Greta Thunberg says Trump ‘more dangerous’ but blasts Harris on Gaza

The Republican presidential nominee, former US President Donald Trump, and the Democratic presidential nominee, US Vice President Kamala Harris take part in a presidential debate hosted by ABC in Philadelphia. (Reuters/File Photo)
The Republican presidential nominee, former US President Donald Trump, and the Democratic presidential nominee, US Vice President Kamala Harris take part in a presidential debate hosted by ABC in Philadelphia. (Reuters/File Photo)
Short Url
Updated 01 November 2024

Greta Thunberg says Trump ‘more dangerous’ but blasts Harris on Gaza

Greta Thunberg says Trump ‘more dangerous’ but blasts Harris on Gaza
  • Thunberg urged Americans to go beyond exercising their right to vote and take direct action

STOCKHOLM: Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg on Friday labelled Donald Trump the “more dangerous” option in next week’s US presidential election but slammed the incumbent administration for its support of Israel.
With the United States heading to the polls on November 5, the 21-year-old activist said in a post on X that it was “probably impossible to overestimate the consequences this specific election will have for the world and for the future of humanity.”
“There is no doubt that one of the candidates — Trump — is way more dangerous than the other,” Thunberg said.
But she also slammed sitting President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris — who is running against former president Donald Trump — for their backing of Israel and its offensive in Gaza.
“Let’s not forget that the genocide in Palestine is happening under the Biden and Harris administration, with American money and complicity,” Thunberg said.
“It is not in any way ‘feminist’, ‘progressive’ or ‘humanitarian’ to bomb innocent children and civilians — it is the opposite, even if it is a woman in charge.”
Hamas’s Oct. 7 attack on Israel last year triggered the war in Gaza and resulted in 1,206 deaths, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally of Israeli official figures.
Israel’s retaliatory bombardment and ground war have killed at least 43,259 Palestinians in Gaza, a majority of them civilians, according to data from the Hamas-run territory’s health ministry.
The United Nations considers these figures to be reliable.
Thunberg urged Americans to go beyond exercising their right to vote and take direct action such as protests and boycotts against the “catastrophic consequences of American imperialism.”
“My main message to Americans is to remember that you cannot only settle for the least worst option,” Thunberg said.


Pakistani security forces kill 17 Taliban fighters

Pakistani security forces kill 17 Taliban fighters
Updated 26 September 2025

Pakistani security forces kill 17 Taliban fighters

Pakistani security forces kill 17 Taliban fighters
  • The clash in Karak, a district in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, also injured three security officers

DERA ISMAIL KHAN, Pakistan: Pakistani security forces on Friday raided a militant hideout in the country’s restive northwest, triggering a shootout that left 17 Pakistani Taliban fighters dead, police said.
The clash took place in Karak, a district in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, according to regional Police Chief Shehbaz Elahi. He said three officers were wounded in the gunbattle.
Elahi provided no further details but said that the killed militants were “Khwarij,” a term often used by Pakistani authorities to refer to members of the Pakistani Taliban.
While security forces frequently carry out such operations, Friday’s raid followed a similar intelligence-based operation two days earlier in Dera Ismail Khan, another district in the northwest, where 13 Pakistani Taliban fighters were killed in a shootout.
Pakistan has seen a rise in militant violence in recent years, much of it claimed by separatist groups and the Pakistani Taliban, also known as Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan, or TTP.
The TTP is a separate group from, but allied with, the Afghan Taliban. It has been emboldened since the Afghan Taliban returned to power in 2021, and many of its leaders and fighters are believed to have taken refuge in Afghanistan since then.


India retires 'flying coffin' Soviet fighter jet after six decades

India retires 'flying coffin' Soviet fighter jet after six decades
Updated 26 September 2025

India retires 'flying coffin' Soviet fighter jet after six decades

India retires 'flying coffin' Soviet fighter jet after six decades
  • Crowds cheered as officials staged a grand farewell for the final two MiG-21 squadrons, totalling around 36 aircraft, in Chandigarh
  • The send-off came months after India signed multi-billion-dollar deal to purchase 26 Rafale fighter jets from France's Dassault Aviation

INDIA: India's Russian-built MiG-21s flew for the final time Friday, marking the end of an era for the country's first supersonic fighter jet -- lauded for its valour but tarnished by a legacy of some 400 crashes.

Crowds cheered as officials staged a grand farewell for the final two MiG-21 squadrons, totalling around 36 aircraft, at an air force base in the northern city of Chandigarh.

The send-off came a day after New Delhi signed a $7-billion deal to acquire 97 domestically designed and built Tejas jets as it seeks to modernise its Soviet-era fleet.

The farewell ceremony included a mock dogfight between Russian MiGs and a colourful display by the Surya Kiran aerobatic team.

The retired jets will likely be put up for public display, though the government has yet to announce any plans.

Defence minister Rajnath Singh, senior air force officials, including veterans who piloted the MiG-21, watched as the storied aircraft made their last pass.

First inducted in the 1960s, India operated a staggering 874 MiG-21s.

Plans to retire them in the 1990s were repeatedly delayed amid local production setbacks, bureaucratic obstacles and corruption scandals.

"MiG-21's legacy is undeniable. It was a capable -- if flawed -- fighter that formed the Indian Air Force's backbone for decades," former Air Marshal Raghunath Nambiar told AFP on the sidelines of the event.

He credited a key MiG-21 bombing campaign for hastening India's victory over Pakistan in the 1971 war that led to the creation of Bangladesh.

But age caught up with the Soviet-era jet.

'FLYING COFFIN'

"Designed for simplicity, the MiG-21 was meant to be rugged but faltered as it aged," Nambiar said.

Engine flameouts, hydraulic failures, and electrical faults were frequent and with no backup systems, emergency landings and ejections became all too common, he added.

The MiG-21's grim reputation earned it the infamous "flying coffin" moniker in its later years.

Over roughly 40 years, 482 MiG crashes were recorded, claiming the lives of 171 pilots in India as of 2012, according to defence ministry figures.

"It's time to let it go -- not as a flawless icon, but as a sobering reminder of the sacrifices made by those who flew it," Nambiar said.

With the MiG-21's retirement, India, the world's fifth-largest economy, is set to intensify its push for domestic arms production and new international partnerships.

In April, India signed a multi-billion-dollar deal to purchase 26 Rafale fighter jets from France's Dassault Aviation. They will join 36 Rafale fighters already acquired.

India is also working with a French company to develop and manufacture fighter jet engines at home.

Angad Singh, co-author of a book on the MiGs, told AFP the country faced an "unenviable position" given its current fighter shortfall.

He, however, added that India was putting its full weight behind the improved Tejas aircraft and was in talks to buy another 114 Rafales.

Regional security concerns loom large for India, especially after an intense four-day clash with arch-rival Pakistan in May, their worst standoff since 1999.

Both sides claimed victory, each boasting of downing the other's fighter jets.

 


Muslim Impact Forum launches in London with Humza Yousaf as keynote speaker

Muslim Impact Forum launches in London with Humza Yousaf as keynote speaker
Updated 26 September 2025

Muslim Impact Forum launches in London with Humza Yousaf as keynote speaker

Muslim Impact Forum launches in London with Humza Yousaf as keynote speaker
  • Launch comes amid heightened global prejudice against Muslim communities and the forum seeks to counter negative narratives

LONDON: The Muslim Impact Forum, an organization aimed at promoting a positive image of the religion, was launched on Thursday at Palestine House in London.

The event was attended by former Scottish First Minister Humza Yousaf — the first Muslim to hold the position — who gave the keynote speech.

He was joined by Equi CEO Professor Javed Khan and other leaders from the business and charity sectors for a lively Q&A exploring the forum’s vision.

At its heart is a mission to recognize and amplify Muslim contributions globally, while countering misconceptions and stereotypes. It will focus on civil rights, economic empowerment and foreign policy.

“We want to create a space where ideas can be shared freely, partnerships can be forged and positive change can happen,” a spokesperson said.

“Muslims have a vital role to play in shaping civil society, contributing to global economic growth and informing policy debates at every level.”

By bringing together leaders from different sectors, the forum aims to foster a cohesive community able to respond to challenges with clarity and integrity.

The launch comes amid heightened global prejudice against Muslim communities and the forum seeks to counter negative narratives to foster understanding between communities and institutions.

It plans to reconvene in April in Istanbul to continue the discussions started in London.


Russia is helping China to prepare for a potential invasion of Taiwan, defense institute says

Russia is helping China to prepare for a potential invasion of Taiwan, defense institute says
Updated 26 September 2025

Russia is helping China to prepare for a potential invasion of Taiwan, defense institute says

Russia is helping China to prepare for a potential invasion of Taiwan, defense institute says
  • Under President Xi Jinping, China has embarked upon a broad modernization program of its armed forces with the goal of transforming it into a “world-class” military by 2050
  • Equipment could be used to attack Taiwan

LONDON: Russia is selling military equipment and technology to China that could help Beijing prepare an airborne invasion of Taiwan, according to an analysis of leaked Russian documents by a UK-based defense and security forum.
The Royal United Services Institute’s analysis is based on around 800 pages of documents, including contracts and lists of equipment to be supplied by Moscow to Beijing, from the Black Moon hacktivist group, which previously published some of the documents online. It does not identify its members but describes itself in a manifesto as opposed to governments that carry out aggressive foreign policy.
The authors of the RUSI report shared some of the documents with The Associated Press and say they appear to be genuine, although parts of the documents may have been omitted or altered. AP is unable to independently verify their authenticity.
The mix of completed and apparent draft Russian documents reference meetings between Chinese and Russian delegations — including visits to Moscow — and payment and delivery timelines for high-altitude parachute systems and amphibious assault vehicles. They suggest that Russia has begun work on the products to be delivered but don’t contain direct evidence from the Chinese side that Beijing has paid any money or received any equipment.
The authors argue the equipment could be used to invade Taiwan. Under President Xi Jinping, China has embarked upon a broad modernization program of its armed forces with the goal of transforming it into a “world-class” military by 2050.
Equipment could be used to attack Taiwan
High ranking US officials have suggested Xi ordered his military to be prepared for a possible invasion of Taiwan as early as 2027. Beijing claims the self-governing democracy is rightfully a part of China and has not ruled out seizing the island by force.
The documents don’t mention Taiwan directly, but the analysis by the London-based institute suggests the deal would help China gain advanced parachuting capabilities that it would need to mount an invasion, potentially speeding up a timeline.
It’s not certain that China has decided to invade Taiwan, but access to Russian equipment and localized training in China means Beijing will be better equipped for a potential invasion, Danylyuk said.
“The Chinese school of airborne landing is very young,” he said, suggesting Moscow’s assistance could help speed up China’s airborne program by about 10 to 15 years.
Russia’s Kremlin, and China and Taiwan’s defense and foreign ministries did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
“The greatest value of the deal” to China is likely in the training and procedures for command and control of parachute forces, because Russia has “combat experience,” whereas China doesn’t, write Oleksandr Danylyuk and Jack Watling.
The analysts say Russia’s aim is to develop as a military supplier to China and fund its war in Ukraine. But Danylyuk also suggested that Moscow may want to draw Beijing into a conflict with Washington over Taiwan, distracting the US from Russia’s war with Ukraine.
While Beijing’s military capabilities largely surpass Moscow’s, the analysis says China has gaps which Russia can fill. Russia has a long history of airborne forces dating back decades, knowhow the authors say China needs.
Song Zhongping, a military commentator in Beijing, said China had superior equipment, but “Russia has more combat experience.”
Wen-Ti Sung, an expert on China and Taiwan with the Atlantic Council, said parachuting in forces would probably support the logistics of any invasion but would be unlikely to be the “main event.”
Instead, “China is playing the long game” by acquiring Russian equipment, Sung said. That’s because Beijing will find a way to reverse engineer the equipment and technology and develop it not just for airborne combat but also for advanced intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance which are critical for modern warfare, he said.
Russia agreed to provide training and equipment
According to a document dated September 2024, an initial 2021 agreement detailed timelines for payments and delivery. Stages one and two — analysis of technical specifications, software modifications and equipment manufacturing — have been completed, according to that document.
Russia also agreed to provide training in China and a complete set of equipment for an airborne battalion including the ability to carry out infiltration by special forces, the analysis says.
That includes the sale of 37 light amphibious assault vehicles, 11 amphibious anti-tank self-propelled guns, and 11 airborne armored personnel carriers, as well as command and observation vehicles. The total cost is listed as more than $210 million.
Beijing wants all the vehicles to be equipped with Chinese communication systems and to be prepared to use Chinese ammunition, the documents show.
Beijing seeks high-altitude parachute systems
Russia agreed to sell China systems which are designed for parachuting up to 190 kilograms (419 pounds) from an extremely high altitude, the RUSI analysis said.
The documents reference the minutes of a meeting from March 8, 2024 in Moscow where Russia agreed to provide China by the end of 2024 with details of how the system, known as Dalnolyot, performed under colder temperature conditions down to –60 degrees Celsius (–76 Fahrenheit.)
According to the documents, Beijing requested testing the parachute systems for drops from 8,000 meters (26,250 feet).
That height would allow Chinese forces to glide for up to 80 kilometers (50 miles) allowing “Chinese special forces groups to penetrate the territory of other countries without being noticed,” the RUSI report said.
Danylyuk suggested the Dalnolyot system could be used for a “stage zero” landing in Taiwan, in which Beijing secretly sends in equipment and special forces from aircraft outside Taiwanese airspace.
Russia’s parachute troops failed in Ukraine
Although Russia has a long history of parachute troops, Moscow did not deploy them successfully in Ukraine.
In February 2022, just days after Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered a full-scale invasion of Ukraine, his special forces soldiers tried to take over Hostomel airfield on the outskirts of Kyiv.
They planned to establish a base to fly in more troops, but several Russian helicopters were hit by missiles before they even got to Hostomel. An attempt to take control of a military air base south of Kyiv also failed.
Western officials and military experts suggest the failure to establish an air bridge from Russia to Ukraine turned what Moscow expected to be a swift victory into a grueling war three years and counting.
Now Moscow has dipped into its Soviet-era stocks to replace weapons on the battlefield and, like Ukraine, is ramping up its weapons production.
But that doesn’t mean Moscow is unable to sell equipment to China, Danylyuk said.
The airborne equipment described in the documents was necessary only for “the invasion stage,” he said. Russia doesn’t need such equipment for Ukraine, he said.
Lessons from Russian defeats
The analysts wrote that China’s “operational challenge” in Taiwan would be to do what Russia did not: suppress Taiwan’s air defenses and land sufficient troops and equipment to be able to build up a force to defeat the Taiwanese military before it mobilizes.
The report suggests China could do that by airdropping armored vehicles on golf courses near Taiwanese ports and airfields which could allow air troops to clear a path for landing forces.


Sarkozy conviction exposes political divide in crisis-hit France

Sarkozy conviction exposes political divide in crisis-hit France
Updated 26 September 2025

Sarkozy conviction exposes political divide in crisis-hit France

Sarkozy conviction exposes political divide in crisis-hit France
  • The conviction comes at a deeply sensitive moment, with France in political deadlock and the far-right sensing its best ever chance to come to power
  • Henri Guaino, a former special adviser to Sarkozy, called the conviction “a humiliation for the state and its institutions“

PARIS: The dramatic decision to send former president Nicolas Sarkozy to prison for criminal conspiracy has laid bare France’s stark political divisions, with the move cheered by the left but slammed by the ascendant right.
Sarkozy, seen as a mentor to many conservative politicians, was convicted on Thursday over a scheme enabling late Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi to fund his 2007 presidential run.
He must serve his sentence while awaiting the outcome of his appeal, and will be the first French postwar leader to serve jail time.
The conviction comes at a deeply sensitive moment, with France in political deadlock and the far-right sensing its best ever chance to come to power.
Speaking to broadcaster RTL, Henri Guaino, a former special adviser to Sarkozy, called the conviction “a humiliation for the state and its institutions.”
Guaino urged President Emmanuel Macron to pardon Sarkozy, who was president of France from 2007 to 2012, allowing him to avoid prison.
There was no immediate reaction from Macron’s office.
Despite his legal troubles, Sarkozy still enjoys considerable influence and popularity on the French right and has on occasion had private meetings with Macron.

- ‘It’s Nicolas who pays’ -

In an editorial, conservative French daily Le Figaro denounced the court ruling as “absurd and incomprehensible,” claiming there was no “tangible evidence” of Sarkozy’s wrong-doing.
Left-leaning Liberation featured Sarkozy’s face on its front page, with the words “The slammer” printed over it.
Far-right leader Marine Le Pen, who has herself been convicted of embezzlement and insists she is a target of a “witch hunt,” criticized Thursday’s ruling.
She argued on X that the use of provisional enforcement represented “a great danger, in view of the fundamental principles of our law, foremost among which is the presumption of innocence.”
In France, provisional enforcement means that a judicial decision will be implemented even as the appeals process plays out.
Le Pen drew parallels between her own case — which saw her banned from standing for office for five years, scuppering her chances of running in France’s 2027 presidential election unless she wins her appeal — and that of Sarkozy.
“A number of magistrates have a kind of scorecard where they try to pin down as many politicians as possible,” she told broadcaster LCI.
But some on the left expressed their satisfaction.
“In the end, it’s Nicolas who pays,” quipped hard-left lawmaker Anais Belouassa-Cherifi, referring to a right-wing viral meme denouncing the tax burden on ordinary French people.
But Liberation daily said it did not see the conviction as a cause for celebration.
In an editorial, the newspaper said Sarkozy’s case as well as various other political scandals only serve to widen the gap between the French people and the elites.
There is “only one winner in the long run: the far right.”
The court ordered that Sarkozy should be placed in custody at a later date, with prosecutors to inform him on October 13 when he should go to prison.
He has already been convicted in two separate trials but always avoided jail.