London’s pro-Palestine demo set for standoff as police-approved route rejected

 Tensions are rising ahead of a planned pro-Palestine demonstration in London after the Palestine Solidarity Campaign and its coalition partners vowed to reject the Metropolitan Police’s proposed new route for the march. (Screenshot/PSC)
Tensions are rising ahead of a planned pro-Palestine demonstration in London after the Palestine Solidarity Campaign and its coalition partners vowed to reject the Metropolitan Police’s proposed new route for the march. (Screenshot/PSC)
Short Url
Updated 18 January 2025

London’s pro-Palestine demo set for standoff as police-approved route rejected

London’s pro-Palestine demo set for standoff as police-approved route rejected
  • Organizers say they will assemble at Whitehall on Saturday to protest the police ban on their original demonstration route
  • Police ban on the original gathering at the BBC headquarters, citing a potential threat to the Jewish community, has sparked backlash

LONDON: Tensions are rising ahead of a planned pro-Palestine demonstration in London after the Palestine Solidarity Campaign and its coalition partners vowed to reject the Metropolitan Police’s proposed new route for the march.

Organizers have announced they will gather at Whitehall on Saturday to protest the police decision instead.

PSC, alongside Stop the War, the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, the Muslim Association of Britain, Friends of Al-Aqsa, and the Palestine Forum in Britain, made the announcement on Friday following protracted negotiations with police.

The Met had last week banned the original march, which was scheduled to start at the BBC’s headquarters, citing its proximity to a synagogue and potential security concerns.

“Despite intensive efforts to reach a compromise with the Met, it has so far refused to accept or offer a reasonable solution,” said the coalition in a statement. “However, we will assemble on Whitehall on Saturday at noon. We reiterate our call on the police to lift their repressive conditions and allow us to march. If they continue to refuse to do so and prevent us from marching, we will be rallying in Whitehall to protest.”

The controversy erupted after the police revoked the pre-approved march route, which had been announced in November, over claims it could pose a threat to the Jewish community.

Organizers described the decision as “discriminatory” and accused the authorities of bowing to political pressure from pro-Israeli groups.

“The Met has seemingly accepted and acted upon the arguments of pro-Israel groups that seek to delegitimise our protest as antisemitic or a threat to Jewish people,” said PSC Director Ben Jamal. “This is a gross distortion of the truth. There is not a single instance of our marches posing any threat to synagogues or Jewish individuals. Indeed, we count a large, self-organised Jewish bloc as some of our most indefatigable supporters.”

Organizers also said they offered to reroute the march to avoid clashing with Shabbat services at the synagogue, but claimed the police refused their proposals.

“Over the past week the Met Police have imposed a series of repressive conditions to prevent us marching and have even attempted to impose a route that the Board of Deputies of British Jews announced they had suggested to the police. This has been firmly rejected by the Palestine Coalition — it is an affront that pro-Israel groups can attempt to decide where we can or cannot march,” read the group’s statement.

On Friday, the coalition said that while they plan to defy the ban, they would gather at Whitehall instead of the BBC’s Portland Place headquarters. They also claimed the police had backed away from plans to arrest protesters assembling outside Russell Square, which the Met had suggested as a designated protest zone.

The police’s decision has drawn widespread criticism, with several cultural figures and members of the Jewish community urging the authorities to reverse the ban.

“The Met’s approach has been confrontational, heavy-handed and intransigent. Their use of powers under the Public Order Act has been based on flimsy grounds and arbitrarily applied, which erodes the right of peaceful protest that is fundamental in a democracy,” Jamal said. “Despite this, our protest tomorrow will go ahead — we call on all those who seek justice for Palestine to stand with us.”


Israeli prisons treated like another war front after Oct. 7, says freed Palestinian author

Israeli prisons treated like another war front after Oct. 7, says freed Palestinian author
Updated 04 November 2025

Israeli prisons treated like another war front after Oct. 7, says freed Palestinian author

Israeli prisons treated like another war front after Oct. 7, says freed Palestinian author
  • Brutality rose significantly in last 2 years, says Nasser Abu Srour

DUBAI: Palestinian author Nasser Abu Srour, who was released last month after 32 years in captivity, said torture and brutality inside Israeli prisons had intensified in the past two years, turning detention centers into “another front” of the conflict in Gaza.

Abu Srour was among more than 150 Palestinians serving life sentences who were freed under a US-brokered Gaza ceasefire deal. He was exiled to Egypt, where he was placed in a five-star hotel in Cairo — a jarring contrast, he said, to the conditions he endured during imprisonment.

After Oct. 7, 2023, beatings and deprivation of food and warmth increased in prisons. Even the guards’ uniforms were replaced with ones bearing tags that read “fighters” or “warriors,” he said.

Abu Srour added: “They started acting like they were in a war, and this was another front, and they started beating, torturing, killing like warriors.”

He described how areas without security cameras became “places for brutality,” where guards would tie prisoners’ hands behind their heads, throw them to the ground, and trample on them.

“All cultural life in the prison ended in the last two years,” he said, as all reading and writing materials were confiscated. Daily rations were minimal, and prisoners were only given one set of thin clothes.

He recalled that prisoners were always hungry, and because their bodies were weak they “couldn’t handle even a medium temperature.”

He added: “Whenever someone was leaving prison, everyone would try to become their friends so they would get their T-shirt or underwear, or anything.”

Abu Srour took part in the First Intifada, the Palestinian uprising between 1987 and 1993, when he was charged as an accomplice in the death of an Israeli Shin Bet security officer.

He was sentenced to life in prison without parole in 1993, based on a confession extracted under torture.

In his more than three decades behind bars, Abu Srour completed a bachelor’s and a master’s degree in political science and turned to writing. He began composing poetry and other works that were smuggled out of prison.

His memoir “The Tale of a Wall: Reflections on Hope and Freedom,” dictated to a relative through phone calls over two years, has been translated into seven languages and is a finalist for the Arab Literature Prize.

After years of torture and unheeded appeals, Abu Srour struggled to believe until the final moment that his name was on the list of prisoners to be released after the Oct. 10 ceasefire.

He said: “They were calling out cell numbers, and I was sitting on my bed in room number six feeling like I am not part of it.

“There were so many times when I should have been part of it over all those years. But the whole thing is so huge and so painful, I didn’t want to interact. It was a defense mechanism.”

The 24 hours before his release were particularly painful, as prisoners were subjected to an intense final round of beatings.

During the 48-hour transfer that followed, prisoners were not allowed to open the curtains on the buses until they reached Egypt.

It was only then that Abu Srour saw the sky for the first time outside prison walls.