Judge delays Donald Trump’s sentencing in hush money case until after November election

Update Judge delays Donald Trump’s sentencing in hush money case until after November election
Protesters gather outside the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse on Sept. 6, 2024 in New York City. Both parties appear in court today as Trump’s lawyers fight to overturn the jury’s finding that he sexually abused E. Jean Carroll. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 06 September 2024

Judge delays Donald Trump’s sentencing in hush money case until after November election

Judge delays Donald Trump’s sentencing in hush money case until after November election
  • It had been scheduled for Sept. 18, about seven weeks before Election Day
  • Trump’s lawyers pushed for the delay on multiple fronts, petitioning the judge and asking a federal court to intervene

NEW YORK: A judge agreed Friday to postpone Donald Trump’s sentencing in his hush money case until after the November election, granting him a hard-won reprieve as he navigates the aftermath of his criminal conviction and the homestretch of his presidential campaign.
Manhattan Judge Juan M. Merchan, who is also weighing a defense request to overturn the verdict on immunity grounds, delayed Trump’s sentencing until Nov. 26, several weeks after the final votes are cast in the presidential election.
It had been scheduled for Sept. 18, about seven weeks before Election Day.
Merchan wrote that he was postponing the sentencing “to avoid any appearance — however unwarranted — that the proceeding has been affected by or seeks to affect the approaching presidential election in which the Defendant is a candidate.”
“The Court is a fair, impartial, and apolitical institution,” he added.
Trump’s lawyers pushed for the delay on multiple fronts, petitioning the judge and asking a federal court to intervene. They argued that punishing the former president and current Republican nominee in the thick of his campaign to retake the White House would amount to election interference.
Trump’s lawyers argued that delaying his sentencing until after the election would also allow him time to weigh next steps after Merchan rules on the defense’s request to reverse his conviction and dismiss the case because of the US Supreme Court’s July presidential immunity ruling.
In his order Friday, Merchan delayed a decision on that until Nov. 12.
A federal judge on Tuesday rejected Trump’s request to have the US District Court in Manhattan seize the case from Merchan’s state court. Had they been successful, Trump’s lawyers said they would have then sought to have the verdict overturned and the case dismissed on immunity grounds.
Trump is appealing the federal court ruling.
The Manhattan district attorney’s office, which prosecuted Trump’s case, deferred to Merchan and did not take a position on the defense’s delay request.
Messages seeking comment were left for Trump’s lawyers and the district attorney’s office.
Election Day is Nov. 5, but many states allow voters to cast ballots early, with some set to start the process just a few days before or after the date Sept. 18.
Trump was convicted in May on 34 counts of falsifying business records to conceal a $130,000 hush money payment to porn actor Stormy Daniels just before the 2016 presidential election. Daniels claims she and Trump had a sexual encounter a decade earlier after they met at a celebrity golf tournament in Lake Tahoe.
Prosecutors cast the payout as part of a Trump-driven effort to keep voters from hearing salacious stories about him during his first presidential campaign. Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen paid Daniels and was later reimbursed by Trump, whose company logged the reimbursements as legal expenses.
Trump maintains that the stories were false, that reimbursements were for legal work and logged correctly, and that the case — brought by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat — was part of a politically motivated “witch hunt” aimed at damaging his current campaign.
Democrats backing their party’s nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris, have made his conviction a focus of their messaging.
In speeches at the party’s conviction in Chicago last month, President Joe Biden called Trump a “convicted felon” running against a former prosecutor. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, labeled Trump a “career criminal, with 34 felonies, two impeachments and one porn star to prove it.”
Trump’s 2016 Democratic opponent, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, inspired chants of “lock him up” from the convention crowd when she quipped that Trump “fell asleep at his own trial, and when he woke up, he made his own kind of history: the first person to run for president with 34 felony convictions.”
Falsifying business records is punishable by up to four years behind bars. Other potential sentences include probation, a fine or a conditional discharge, which would require Trump to stay out of trouble to avoid additional punishment. Trump is the first ex-president convicted of a crime.
Trump has pledged to appeal, but that cannot happen until he is sentenced.
In seeking the delay, Trump lawyers Todd Blanche and Emil Bove argued that the short time between the scheduled immunity ruling on Sept. 16 and sentencing, which was to have taken place two days later, was unfair to Trump.
To prepare for a Sept. 18 sentencing, the lawyers said, prosecutors would be submitting their punishment recommendation while Merchan is still weighing whether to dismiss the case. If Merchan rules against Trump, he would need “adequate time to assess and pursue state and federal appellate options,” they said.
The Supreme Court’s immunity decision reins in prosecutions of ex-presidents for official acts and restricts prosecutors in pointing to official acts as evidence that a president’s unofficial actions were illegal.
Trump’s lawyers argue that in light of the ruling, jurors in the hush money case should not have heard such evidence as former White House staffers describing how the then-president reacted to news coverage of the Daniels deal.


UK migrant arrivals on small boats reach new record

UK migrant arrivals on small boats reach new record
Updated 25 August 2025

UK migrant arrivals on small boats reach new record

UK migrant arrivals on small boats reach new record
  • Record 28,076 migrants reach UK in small boats so far in 2025
  • Labour government pledges asylum system overhaul by 2029
  • Opposition politician Farage proposes mass deportations of migrants

LONDON: A record 28,076 migrants have crossed the Channel to Britain in small boats this year, a 46 percent rise on the same period in 2024, government data showed on Monday, piling pressure on Prime Minister Keir Starmer over his handling of immigration.

The sharp increase comes amid mounting public concern over immigration, which is polling as the public’s top concern, with anti-migrant protests continuing outside hotels housing asylum seekers.

The record was reached on Sunday after 212 migrants arrived in four different boats that day, the data showed.

The Home Office, or interior ministry, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Demonstrations took place across Britain over the weekend following a court ruling last week that ordered the removal of asylum seekers from a hotel in Epping, north-east of London, the latest flashpoint in the immigration debate.

Starmer’s Labour government has pledged to phase out hotel use by 2029 and to overhaul the asylum system. On Sunday it announced reforms to speed up asylum appeals and reduce a backlog of more than 100,000 cases.

Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, the country’s interior minister, said the changes were aimed at restoring “control and order” to a system she described as “in complete chaos.”

Official data last week showed asylum claims were at a record high, with more migrants being housed in hotels compared with a year ago.

Nigel Farage, leader of the right-wing Reform UK party that has topped recent surveys of voting intentions, outlined plans for “mass deportations” of migrants arriving by small boats.

These would include taking Britain out of the European Convention on Human Rights, barring asylum claims, and building detention centers for 24,000 people.

He told The Times newspaper he would strike repatriation deals with countries such as Afghanistan and Eritrea, and arrange daily deportation flights.


Bangladesh runs out of resources for Rohingya as global support plunges

Bangladesh runs out of resources for Rohingya as global support plunges
Updated 25 August 2025

Bangladesh runs out of resources for Rohingya as global support plunges

Bangladesh runs out of resources for Rohingya as global support plunges
  • UN’s response plan for Rohingya crisis is only 36% funded for 2025-26
  • Bangladesh looks for alternative strategies to stop violence in Myanmar, expert says

DHAKA: Bangladesh is unable to allocate additional resources for the growing number of Rohingya refugees, the country’s leader said on Monday, as he called on the international community to deliver on UN commitments to address the crisis.

The chief of Bangladesh’s interim government, Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, was addressing a two-day conference in Cox’s Bazar, held by the Bangladeshi government ahead of a high-level meeting at the UN General Assembly in September.

It comes eight years after hundreds of thousands of Rohingya were forced to flee a military crackdown in Myanmar and take shelter in neighboring Bangladesh.

Today, more than 1.3 million Rohingya are cramped inside 33 camps in the Cox’s Bazar district on the country’s southeast coast, making it the world’s largest refugee settlement.

While the number of refugees arriving from Myanmar has increased by some 150,000 since last year, international aid is dwindling. The latest Joint Response Plan for the Rohingya Humanitarian Crisis in Bangladesh has only 36 percent funding from the requested 2025-26 amount of nearly $935 million.

Bangladesh, which is already grappling with domestic challenges, does not “foresee any scope whatsoever for further mobilization of resources from domestic sources” to sustain the refugees, Yunus said.

“During the last eight years, people of Bangladesh, in particular the host community here in Cox’s Bazaar, have been making tremendous sacrifices. The impacts on our economy, resources, environment and ecosystem, society and governance have been huge,” he told attendees.

“(The) Rohingya issue and its sustainable resolution must be kept alive on the global agenda, as they need our support until they return home.”

Despite multiple attempts from Bangladeshi authorities, a UN-backed repatriation and resettlement process has failed to take off for the past few years.

Efforts have been stalled by armed conflict in Myanmar since the military junta seized power in 2021, and the number of refuges has been steadily increasing. In 2024, it grew sharply as fighting escalated in Rakhine state between junta troops and the Arakan Army, a powerful local ethnic militia.

Yunus called on the international community to draft a practical roadmap to end the violence, enable the Rohingya’s return to Rakhine, and hold perpetrators of violence and ethnic cleansing accountable.

“We urge upon all to calibrate their relationship with Myanmar and Arakan Army, and all parties to the conflict, in order to promote an early resolution of the protracted crisis,” he said.

“We urge all of the international community to add dynamism to the ongoing international accountability processes at the International Court of Justice, International Criminal Court and elsewhere.”

As the UN conference on Rohingya nears, with another scheduled to take place in Doha in December, the meeting in Cox’s Bazaar — where donors will also visit the Rohingya camps — is seen as an attempt to find a new strategy to address the crisis. Regional efforts are also being encouraged, with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations earlier this month vowing to send a peace mission to Myanmar — its member state.

“We’ve seen during the last few months, especially during the interim government, that they have been trying to see if there could be some alternative ways of advocacy or getting Myanmar to accept certain positions through the ASEAN,” Asif Munier, a rights and migration expert, told Arab News.

“We know that it would be very difficult to get a common understanding at the UN Security Council to vote against Myanmar authorities. But if there could be other efforts to provide some sort of justice — that’s something that also should come up.”


Norway proposes maintaining Ukraine aid at $8.4bn in 2026

Norway proposes maintaining Ukraine aid at $8.4bn in 2026
Updated 25 August 2025

Norway proposes maintaining Ukraine aid at $8.4bn in 2026

Norway proposes maintaining Ukraine aid at $8.4bn in 2026
  • The proposal must be ratified by the Norwegian parliament
  • Norway was the second largest European provider of military aid to Ukraine in May and June

OSLO: The Norwegian government aims to maintain its aid to Ukraine at 85 billion kroner ($8.4 billion) in 2026, the same level as this year, the office of Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store said Monday.
The proposal, made as Store visited Kyiv, must be ratified by parliament and if passed would take to 275 billion kroner ($27.1 billion) the total civilian and military aid which Norway will send the country for the 2023-2030 period.
“The government intends to maintain Norway’s extraordinary support to Ukraine next year and is proposing an allocation of a total of 85 billion kroner in military and civilian support,” said Store in a statement.
“This is a critical time in Ukraine’s fight to defend itself. As talks on a ceasefire and peace take place, the war rages on in Ukraine.
“It is important in the current situation to reaffirm our continued strong support for Ukraine: political, financial and military,” said Store, who was to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Monday.
The aid package proposed by the minority Labor government must be included in 2026 budget proposals due for presentation in October.
Norway is to hold parliamentary elections – expected to see a close battle between left and right – on September 8.
Oslo’s support for Ukraine is almost universal among the Norwegian public, with the country sharing a border with Russia.
According to German research institute Kiel Institute, Norway was the second largest European provider of military aid to Ukraine in May and June, behind Germany.
On Sunday, Oslo announced it would allocate some seven billion kroner to strengthening Ukraine’s air defenses, including the joint purchase with Germany of two Patriot air and missile defense systems.


Polish president proposes restricting state benefits for Ukrainians

Polish president proposes restricting state benefits for Ukrainians
Updated 25 August 2025

Polish president proposes restricting state benefits for Ukrainians

Polish president proposes restricting state benefits for Ukrainians
  • President Karol Nawrocki, a conservative nationalist inspired by US President Donald Trump, promised during his election campaign this year to put “Poles first” and to limit the rights of foreigners in Poland
  • Official data shows some 1.5 million Ukrainian citizens currently reside in Poland

WARSAW: Poland’s president unveiled plans on Monday to limit Ukrainians’ access to child benefits and health care, while also proposing a ban on the glorification of a 20th-century Ukrainian nationalist leader, in a sign of a hardening stance toward refugees.
Poland has been one of Ukraine’s staunchest backers since Russia invaded in 2022, but some Poles have grown weary of large numbers of refugees, while tensions between Warsaw and Kyiv over World War Two Volhynia massacres have at times come to the surface. Official data shows some 1.5 million Ukrainian citizens currently reside in Poland.
President Karol Nawrocki, a conservative nationalist inspired by US President Donald Trump, promised during his election campaign this year to put “Poles first” and to limit the rights of foreigners in Poland.
“I did not change my opinion and I intend to fulfil my obligations and I believe that (family) benefit should only be granted to those Ukrainians who make the effort to work in Poland, the same with health care,” he told journalists.
Ukraine’s Foreign Ministry did not immediately reply to a request for comment.
Ukrainian refugees are currently eligible to receive the monthly family benefit of 800 zlotys ($219) per child if their children attend Polish schools. Other EU countries such as Germany have also proposed cutting benefits recently.
In Poland, the president can propose bills and veto government legislation. The government, currently led by Prime Minister Donald Tusk, a pro-EU centrist opposed to Nawrocki, can similarly block the president’s proposals, creating deadlock.

HISTORICAL STRAINS
Nawrocki also proposed on Monday tightening the criminal code to ban the promotion of Stepan Bandera, a Ukrainian nationalist leader who fought both Nazi and Soviet forces during World War Two, and his insurgent army.
“I believe this bill should clearly address Bandera and equate the Bandera symbol in the criminal code with symbols corresponding to German National Socialism, commonly known as Nazism, and Soviet communism,” Nawrocki said.
Many Ukrainians regard Bandera and his militia as heroes for the resistance they mounted against the Soviet Union and as symbols of Kyiv’s painful struggle for independence from Moscow.
But he is remembered by many in Poland as a symbol of anti-Polish violence. Bandera is associated with the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA), which Warsaw says carried out mass killings of Polish civilians in 1943-44, especially in Volhynia.
Thousands of Ukrainians also died in reprisal killings.
Publicly promoting Nazi, fascist or communist ideas is subject to up to 3 years of prison under the Polish criminal code.


Suspects blame technical faults for Baltic Sea cable breaches

Suspects blame technical faults for Baltic Sea cable breaches
Updated 25 August 2025

Suspects blame technical faults for Baltic Sea cable breaches

Suspects blame technical faults for Baltic Sea cable breaches
  • NATO allies with forces stationed around the Baltic Sea went on high alert after the December 25 incident
  • Prosecutors say the Eagle S tanker deliberately dragged its 11,000kg anchor along the seabed

HELSINKI: The captain of an oil tanker and two officers accused of severing five undersea power and telecoms cables in the Baltic Sea last December, blamed technical faults for the damage as their trial began in Helsinki on Monday.

NATO allies with forces stationed around the Baltic Sea went on high alert after the December 25 incident, one of a string of suspicious cable and gas pipeline outages in the region since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022.

Prosecutors say the Eagle S tanker deliberately dragged its 11,000 kg (24,250 lb) anchor along the seabed to sever the Estlink 2 power cable linking Finland and Estonia and four Internet cables as the vessel sailed from a Russian port via the Gulf of Finland.

Finnish security forces intercepted the Cook Islands-registered ship and boarded it from helicopters after ordering it to move into Finnish territorial waters.

The tanker’s Georgian captain, Davit Vadatchkoria, and its Georgian first and Indian second officers pleaded not guilty, saying the vessel’s anchor had dropped due to technical faults in the securing of the anchor winch.

State prosecutor Heidi Nummela said that, while investigators did not find proof that the anchor’s fastening had been manipulated, the failure of all three available backstops was at minimum a sign of gross negligence on the crew’s part.

Finnish prosecutors are seeking 2.5 years in prison for aggravated criminal mischief and aggravated interference with telecommunications for the defendants who deny all charges and reject the cable owners’ claims for damages that amount to tens of millions of euros.

They also questioned the court’s jurisdiction in the matter, given the cable cuts occurred in international waters.

“This was a normal marine accident, not any sabotage,” second officer Santosh Kumar Chuarasia told reporters during a break.

He said that the anchor dropped due to bad weather and mechanical malfunction and that he trusted the court to rule in the defendants’ favor.

Vadatchkoria declined comment, while his lawyer Tommi Heinonen told the court the incident was “a marine accident.” On December 25, the Eagle S sailed on for three hours at a reduced speed after severing the first power cable at 12:26 p.m. (1026 GMT), prosecutors told the court.

When contacted by Finnish marine authorities at 3:20 p.m. and asked whether its anchor was up and secured, its crew replied in the affirmative, which was not true, prosecutors said.

Defense lawyers said the defendants had no reason to believe the anchor had sunk to the seabed as the tanker’s mechanical engineer, who is not on trial, had told them the drop in speed was caused by “an engine problem.” Prosecutors said the tanker sailed on and cut four more cables between 6 p.m. and 7 p.m. that day, which they said showed clear criminal intent.

Last week, a Ukrainian was arrested over the 2022 attacks on the Nord Stream gas pipelines in the Baltic Sea.

Both Moscow and the West have described the explosions, which largely severed Russian gas supplies to Europe, as sabotage.