TikTok is restoring service in US, thanks Trump

TikTok is restoring service in US, thanks Trump
The logo for TikTok is displayed on a mobile phone, in Denver, United States, on January 17, 2025. (AP/File)
Short Url
Updated 19 January 2025

TikTok is restoring service in US, thanks Trump

TikTok is restoring service in US, thanks Trump
  • TikTok stopped working for US users late Saturday before law shutting it down on national security grounds took effect
  • US officials had warned that under Chinese parent company ByteDance, there was a risk of Americans’ data being misused

WASHINGTON: TikTok said on Sunday it was restoring its service after President-elect Donald Trump said he would revive the app’s access in the US when he returns to power on Monday.
The statement came after US users reported being able to access the Chinese-owned service’s website while the far more widely used TikTok app itself began coming back online for some users with just a few basic services.
“In agreement with our service providers, TikTok is in the process of restoring service,” TikTok said in a statement that thanked Trump for “providing the necessary clarity and assurance to our service providers that they will face no penalties (for) providing TikTok to over 170 million Americans and allowing over 7 million small businesses to thrive.”
TikTok stopped working for US users late on Saturday before a law shutting it down on national security grounds took effect on Sunday. US officials had warned that under Chinese parent company ByteDance, there was a risk of Americans’ data being misused.
Trump said he would “extend the period of time before the law’s prohibitions take effect, so that we can make a deal to protect our national security.”
“I would like the United States to have a 50 percent ownership position in a joint venture,” he wrote on Truth Social.
Trump said the executive order would specify there would be no liability for any company that helped keep TikTok from going dark before his order.
Trump had earlier said he would most likely give TikTok a 90-day reprieve from the ban after he takes office, a promise TikTok cited in a notice posted to users on the app.
“A law banning TikTok has been enacted in the US Unfortunately, that means you can’t use TikTok for now. We are fortunate that President Trump has indicated that he will work with us on a solution to reinstate TikTok once he takes office. Please stay tuned,” a message notified users of TikTok, which disappeared from Apple and Google app stores late on Saturday.
Even if temporary, the unprecedented shutdown of TikTok is set to have a wide-ranging impact on US-China relations, US politics, the social media marketplace and millions of Americans who depend on the app economically and culturally.
Trump saving TikTok represents a reversal in stance from his first term in office. In 2020, he aimed to ban the short-video app over concerns the company was sharing Americans’ personal info with the Chinese government. More recently, Trump has said he has “a warm spot in my heart for TikTok,” crediting the app with helping him win over young voters in the 2024 election.
In August 2020, Trump signed an executive order giving ByteDance 90 days to sell TikTok but then blessed a deal structured as a partnership rather than a divestment that would have included both Oracle and Walmart taking stakes in the new company.
Not everyone in Trump’s Republican Party agreed with efforts to get around the law and “Save TikTok.”
Republican senators Tom Cotton and Pete Ricketts said in a joint statement: “Now that the law has taken effect, there is no legal basis for any kind of ‘extension’ of its effective date. For TikTok to come back online in the future, ByteDance must agree to a sale that satisfies the law’s qualified-divestiture requirements by severing all ties between TikTok and Communist China.”
The US has never banned a major social media platform. The law passed overwhelmingly by Congress gives the incoming Trump administration sweeping authority to ban or seek the sale of other Chinese-owned apps.
Other apps owned by ByteDance, including video editing app CapCut and lifestyle social app Lemon8, were also offline and unavailable in US app stores as of late Saturday.
Apple and Google did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
MOVE TO ALTERNATIVES
Under the law passed last year and upheld on Friday by a unanimous US Supreme Court, the platform had until Sunday to cut ties with its China-based parent or shut down its US operation to resolve concerns it poses a threat to national security.
The Chinese Embassy in Washington on Friday accused the US of using unfair state power to suppress TikTok. “China will take all necessary measures to resolutely safeguard its legitimate rights and interests,” a spokesperson said.
Uncertainty over the app’s future had sent users — mostly younger people — scrambling to alternatives including China-based RedNote. Rivals Meta and Snap have seen their share prices rise this month ahead of the ban, as investors bet on an influx of users and advertising dollars.
‘HAIR ON FIRE’ MOMENT
Web searches for “VPN” spiked in the minutes after US users lost access to TikTok, according to Google Trends.
Users on Instagram fretted about whether they would still receive merchandise they had bought on TikTok Shop, the video platform’s e-commerce arm.
Marketing firms reliant on TikTok have rushed to prepare contingency plans in what one executive described as a “hair on fire” moment after months of conventional wisdom saying that a solution would materialize to keep the app running.
TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew plans to attend the US presidential inauguration and attend a rally with Trump on Sunday, a source told Reuters.
Suitors including former Los Angeles Dodgers owner Frank McCourt have expressed interest in the fast-growing business that analysts estimate could be worth as much as $50 billion. Media reports say Beijing has also held talks about selling TikTok’s US operations to billionaire and Trump ally Elon Musk, though the company has denied that.
US search engine startup Perplexity AI submitted a bid on Saturday to ByteDance for Perplexity to merge with TikTok US, a source familiar with the company’s plans told Reuters. Perplexity would merge with TikTok US and create a new entity by combining the merged company with other partners, the person added.
Privately held ByteDance is about 60 percent owned by institutional investors such as BlackRock and General Atlantic, while its founders and employees own 20 percent each. It has more than 7,000 employees in the US.


Japan opposes Israel plan to take control of Gaza City

Japan opposes Israel plan to take control of Gaza City
Updated 09 August 2025

Japan opposes Israel plan to take control of Gaza City

Japan opposes Israel plan to take control of Gaza City
  • “Japan once again urges all parties to return to negotiations,” Minister Iwaya said
  • “Improving the catastrophic humanitarian situation in Gaza is an urgent priority”

TOKYO: Japan opposes Israel’s plan to take control of Gaza City as it undermines the realization of a two-state solution, Foreign Minister Iwaya Takeshi stated.

Japan is strongly concerned that this decision will further exacerbate the already dire humanitarian situation in Gaza.

“Japan once again urges all parties to return to negotiations and to work in good faith toward a ceasefire and the release of hostages,” Minister Iwaya said in an official statement issued by the Ministry.

“Improving the catastrophic humanitarian situation in Gaza is an urgent priority. Japan calls on Israel to take substantive measures to end the serious humanitarian crisis, including starvation, and reiterates our strong demand for its full compliance with international law, including international humanitarian law,” the statement added.

Japan has consistently supported a two-state solution, whereby Israel and a future independent Palestinian state live side by side in peace and security, through confidence building and negotiations between the parties.

Japan remains committed to continuing to work for its realization, according to the statement.


Philippines’ Marcos moves to address online gambling crisis amid calls for ban 

Philippines’ Marcos moves to address online gambling crisis amid calls for ban 
Updated 09 August 2025

Philippines’ Marcos moves to address online gambling crisis amid calls for ban 

Philippines’ Marcos moves to address online gambling crisis amid calls for ban 
  • Government has been raking in significant revenue from gaming sites
  • Filipino lawmakers divided between tighter regulation and outright ban

MANILA: Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. will examine policy options to address the online gambling crisis gripping the nation, his office said on Saturday, as calls mount for the government to enact tighter regulations, or ban internet betting completely.

Concerns are growing over the rising number of Filipinos battling addiction to online gambling, which has become more accessible through social media and e-wallet platforms. 

Marcos is planning to convene a conference of stakeholders to help develop a policy to tackle the crisis, the Presidential Communications Office said in a statement issued on Saturday. 

“The president underscored the need to carefully examine policy options, saying an outright ban on online gambling is not (necessarily the) solution,” the statement read.  

Marcos recently told a media gathering that “a ban will not take care of the problem,” adding that his administration seeks to identify its root cause. 

“We really have this tendency sometimes, when there’s a problem, we just ban it. It’s not necessarily the solution,” Marcos said, according to a transcript supplied by his office. “Maybe it is. Maybe after all the discussions, we’ll conclude that a ban is necessary — then we’ll implement a ban. But let’s study it properly. Let’s not jump into it impulsively. We have to be measured in our responses. If it comes down to a ban, then we will ban. But if there are better solutions than a ban, we will take those on.”

Online gambling has been called a “silent epidemic” in the Philippines, amid a surge in cases that have sometimes reportedly torn families apart, depleted savings and pushed students into financial ruin. 

While there is no official data on how many Filipinos are addicted to online gambling, a 2023 survey by Capstone-Intel found that 64 percent of the nation’s 117 million-strong population had tried online betting. More than 80 gaming platforms run by local operators are legally registered with the government, and the revenue from e-games has also become a key source of government revenue. 

In the first half of 2025, the government’s gaming regulator — the Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation — recorded a gross gaming revenue of 114.83 billion pesos, (around $2 billion) from the e-gaming sector alone, accounting for more than 50 percent of the government’s total gaming revenues over the same period.

Last month, Senator Juan Miguel Zubiri filed a bill seeking to ban all forms of online gambling in the country, saying in a statement issued on July 4 that the practice was “quietly harming” Filipinos, especially minors and the most vulnerable. 

The Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines has also called on the government to “declare any type of online gambling illegal.” CBCP president Cardinal Pablo Virgilio David said in a pastoral letter: “This is no longer a simple problem of individuals. It is now a public health crisis in our society, just like drug addiction, alcoholism and other types of addiction. It destroys not only the individual but also their families.”

Others, like Senator Sherwin Gatchalian, are pushing for tighter regulations — including raising the minimum age of players from 18 to 21 and prohibiting e-wallets from providing direct links to online gambling platforms — rather than an outright ban. 

DigiPlus Interactive, which operates gaming sites BingoPlus, ArenaPlus and GameZone, has said that banning licensed platforms “does not eliminate demand for online gaming, but merely shifts users to unregulated black markets,” and that it supports tighter regulation. 

 


UN plastic pollution treaty talks progress not ‘sufficient’: chair

UN plastic pollution treaty talks progress not ‘sufficient’: chair
Updated 09 August 2025

UN plastic pollution treaty talks progress not ‘sufficient’: chair

UN plastic pollution treaty talks progress not ‘sufficient’: chair
  • “Progress made has not been sufficient,” Ecuadoran diplomat Luis Vayas Valdivieso said
  • “We have arrived at a critical stage where a real push to achieve our common goal is needed“

GENEVA: Talks at the United Nations on forging a landmark treaty to combat the scourge of plastic pollution have made insufficient progress, the negotiations chair warned Saturday in a frank mid-way assessment.

The negotiations, which opened on Tuesday, have four days left to find consensus on a legally-binding instrument that would tackle the growing problem choking the environment.

“Progress made has not been sufficient,” Ecuadoran diplomat Luis Vayas Valdivieso told delegates in a blunt summary as all 184 country delegations gathered in the main assembly hall.

“We have arrived at a critical stage where a real push to achieve our common goal is needed,” ahead of the Thursday deadline.

“August 14 is not just a deadline for our work: it is a date by which we must deliver.”

The draft text as it stands, released publicly ahead of Saturday’s session, has now ballooned from 22 to 35 pages, with the number of brackets in the text going up from 371 to almost 1,500.

It does not specify which countries or groups inserted the proposed text — meaning the changes could have majority support or be backed by one country alone.

“Some articles still have unresolved issues and show little progress toward reaching a common understanding,” Valdivieso said.

“We have had two and a half years of opportunities for delegations to make proposals,” he said, adding: “there is no more time” for such interventions.

Countries have reconvened at the UN in Geneva to try and find common ground after the failure of what was supposed to be the fifth and final round of talks in Busan, South Korea, which closed in December without agreement.


At least 11 dead in collision involving bus and truck in Brazil

At least 11 dead in collision involving bus and truck in Brazil
Updated 09 August 2025

At least 11 dead in collision involving bus and truck in Brazil

At least 11 dead in collision involving bus and truck in Brazil
  • Among the over 40 people injured, 12 were in critical condition

SAO PAULO: At least 11 people died, while over 40 were injured, in a crash between a bus and a truck in Brazil’s center-western state of Mato Grosso late Friday, news outlet G1 reported on Saturday, citing local authorities and the firm that runs the toll road.
Among the over 40 people injured, 12 were in critical condition, G1 reported.


UK arrests 200 backing banned Palestine Action group

UK arrests 200 backing banned Palestine Action group
Updated 09 August 2025

UK arrests 200 backing banned Palestine Action group

UK arrests 200 backing banned Palestine Action group
  • Officers made arrests after crowds, waving placards expressing support for the group, gathered in Parliament Square
  • The government banned Palestine Action under anti-terrorism legislation after some of its members broke into a Royal Air Force base

LONDON: Police in London arrested at least 200 people Saturday for supporting Palestine Action at the latest and largest protest backing the group since the government banned it last month under anti-terror laws.
The UK capital’s Metropolitan Police said it expected to make further arrests at the demonstration in Parliament Square, as organizers claimed only a “fraction” of the hundreds who turned out had been detained.
“That claim simply isn’t true,” the Met said in a statement, noting some of those there were onlookers or not visibly supporting Palestine Action.
“We are confident that anyone who came to Parliament Square today to hold a placard expressing support for Palestine Action was either arrested or is in the process of being arrested.”
The government banned the group days after several of its activists broke into an air force base in southern England, causing an estimated £7 million ($9.3 million) of damage to two aircraft.
Britain’s interior ministry reiterated ahead of Saturday’s protests that its members were also suspected of other “serious attacks” that involved “violence, significant injuries and extensive criminal damage.”
But critics, including the United Nations and NGOs like Amnesty International and Greenpeace, have lambasted the move as legal overreach and a threat to free speech.
A group called Defend our Juries, which organized Saturday’s protests and previous demonstrations against the ban, said “unprecedented numbers” had risked “arrest and possible imprisonment” to “defend this country’s ancient liberties.”
“We will keep going. Our numbers are already growing for the next wave of action in September,” it added.
Attendees began massing near parliament at lunchtime bearing signs saying “oppose genocide, support Palestine Action” and other slogans, and waving Palestinian flags.
Psychotherapist Craig Bell, 39, was among those holding a placard.
He branded the ban “absolutely ridiculous.”
“When you compare Palestine Action with an actual terrorist group who are killing civilians and taking lives, it’s just a joke that they’re being prescribed a terrorist group,” he told AFP.
As police moved in on the demonstrators, they applauded those being arrested and shouted “shame on you” at officers.
“Let them arrest us all,” said Richard Bull, 42, a wheelchair-user in attendance.
“This government has gone too far. I have nothing to feel ashamed of.”
London’s Met Police and other UK forces have made scores of similar arrests on previous weekends since the government outlawed Palestine Action on July 5.
Anyone expressing support for a proscribed group risks arrest under UK anti-terror laws.
Police announced this week that the first three people had been charged in the English and Welsh criminal justice system with supporting Palestine Action following their arrests at a July 5 demo.
Being a member or supporting the group is now a criminal offense punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
Seven people have so far been charged in Scotland, which has a separate legal system.
Amnesty International UK Chief Executive Sacha Deshmukh wrote to Met Police chief Mark Rowley this week urging restraint be exercised when policing people holding placards expressing support for Palestine Action.
The NGO has argued arrests of such people are in breach of international human rights law.
A UK court challenge against the decision to proscribe Palestine Action will be heard later this year.