and prime ministers covet an invitation to join them. That makes the invitations, handed out at the request of the elected government, a powerful tool to reward friends and wring concessions out of reluctant allies.
 

State banquet
No US president, or any other world leader, has ever had the honor of a second UK state visit. That won’t be lost on a president who often describes his actions with superlatives and has made no secret of his fondness for the British royals.
The day will begin when the king and Queen Camilla formally welcome the Trumps to Windsor Castle.
That will be followed by a horse-drawn carriage ride through the estate — 6,400 hectares (15,800 acres) of farms, forest and open space that includes a one-time royal hunting ground which is still home to 500 red deer.
Back at the castle, a military band will play “God Save the King” and “The Star-Spangled Banner” before Trump and the king inspect an honor guard of soldiers in traditional scarlet tunics and tall bearskin hats.
After a private lunch and a visit to an exhibit of documents and artwork illustrating the ties between Britain and the US, it will be time for the glitz and glamor of a state banquet.
Tiaras and medals will be on display as up to 160 guests in formal wear gather around a 50-meter long mahogany table set with 200-year-old silver to honor the president. Charles will deliver a speech, then the king and president will offer toasts.
Trump won’t, however, have the chance to address a joint session of Parliament as French President Emmanuel Macron did in July during his state visit, because the House of Commons is in recess. The president also missed out on that honor during his first state visit amid opposition from then-Speaker of the House John Bercow.

‘It’s very dreary’
Most state visits are staged in London, against the grand backdrop of Buckingham Palace and the broad, flag-lined boulevard known as The Mall. But this one is taking place in the cozier confines of Windsor, a historic town of just over 30,000 people about 25 miles (40 kilometers) west of central London.
That makes it easier to control protests and protect the president at a time of increased international tensions, especially after the fatal shooting of Trump ally Charlie Kirk last week in Utah. Even so, British police have mounted a massive police operation to ensure the president’s safety.
When Trump was in London on his first state visit in 2019, he was met by thousands of protesters who filled the streets outside the Houses of Parliament as a balloon shaped like a giant, diaper-wearing baby Trump floated overhead.
Robert Lacey, a royal historian and the consultant on the Netflix television series “The Crown,” said Windsor is also a more “photogenic setting” for a state visit.
“Buckingham Palace has got its balcony, it’s got its façade,” he said. But “inside it’s very dreary and it’s currently being renovated, which is one reason why Mr. Trump will not be staying there. Windsor is a proper castle.”


FBI Director Kash Patel clashes with skeptical Democrats at contentious Senate hearing

FBI Director Kash Patel clashes with skeptical Democrats at contentious Senate hearing
Updated 17 September 2025

FBI Director Kash Patel clashes with skeptical Democrats at contentious Senate hearing

FBI Director Kash Patel clashes with skeptical Democrats at contentious Senate hearing

WASHINGTON: FBI Director Kash Patel clashed with skeptical Democrats at a contentious Senate oversight hearing Tuesday, defending his record amid criticism that he has politicized the nation’s premier federal law enforcement agency and pursued retribution against perceived adversaries of President Donald Trump.
The appearance Tuesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee represented the first oversight hearing of Patel’s young but tumultuous tenure and provided a high-stakes platform for him to try to demonstrate that he is the right person for the job at a time of internal upheaval and mounting concerns about political violence inside the United States, a threat laid bare by last week’s killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk at a college campus in Utah.
The hearing broke along starkly partisan lines, with Republicans rallying support for Patel even as Democrats said he had debased the integrity of the nation’s premier federal law enforcement agency. Patel, for his part, accused Democrats of grandstanding for cameras and looking to score political points in a series of testy shouting matches that punctuated more sedate testimony about the criminal and national security threats facing the US
“You are the biggest fraud to ever sit in the United States Senate, you are a disgrace to this institution and you are an utter coward,” Patel told Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff of California, raising his voice during one particularly combative interaction.
“You can make an Internet troll the FBI director, but he will always be an Internet troll,” Schiff shot back as Patel continued to shout over him.
Patel sought to keep the focus on what he said was a series of accomplishments in fighting violent crime, protecting children from abuse and disrupting the flow of fentanyl. He similarly touted the FBI’s work in arresting within 33 hours the man suspected in Kirk’s assassination, but also faced questions over confusion he caused soon after the killing when he posted on social media that “the subject” was in custody.
That person was later released after investigators determined he had no connection. Patel said he had been trying to be transparent with the public and didn’t consider the post a mistake, but acknowledged he could have been clearer.
“Could I have been more careful in my verbiage and included ‘a’ subject instead of subject? Sure,” Patel said.
Questions about FBI firings
Democrats repeatedly tried to steer the hearing back to the turmoil inside the FBI, including a purge of experienced agents and supervisors that they said was a troubling about-face from his confirmation hearing pledge in January that he would not look “backwards” or seek retaliation as director.
“I’m not going to mince words: You lied to us,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal, a Connecticut Democrat.
Patel angrily disputed that suggestion, and said that though he could not discuss the specifics of those firings due to the litigation, “Anyone that is terminated at the FBI, as I’ve said before, is done so because they failed to meet the standards and uphold their loyalty and oath to the Constitution.”
Five agents and top-level executives were known to have been summarily fired last month in a wave of ousters that current and former officials say has contributed to declining morale.
One of those, Steve Jensen, helped oversee investigations into the Jan. 6, 2021 riot at the US Capitol. Another, Brian Driscoll, served as acting director in the early days of the Trump administration and resisted Justice Department demands to supply the names of agents who investigated Jan. 6. A third, Chris Meyer, was incorrectly rumored on social media to have participated in the investigation into Trump’s retention of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida.
A lawsuit filed last week by three of the fired agents alleged that Patel understood that the firings were “likely illegal” but had to carry them out because he was ordered to do so from the White House. Patel on Tuesday denied taking orders from the White House on whom to fire.
“I believe that you’re failing as a leader and that your failure does have serious implications for the safety and security of Americans and our families,” said Democratic Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey. “We’re more vulnerable to domestic and foreign attack because of your failures of leadership.”
The accusation prompted an angry response from Patel, who called it a “rant of false information” and rattled off what he said was a series of successes under his watch as the FBI has elevated its focus on illegal immigration, street crime, drugs and human trafficking.
“If the FBI under my seven-month leadership were failing this administration and this country, why do we have 23,000 violent felons arrested this year alone?” Patel asked. “Why is it that we have seized 6,000 weapons? Why have we found 1,500 child predators and arrested them?”
Patel had a similarly tense exchange with Sen. Dick Durbin, the top Democrat on the committee, after Durbin challenged him on an unsubstantiated theory advanced by Deputy Director Dan Bongino that the placement of pipe bombs in Washington ahead of the Capitol riot was an inside job.
“I find it disgusting that everyone and anyone would jettison our 31 years of combined experience that is now at the helm of the FBI, delivering historic results at a historic speed for the American people,” Patel said.
Retaliation denied
Republicans eagerly came to Patel’s defense, with Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the committee chairman, praising the director for having “begun the important work of returning the FBI to its law enforcement mission.”
“It’s well understood that your predecessor left you an FBI infected with politics,” Grassley stated.
The hearing unfolded against the backdrop of the Kirk killing and on the same day that the suspected shooter, 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, was charged in Utah with aggravated murder. Patel said the FBI was continuing to investigate the suspect, who authorities said ascribed to a ” leftist ideology, ” with investigators “running out every lead related to any allegation of broader violence.”
The FBI director was also challenged on whether he was pursuing retaliation against perceived Trump foes, including through a fresh inquiry the bureau has undertaken related to the long-concluded FBI investigation into potential ties between Russia and Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse estimated that Patel had already taken some sort of adverse action against 20 of the 60 or so people who were singled out in what the Rhode Island Democrat described as an “enemies list” in a 2023 book Patel authored called “Government Gangsters: The Deep State, the Truth and the Battle for Our Democracy.”
The Justice Department, for instance, appeared to confirm in an unusual statement in July that it was investigating former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan, both pivotal players in the Russia saga.
“That is an entirely inaccurate presupposition,” Patel said. “I do not have an enemies list.”


Trump administration sued over actions against University of California

Trump administration sued over actions against University of California
Updated 17 September 2025

Trump administration sued over actions against University of California

Trump administration sued over actions against University of California
  • Protesters, including some Jewish groups, have said the government is wrongly equating their criticism of Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories with antisemitism, and their advocacy for Palestinian rights with support for extremism

WASHINGTON: Labor unions, faculty and students in the University of California education system sued President Donald Trump’s administration on Tuesday over the freezing of federal funds and other actions that they say aim to stifle academic freedom.
The lawsuit, filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, seeks to forbid the government from using financial threats against the system that it said were harmful and unlawful. It also aims to restore funding already suspended.
“(The administration) has attempted to implement a playbook to threaten colleges and universities,” the coalition that filed the lawsuit said. It added that those threats were based on disdain for the institutions’ curriculum, expressive activity on campuses, and initiatives for diversity, equity and inclusion.
The University of California system and the White House had no immediate comment on the lawsuit.

HIGHLIGHTS

• Trump has targeted universities with threats of funding freezes

• Critics say Trump is using probes and funding threats to strong-arm universities

• University of California says it faces ‘one of the gravest threats’ in its history

The government has launched probes into universities’ handling of alleged antisemitism during student protests against Israel’s assault on Gaza, and has frozen funds over that and other issues, including climate initiatives and DEI programs.
Civil rights advocates say the Trump administration is attempting to make universities more aligned with his political agenda, while critics also see such attempts as threatening free speech and academic freedom.
The University of California operates one of the largest higher-education systems in the country, with 10 main campuses and nearly 300,000 students, as well as 265,000 faculty and staff.
The Trump administration had proposed to settle its probe into the University of California, Los Angeles — part of the university system — through a $1 billion payment from the institution. Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom called that an extortion attempt.
UCLA said in August the government froze $584 million in funding before a judge ordered the Trump administration to restore some of that money. The University of California, Berkeley, another campus in the system, said on Friday it provided information on 160 faculty members and students to the government as part of an investigation.
University of California President James Milliken said on Monday the institution was facing one of the gravest threats in its history due to the federal government’s actions, noting that it receives more than $17 billion each year in federal support.
The Trump administration has faced some legal roadblocks in its funding freeze attempts. A federal judge ruled earlier this month that it had unlawfully terminated more than $2 billion in grants for Harvard University.
The government alleges universities allowed antisemitism during campus protests. Protesters, including some Jewish groups, have said the government is wrongly equating their criticism of Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories with antisemitism, and their advocacy for Palestinian rights with support for extremism.
Human rights advocates have noted a rise in antisemitism, anti-Arab bias and Islamophobia due to conflict in the Middle East, although the Trump administration has not announced probes into Islamophobia.
The administration has settled its investigations with Columbia and Brown universities. 

 


Israel’s new ground offensive in Gaza City ‘horrific,’ Canada says

Israel’s new ground offensive in Gaza City ‘horrific,’ Canada says
Updated 17 September 2025

Israel’s new ground offensive in Gaza City ‘horrific,’ Canada says

Israel’s new ground offensive in Gaza City ‘horrific,’ Canada says
  • “The Government of Israel must adhere to international law”

OTTAWA: Canada’s foreign ministry on Tuesday called Israel’s new ground offensive in Gaza City “horrific.”
“It worsens the humanitarian crisis and jeopardizes the release of the hostages,” the foreign ministry said in a post on X. “The Government of Israel must adhere to international law.”