Trudeau in Florida to meet Trump as tariff threats loom

Update Trudeau in Florida to meet Trump as tariff threats loom
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau arrives back to his hotel after meeting US President-elect Donald Trump, in West Palm Beach, Florida, on November 29, 2024. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau arrived in Florida on November 29 for a dinner with Donald Trump at the president-elect's Mar-a-Lago estate, as the incoming US leader promised tariffs on Canadian imports. The unannounced meeting comes at the end of a week that has seen Canada as well as Mexico scramble to blunt the impact of Trump's trade threats, which experts have warned could also hit US consumers hard. (Photo by CHANDAN KHANNA / AFP)
Short Url
Updated 01 December 2024

Trudeau in Florida to meet Trump as tariff threats loom

Trudeau in Florida to meet Trump as tariff threats loom
  • The unannounced meeting came at the end of a week that has seen Canada as well as Mexico scramble to blunt the impact of Trump’s trade threats

Palm Beach: Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau traveled to Florida on Friday for a dinner with Donald Trump at the president-elect’s Mar-a-Lago estate, as the incoming US leader promised tariffs on Canadian imports.
The unannounced meeting came at the end of a week that has seen Canada as well as Mexico scramble to blunt the impact of Trump’s trade threats, which experts have warned could also hit US consumers hard.
A smiling Trudeau was seen exiting a hotel in West Palm Beach before arriving at Mar-a-Lago, making him the latest high-profile guest of Trump, whose impending second term — which starts in January — is already overshadowing the last few months of President Joe Biden’s administration.
Flight trackers had first spotted a jet broadcasting the prime minister’s callsign making its way to the southern US state. A Canadian government source later told AFP that the two leaders were dining together.
Trump caused panic among some of the biggest US trading partners on Monday when he said he would impose tariffs of 25 percent on Mexican and Canadian imports and 10 percent on goods from China.
He accused the countries of not doing enough to halt the “invasion” of the United States by drugs, “in particular fentanyl,” and undocumented migrants.
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum spoke with Trump by phone on Wednesday, though the two leaders’ accounts of the conversation differed drastically.
Trump claimed that Mexico’s left-wing president had “agreed to stop migration through Mexico, and into the United States, effectively closing our Southern Border.”
Sheinbaum later said she had discussed US-supported anti-migration policies that have long been in place in Mexico.
She said that after that, the talks had no longer revolved around the threat of tariff hikes, downplaying the risk of a trade war.
Billions in trade
Biden warned that same day that Trump’s tariff threats could “screw up” Washington’s relationships with Ottawa and Mexico City.
“I think it’s a counterproductive thing to do,” Biden told reporters.
Trudeau did not respond to questions from the media as he returned to his hotel Friday evening after meeting with Trump.
But for Canada, the stakes of any new tariffs are high.
More than three-quarters of Canadian exports, or Can$592.7 billion ($423 billion), went to the United States last year, and nearly two million Canadian jobs are dependent on trade.
A Canadian government source told AFP that Canada is considering possible retaliatory tariffs against the United States.
Some have suggested Trump’s tariff threat may be bluster, or an opening salvo in future trade negotiations. But Trudeau rejected those views when he spoke with reporters earlier in Prince Edward Island province.
“Donald Trump, when he makes statements like that, he plans on carrying them out,” Trudeau said. “There’s no question about it.”
According to the website Flightradar, the Canadian leader’s plane landed at Palm Beach International Airport late Friday afternoon.
Canadian public broadcaster CBC said that Trudeau’s public safety minister, Dominic LeBlanc, was accompanying him on the trip.


India vows to reopen embassy in Afghanistan as Taliban FM visitsv

India vows to reopen embassy in Afghanistan as Taliban FM visitsv
Updated 5 sec ago

India vows to reopen embassy in Afghanistan as Taliban FM visitsv

India vows to reopen embassy in Afghanistan as Taliban FM visitsv
  • India, Afghanistan to revive air corridor for trade, bypassing land route through Pakistan
  • India signals willingness to return to previous representation level in Afghanistan, expert says

New Delhi: India will reopen its embassy in Kabul, Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar said on Friday, in a meeting with his Afghan counterpart, Amir Khan Muttaqi, the first senior official from Afghanistan visiting New Delhi since the Taliban took power in 2021.

India closed its embassy when the Taliban took control four years ago, when Afghanistan’s Western-backed regime collapsed and US-led troops withdrew after two decades of military occupation.

Like all other countries, except for Russia, India also does not officially recognize Afghanistan’s Taliban administration, but in 2022, it opened what it called a “technical mission” to facilitate trade and humanitarian aid.

The mission will now be upgraded, Jaishankar told Muttaqi during their live-streamed meeting in New Delhi.

“Your visit marks an important step in advancing our ties and affirming the enduring friendship between India and Afghanistan,” he said.

“Closer cooperation between us contributes to your national development, as well as regional stability and resilience. To enhance that, I am pleased to announce today the upgrading of India’s technical mission in Kabul to the status of Embassy of India.”

Muttaqi arrived in India on Thursday. Like most Taliban leaders, he has been sanctioned by the UN, but the Security Council said last month that he was granted “an exemption to the travel ban” to visit New Delhi from Oct. 9 to 16.

“I’m happy today that I am here in Delhi and this visit will increase and strengthen the understanding between both countries and open a new chapter of these relations,” he said in the meeting with Jaishankar.

“During the American occupation, there were many ups and downs that happened. However, throughout this time, we never gave a statement against India, rather we always sought good relations with India. We will not allow any group to threaten anyone else or to use the territory of Afghanistan against others.”

In a statement after the meeting, the Indian Ministry of External Affairs said that New Delhi agreed to “deepen its engagement” in developmental, healthcare and infrastructure projects in Afghanistan, as well as to offer scholarships to Afghan students to pursue studies at Indian universities.

The ministry also announced plans to increase economic engagement.

“The Afghan side invited Indian companies to invest in the mining sector which would help strengthen the bilateral trade and commercial relations,” it said.

“Both sides welcomed the commencement of the India-Afghanistan Air Freight Corridor, which will further enhance direct trade and commerce between the two countries.” 

The corridor is a trade initiative launched in 2017 under Afghanistan’s previous government to promote direct air cargo connectivity between the two countries, bypassing land routes that were often restricted due to political tensions, especially with Pakistan which lies between the two countries.

“I think India is certainly signaling that it is willing to consider moving towards the same level of representation as in the past, and changing the technical mission into a full embassy underscores that,” said Prof. Harsh V. Pant, vice president of the Observer Research Foundation in New Delhi.

“The important thing here is that both Taliban are willing to engage with India and make it very clear that they are interested in India having a larger economic role in Afghanistan.

“And India is also indicating that it does not want to be left out because other countries, in particular China, seem to be making a go at it ... It seems that this is certainly the beginning of a new phase of India’s engagement in Afghanistan.”


White House says Nobel Trump omission was ‘politics over peace’

White House says Nobel Trump omission was ‘politics over peace’
Updated 25 min 15 sec ago

White House says Nobel Trump omission was ‘politics over peace’

White House says Nobel Trump omission was ‘politics over peace’
  • “The Nobel Committee proved they place politics over peace,” Cheung said
  • “President Trump will continue making peace deals, ending wars, and saving lives”

WASHINGTON: The White House lashed out at the Norwegian Nobel Committee on Friday after it awarded the peace prize to Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado and overlooked US President Donald Trump.
“The Nobel Committee proved they place politics over peace,” White House Director of Communications Steven Cheung said on X.
“President Trump will continue making peace deals, ending wars, and saving lives. He has the heart of a humanitarian, and there will never be anyone like him who can move mountains with the sheer force of his will.”


Since returning to the White House for his second term in January, Trump had repeatedly insisted that he deserved the Nobel for his role in resolving numerous conflicts — a claim observers say is broadly exaggerated.
Trump restated his claim on the eve of the peace prize announcement, saying that his brokering of the first phase of a ceasefire in Gaza this week was the eighth war he had ended.
But he added on Thursday: “Whatever they do is fine. I know this: I didn’t do it for that, I did it because I’ve saved a lot of lives.”
Nobel Prize experts in Oslo had insisted in the run-up to Friday’s announcement that Trump had no chance, noting that his “America First” policies run counter to the ideals of the Peace Prize as laid out in Alfred Nobel’s 1895 will creating the award.


After statehood recognition, Palestinians stuck in limbo in Norway

After statehood recognition, Palestinians stuck in limbo in Norway
Updated 55 min ago

After statehood recognition, Palestinians stuck in limbo in Norway

After statehood recognition, Palestinians stuck in limbo in Norway
  • The very act of recognition — granted on 28 May, 2024 — means that Oslo no longer considers Palestinians like Adam to be stateless
  • “We don’t know what is the reason behind this. Is it to satisfy some parties who are against immigrants or is it for some other reasons?” said Adam

LONDON: When Norway recognized Palestine as a state, Palestinian engineer Adam was thrilled by the show of support, little knowing the move would ultimately derail his family’s dream of winning citizenship in their adopted homeland.
The very act of recognition — granted on 28 May, 2024 — means that Oslo no longer considers Palestinians like Adam to be stateless, according to the Norwegian Directorate of Immigration (UDI) which oversees visa processes.
And this change has upended Adam’s dreams and left him dumbfounded by what has turned out to be a poisoned chalice.
“We don’t know what is the reason behind this. Is it to satisfy some parties who are against immigrants or is it for some other reasons?” said Adam, who wanted to use a pseudonym for fear of retaliation.
“You support us, which is appreciated. At the same time, you are punishing Palestinians when you recognize their state. It doesn’t make any sense,” the father of two told the Thomson Reuters Foundation in a video interview from Norway.
Legal and migrant charities worry that Norway may also have set a dangerous precedent — denying millions of other Palestinians who live outside their homeland the protections that are routinely granted to the stateless.
Britain, France and Australia were among the latest nations to officially recognize the Palestinian state last month, with leaders hoping the move would pressure Israel to end its devastating two-year military campaign in Gaza.
A ceasefire in Gaza was announced on Thursday as part of the first phase of a US-backed peace deal to end a conflict that has killed more than 67,000 Palestinians.
Israel launched its assault on Gaza after Hamas-led militants attacked southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing 1,200 people and seizing 251 hostages.
Arab countries say the peace plan must lead to eventual independence for a Palestinian state. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says this will never happen.
Experts meanwhile worry that the pickup in recognition for a Palestinian state — more than 150 countries have now made the move — may perversely curtail the rights of some of the 7.6 million Palestinians living outside the occupied territories.

LEGAL LIMBO
Adam would have been able to apply for citizenship in 2026 under rules that make stateless people eligible for naturalization after living in country for three years.
Children born stateless can become citizens after one year.
But that all changed after Norway backed statehood.
The UDI says Palestinians who are on the civil registry in the West Bank, Gaza or East Jerusalem and assigned ID cards can no longer apply for Norwegian citizenship as stateless persons.
Born in the West Bank, Adam and his family all have Palestinian documents which means they now need to wait eight years — like any other migrant — before they can apply for citizenship, leaving them in legal limbo.
Nor does it just affect Palestinians in Norway.
“We are worried about our people in other countries because these countries may do exactly what Norway did,” said Adam.
The Norwegian Ministry of Labour and Social Inclusion, which oversees immigration and welfare policies, did not respond to a request for comment before the publication of this article.
The European Network on Statelessness (ENS), a civil society alliance, said Palestinians who have no other nationality should retain protections as their homeland remains under Israeli occupation.
Patricia Cabral, legal policy coordinator at ENS, says other authorities could follow Norway’s example — noting that Palestinians in Bulgaria and Hungary had already seen their rights curbed by statehood recognition.
“Stateless Palestinians, as other stateless people, should be granted residency rights, access to economic and social rights, and a facilitated route to naturalization,” Cabral said. “They shouldn’t be kept in limbo for a long time.”

STATEHOOD?
Despite growing political support, a Palestinian state currently lacks the core elements of a state, Cabral said.
These would include control over borders and a population registry, the ability to issue identity and travel documents, and the right to decide how nationality is passed on, she said.
As it stands, Israel restricts access into Palestinian territories for goods, investment and educational or cultural exchanges.
There are no Palestinian airports.
The landlocked West Bank can be reached only through Israel or through the Israeli-controlled border with Jordan.
Israel now controls all access to the Gaza Strip since capturing Gaza’s buffer zone on the border with Egypt last year.
As part of the ceasefire deal, it is supposed to eventually withdraw troops, although timings remain unclear.
“You recognize Palestine as a state, but does Palestine actually have a nationality law? They don’t,” said Marek Linha, senior legal adviser at the Norwegian Organization for Asylum Seekers charity, which is supporting affected Palestinians.
“There are legal questions that need to be carefully considered, and unfortunately, it has not been done as far as I can see, or from what is publicly available (in Norway),” he said in a phone interview.
Adam said he and his wife have abandoned plans for a third child since any newborn would now start life stateless.
Palestinians typically need to travel to Palestinian territories to give birth and get a birth certificate, plus other documents, since most embassies cannot issue them.
Adam said he fears one of his children’s passports might expire by the time they can apply for citizenship, which means they would need to travel to the West Bank for renewal.
“Norway is pushing us to do this. I am forced to go to Palestine to renew my documents. We have to go to Palestine if we have a new baby. It means exposing our young children to dangerous and traumatic experiences in conflict zones,” he said.
“We both work. We have an income. We are not looking for any social support from the government. We’re looking for stability.”


UK govt must do ‘much more’ to explain Palestine Action ban: Labour peer

UK govt must do ‘much more’ to explain Palestine Action ban: Labour peer
Updated 10 October 2025

UK govt must do ‘much more’ to explain Palestine Action ban: Labour peer

UK govt must do ‘much more’ to explain Palestine Action ban: Labour peer
  • Party’s ex-deputy leader: Govt has to ‘uphold the right to free speech and the right of protest’
  • It appears instead to be ‘arresting octogenarian vicars who are worried about the awful situation in Gaza’

LONDON: A peer with the UK’s ruling Labour Party has demanded that government ministers do “much more” to explain why Palestine Action was banned as a terrorist organization.

Harriet Harman, the party’s former deputy leader, was speaking after the latest demonstration in London in support of Palestine Action, which saw around 500 people detained.

She told the Sky News “Electoral Dysfunction” podcast that the government has a “number of incredibly important duties,” including upholding freedom of speech, and that it appears instead to be “arresting octogenarian vicars who are worried about the awful situation in Gaza.”

The government has to “support and uphold the right to free speech and the right of protest,” she said, adding: “People have felt so horrified. We all have about the devastating loss of life and suffering in Gaza. And so it’s right that people are allowed to protest.”

Palestine Action was proscribed in the UK under terrorism legislation after a series of incidents, including a break-in at a Royal Air Force base that saw red paint sprayed on two military aircraft in July.

“They’ve got to actually be much clearer in why Palestine Action is a terrorist group and that they’re justified in prescribing them and making them illegal,” Harman said.


Refugees in Ethiopia risk losing food aid: UN agency

Refugees in Ethiopia risk losing food aid: UN agency
Updated 10 October 2025

Refugees in Ethiopia risk losing food aid: UN agency

Refugees in Ethiopia risk losing food aid: UN agency
  • According to the agency, the latest cuts mean refugees are now receiving fewer than 1,000 calories a day in food aid — less than half the recommended 2,100 daily intake
  • The director of the program (WFP) in Ethiopia, Zlatan Milisic, said it needed to raise about $230 million to sustain humanitarian operations for the next six months

ADDIS ABABA: The World Food Programme is on the brink of suspending food aid for millions of refugees in Ethiopia due to cuts in international aid, the UN agency said on Friday.
Ethiopia, Africa’s second most populous country, hosts many refugees from neighboring Sudan and South Sudan, and also has internally displaced residents fleeing internal conflicts.
The director of the program (WFP) in Ethiopia, Zlatan Milisic, said it needed to raise about $230 million to sustain humanitarian operations for the next six months.
“Without immediate new funding, WFP could be forced to completely suspend food assistance for all refugees in Ethiopia in the coming months,” he said in a statement.
Reductions in foreign humanitarian aid by the United States and other Western countries this year have worsened funding issues in many developing countries.
WFP said this month it was forced to cut food rations for 780,000 refugees in 27 camps across Ethiopia.
“We are making impossible choices,” Milisic said.
“These reductions are just another step toward stopping food distributions completely, putting the lives of those we currently assist at risk.”
According to the agency, the latest cuts mean refugees are now receiving fewer than 1,000 calories a day in food aid — less than half the recommended 2,100 daily intake.
Ethiopia is receiving a surge of refugees from neighboring Sudan, gripped by civil war since April 2023, and South Sudan, long troubled by instability.
The Horn of African nation is also facing internal conflicts, particularly in its two most populous regions, which have displaced tens of thousands of people.
“Every ration cut is a child left hungrier, a mother forced to skip meals, a family pushed closer to the edge,” Milisic said.
In April, WFP said it had halted aid for 650,000 malnourished women and children in Ethiopia.
From January to October, it provided life-saving assistance to 4.7 million vulnerable people across the country.