Ireland joins ICJ genocide case against Israel

Ireland joins ICJ genocide case against Israel
The UN's top court handed down its view, on July 19, 2024, declaring "illegal" Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories since 1967, amid growing international pressure over the war in Gaza (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 08 January 2025

Ireland joins ICJ genocide case against Israel

Ireland joins ICJ genocide case against Israel
  • Deputy PM has accused Israel of ‘collective punishment of the Palestinian people’
  • South Africa brought case before UN’s top court in December 2023

LONDON: Ireland has joined the South African genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice, the New York Times reported.

The filing comes months after Ireland said it would intervene in the case. South Africa brought its case to the UN’s highest judicial body in December 2023, accusing Israel of committing genocide in Gaza.

A court statement on Tuesday said: “Ireland, invoking Article 63 of the Statute of the Court, filed in the Registry of the Court a declaration of intervention in the case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip.”

A first ruling in January last year saw the ICJ order Israel to restrain its attacks in Gaza. In May, the court ordered Israel to immediately cease its offensive in Rafah.

A spokesperson for the Irish Foreign Ministry said on Tuesday: “It is important for the court, in its consideration of any multilateral convention, to understand how other parties to that convention interpret and apply it.”

Micheal Martin, Ireland’s deputy prime minister and foreign minister, last month said: “There has been a collective punishment of the Palestinian people through the intent and impact of military actions of Israel in Gaza, leaving 44,000 dead and millions of civilians displaced.”

Ireland would request the court to broaden its interpretation of genocide by a state, he said, adding: “We are concerned that a very narrow interpretation of what constitutes genocide leads to a culture of impunity in which the protection of civilians is minimized.”

Experts believe that the court will not rule on the genocide charge for several years. Last month, Israel said it was closing its embassy in Dublin, citing “the extreme anti-Israel policies of the Irish government.”


Australia’s top court blocks Russia from building new Canberra embassy

Australia’s top court blocks Russia from building new Canberra embassy
Updated 14 sec ago

Australia’s top court blocks Russia from building new Canberra embassy

Australia’s top court blocks Russia from building new Canberra embassy
  • Russia owned a lease to a plot of land that is about 300 meters from Parliament House in Canberra
  • The Russian government secured a 99-year lease for diplomatic use of the site in 2008

SYDNEY: Australia’s highest court on Wednesday blocked Russia from building a new embassy in the nation’s capital, unanimously upholding a law that canceled its lease on national security grounds.

Russia owned a lease to a plot of land that is about 300 meters (984 feet) from Parliament House in Canberra and intended to build a new embassy building there to replace an older building elsewhere in the capital.

But in 2023, the Australian government introduced a law to cancel the lease after receiving “very clear security advice as to the risk presented by a new Russian presence so close to Parliament House,” Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said at the time.

Russia challenged the law in front of the High Court of Australia, arguing parliament was not authorized under the constitution to pass such a law.

On Wednesday, the court ruled unanimously that the Home Affairs Act 2023 validly invoked parliament’s constitutional power to seize land on “just terms,” though it said Moscow was entitled to compensation.

The Russian government secured a 99-year lease for diplomatic use of the site in 2008, paying A$2.75 million ($1.79 million).

Construction on the new site kicked off but was never completed. Russia’s existing embassy is in Griffith, a suburb.

Australia’s government argued that the lease’s cancelation was supported by parliament’s power to make laws for the nation’s territories, including the Australian Capital Territory, where Canberra is located.

It added that it did not need to pay Russia “just terms” because the constitution only required compensation in cases where property was acquired for a specific use case, which it said did not exist in this instance.

It also argued that compensation should not extend to paying a foreign state as it would be “incongruous” with the Home Affairs Act.

The court said the absence of a proposed use or application for the land was “irrelevant” and compensation “is what the constitution requires.”

Australian Attorney-General Michelle Rowland welcomed the High Court’s decision.

“Australia will always stand up for our values and we will stand up for our national security,” she said in a statement.

“The government will closely consider the next steps in light of the court’s decision.”

The Russian embassy did not immediately respond to a request for comment.