Lebanese army takes control of western sector in country’s south

A Lebanese army soldier stands guard in the southern Lebanese coastal town of Naqura, on the border with Israel on January 7, 2025. (AFP)
A Lebanese army soldier stands guard in the southern Lebanese coastal town of Naqura, on the border with Israel on January 7, 2025. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 07 January 2025

Lebanese army takes control of western sector in country’s south

A Lebanese army soldier stands guard in the southern Lebanese coastal town of Naqura, on the border with Israel on January 7.
  • US and French envoys follow up on presidential dossier ahead of Thursday’s session

BEIRUT: On Tuesday, Lebanese Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri confirmed that Thursday is the scheduled date for the parliamentary session to elect a president, a position that has been vacant for two years, two months, and one week.

Berri’s confirmation coincided with the continued deployment of the Lebanese army in the western sector of southern Lebanon following the withdrawal of Israeli forces that had been there since last October.

It also coincided with US envoy Amos Hochstein, who is in Beirut for the second day, stating that “Israeli forces will withdraw from Lebanon within 60 days,” reflecting, according to a political observer, “an international desire to defuse the tensions of war feared by the Lebanese between the Israeli army and Hezbollah after the 60-day deadline.”

The US Embassy in Lebanon announced on Tuesday that “US Major General Jasper Jeffers, the Chairman of the Cessation of Hostilities Implementation Mechanism, was joined by French Brigadier General Guillaume Ponchin on a visit to the Lebanese Armed Forces headquarters in southwest Lebanon this morning. The headquarters is five kilometers northeast of Naqoura, a town under the control of the Lebanese Armed Forces after the first phase of withdrawal by Israeli forces on January 6th.”

The embassy said that “Generals Jeffers and Ponchin viewed stockpiles of weapons to be destroyed in the coming days, which the LAF seized from unauthorized armed groups.”

On Tuesday, Lebanese army vehicles prepared to continue repositioning in locations previously vacated during the Israeli forces’ incursion, including in Labouneh and Alma Al-Shaab. The army also redeployed at the entrance to the town of Tayr Harfa.

For the first time since the war, fishermen entered the port of Naqoura, accompanied by the Lebanese army, to inspect their boats, some of which had been sunk.

While the Lebanese army prohibited citizens from returning to areas where the army is still conducting surveys, Naqoura Mayor Abbas Awada revealed the extent of systematic destruction in the border area. He stated: “The town of Naqoura is almost completely destroyed. I urge the town’s residents to wait before returning until field inspections are completed due to the fear of unexploded ordnance.”

Lebanese Army Commander Gen. Joseph Aoun informed Hochstein on Monday during a meeting that “the Lebanese military deployment on the borders requires the full withdrawal of Israeli forces.”

He emphasized: “The inability to fully implement the agreement is due to the continued Israeli presence in southern villages.”

After meeting with Lebanese officials, Hochstein stressed that “the US supports the Lebanese army, and southern Lebanon will return to stability and security.”

Hochstein, in the context of addressing the presidential file in Lebanon, emphasized during a meeting with a range of MPs affiliated with various blocs or acting independently that “the United States is a friendly nation to Lebanon and will continue to support it and its army.”

As French envoy Jean-Yves Le Drian joins the ongoing efforts to address the presidential file with his arrival in Beirut on Tuesday, Hochstein emphasized during the parliamentary meeting “the necessity for Lebanon, and implicitly any incoming president, to adhere to the Taif Agreement and the essential agreements and reforms.”

MPs are divided regarding the election of the army commander. Hezbollah MPs insist on supporting their candidate, former Minister Sleiman Frangieh, while the Free Patriotic Movement categorically rejects the candidacy of Aoun.

Discussions and meetings regarding a consensus candidate among the Lebanese political parties are taking place away from the public eye. However, the names currently being circulated do not yet command the majority needed for victory.

MP Bilal Hashimi stated that “the presidency dynamic remains characterized by ambiguity and complexity, despite the notable external activity represented by the arrival of American and French envoys to Lebanon.”

The leader of the Lebanese Forces Party, Samir Geagea, affirmed that his party maintains “a positive relationship with General Joseph Aoun. When Aoun’s name was proposed as a presidential candidate, the Lebanese Forces were the first to regard him as one of the serious contenders and did not impose any veto against his name at any point in time.”

The Grand Mufti of Lebanon, Sheikh Abdul Latif Derian, cautioned against “any obstruction that may prevent the election of a president on Thursday.”

He emphasized that “the ongoing presidential vacancy provides the Israeli enemy with an opportunity to exploit political divisions to undermine the unity and solidarity of the Lebanese people and put the country at risk of collapse.”

The President of Economic Organizations Mohammad Choucair urged lawmakers to complete the presidential election process, emphasizing that “we have no option but the state, as it is the only solution to rescue Lebanon and guide it back to a path of recovery.”

The President of the Economic, Social, and Environmental Council Charles Arbid called upon the members of parliament to “complete the presidential election as it is essential for a functioning state,” emphasizing the need for “a reformist leader to guide the nation and restore Lebanon to a stable country.”


US says it has regional support for Gaza peace resolution and proposed UN stabilization force

US says it has regional support for Gaza peace resolution and proposed UN stabilization force
Updated 06 November 2025

US says it has regional support for Gaza peace resolution and proposed UN stabilization force

US says it has regional support for Gaza peace resolution and proposed UN stabilization force
  • Under the draft proposal, governance of Gaza would be transferred away from Hamas and demilitarization imposed on the group
  • A copy of the draft resolution was circulated Wednesday night for formal consideration by Security Council

NEW YORK CITY: The US mission to the UN on Wednesday said that key regional partners, including , Qatar and the UAE, have thrown their weight behind its draft resolution for Gaza.

The development signals a diplomatic push within the UN Security Council to advance a two-year transitional mandate for the war-torn enclave, and the deployment of an international stabilization force.

During a meeting convened by the US ambassador to the UN, Mike Waltz, the 10 elected, non-permanent members of the council (Algeria, Denmark, Greece, Guyana, Pakistan, Panama, South Korea, Sierra Leone, Slovenia and Somalia), joined by regional states including , Egypt, Qatar, Turkiye and the UAE, expressed support for the Washington-led initiative, a spokesperson for the US mission said.

The draft resolution endorses the creation of a transitional governance body, a so-called “Board of Peace.” Control of Gaza would therefore be transferred out of the hands of Hamas, and demilitarization would be imposed on the group.

The draft resolution also authorizes the deployment of an “International Stabilization Force” in Gaza that would operate under a two-year UN mandate. It would have the authority to use “all necessary measures” to protect civilians, oversee flows of humanitarian aid, secure zones along the borders with Israel and Egypt, demilitarize non-state actors, and train a new Palestinian police force.

A copy of the draft resolution was circulated Wednesday night for formal consideration by all 15 members of the Security Council. 

The regional buy-in to the draft reflects the “historic opportunity” to end decades of bloodshed in the Middle East and transform Gaza into a safer, more prosperous territory, the spokesperson continued, and underlines the intent of the US to translate the resolution into results rather than “endless talk.”

The backing of major regional actors is significant because their participation is widely viewed as a prerequisite for authorization of any multinational stabilization force to operate in Gaza, and gain international legitimacy.

The US spokesperson stressed that no US troops would be deployed in Gaza. Instead, Washington has engaged in talks with states including Indonesia, the UAE, Egypt, Qatar, Turkiye and Azerbaijan about contributing troops to an international stabilization force.

The draft text reportedly stipulates that such a force would operate under a unified command, as agreed by the Board of Peace, Egypt and Israel once status-of-mission agreements are reached.

It further outlines a sequence of events through which the force will stabilize the security situation in Gaza, demilitarize non-state armed groups, decommission weapons, and oversee training and support for the newly vetted Palestinian police force.