TikTok turns to US Supreme Court in last-ditch bid to avert ban

TikTok turns to US Supreme Court in last-ditch bid to avert ban
The TikTok Inc. building is seen in Culver City, Calif., March 17, 2023. (AP/File)
Short Url
Updated 17 December 2024

TikTok turns to US Supreme Court in last-ditch bid to avert ban

TikTok turns to US Supreme Court in last-ditch bid to avert ban
  • Justice Department calls TikTok threat to US security
  • Trump says he has a “warm spot in my heart” for TikTok

WASHINGTON: TikTok made a last-ditch effort on Monday to continue operating in the United States, asking the Supreme Court to temporarily block a law intended to force ByteDance, its China-based parent company, to divest the short-video app by Jan. 19 or face a ban.
TikTok and ByteDance filed an emergency request to the justices for an injunction to halt the looming ban on the social media app used by about 170 million Americans while they appeal a lower court’s ruling that upheld the law. A group of US users of the app filed a similar request on Monday as well.
Congress passed the law in April. The Justice Department has said that as a Chinese company, TikTok poses “a national-security threat of immense depth and scale” because of its access to vast amounts of data on American users, from locations to private messages, and its ability to secretly manipulate content that Americans view on the app.
The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Washington on Dec. 6 rejected TikTok’s arguments that the law violates free speech protections under the US Constitution’s First Amendment.
In their filing to the Supreme Court, TikTok and ByteDance said that “if Americans, duly informed of the alleged risks of ‘covert’ content manipulation, choose to continue viewing content on TikTok with their eyes wide open, the First Amendment entrusts them with making that choice, free from the government’s censorship.”
“And if the D.C. Circuit’s contrary holding stands, then Congress will have free rein to ban any American from speaking simply by identifying some risk that the speech is influenced by a foreign entity,” they added.
The companies said that being shuttered for even one month would cause TikTok to lose about a third of its US users and undermine its ability to attract advertisers and recruit content creators and employee talent.
Calling itself one of the “most important speech platforms” used in the United States, TikTok has said that there is no imminent threat to US national security and that delaying enforcement of the law would allow the Supreme Court to consider the legality of the ban, and the incoming administration of President-elect Donald Trump to evaluate the law as well.
Trump, who unsuccessfully tried to ban TikTok during his first term in 2020, has reversed his stance and promised during the presidential race this year that he would try to save TikTok. Trump takes office on Jan. 20, the day after the TikTok deadline under the law.
The law would “shutter one of America’s most popular speech platforms the day before a presidential inauguration,” the companies said in their filing. “A federal law singling out and banning a speech platform used by half of Americans is extraordinary.”
Asked on Monday at a press conference what he would do to stop a ban on TikTok, Trump said that he has “a warm spot in my heart for TikTok” and that he would “take a look” at the matter.
The companies asked the Supreme Court to issue a decision on its request by Jan. 6 to allow, in the event it is rejected, for the “complex task of shutting down TikTok” in the United States and to coordinate with service providers by the deadline set under the law.
The dispute comes amid growing trade tensions between China and the United States, the world’s two biggest economies.

‘RIGOROUS SCRUTINY’

TikTok has denied that it has or ever would share US user data, accusing US lawmakers of advancing speculative concerns.
TikTok spokesperson Michael Hughes said after the filing that “we are asking the court to do what it has traditionally done in free speech cases: apply the most rigorous scrutiny to speech bans and conclude that it violates the First Amendment.”
In its ruling, the D.C. Circuit wrote, “The First Amendment exists to protect free speech in the United States. Here the government acted solely to protect that freedom from a foreign adversary nation and to limit that adversary’s ability to gather data on people in the United States.”
Without an injunction, the ban on TikTok would make the company far less valuable to ByteDance and its investors, and hurt businesses that depend on TikTok to drive their sales.
The law would bar providing certain services to TikTok and other foreign adversary-controlled apps including offering it through app stores such as Apple and Alphabet’s Google, effectively preventing its continued US use unless ByteDance divests TikTok by the deadline.
A ban could open the door to a future US crackdown on other foreign-owned apps. In 2020, Trump tried to ban WeChat, owned by Chinese company Tencent, but was blocked by the courts.


Kingdom’s Media Bridges initiative explores global content partnerships at MIPCOM festival

Kingdom’s Media Bridges initiative explores global content partnerships at MIPCOM festival
Updated 17 October 2025

Kingdom’s Media Bridges initiative explores global content partnerships at MIPCOM festival

Kingdom’s Media Bridges initiative explores global content partnerships at MIPCOM festival
  • Session reflects broader push to deepen international collaboration

RIYADH: The Media Bridges initiative, under the auspices of the Saudi Media Forum, convened a strategic workshop with the theme “Toward Global Partnerships in Production and Content Marketing,” at the MIPCOM international festival in Cannes, France, the Saudi Press Agency reported.

The session reflected ’s broader push to deepen international collaboration in media investment while advancing production capabilities and cutting-edge technologies.

The effort aligned directly with Vision 2030’s emphasis on empowering creative and media industries through expanded strategic partnerships with global players.

Workshop participants examined how traditional media organizations could integrate with digital platforms and international technology firms, creating pathways for Saudi and Arab companies to forge production and marketing alliances suited to the evolving global content landscape.

Those attending explored ’s media infrastructure and investment landscape, with discussions centered on attracting international capital and broadening partnerships across media production and digital content ventures.

The gathering drew a diverse international roster: executives from major technology companies, founders of over-the-top streaming platforms, and experts specializing in media analytics and artificial intelligence applications — bringing varied global perspectives and industry insights to the conversation.

The workshop represented one element in the Saudi Media Forum’s campaign to amplify the Kingdom’s visibility at premier international industry gatherings, positioning as a rising center for media innovation.


Freed Gaza photographer overjoyed to find family alive after being told in Israeli jail they were dead

Freed Gaza photographer overjoyed to find family alive after being told in Israeli jail they were dead
Updated 16 October 2025

Freed Gaza photographer overjoyed to find family alive after being told in Israeli jail they were dead

Freed Gaza photographer overjoyed to find family alive after being told in Israeli jail they were dead
  • Shadi Abu Sido says Israeli prison guards told him his family had been killed in Gaza war
  • The Palestinian photojournalist was detained without trial under Israel’s Unlawful Combatants Law, severely beaten

KHAN YOUNIS, Gaza Strip: Shadi Abu Sido said his world shattered in Israeli detention when guards told him his wife and two children had been killed in the Gaza war.
“I got hysterical,” the Gaza Palestinian photographer said.
It wasn’t until his release on Monday, part of the US-mediated ceasefire deal between Hamas and Israel that halted two years of war, that he discovered his loved ones were alive.
His wife, Hanaa Bahlul, raced down the hallway of his family’s house in Khan Younis and leapt into his arms. He spun her in the air as they clung to each other. Abu Sido kissed his children’s cheeks again and again, murmuring “my love” as he held the daughter and son he thought he would never see again.
“I heard her voice, I heard the voice of my children, I was astonished, it cannot be explained, they were alive. I saw my wife and children alive. Imagine amid death — life,” he said.
Abu Sido, a photojournalist, said he was detained at Shifa hospital in the northern Gaza Strip on March 18, 2024.
He was among 1,700 Palestinians detained by Israeli forces during the devastating war in Gaza and released on Monday, along with 250 prisoners convicted or suspected of involvement in deadly attacks, in exchange for 20 Israeli hostages held by Hamas since its October 2023 cross-border assault.
DETAINED UNDER THE ‘UNLAWFUL COMBATANTS’ LAW
Bahlul said a lawyer from Addameer, a Palestinian human rights group, had told her Abu Sido was being held under Israel’s Unlawful Combatants Law — a form of administrative detention.
Omer Shatz, an Israeli international law expert at Sciences Po university in Paris, said the law allows Israel to limit access to lawyers, incarcerate people without charge or trial, and arbitrarily detain many Palestinians in Gaza.
According to Addameer, 2,673 Gazans are currently detained under this law.
The Israeli military said in a statement sent to Reuters that its detention policy was “in full alignment with Israeli law and the Geneva Conventions” on legal standards for humanitarian treatment in wartime.
Israel’s Justice Ministry did not respond to Reuters requests for comment.
In March 2024 the Israeli military said it raided Shifa hospital, accusing Hamas of operating from the premises. Hamas has denied Israeli allegations it had command posts underneath Shifa and other Gaza hospitals. Reuters could not independently verify the assertions of either side.

’A GRAVEYARD FOR THE LIVING’
Abu Sido said he was severely beaten, handcuffed, blindfolded and forced to kneel for long periods while in detention. His wrists looked raw during his meeting with Reuters, which he said had been caused by the shackles. Reuters could not independently verify the details of his account.
He was first held at Israel’s Sde Teiman military detention camp, then transferred to the Ofer military camp — which is in the Israeli-occupied West Bank — and later to Ketziot prison in Israel, according to his wife.
Bahlul said Abu Sido was arrested only for being “a journalist for a Palestinian institution.”
A spokesperson for the Israeli Prison Service said all inmates were held according to legal procedures and their rights upheld. “We are not aware of the claims described, and to the best of our knowledge, no such incidents occurred under IPS responsibility,” the spokesperson said.
The Israeli military statement said mistreatment of detainees was “strictly prohibited.” The military said that prolonged restraint was only allowed in “exceptional cases” with significant security risks, and denied that detainees were forced to remain in a crouching position.
An Israeli military official told Reuters in September that of around 100 criminal investigations related to the Gaza war, most concerned allegations of abuse or death of detainees in military custody. Two cases have led to indictments, and one soldier was sentenced to 17 months in prison.
Reuters previously spoke to released Palestinian prisoners who said they suffered abuses in Israeli detention.
Many of the Israeli hostages released by Hamas have also described torture, sexual assault, psychological abuse, and denial of food and medical care.
Amany Srahneh of the Palestinian Prisoners Society said conditions for Palestinian inmates deteriorated dramatically after Hamas’ October 7, 2023 attack, with reports of sexual assault, beatings, denial of medication, and food shortages.
She said conditions were even worse for Gaza Palestinians held in military detention.
Abu Sido said that prison was “the graveyard of the living. When I returned to Gaza, it was like my soul returned to my body. But when I saw the destruction..., how can I start again?“


Court strikes down Irish police decision not to investigate Airbnb over Israeli settlements

Court strikes down Irish police decision not to investigate Airbnb over Israeli settlements
Updated 16 October 2025

Court strikes down Irish police decision not to investigate Airbnb over Israeli settlements

Court strikes down Irish police decision not to investigate Airbnb over Israeli settlements
  • More than 150 businesses, including Airbnb and rivals Booking.com, Expedia and TripAdviser, are operating in Israeli West Bank settlements deemed illegal under international law

DUBLIN: Ireland’s High Court on Thursday struck down a decision by the Irish police not to investigate the legality of Airbnb operations in Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, rejecting the argument that it did not have jurisdiction.
The ruling does not automatically trigger an investigation by police in Ireland, where Airbnb has its Europe and Middle East headquarters, but it obliges the Irish police to consider the matter afresh, the court heard.
The case was brought by Irish-Palestinian non-governmental organization Sadaka, which asked police to investigate whether Airbnb had broken Irish law by operating in the settlements. It argued that the police decision not to investigate due to jurisdiction issues was “legally erroneous and irrational.”
A lawyer representing the Irish police, Remy Farrell, conceded the case on Thursday and said the matter would be “considered afresh” by the respondents.
Airbnb did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment.
The company allows listings throughout the West Bank but takes no profits from this activity in the region, the company said in a 2019 statement, in which it said it had never boycotted Israel or Israeli businesses.
More than 150 businesses, including Airbnb and rivals Booking.com, Expedia and TripAdviser, are operating in Israeli West Bank settlements deemed illegal by the UN, a report by the organization’s human rights office showed in September.
Most of the international community considers Israeli settlements in the West Bank illegal under international law.
Israel disputes this, citing historical and biblical ties to the area. It says the settlements provide strategic depth and security and that the West Bank is “disputed” not “occupied.”


WEF panel: Humanity has breached planetary limits but innovation can still restore balance

WEF panel: Humanity has breached planetary limits but innovation can still restore balance
Updated 16 October 2025

WEF panel: Humanity has breached planetary limits but innovation can still restore balance

WEF panel: Humanity has breached planetary limits but innovation can still restore balance
  • Humanity has breached 7 of the 9 planetary boundaries that regulate the stability of Earth’s life support systems, experts say
  • Second day of Dubai forum sees focus on global cooperation, green technology-driven innovations

DUBAI: With climate disasters increasingly disrupting agriculture, finance and infrastructure, experts at the World Economic Forum’s Annual Meeting of the Global Future Councils on Cybersecurity in Dubai warned that humanity has crossed critical environmental thresholds — but said innovation could still help restore planetary balance.

A session titled “Emerging Technologies for the Planet” explored how scientific advances can strengthen Earth’s resilience at a time when, according to a recent World Economic Forum report, humanity has breached seven of the nine planetary boundaries that regulate the planet’s stability — from biodiversity loss to ocean acidification — pushing the Earth’s system beyond its safe operating space.

Yet experts said that technologies such as green concrete, precision fermentation and lab grown proteins could still help reverse some of the damage.

Prof. Drew Shindell of Duke University said that reducing methane emissions must become a global priority.

“Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas and it creates ozone in the lower atmosphere, which is toxic to forests,” he said. “It is about 40 percent as responsible for global warming as CO2.”

He added that while emissions from fossil fuels and waste can be measured and mitigated, the agricultural sector remains far more complex.

“With companies, solutions are more straightforward; there is detection and money available to track methane’s damage,” he said. “But in agriculture we need new techniques and we might also need to explore ways to get people to change their diet as other ways to reduce the methane.”

Shindell urged stronger public-private partnerships to scale technologies worldwide and called for agricultural policies focusing on methane, soil carbon and nitrogen use.

Dr. Leigh Ann Winowiecki, global research lead for Soil and Land Health at CIFOR-ICRAF, said soil systems are central to both food security and climate stability.

“What is soil? It is the biological layer of the Earth’s surface, and we depend on healthy soil for water regulation, for food and nutrition security,” she said. “It is the most biodiverse ecosystem in the world. It is also important to store carbon if we manage it properly.”

She added that new technological tools have revolutionized how scientists study underground ecosystems.

“We just launched the first ever Global Future Council on Soil and Land Health,” she said. “This wasn’t possible 20 or 30 years ago; the technology to understand the biodiversity of the soil wasn’t there, now we are capable of doing so much more with the studies and advancements we have.”

The discussion took place ahead of the UN COP30 conference, which will be held in Belem, in the Brazilian Amazon in November.

In a recent op-ed for Arab News, Iranian American political scientist Dr. Majid Rafizadeh called COP30 “perhaps the most significant climate summit yet,” as the world faces escalating environmental risks.

Masami Onoda, director of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency’s International Relations and Research Department, said satellite observation has fundamentally changed how humans monitor the planet.

“Earth observation technology not only allows us to work with all the different areas we need to look into the planet, but it also brings a perspective shift,” she said. “There are hundreds of thousands of satellites tirelessly circling around the world to observe it, producing massive amounts of information for scientists to study.”

From a technological deployment perspective, Yousef Yousef, CEO and environmental innovation leader in water technology, said scalability is essential to impact.

“The key is not only in finding new technologies, but in how to scale it,” he said. “We used ultrasound, for example, to kill algae on water surfaces. It took about five years after the research to go from a pilot to being active in 67 countries. Once you scale the technology, you can create the impact.”

As the discussion concluded, speakers agreed that although the planet’s ecological boundaries are under severe strain, global cooperation and technology-driven innovation remain essential to restoring balance and resilience.


Journalists turn in access badges, exit Pentagon rather than agree to new reporting rules

Journalists turn in access badges, exit Pentagon rather than agree to new reporting rules
Updated 16 October 2025

Journalists turn in access badges, exit Pentagon rather than agree to new reporting rules

Journalists turn in access badges, exit Pentagon rather than agree to new reporting rules
  • News outlets nearly unanimous in rejecting new rules imposed by defense chief Hegseth, effectively censoring what they can report on
  • “They want to spoon-feed information to the journalist... That’s not journalism,” said Jack Keane, a retired US Army general and Fox News analyst

NEW YORK: Dozens of reporters turned in access badges and exited the Pentagon on Wednesday rather than agree to government-imposed restrictions on their work, pushing journalists who cover the American military further from the seat of its power. The nation’s leadership called the new rules “common sense” to help regulate a “very disruptive” press.
News outlets were nearly unanimous in rejecting new rules imposed by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that would leave journalists vulnerable to expulsion if they sought to report on information — classified or otherwise — that had not been approved by Hegseth for release.
Many of the reporters waited to leave together at a 4 p.m. deadline set by the Defense Department to get out of the building. As the hour approached, boxes of documents lined a Pentagon corridor and reporters carried chairs, a copying machine, books and old photos to the parking lot from suddenly abandoned workspaces. Shortly after 4, about 40 to 50 journalists left together after handing in badges.
“It’s sad, but I’m also really proud of the press corps that we stuck together,” said Nancy Youssef, a reporter for The Atlantic who has had a desk at the Pentagon since 2007. She took a map of the Middle East out to her car.
It is unclear what practical impact the new rules will have, though news organizations vowed they’d continue robust coverage of the military no matter the vantage point.
Images of reporters effectively demonstrating against barriers to their work are unlikely to move supporters of President Donald Trump, many of whom resent journalists and cheer his efforts to make their jobs harder. Trump has been involved in court fights against The New York Times, CBS News, ABC News, the Wall Street Journal and The Associated Press in the past year.

Trump supports the new rules
Speaking to reporters at the White House on Tuesday, Trump backed his defense secretary’s new rules. “I think he finds the press to be very disruptive in terms of world peace,” Trump said. “The press is very dishonest.”
Even before issuing his new press policy, Hegseth, a former Fox News Channel host, has systematically choked off the flow of information. He’s held only two formal press briefings, banned reporters from accessing many parts of the sprawling Pentagon without an escort and launched investigations into leaks to the media.
He has called his new rules “common sense” and said the requirement that journalists sign a document outlining the rules means they acknowledge the new rules, not necessarily agree to them. Journalists see that as a distinction without a difference.
“What they’re really doing, they want to spoon-feed information to the journalist, and that would be their story. That’s not journalism,” said Jack Keane, a retired US Army general and Fox News analyst, said on Hegseth’s former network.
When he served, Keane said he required new brigadier generals to take a class on the role of the media in a democracy so they wouldn’t be intimidated and also see reporters as a conduit to the American public. “There were times when stories were done that made me flinch a little bit,” he said. “But that’s usually because we had done something that wasn’t as good as we should have done it.”
Youssef said it made no sense to sign on to rules that said reporters should not solicit military officials for information. “To agree to not solicit information is to agree to not be a journalist,” she said. “Our whole goal is soliciting information.”
 

Members of the Pentagon press corp gather for a group photo after turning in their press credentials on Oct. 15, 2025 in Washington. (AP)

Reporting on US military affairs will continue — from a greater distance
Several reporters posted on social media when they turned in their press badges.
“It’s such a tiny thing, but I was really proud to see my picture up on the wall of Pentagon correspondents,” wrote Heather Mongilio, a reporter for USNINews, which covers the Navy. “Today, I’ll hand in my badge. The reporting will continue.”
Mongilio, Youssef and others emphasized that they’ll continue to do their jobs no matter where their desks are. Some sources will continue to speak with them, although they say some in the military have been chilled by threats from Pentagon leadership.
In an essay, NPR reporter Tom Bowman noted the many times he’d been tipped off by people he knew from the Pentagon and while embedded in the military about what was happening, even if it contradicted official lines put out by leadership. Many understand the media’s role.
“They knew the American public deserved to know what’s going on,” Bowman wrote. “With no reporters able to ask questions, it seems the Pentagon leadership will continue to rely on slick social media posts, carefully orchestrated short videos and interviews with partisan commentators and podcasters. No one should think that’s good enough.”
The Pentagon Press Association, whose 101 members represent 56 news outlets, has spoken out against the rules. Organizations from across the media spectrum, from legacy organizations like The Associated Press and The New York Times to outlets like Fox and the conservative Newsmax, told their reporters to leave instead of signing the new rules.
Only the conservative One America News Network signed on. Its management likely believes it will have greater access to Trump administration officials by showing its support, Gabrielle Cuccia, a former Pentagon reporter who was fired by OANN earlier this year for writing an online column criticizing Hegseth’s media policies, told the AP in an interview.