BBC editor ‘considering’ legal action against Owen Jones over Israeli bias claims

The controversy has coincided with the police banning a planned pro-Palestinian march near the BBC headquarters in London earlier this month. (AFP/File)
The controversy has coincided with the police banning a planned pro-Palestinian march near the BBC headquarters in London earlier this month. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 13 January 2025

BBC editor ‘considering’ legal action against Owen Jones over Israeli bias claims

BBC editor ‘considering’ legal action against Owen Jones over Israeli bias claims
  • Jones published a report accusing Raffi Berg and the BBC of ‘watering down everything that’s too critical of Israel’
  • Investigation sparked wave of death threats against Berg via social media and email

LONDON: BBC Middle East online editor Raffi Berg is reportedly considering legal action against British journalist Owen Jones, following accusations in an investigative article that claimed Berg exhibited bias in favor of Israel.

The allegations have allegedly triggered a wave of online abuse and threats directed at the editor.

The 9,000-word article, titled “The BBC’s Civil War Over Gaza,” was published earlier in December by Drop Site, an investigative news platform.

In the report, Jones accused the BBC and its Middle East editor of favoring Israeli narratives in their coverage of the Gaza conflict and alleged that internal objections raised by staff were repeatedly dismissed.

According to The Times, the report has led to “a torrent of antisemitic abuse” against Berg, which BBC sources described as “the worst case of targeted abuse” they had seen at the organization.

Police are now investigating death threats made against Berg via social media and email.

Mark Lewis, a partner at the legal firm Patron Law, confirmed that he had been instructed to explore legal action on behalf of Berg.

In the article, Jones cited interviews with 13 current and former BBC staffers, who alleged that Berg “sets the tone for the BBC’s digital output on Israel and Palestine.”

One former journalist was quoted as saying: “This guy’s (Berg’s) entire job is to water down everything that’s too critical of Israel.”

Jones also claimed that internal complaints about the network’s Gaza coverage were “brushed aside” and that Berg had been given months to respond to the allegations but had not done so.

The BBC rejected the allegations, describing Berg’s role as “fundamentally mis-described.” It also denied claims that the organization had taken a lenient stance toward Israel during its coverage of the conflict in Gaza, where Israel’s war has now lasted 15 months.

The investigation has sparked significant public debate about the BBC’s impartiality in its reporting on the Gaza conflict.

While critics of the network, including Jones, have accused it of pro-Israel bias, others argue that the backlash against the BBC has fueled antisemitic rhetoric.

Jake Wallis Simons, writing in The Telegraph, criticized Jones and his supporters: “Brave Owen Jones has revealed that the corporation is actually the broadcasting equivalent of Theodor Herzl, Ze’ev Jabotinsky and Moshe Dayan rolled into one. Phew! How typical of those cunning Jews to make everyone believe the opposite.”

A petition calling for Berg’s suspension has garnered 8,000 signatures, while another demands the resignation of Deborah Turness, chief executive of BBC News.

The controversy has coincided with the police banning a planned pro-Palestinian march near the BBC headquarters in London earlier this month.

The protest, organized by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC), cited Jones’s article in its criticism of the BBC.

In a statement, the PSC rejected any implication that its demonstrations posed a threat to Jewish communities: “The Palestine coalition rejects the implication that our marches are somehow hostile to or a threat to Jewish people.”


BBC apologizes to Trump over speech edit but rejects defamation claim

BBC apologizes to Trump over speech edit but rejects defamation claim
Updated 14 November 2025

BBC apologizes to Trump over speech edit but rejects defamation claim

BBC apologizes to Trump over speech edit but rejects defamation claim
  • Trump team demanded compensation, apology
  • Broadcaster says it has no plans to rebroadcast documentary

LONDON: The British Broadcasting Corporation sent a personal apology to US President Donald Trump on Thursday but said there was no legal basis for him to sue the public broadcaster over a documentary his lawyers called defamatory.
The documentary, which aired on the BBC’s “Panorama” news program just before the US presidential election in 2024, spliced together three parts of Trump’s speech on January 6, 2021, when his supporters stormed the Capitol. The edit created the impression he had called for violence.
“While the BBC sincerely regrets the manner in which the video clip was edited, we strongly disagree there is a basis for a defamation claim,” the broadcaster said in a statement.
Lawyers for the US president threatened on Sunday to sue the BBC for damages of up to $1 billion unless it withdrew the documentary, apologized to the president and compensated him for “financial and reputational harm.”

No plans to rebroadcast
By asserting that Trump’s defamation case lacks merit, the BBC effectively signaled that it believes his claim for financial damages is equally untenable. But the broadcaster did not directly address Trump’s financial demand.
In its statement, the BBC said Chair Samir Shah on Thursday “sent a personal letter to the White House making clear that he and the corporation were sorry for the edit.” Shah earlier in the week apologized to a British parliamentary oversight committee and said the edit was “an error of judgment.”
British culture minister Lisa Nandy said on Friday it was right that the BBC had apologized to Trump.
“They’ve rightly accepted that they didn’t meet the highest standards and that’s the basis on which the chairman of the board has offered this apology to the President of the United States,” she told Times Radio. In its statement on Thursday, the BBC added that it has no plans to rebroadcast the documentary on any of its platforms.
Earlier on Thursday, the BBC said it was looking into fresh allegations, published in The Telegraph newspaper, over the editing by another of its programs, “Newsnight,” of the same speech.
The BBC has been thrown into its biggest crisis in decades after two senior executives resigned amid allegations of bias, including about the edit of Trump’s speech. The claims came to light because of a leaked report by a BBC standards official.
Founded in 1922 and funded largely by a license fee paid by TV-watching Britons, the BBC is without a permanent leader as the government weighs how it should be funded in the future.
It is a vital instrument of Britain’s “soft power” globally. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said on Wednesday that he believed in a “strong and independent” BBC.