US sanctions Venezuela security chiefs for crackdown

US sanctions Venezuela security chiefs for crackdown
Fifteen leaders of the Venezuelan security apparatus are among those hit by an asset freeze, including the heads of the intelligence service, military counterintelligence service, the national guard and the police. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 28 November 2024

US sanctions Venezuela security chiefs for crackdown

US sanctions Venezuela security chiefs for crackdown

WASHINGTON: The United States slapped sanctions on 21 top Venezuelan security and cabinet officials Wednesday, accusing them of a campaign of repression after President Nicolas Maduro’s bitterly contested July reelection.
The fresh measures — which Venezuela rejected as a “desperate act” against “patriots” — come after Washington and the G7 said they recognized opposition candidate Edmundo Gonzalez Urrutia as president-elect, amid accusations of fraud against Maduro.
“Maduro and his representatives’ repressive actions in the wake of the Venezuelan presidential election are a desperate attempt to silence the voices of its citizens,” Bradley Smith, the acting under secretary of the Treasury Department, said in a statement.
Fifteen leaders of the Venezuelan security apparatus are among those hit by an asset freeze, including the heads of the intelligence service, military counterintelligence service, the national guard and the police.
The sanctions also target the Venezuelan communications minister and the head of the prison service.
“All of these entities are part of Maduro’s security apparatus and are responsible for violently repressing peaceful protesters and carrying out arbitrary detention,” a senior US administration official told reporters.
A Venezuelan foreign ministry statement said the country “rejects with the utmost firmness” the latest sanctions of the “outgoing US government against the Venezuelan people and, in particular, a group of patriots who have dedicated themselves to safeguarding peace, stability, economic recovery and national unity in the face of fascist violence.”
The US Treasury said Venezuelan security forces had also issued an “unjustified arrest warrant” for Urrutia, forcing him to flee to Spain.
At the same time, the US State Department said it was expanding visa restrictions on Maduro’s allies.
“Maduro’s security apparatus has engaged in widespread abuses, including killings, repression, and mass detention of protesters,” the State Department said in a statement.
In September, the United States announced sanctions against 16 Venezuelan officials over alleged election fraud.
They included senior figures in the Venezuelan electoral council and Supreme Court, with the US Treasury saying at the time that they “impeded a transparent electoral process and the release of accurate election results.”
Maduro claimed victory in the election and defied intense domestic and international pressure to release detailed polling numbers to back up the assertion.
Amid an outcry at home and abroad, the former bus driver handpicked by the late authoritarian strongman Hugo Chavez is now serving his third term.
But the oil-rich country’s economy is in shambles, as Venezuelans endure acute shortages of food, medicine and other basic goods.
Maduro is accused of leading a harshly repressive leftist regime, with a systematic crackdown on the opposition.


India’s Modi dangles tax cuts as US tariffs loom

India’s Modi dangles tax cuts as US tariffs loom
Updated 4 sec ago

India’s Modi dangles tax cuts as US tariffs loom

India’s Modi dangles tax cuts as US tariffs loom
  • Proposed cuts to the goods and services tax to make everything from small cars to air conditioners cheaper for consumers, economists say
  • As the clock ticks down on the tariff hike, the state of US-India trade negotiations remains uncertain
MUMBAI: Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s push to slash consumption taxes on everyday goods could deliver billions of dollars in annual relief and boost demand in an economy bracing for painful US tariffs, experts say.
US President Donald Trump has threatened to double import duties on India from 25 to 50 percent to punish New Delhi for buying oil from Russia, saying the purchases help Moscow fund its invasion of Ukraine.
The prospective measure has clouded the outlook for the world’s fifth-largest economy, with Indian exporters warning of plunging orders and severe job losses.
New Delhi has called Washington’s move “unfair, unjustified and unreasonable” but is already seeking to cushion the blow, with Modi last week promising to “bring down the tax burden on the common man” during an annual speech to mark India’s independence.
His proposed cuts to the goods and services tax (GST) would make everything from small cars to air conditioners cheaper for consumers, economists say.
Currently, the tax operates under a complex four-tier structure, with rates ranging from five to 28 percent.
Under Modi’s reforms, most goods would fall into just two tiers, taxed at either five or 18 percent.
The Indian leader has called the change a “Diwali gift,” a reference to the annual Hindu festival of lights when consumers splurge on everything from gold and clothes to consumer electronics.
Trump’s tariffs – and their impact on ordinary Indians – will hinge on how much progress is made toward a Russia-Ukraine peace deal, and whether New Delhi can secure alternative oil suppliers before the US president’s August 27 deadline.
But experts say Modi’s tax reform could help shore up demand by reducing tax collections by between $13 billion and $17 billion.
Analysts at Emkay Global Financial Services called the policy a “welcome reform toward boosting domestic consumption.”
They estimated that about the vast majority of items currently subject to the top 28 percent rate would be taxed at 18 percent, while “nearly all” in the 12 percent tier would move into the five-percent bracket.
Analysts at Motilal Oswal, an Indian financial services firm, said the changes would bring benefits to a wide range of sectors and “sizeable savings” to households.
The fate of the proposal ultimately rests with the GST Council, which includes representatives from state governments and has struggled to achieve broad consensus in the past.
If approved, the cuts would strain public finances, according to experts.
However, they said, they could also help to offset tariff risks and burnish Modi’s credentials among the middle class.
The proposal comes ahead of expected elections later this year in Bihar, a large, Hindu-majority state of 130 million people that is a key political battleground for Modi.
“The popular economic narrative right now is that of Trump’s 50 percent tariffs and how the US-India relationship is seeing setbacks,” Deepanshu Mohan, economist at O.P. Jindal Global University, said.
“The GST readjustment is a strong response from Modi in that context. It’s Modi telling the middle class: ‘We are trying to make sure you have enough at your end,’” Mohan said.
But, he added, it was also an acknowledgement that India’s economy had not worked for its “low middle-income class for some time.”
Although economists have called for an overhaul of the GST system for years, Modi’s surprise announcement comes as US-India ties hit a multi-decade low.
Economists estimate that if the two countries fail to sign a trade deal, Trump’s tariffs could drag India’s GDP growth below six percent this fiscal year, lower than the central bank’s projections of 6.5 percent.
New Delhi’s stance on Russian oil imports will become clearer by late September as most cargoes this month were contracted before Trump’s threats, according to trade intelligence firm Kpler.
Kpler analyst Sumit Ritolia said that while Indian refiners are showing “growing interest” in US, West African and Latin American crude, it was more indicative of “greater flexibility, not a deliberate pivot.”
“Until there’s a clear policy shift or sustained change in trade economics, Russian flows remain a core part of India’s crude basket,” Ritolia said.
As the clock ticks down on the tariff hike, the state of US-India trade negotiations remains uncertain.
New Delhi says it is committed to striking a deal, but Indian media reports suggest US negotiators have postponed a planned late-August visit to the Indian capital.

Pentagon working on plans for military deployment in Chicago, Washington Post reports

Pentagon working on plans for military deployment in Chicago, Washington Post reports
Updated 13 min ago

Pentagon working on plans for military deployment in Chicago, Washington Post reports

Pentagon working on plans for military deployment in Chicago, Washington Post reports
  • President Donald Trump: ‘Chicago is a mess … And we’ll straighten that one out probably next’
  • City has grave concerns about the impact of any unlawful deployment of National Guard troops

WASHINGTON: The Pentagon is working on plans to deploy the US military to Chicago as President Donald Trump says he is cracking down on crime, homelessness and undocumented immigration, the Washington Post reported on Saturday.
The Defense Department planning, in the works for weeks, involves several options, including mobilizing at least a few thousand members of the National Guard as soon as September, the Post reported, citing officials familiar with the matter.
“Chicago is a mess,” Trump, a Republican, told reporters on Friday, deriding its mayor as he continued his attacks on cities run by Democratic politicians. “And we’ll straighten that one out probably next.”
The Pentagon said in a statement late on Saturday: “We won’t speculate on further operations. The department is a planning organization and is continuously working with other agency partners on plans to protect federal assets and personnel.”
Asked for comment, the White House referred to Trump’s statement on Friday.
JB Pritzker, the Democratic governor of Illinois, which includes Chicago, said in a statement the state had received no outreach from the federal government on whether it needed assistance. He said there was no emergency warranting a National Guard or other military deployment.
“Donald Trump is attempting to manufacture a crisis, politicize Americans who serve in uniform and continue abusing his power to distract from the pain he is causing working families,” Pritzker said.
A spokesperson for Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. On Friday Johnson said the city had grave concerns about the impact of any unlawful deployment of National Guard troops.
“The problem with the President’s approach is that it is uncoordinated, uncalled for and unsound,” the mayor said, adding that over the past year, homicides in Chicago have fallen by more than 30 percent, robberies by 35 percent and shootings by almost 40 percent.
At Trump’s request last weekend, the Republican governors of three states said they were sending hundreds of National Guard troops hundreds of miles to Washington, D.C.
The president has portrayed the nation’s capital as a city awash in crime, although Justice Department data shows violent crime hit a 30-year low last year in Washington, a self-governing federal district under the jurisdiction of Congress.
In June, Trump ordered 700 Marines and 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles, against the wishes of California’s Democratic governor, during protests over mass immigration raids by federal officials.


Indonesia turns down ear-splitting ‘haram’ street parties

Indonesia turns down ear-splitting ‘haram’ street parties
Updated 24 August 2025

Indonesia turns down ear-splitting ‘haram’ street parties

Indonesia turns down ear-splitting ‘haram’ street parties
  • Loudspeaker towers are commonplace on Indonesia’s main island of Java, but they have drawn the ire of local authorities and calm-seeking neighbors
  • An online backlash has forced authorities in East Java to issue an order limiting noise levels and specifying the times and locations loudspeakers can be used

MALANG, Indonesia: People in an Indonesian village watched as a tower of loudspeakers mounted on a truck rumbled through their usually serene home, blasting a thumping bass loud enough to crack windows.
Loudspeaker towers are commonplace on Indonesia’s main island of Java, blaring a repetitive mix of electronic tunes and traditional folk music at street parties, but they have drawn the ire of local authorities and calm-seeking neighbors.
The loudspeaker stacks have proven so disruptive that officials this month have restricted their use while religious bodies have declared excessive and damaging sound from them to be “haram,” or forbidden under Islamic law.
“The sound is booming from 1 p.m. to 3 am. They play loud music and drink alcohol,” Ahmad Suliyat, a resident of Ngantru village in East Java province, told AFP.
“It’s really disturbing.”
Indonesians in East Java have shared videos on social media of cracked walls, falling roof tiles and damaged stores caused by the noise impact known as “sound horeg,” which loosely means to move or vibrate in Javanese.
The online backlash forced authorities in East Java to issue an order this month limiting noise levels and specifying the times and locations loudspeakers can be used.
“It was made for health and security reasons. The noise level must be regulated so it will not disturb the public peace and order,” East Java governor Khofifah Indar Parawansa told AFP.

This photo taken on August 9, 2025 shows costumed dancers performing as they follow a truck mounted with a tower of subwoofers and spotlights during a "sound horeg", which loosely means to move or vibrate in Javanese, held as part of Indonesia's 80th Independence Day celebrations in Malang, East Java. (AFP)


Ear-splitting noise has been shown to have adverse health consequences, including a higher risk of heart conditions for those exposed.
And Indonesia’s loudspeaker towers, popular for little more than a decade in the world’s most populous Muslim nation, have had dire consequences for some who attend the deafening street gatherings.
A woman died this month after allegedly suffering cardiac arrest caused by loudspeaker towers at a carnival she attended, local media reported, while there has been an increase in hearing problems among those attending the events.
The East Java government has capped sound system levels at 120 decibels, while mobile units used in parades or protests are limited to 85 decibels.
Mobile units are also banned from being used near schools, hospitals, ambulances and places of worship that are in session.
In July, a local Islamic council issued a religious edict that said excessive sound at parties that is capable of causing damage is forbidden by religion.
“The use of a sound system excessively, especially during a wedding convoy, or any other events that cause noise, disturb road users, or make people neglect worshipping, is haram,” read the fatwa.
Locals typically rent the speaker towers for weddings, circumcisions and Independence Day events — all celebrations that can last until dawn.
Some like Daini, who goes by one name like many Indonesians, believe the loudspeakers are a local tradition that should be kept.
She glanced at her cracked window, held together by duct tape, as music blared from the truck in Ngantru.
“The glass cracked during a sound horeg event last year. But that’s OK, people here like loud events,” said the 61-year-old.

 

This photo taken on August 9, 2025 shows costumed dancers performing as they follow a truck mounted with a tower of subwoofers and spotlights during a "sound horeg", which loosely means to move or vibrate in Javanese, held as part of Indonesia's 80th Independence Day celebrations in Malang, East Java. (AFP)

But loudspeakers have continued blasting above the new limits, due to lax enforcement by local authorities.
After the rules were issued, an AFP journalist heard loudspeaker towers blaring music at an East Javan event as authorities watched on.
The World Health Organization says sound at 85 decibels and above can cause hearing damage over time, and anything above 120 decibels can cause immediate harm.
Some Indonesians posted screenshots online of apps registering loudspeaker sound levels as high as 130 decibels.
Operators of loudspeaker towers argue they are responding to demand that generates revenue for local businesses.
“I believe most people who dislike sound horeg are not from here,” David Stevan Laksamana, a 40-year-old loudspeaker rental owner in Malang, told AFP.
“In Malang alone, it employed tens of thousands of people. This business is helping the economy.”
Others who cannot stand the disruptive street parties fear reporting them, with some loudspeaker tower owners reportedly parking outside complainants’ houses to blare music for hours.
“I never complain to the village head,” said Ahmad.
“I just keep quiet. I’m afraid of intimidation if I say anything.”
 


Taiwan, China battle it out in competing World War Two narratives

Taiwan, China battle it out in competing World War Two narratives
Updated 24 August 2025

Taiwan, China battle it out in competing World War Two narratives

Taiwan, China battle it out in competing World War Two narratives
  • Taiwan says China falsely claiming communists had leading role fighting Japan
  • China hits back at what it sees as distorting of communist party’s role
  • Taiwan calls on its people not to go to China’s parade set for next month to mark war’s end

TAIPEI: Veteran Pan Cheng-fa says he clearly remembers fighting for China against the Japanese in World War Two, but gets agitated when asked about the role of communist forces who at the time were in an uneasy alliance with his republican government.
“We gave them weapons, equipment — we strengthened them,” Pan, 99, said at an event in Taiwan’s capital Taipei to commemorate the 80th anniversary of the end of World War Two.
As China gears up for a mass military parade in Beijing next month to mark the war’s end, both Taiwan — whose formal name remains Republic of China — and the People’s Republic of China are locked in an increasingly bitter war of words about historical narrative and who should really be claiming credit for the victory.
Fighting in China began in earnest in 1937 with the full-scale Japanese invasion and continued until the surrender of Japan in 1945, when the island of Taiwan was handed over to the Republic of China after decades of Japanese rule.
“After Japan was taken down, (the communists’) next target was the Republic of China,” Pan added, referring to the resumption of the civil war which led to the victory of Mao Zedong’s forces and flight of the republican government to Taiwan in 1949.

The ruling Chinese Communist Party often reminds people of its struggle against the Japanese, but a lot of the fighting was done by the forces of Chiang Kai-shek’s republican government, and it was the Republic of China who signed the peace agreement as one of the allied nations.
“During the Republic of China’s war of resistance against Japan, the People’s Republic of China did not even exist, but the Chinese communist regime has in recent years repeatedly distorted the facts, claiming it was the Communist Party who led the war of resistance,” Taiwan’s top China-policy maker Chiu Chui-cheng said on August 15, the Japanese surrender anniversary.

A wreath lies during an event to commemorate the 80th anniversary of the end of World War Two at Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall in Taipei, Taiwan, August 16, 2025. (REUTERS)

The Mainland Affairs Council, which Chiu heads, said this month that the communists’ strategy at the time was “70 percent about strengthening themselves, 20 percent dealing with republican government and 10 percent about opposing Japan,” repeating an old wartime accusation against Mao the Chinese Communist Party has denied.
Taiwan’s own anniversary events are much more low key, and don’t mention the role of the communists apart from to lambaste them.
A defense ministry concert on Thursday night in Taipei featured performers dressed as World War Two-era republican soldiers, images of the Flying Tigers — volunteer US pilots who flew for the republican Chinese air force — and rap by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One.
“History affirms that the War of Resistance was led and won by the Republic of China,” the ministry said a performance program.
China has hit back at what it sees as misrepresentation of the Chinese Communist Party’s role.
On Tuesday, the party’s official People’s Daily wrote in an online commentary that vigilance was needed against efforts to “distort and falsify the Chinese Communist Party’s role as the country’s backbone” in fighting Japan.
China says the victory belongs to all Chinese people, including those in Taiwan, and is also celebrating the fact the war’s end in 1945 led to Taiwan — a Japanese colony from 1895 — being “returned” to Chinese rule as part of the peace agreement.

Caption

Taiwan says nothing in any agreements talked about handing over Taiwan to the Chinese Communist Party-run People’s Republic of China which was only founded in late 1949.
Taiwan’s President Lai Ching-te marked the surrender anniversary of August 15 with a Facebook post saying aggression will be defeated, in a pointed reference to Beijing’s military threats against the island.
The People’s Republic of China says it is the successor state to the Republic of China and that Taiwan is an inherent part of Beijing’s territory, a view Taipei’s government vehemently opposes.
Taiwan’s government has urged its people not to attend China’s military parade, warning against reinforcing Beijing’s territorial claims and backing its version of what the anniversary means.
Veteran Pan, who says family members left behind after the civil war were brutalized while he escaped to Taiwan, sees Beijing’s parade as having nothing to do with him.
“I can’t say anything good about the communists,” he said.


UK’s mass facial-recognition roll-out alarms rights groups

UK’s mass facial-recognition roll-out alarms rights groups
Updated 24 August 2025

UK’s mass facial-recognition roll-out alarms rights groups

UK’s mass facial-recognition roll-out alarms rights groups
  • Britain is theonly European country to deploy the technology on a large scale as apolicing tool
  • Big Brother Watchworried thatsuch mass data capture “treats us like a nation of suspects”

 

LONDON: Outside supermarkets or in festival crowds, millions are now having their features scanned by real-time facial-recognition systems in the UK — the only European country to deploy the technology on a large scale.
At London’s Notting Hill Carnival, where two million people are expected to celebrate Afro-Caribbean culture over Sunday and Monday, facial-recognition cameras are being deployed near entrances and exits.
The police said their objective was to identify and intercept wanted individuals by scanning faces in large crowds and comparing them with thousands of suspects already in the police database.
The technology is “an effective policing tool which has already been successfully used to locate offenders at crime hotspots resulting in well over 1,000 arrests since the start of 2024,” said Metropolitan Police chief Mark Rowley.
The technology was first tested in 2016 and its use has increased considerably over the past three years in the United Kingdom.
Some 4.7 million faces were scanned in 2024 alone, according to the NGO Liberty.
UK police have deployed the live facial-recognition system around 100 times since late January, compared to only 10 between 2016 and 2019.

Examples include before two Six Nations rugby games and outside two Oasis concerts in Cardiff in July.
When a person on a police “watchlist” passes near the cameras, the AI-powered system, often set up in a police van, triggers an alert.
The suspect can then be immediately detained once police checks confirm their identity.

“Nation of suspects”

But such mass data capture on the streets of London, also seen during the coronation of King Charles III in 2023, “treats us like a nation of suspects,” said the Big Brother Watch organization.

“There is no legislative basis, so we have no safeguards to protect our rights, and the police is left to write its own rules,” Rebecca Vincent, its interim director, told AFP.
Its private use by supermarkets and clothing stores to combat the sharp rise in shoplifting has also raised concerns, with “very little information” available about how the data is being used, she added.
Most use Facewatch, a service provider that compiles a list of suspected offenders in the stores it monitors and raises an alert if one of them enters the premises.
“It transforms what it is to live in a city, because it removes the possibility of living anonymously,” said Daragh Murray, a lecturer in human rights law at Queen Mary University of London.
“That can have really big implications for protests but also participation in political and cultural life,” he added.
Often, those using such stores do not know that they are being profiled.
“They should make people aware of it,” Abigail Bevon, a 26-year-old forensic scientist, told AFP by the entrance of a London store using Facewatch.
She said she was “very surprised” to find out how the technology was being used.
While acknowledging that it could be useful for the police, she complained that its deployment by retailers was “invasive.”

“Invasive tech”
Since February, EU legislation governing artificial intelligence has prohibited the use of real-time facial recognition technologies, with exceptions such as counterterrorism.
Apart from a few cases in the United States, “we do not see anything even close in European countries or other democracies,” stressed Vincent.
“The use of such invasive tech is more akin to what we see in authoritarian states such as China,” she added.
Interior minister Yvette Cooper recently promised that a “legal framework” governing its use would be drafted, focusing on “the most serious crimes.”
But her ministry this month authorized police forces to use the technology in seven new regions.
Usually placed in vans, permanent cameras are also scheduled to be installed for the first time in Croydon, south London, next month.
Police assure that they have “robust safeguards,” such as disabling the cameras when officers are not present and deleting the biometric data of those who are not suspects.
However, the UK’s human rights regulator said on Wednesday that the Metropolitan Police’s policy on using the technology was “unlawful” because it was “incompatible” with rights regulations.
Eleven organizations, including Human Rights Watch, wrote a letter to the Metropolitan Police chief, urging him not to use it during Notting Hill Carnival, accusing him of “unfairly targeting” the Afro-Caribbean community while highlighting the racial biases of AI.
Shaun Thompson, a 39-year-old black man living in London, said he was arrested after being wrongly identified as a criminal by one of these cameras and has filed an appeal against the police.